Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

F*ck Da HollowCo$t. It doan make mein mangina wettt or put $lop in mein trough.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    The Hidden Influence of Historical Revisionism

    The Hidden Influence of Historical Revisionism


    http://national-socialist-worldview....istorical.html


    Certain nationalists in recent years have taken the position that historical revisionism, specifically in regard to the so-called Holocaust, is unworthy of effort. They say that it has not accomplished much.

    By what measurement does somebody claim that historical revisionism has not accomplished much when people in positions of authority would never admit being influenced by it? Whatever influence revisionism has had will be largely untraceable.

    I think it has had a lot of influence. It seemed to me, when Kofi Annan said at the Durban anti-racist conference in 2000 that the State of Israel should stop using the Holocaust as an excuse, that the fact that the veracity of the Holocaust story had been disputed for many years, with some arguments that are unassailable, very likely lay somewhere behind that statement.
    .

    .

    There is a dialectical process that has to be taken into account. When somebody takes the extreme position that there was no Holocaust, others are influenced by that, whether they wish to be influenced or not. Some of them will then say, I am not a Holocaust denier but it does seem to me that there has been some exaggeration, or alternately, I am not a Holocaust-denier but the Jewish exploitation of that story is over the top — which is what the Secretary-General of the United Nations effectively said.

    Look at all the Google hits for “I am not a Holocaust-denier but”: 6620 hits for that exact combination of words in the English language.

    These people are able to speak more freely because there are “Holocaust-deniers” that have taken the extreme position. That is a major part of the influence of revisionism.

    Extreme positions, insofar as they carry any credibility at all, define the limits of discourse. Shocking and upsetting people is part of the dialectical process. This is why it’s wrong to try to cater to people’s sensitivities at the expense of facts and logic (the basis of credibility) as Greggy Johnson has recently advocated, and as Mark Weber has been practicing for some years now.


    POSTED BY HADDING AT 5:08 PM*09 OCTOBER 2012

    Comment


    • #32
      We need more aggressive mattoid meercats to chrrrrrr, chrrrrrrr, chrrrrrrr new talking points.

      We need more aggressive mattoid meercats to chrrrrrr, chrrrrrrr, chrrrrrrr new talking points.


      http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...96#post1442396
      http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=6921#post6921


      I don't have any problem with the basic idea of mobilizing people with talking points. It's a good concept. It's the fact that the author of the talking points is an old Republican who thinks like an old Republican that is the problem. His talking points are way overly apologetic.

      I always wondered what the utility was of being so apologetic. I thought, these talking points must be intended to remain within the tolerance of essentially hostile people who have the power to censor them, like some leftist blog-editor. I tried to find out from the BUGSters if this was the idea. They didn't want to explain anything, but it seemed to me that this must be the idea. Otherwise there was no point to so much defensive preamble before delivering a statement that a large segment of the White population surely already finds agreeable: that "anti-racist" really means anti-White.

      But look at this:

      Let’s be sure we understand what WE are trying to do with the American Third Position using the Mantra. I proposed some time ago that we could get the Mantra on radio and TV and past censorship very CHEAPLY if a valid candidate would use it.

      Kelso knew exactly what I was talking about. He said they could get ads on TV for something like ten dollars, since stations are required to give the lowest possible rate to campaign ads, and they cannot censor the content.["Mrs. Kelso, the Mantra, and AP3" (sic) BUGS]


      Can you not think of better uses of cheap broadcast time than Whitaker's mantra? In other words, is there not a better use of media-access than to complain about anti-White racism, which Republican talkshow hosts have been doing every day for decades? Why use guaranteed airtime to put on a statement that is mostly defensive? This was the squandering of an opportunity.

      There is a time and a place for wording things very cautiously but with guaranteed airtime, there's no need. The BUGSters and Whitaker himself ought to recognize that those mantras are not in all cases the best way to communicate.


      Comment


      • #33
        There is simply not nearly enough hot air for both the Bugsters and blowing up my new plastic love doll.

        There is simply not nearly enough hot air for both the Bugsters and blowing up my new plastic love doll.


        http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...23#post1442423
        http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=6922#post6922

        I've never paid any attention to Kelso before, but from the audio link you provided I immediately found myself hating him. I bet that he is nearly as big of a 'New Right' faggot as Greggie. I hope he get's so busy repeating "anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White" that he has no time to left to spread any more nonsense about WWII. To that extent, maybe Ole Bob's government cheques can be put to good use.

        In my opinion, the Mantra, in itself, is not overly apologetic. I always assumed the two allusions to WWII were tongue-in-cheek.

        I've invested a good amount of time propagating the Mantra, person-to-person, on the street, and I've never seen anyone receive it as an apology for anything. Quite the opposite.

        Certain people, if they get 90 seconds of public air time, can probably do better than the Mantra, but most cannot, and even if they did, it wouldn't have the power of consistency. So, I'm not going to fight the Mantra, per se. Especially given that I'm one of the many ZOGling whigger ass-clown fuktards.

        When Bugsers start spouting establishment history lessons, then I agree it's time to take some air out of them. There is simply not nearly enough hot air for both the Bugsters and blowing up my new plastic love doll.


        You Nazis may be insane . . . .
        . . . . but us whiggers are typpycull!!!

        Comment

        Working...
        X