Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hunter’s Vision: Goals, Strategy, Tactics

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hunter’s Vision: Goals, Strategy, Tactics

    Hunter’s Vision: Goals, Strategy, Tactics


    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...ategy-tactics/
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7238#post7238


    Dixie

    Editor’s Note: I will continue working on this post throughout the evening. The next RFM debate with Alex Linder is about goals, tactics, and strategy.

    Our Vision

    I’m an ethnonationalist.

    I believe that ethnicity is more powerful than race. I want a free and independent Republic of Dixie, an Anglo-Celtic nation-state like Hungary or Poland carved out of the wreckage of the United States, that is based on blood, culture, and history, not on failed liberal abstractions.

    There are other separatist movements that fall into the same category: Québec in Canada, Flanders in Belgium, Scotland in the United Kingdom, Catalonia and the Basque Country in Spain, and Padania in Italy. Ireland, Croatia, Norway, Hungary, Greece, and Ukraine have already succeeded in joining the European family of nations.

    Like the Catalans or Québécois, Southern Whites are a distinct ethnic group within America. Dixie is a nation within the United States that manifests itself in every presidential election, every major vote in Congress, the U.S. Census, and the maps of cultural geographers.

    The Southern States:


    .

    The Southern States (Core and Periphery):


    .

    The Baptists:

    .

    Southern English:


    .

    “Real Americans”:


    .

    Dixie:

    .

    Dixie Coalition:

    .

    Confederate States of America (1861-1865):

    .

    Jim Crow South (1896-1965):



    The Republic of Dixie would include the 11 states of the ex-Confederacy, West Virginia, Kentucky, Oklahoma, and the southern third of Missouri below I-44. In a worst case scenario, we might may have to cede Maryland, the Mexican border counties in Texas, the Washington Metro Area in Northern Virginia, and South Florida.

    The international border between the Republic of Dixie and the United States would start at the Atlantic, run under the NOVA counties in Virginia before moving up toward the Shenandoah Valley, it would wrap around West Virginia excluding the Northern Panhandle, follow the Ohio River around Kentucky to Missouri, where it would follow I-44 through Missouri toward Oklahoma before sweeping around the Texas-New Mexico border and down through the Anglo-Hispanic ethnic fault line in South Texas toward the Gulf of Mexico.

    The differences between the Republic of Dixie and the White Republic envisioned by the White Nationalists are clear:
    - Dixie is a real nation. Southern Whites are a distinct people. This is a place that exists in the real world. It is not an abstraction or a proposition nation. It has a name and already exists in the minds of the people. It is not a vague fantasy that exists only in the minds of alienated intellectuals scattered across a continent.

    - Dixie has all the ingredients of an independent nation: a common ethnicity, a common culture, a common ideological outlook, and a common history. White Nationalism is based on a racial identity and racial grievances. Simply put, there is more glue to Southern Nationalism because there is more homogeneity, which means there are fewer areas for conflict and division.

    - Dixie has existed as an independent nation in the past: the Confederate States of America. There has been an earthquake along that sectional fault line before which destroyed the Union. It is still to this day the most likely spot where the Union would be cleaved in two.

    - Southern Nationalism is actually a type of European-style ethnonationalism. White Nationalism is a reiteration of Americanism. There has already been at least one White Republic, the United States until 1861, and it failed due to ethnic and cultural divisions among White Americans.

    With the exception of Harold Covington, White Nationalists can’t tell you the name of their proposed nation, where it would be located in the real world, what ethnicity would be the basis of their White ethnostate, or how their White Republic would be created. After thirty years of talking about creating a White Republic, you would think these basic questions would have been answered a long time ago.

    Golden Dawn, for example, can answer all of these questions in under a minute: Greece, Greece, the Greeks, taking over the government. The Québécois can answer all of those questions: Québec, Québec, the Québécois, taking over the government and seceding from Canada. The Catalans have the same answers: Catalonia, Catalonia, the Catalans, taking over the government and seceding from Spain.

    What about Southern Nationalists? We have the same answers as the Scots, Québécois, the Greeks, and the Catalans: Dixie, Dixie, taking over the Southern states, seceding from the Union, and creating the Republic of Dixie.


    .




    The quality of people I am reaching is much higher than I ever did with a forum.
    I'm now at the top of the racialist intellectual community in the United States.
    I was a nobody when I ran The Phora.

  • #2
    A Secession Vision is starting to emerge

    A Secession Vision is starting to emerge


    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7282#post7282



    Futura on November 29, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    This is good. A vision is starting to emerge. You may want to think about how one might explain why the nations/peoples existing WITHIN Dixie (Marsh Cajuns, Low Country Carolinians, Piney Woods Baptists) have more in common with each other than with the rest of America. In other words, what makes “us” a people any more than the various Identity Factions of Yankeedom?

    .


    Futura on November 29, 2012 at 10:56 pm


    One more thing: What is to be done with the millions of blacks around if this is to be an ethnostate? Can an ethnicity be multi-racial? What of blacks with a long-standing claim on being Southrons? Can blacks BE Southrons, in your mind? As a life-long Southerner (until 2010), the idea of a black-free Southland seems somehow very UN-Southern.


    ===========

    Tell Me What To Do, O, Fearless/Dickless/Mindless Leader!!!!
    I Need A Zero!!!!!!


    Comment


    • #3
      The Republic of Dixie, defined merely as an ethnostate will allow some blacks while excluding some whites

      The Republic of Dixie, defined merely as an ethnostate will allow some blacks while excluding some whites


      http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...comment-877074
      http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7266#post7266


      If whites-as-a-race is too abstract for the foundation of an ethnostate, then:
      1. Allowing immigration of whites simply because they are white would subvert the ethnostate.

      2. Excluding blacks-as-a-race would be too abstract a criterion as well. After all, there are Southern Blacks, and most American Blacks have some Southern roots. Aren’t they ethnically more similar to Southern whites than Southern whites are to Yankees?

      I think the Republic of Dixie, defined merely as an ethnostate, could end up refusing South African Boers as too “foreign.” But they would end up clinging to “good” local Negroes, because Southerners don’t hate blacks as individuals. Or do concerns like this require too much abstract reasoning to be taken seriously?

      “I just couldn’t do without my good black friends” says the middle class farm woman in Flannery O’Connor’s “Revelation,” but she sure could do without the white trash clogging up her doctor’s waiting room. But hey, that’s her ethnicity speaking! She don’t need no fancy abstractions about race and racial solidarity.

      On the other hand, if it is not too abstract to exclude blacks-as-a-race, then why is not also not too abstract to include whites-as-a-race? Hunter clearly hates blacks as a race. So that’s not too abstract for him. But he can’t bring himself to love whites as a race.

      That aside, I love the idea of the Republic of Dixie. I wish ya’ll the best. I want the US to break up on as many different lines as possible. I just hope that your ethnonationalism will be informed by a sense of wider white racial solidarity.


      Greg Johnson on November 30, 2012 at 12:38 am

      Counter-Currents Publishing
      Books Against Time

      Comment


      • #4
        Hunter, you are a Vanguardist fantasist, The Covington of the SouthEast

        Hunter, you are a Vanguardist fantasist, The Covington of the SouthEast


        http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...comment-877145
        http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...ted=1#post7333

        Originally posted by Hunter Wallace

        Dixie is a real nation.
        No, Dixie is an abstract notion. A real nation has real borders, like Catalonia, Flanders, Scotland and Quebec do.

        Originally posted by Hunter Wallace
        The international border between the Republic of Dixie and the United States would start at the Atlantic, run under the NOVA counties in Virginia before moving up toward the Shenandoah Valley, it would wrap around West Virginia excluding the Northern Panhandle, follow the Ohio River around Kentucky to Missouri, where it would follow I-44 through Missouri toward Oklahoma before sweeping around the Texas-New Mexico border and down through the Anglo-Hispanic ethnic fault line in South Texas toward the Gulf of Mexico.
        How are these borders any less arbitrary and ridiculous than those of Harold Covington’s Northwest Republic? Do you think you can just carve up states like Virginia, West Virginia, Missouri and Texas in some God-like fashion to suit your particular tastes? Is there even one other Southern nationalist who has signed onto your version of the international borders of the “Republic of Dixie”?

        Meanwhile, back on Earth, Alabama’s secession petition now has more than 30,000 signatures. I’m going to guess that Occidental Dissent is the leading secessionist blog in Alabama, yet, incredibly, OD has been dead-silent about the secession of your own state! You haven’t said a single word in support of the independence of Alabama. Do you oppose it? Did you even sign the petition? Thirty-thousand Alabamians are clamouring for independence and all we get from Hunter Wallace is crickets, not leadership.

        I can’t even believe how badly you’re wasting this golden opportunity. How many people have signed the various state secession petitions? Probably close to a million by now. How many people have signed the Dixie secession petition? None, because just like Dixie, it doesn’t actually exist. Yet you divert all your energies away from the secession movement that’s actually happening back to your own little pet project of an independent Dixie. Are you really that determined to throw away this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to break away from the United States?

        Remember the discussions here about the Vanguardists versus the Mainstreamers? Well Hunter, you have become what you once condemned: a reality-challenged Vanguardist holding on to your dead-end fantasy of a neo-Confederacy against the reality-based Mainstreamers who are seriously working for state secession. You are outnumbered a million to one, so why not switch over to the winning team and start promoting the independence of a real-world place like Alabama rather than an amorphous entity like “Dixie”? This is an issue tailor-made for a secessionist like you, so you should start burnishing your credentials as Alabama’s number one supporter of independence rather than just another deluded internet fantasist, the Covington of the Southeast.


        November 30, 2012 at 1:45 am
        Second To One!!!

        Comment

        Working...
        X