Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obongo: I'm gonna take Whiggers' guns and start Civil War II

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obongo: I'm gonna take Whiggers' guns and start Civil War II

    Obongo: I'm gonna take Whiggers' guns and start Civil War II


    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7598#post7598


    .

    Transcript:

    JOE BIDEN: “Before I begin today, let me say to the families of the innocents who were murdered 33-days ago, our heart goes out to you. And you show incredible courage, incredible courage being here. And the President and I are going to do everything in our power to honor the memory of your children and your lives with the work we take up here today.

    It’s been 33-days since the nation’s heart was broken by the horrific senseless violence that took place at Sandy Hook elementary school. Twenty, twenty beautiful first-graders gone down in a place that’s supposed to be their second sanctuary.

    Six, six members of the staff killed trying to save those children. It’s literally been hard for the nation to comprehend, hard for the nation to fathom. And I know for the families who are here, that time is not measured in days but is measured in minutes, in seconds since you received that news.

    Another minute without your daughter, another minute without your son, another minute without your wife, another minute without your mom. I want to personally thank Chris and Lynn McDonnell who lost a beautiful daughter Grace and the other parents who I had the chance to speak to for their suggestions and for, again, just for the courage of all of you to be here today.

    I admire, I admire the grace and the resolve that you all show. I must say that I’ve been deeply affected by your faith as well and the President and I are going to do everything to try and match the resolve you’ve demonstrated.

    No one can know for certain if this senseless act could have been prevented but we all know we have a moral obligation to do everything in our power to diminish the prospect that something like this could happen again.

    As the President know, I’ve worked in this field a long time in the United States Senate having chaired a committee that had jurisdiction over these issues of guns and crime.

    And having drafted the first gun violence legislation, the last gun violence legislation, I should say. And I have no illusions about what we’re up against or how hard the task is in front of us but I also have never seen the nation’s conscience so shaken by what happened at Sandy Hook.

    The world is changed and it’s demanding action. It’s in this context that the President asked me to put together, along with cabinet members, a set of recommendations about how we should proceed to meet that moral obligation we have.

    And toward that end, the cabinet members and I sat down with 229 groups, not just individuals, representing groups, 229 groups from law enforcement agencies to public health officials to gun advocacy groups to sportsman and hunters and religious leaders.

    And I’ve spoken with members of Congress on both sides of the aisle, had extensive conversations with mayors and governors and county officials and the recommendations we provided to the President on Monday call for executive actions he could sign, legislation he could call for and long-term research that should be undertaken.

    They’re based on the emerging consensus we heard from all the groups with whom we spoke including some of you who were the victims of this God awful occurrence.

    Ways to keep guns out of the wrong hands, as well as ways to take comprehensive action to prevent violence in the first place. We should do as much as we can as quickly as we can and we can not let perfect the be the enemy of the good.

    Some of what you will hear from the President will happen immediately, some will take some time. But we have begun. And we are starting here today and we are going to resolve to continue this fight.
    During the meetings that we held, we met with a young man who I think is here today, I think Collin Goddard is here. Where are you Collin? Collin was one of the survivors of the Virginia Tech massacre. He was in the classroom.

    He calls himself one of the lucky seven and he’ll tell you he was shot four times on that day and he has three bullets that are still inside him. When I ask Collin about what he thought we should be doing, he said ‘I’m not here because of what happened to me, I’m here because of what happened to me keeps happening to other people and we have to do something about it’.

    Collin, we will. Collin, I promise you, we will. This is our intention, we must do what we can now and there’s no person who is more committed to acting on this moral obligation that we have than the President of the United States of America. Ladies and Gentleman, President Barack Obama.” [applause]

    Kenyan nigger In Charge OBONGO: Thank you, thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you everybody, please, please have a seat. Good afternoon everybody. Let me begin by thanking our Vice President Joe Biden for your dedication Joe to this issue, for bringing so many different voices to the table because while reducing gun violence is a complicated challenge, protecting our children from harm shouldn’t be a divisive one.

    Over the month since the tragedy in Newtown, we’ve heard from so many and obviously none have affected us more than the families of those gorgeous children and their teachers and guardians who, who were lost. And so we’re grateful to all of you for taking the time to be here and recognizing that we honor their memories in part by doing everything we can to prevent this from happening again.

    But we also heard from some unexpected people, in particular I started getting a lot of letters from kids. 4 of them are here today, Grant Fritz, Julia Stokes, Taejah Good. They are pretty representative of some of the messages that I got. These are some pretty smart letters from some pretty smart young people.

    Taejah, a third grader – you can go and wave Taejah, that’s you (Laughter). Taejah wrote, “I feel terrible for the parents who lost their children. I love my country and I want everybody to be happy and safe.” And then Grant – go ahead and wave Grant (laughter). Grant said, “I think there should be some changes. We should learn from what happened at Sandy Hook. I feel really bad.”

    And then Julia said – Julia where are you – there you go. “I’m not scared for my safety, I’m scared for others. I have four brothers and sisters and I know that I would not be able to bear the thought of losing any of them.” And these are our kids. This is what they are thinking about.

    And so what we should be thinking about is our responsibility to care for them and shield them from harm. And give them the tools they need to grow up and do everything that they are capable of doing, not only to pursue their own dreams, but to help build this country. This is our first task as a society, keeping our children safe.

    This is how we will be judged. And their voices should compel us to change. And that’s why last month I asked Joe to lead an effort along with members of my cabinet to come up with some concrete steps we can take right now to keep our children safe. To help prevent mass shootings, to reduce the broader epidemic of gun violence in this country.

    And we can’t put this off any longer. Just last Thursday, as TV networks were covering one of Joe meetings, on this topic, news broke of another school shooting this one in California. In the month since 20 precious children and 6 brave adults were violently taken from us at Sandy Hook Elementary, more than 900 of our fellow Americans have reportedly died at the end of a gun.

    900. In the past month. And every day we wait that number will keep growing. So I’m putting forward a specific set of proposals based on the work of Joe’s task force. And in the days ahead I intend to use whatever weight this office holds to make them a reality.

    Because while there is no law or set of laws that can prevent every senseless act of violence completely. No piece of legislation that will prevent every tragedy, every act of evil. If there’s even one thing we can do to reduce this violence, if there’s even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got an obligation to try.

    And I’m going to do my part. As soon as I’m finished speaking here, I will sit at that desk and I will sign a directive giving law enforcement, schools, mental health professionals, and the public health community some of the tools they need to help reduce gun violence. We will make it easier to help keep guns out of the hands of criminals by strengthening the background check system.

    We will help schools hire more resource officers if they want them. And develop emergency preparedness plans. We will make sure mental health professionals know their options for reporting threats of violence, even as we acknowledge that someone with a mental illness is far more likely to be a victim of violent crime then the perpetrator.

    And while year after year, those who oppose even modest gun safety measures have threatened to defund scientific or medical research into the causes of gun violence, I will direct the Centers for Disease Control to go ahead and study the best ways to reduce it. And Congress should fun research into the affects that violent video games have on young minds.

    We don’t benefit from ignorance. We don’t benefit from not knowing the science of this epidemic of violence. There are few of the 23 executive action that I am announcing today. But as important as these steps are, they are in no way a substitute from action from members of Congress.

    To make a real and lasting difference, Congress, too, must act. An Congress must act soon. And I’m calling on Congress to pass some very specific proposals right away. First it’s time for Congress to require a universal background check for anyone trying to buy a gun. (Applause)

    The law already requires licensed gun dealers to run background checks and over the last 14 years that has kept 1.5 million of the wrong people from getting their hands on a gun. But it’s hard to enforce that law when as many as 40% of all gun purchases are conducted without a background check
    That’s not safe. That’s not smart. That’s not fair to responsible gun buyers or sellers. If you want to buy a gun whether it’s from a licensed dealer or a private seller, you should at least have to show you are not a felon or somebody legally prohibited from buying one. This is common sense. And an over whelming majority of Americans agree with us on the need for universal background checks. Including more than 70% of the National Rifle Association members, according to one survey. So there’s no reason we can’t do this.

    Second, Congress should restore a ban on military style assault weapons and a ten-round limit for magazines. [APPLAUSE]

    The type of assault rifle used in Aurora, for example, when paired with high capacity magazines has one purpose. To pump out as many bullets as possible, as quickly as possible. To do as much damage. Using bullets often designed to inflict maximum damage. And that’s what allowed the gunman in Aurora to shoot 70 people, 70 people, killing 12 in a matter of minutes.

    Weapons designed for the theater of war have no place in a movie theater. A majority of Americans agree with us on this. And by the way, so did Ronald Reagan, one of the staunchest defenders of the second amendment. Who wrote to Congress in 1994 urging them, this is Ronald Reagan speaking, urging them to listen to the American public and to the law enforcement community and support a ban on the further manufacture of military style assault weapons. [APPLAUSE]

    And finally Congress needs to help rather than hinder law enforcement as it does its job. We should get tougher on people who buy guns with the express purpose of turning around and selling them to criminals. And we should severely punish anybody that helps them do this.

    Since Congress hasn’t confirmed the director of the bureau of alcohol, tobacco and firearms in six years. They should confirm Todd Jones who has been acting and I will be nominating for the post. [APPLAUSE]

    And at a time when budget cuts are forcing many communities to reduce their police force, we should put more cops back on the job and back on the streets.

    Now let me be absolutely clear, like most Americans I believe the second amendment guarantees an individual the right to bear arms. I respect our strong tradition of gun ownership and the rights of hunters and sportsmen. There are millions of responsible law abiding gun owners in America who cherish their right to bear arms for hunting or sport or protection or collection.

    I also believe most gun owners agree that we can respect the 2nd amendment while keeping an irresponsible law breaking few from inflicting harm on a massive scale. I believe most of them agree that if America worked harder to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people, there would be fewer atrocities like the one that occurred in Newtown.

    That’s what these reforms are designed to do. They are common sense measures. They have the support of the majority of the American people. And yet that doesn’t mean any of this is going to be easy to enact or implement. If it were, we’d already have universal background checks. The ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines never would’ve been allowed to expire. More of our fellow Americans might still be alive celebrating birthdays and anniversaries and graduations.

    This will be difficult. There will be pundits and politicians and special interest lobbyists publicly warning of the tyrannical all out assault on liberty. Not because that’s true. But because they want to gin up fear or higher ratings or revenue for themselves. And behind the scenes they’ll do everything they can to block any common sense reform and make sure nothing changes whatsoever.

    The only way we will be able to change is if their audience, their constituents, their membership says this time must be different. That this time we must do something to protect our communities and our kids. I will put everything I’ve got into this and so will Joe. But I tell you, the only way we can change is if the American people demand it.

    And by the way, that doesn’t just mean from certain parts of the country. We’re going to need voices in those areas and those congressional districts where the tradition of gun ownership is strong to speak up and to say this is important. It can’t just be the usual suspects. We have to examine ourselves and our hearts and ask ourselves what is important. This will not happen unless the American people demand it.
    If parents and teachers, police officers and pastors, if hunters and sportsmen, if responsible gun owners, if Americans of every background stand up and say ‘enough, we’ve suffered too much pain and care too much about our children to allow this to continue.” Then change will come. That’s what it’s going to take.

    You know, on the letter that Julia wrote me, she said I know laws have to be passed by Congress, but I get you to try very hard. [LAUGHTER] Julia, I will try very hard. But she’s right. The most important change we can make depend on congressional action. They need to bring these proposals up for a vote. And the American people need to make sure that they do.

    Get them on record. Ask your member of Congress if they support universal background checks to keep guns out of the wrong hands. Ask them if they support renewing a ban on military style assault weapons and high capacity magazines. And if the say no, ask them why not.

    Ask them what’s more important. Doing whatever it takes to get an A grade from the gun lobby that funds their campaigns or giving parents some peace of mind when they drop their child off for first grade? [APPLAUSE]

    This is the land of the free and it always will be. As Americans we are endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights that no man or government can take away from us. But we’ve also long recognize, as our founders recognize, with rights come responsibilities. Along with our freedom to live our lives as we will comes an obligation to allow others to do the same. We don’t live in isolation. We live in a society. A government of and by for the people. We are responsible for each other.

    You know, the right to worship freely and safely, that right was denied to Sikhs in Oak Creek Wisconsin. The right to assembly peacefully, that right was denied shoppers in Clackamas, Oregon and moviegoers in Aurora, CO. That most fundamental set of rights to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Fundamental rights that were denied to college students in Virginia Tech and high school students in Columbine and elementary school students in Newtown. And kids on street corners in Chicago on too frequent a basis to tolerate. And all the families that never imagined they’d lose a loved one to a bullet. Those rights are at stake. We’re responsible.

    You know, when I visited Newtown last month, I spent private time with many of the families who lost their children that day. And one was the family of Grace McDonnell. Grace’s parents are here. Grace was 7 years old when she was struck down. Just a gorgeous, caring, joyful little girl. I’m told she loved pink. She loved the beach. She dreamed of becoming a painter. And so just before I left Christ, her father, gave me one of her paintings. And I hung it in my private study, just out the oval office.

    And every time I look at that painting, I think about Grace. I think about the life that she had lived and the life that lay ahead of her. And most of all, I think about how when it comes to protecting the most vulnerable among us, we must act now, for Grace. For the 25 other innocent children and devoted educators that had so much left to give. For the men and women in big cities and small towns who fall victim to senseless violence each and every day.

    For all the Americans who are counting on us to keep them safe from harm. Let’s do the right thing. Let’s do the right thing for them and for the country we love so much. [APPLAUSE] Thank you. I’m going to sign these orders. [APPLAUSE]



  • #2
    Are The Turner Diaries Coming True?

    Are The Turner Diaries Coming True?


    http://incogman.net/?p=91378#more-91378
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7599#post7599



    .


    EXCERPT from chapter one of “The Turner Diaries,” a hotly controversial work of fiction by Dr. William Pierce back in the 1980′s. The book has been blamed, damned and censored for the bombing of Murrah Federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995 (since exposed as a horrible psyops, “let it happen on purpose,” false flag by embedded Zionist elements out to demonize pro-White people). I put up this scary part describing a possible gun confiscation scenario in light of all the talk nowadays out of liberal Jews, White-haters and spineless multicults – all “useful idiots” for Globalist, Zionist Jewry – now rapidly turning America into a futuristic, real-life hell-hole for all us White, Patriotic and Christian people. WAKE THE HELL UP!


    =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
    .

    I’ll never forget that terrible day.

    They knocked on my door at five in the morning. I was completely unsuspecting as I got up to see who it was.

    I opened the door, and four Negroes came pushing into the apartment before I could stop them. One was carrying a baseball bat, and two had long kitchen knives thrust into their belts. The one with the bat shoved me back into a corner and stood guard over me with his bat raised in a threatening position while the other three began ransacking my apartment.

    My first thought was that they were robbers. Robberies of this sort had become all too common since the Cohen Act, with groups of Blacks forcing their way into White homes to rob and rape, knowing that even if their victims had guns they probably would not dare use them.

    Then the one who was guarding me flashed some kind of card and informed me that he and his accomplices were “special deputies” for the Northern Virginia Human Relations Council. They were searching for firearms, he said.

    I couldn’t believe it.

    It just couldn’t be happening. Then I saw that they were wearing strips of green cloth tied around their left arms. As they dumped the contents of drawers on the floor and pulled luggage from the closet, they were ignoring things that robbers wouldn’t have passed up: my brand-new electric razor, a valuable gold pocket watch, a milk bottle full of dimes. They were looking for firearms!

    Right after the Cohen Act was passed, all of us in the Organization had cached our guns and ammunition where they weren’t likely to be found. Those in my unit had carefully greased our weapons, sealed them in an oil drum, and spent all of one tedious weekend burying the drum in an eight-foot-deep pit 200 miles away in the woods of western Pennsylvania.

    But I had kept one gun out of the cache. I had hidden my .357 magnum revolver and 50 rounds of ammunition inside the door frame between the kitchen and the living room. By pulling out two loosened nails and removing one board from the door frame I could get to my revolver in about two minutes flat if I ever needed it. I had timed myself.

    But a police search would never uncover it. And these inexperienced Blacks couldn’t find it in a million years.

    After the three who were conducting the search had looked in all the obvious places, they began slitting open my mattress and the sofa cushions. I protested vigorously at this and briefly considered trying to put up a fight.

    About that time there was a commotion out in the hallway. Another group of searchers had found a rifle hidden under a bed in the apartment of the young couple down the hall. They had both been handcuffed and were being forcibly escorted toward the stairs. Both were clad only in their underwear, and the young woman was complaining loudly about the fact that her baby was being left alone in the apartment.

    Another man walked into my apartment. He was a Caucasian, though with an unusually dark complexion. He also wore a green armband, and he carried an attaché case and a clipboard.

    The Blacks greeted him deferentially and reported the negative result of their search: “No guns here, Mr. Tepper.” Tepper ran his finger down the list of names and apartment numbers on his clipboard until he came to mine. He frowned. “This is a bad one,” he said. “He has a racist record. Been cited by the Council twice. And he owned eight firearms which were never turned in.”

    Tepper opened his attaché case and took out a small, black object about the size of a pack of cigarettes which was attached by a long cord to an electronic instrument in the case. He began moving the black object in long sweeps back and forth over the walls, while the attaché case emitted a dull, rumbling noise. The rumble rose in pitch as the gadget approached the light switch, but Tepper convinced himself that the change was caused by the metal junction box and conduit buried in the wall. He continued his methodical sweep.

    As he swept over the left side of the kitchen door frame the rumble jumped to a piercing shriek. Tepper grunted excitedly, and one of the Negroes went out and came back a few seconds later with a sledge hammer and a pry bar. It took the Negro substantially less than two minutes after that to find my gun.

    I was handcuffed without further ado and led outside. Altogether, four of us were arrested in my apartment building. In addition to the couple down the hall, there was an elderly man from the fourth floor. They hadn’t found a firearm in his apartment, but they had found four shotgun shells on his closet shelf. Ammunition was also illegal.

    Mr. Tepper and some of his “deputies” had more searches to carry out, but three large Blacks with baseball bats and knives were left to guard us in front of the apartment building.

    The four of us were forced to sit on the cold sidewalk, in various states of undress, for more than an hour until a police van finally came for us.

    As other residents of the apartment building left for work, they eyed us curiously. We were all shivering, and the young woman from down the hall was weeping uncontrollably. One man stopped to ask what it was all about. One of our guards brusquely explained that we were all under arrest for possessing illegal weapons. The man stared at us and shook his head disapprovingly.

    Then the Black pointed to me and said: “And that one’s a racist.” Still shaking his head, the man moved on. Herb Jones, who used to belong to the Organization and was one of the most outspoken of the “they’ll-never-get-my-gun” people before the Cohen Act, walked by quickly with his eyes averted. His apartment had been searched too, but Herb was clean. He had been practically the first man in town to turn his guns over to the police after the passage of the Cohen Act made him liable to ten years imprisonment in a Federal penitentiary if he kept them.

    That was the penalty the four of us on the sidewalk were facing. It didn’t work out that way, though. The reason it didn’t is that the raids which were carried out all over the country that day netted a lot more fish than the System had counted on: more than 800,000 persons were arrested.

    At first the news media tried hard to work up enough public sentiment against us so that the arrests would stick. The fact that there weren’t enough jail cells in the country to hold us all could be remedied by herding us into barbed-wire enclosures outdoors until new prison facilities could be readied, the newspapers suggested. In freezing weather!

    I still remember the Washington Post headline the next day: “Fascist-Racist Conspiracy Smashed, Illegal Weapons Seized.” But not even the brainwashed American public could fully accept the idea that nearly a million of their fellow citizens had been engaged in a secret, armed conspiracy.

    As more and more details of the raids leaked out, public restlessness grew. One of the details which bothered people was that the raiders had, for the most part, exempted Black neighborhoods from the searches. The explanation given at first for this was that since “racists” were the ones primarily suspected of harboring firearms, there was relatively little need to search Black homes.

    The peculiar logic of this explanation broke down when it turned out that a number of persons who could hardly be considered either “racists” or “fascists” had been caught up in the raids. Among them were two prominent liberal newspaper columnists who had earlier been in the forefront of the antigun crusade, four Negro Congressmen (they lived in White neighborhoods), and an embarrassingly large number of government officials.

    The list of persons to be raided, it turned out, had been compiled primarily from firearms sales records which all gun dealers had been required to keep. If a person had turned a gun in to the police after the Cohen Act was passed, his name was marked off the list. If he hadn’t it stayed on, and he was raided on November 9 — unless he lived in a Black neighborhood.

    In addition, certain categories of people were raided whether they had ever purchased a firearm from a dealer or not. All the members of the Organization were raided.

    The government’s list of suspects was so large that a number of “responsible” civilian groups were deputized to assist in the raids. l guess the planners in the System thought that most of the people on their list had either sold their guns privately before the Cohen Act, or had disposed of them in some other way. Probably they were expecting only about a quarter as many people to be arrested as actually were.

    Anyway, the whole thing soon became so embarrassing and so unwieldy that most of the arrestees were turned loose again within a week. The group I was with — some 600 of us — was held for three days in a high school gymnasium in Alexandria before being released. During those three days we were fed only four times, and we got virtually no sleep.

    But the police did get mug shots, fingerprints, and personal data from everyone. When we were released we were told that we were still technically under arrest and could expect to be picked up again for prosecution at any time.

    The media kept yelling for prosecutions for awhile, but the issue was gradually allowed to die. Actually, the System had bungled the affair rather badly. For a few days we were all more frightened and glad to be free than anything else. A lot of people in the Organization dropped out right then and there. They didn’t want to take any more chances.

    Others stayed in but used the Gun Raids as an excuse for inactivity. Now that the patriotic element in the population had been disarmed, they argued, we were all at the mercy of the System and had to be much more careful. They wanted us to cease all public recruiting activities and “go underground.”

    As it turned out, what they really had in mind was for the Organization to restrict itself henceforth to “safe” activities, such activities to consist principally in complaining — better yet, whispering — to one another about how bad things were.

    The more militant members, on the other hand, were for digging up our weapons caches and unleashing a program of terror against the System immediately, carrying out executions of Federal judges, newspaper editors, legislators, and other System figures. The time was ripe for such action, they felt, because in the wake of the Gun Raids we could win public sympathy for such a campaign against tyranny.

    It is hard to say now whether the militants were right. Personally, I think they were wrong-although I counted myself as one of them at the time. We could certainly have killed a number of the creatures responsible for America’s ills, but I believe we would have lost in the long run.

    For one thing, the Organization just wasn’t well disciplined enough for waging terror against the System. There were too many cowards and blabbermouths among us. Informers, fools, weaklings, and irresponsible jerks would have been our undoing.

    For a second thing, I am sure now that we were overoptimistic in our judgment of the mood of the public. What we mistook as general resentment against the System’s abrogation of civil rights during the Gun Raids was more a passing wave of uneasiness resulting from all the commotion involved in the mass arrests.

    As soon as the public had been reassured by the media that they were in no danger, that the government was cracking down only on the “racists, fascists, and other anti-social elements” who had kept illegal weapons, most relaxed again and went back to their TV and funny papers.

    As we began to realize this, we were more discouraged than ever. We had based all our plans-in fact, the whole rationale of the Organization on the assumption that Americans were inherently opposed to tyranny, and that when the System became oppressive enough they could be led to overthrow it. We had badly underestimated the degree to which materialism had corrupted our fellow citizens, as well as the extent to which their feelings could be manipulated by the mass media.

    As long as the government is able to keep the economy somehow gasping and wheezing along, the people can be conditioned to accept any outrage. Despite the continuing inflation and the gradually declining standard of living, most Americans are still able to keep their bellies full today, and we must simply face the fact that that’s the only thing which counts with most of them.

    Discouraged and uncertain as we were, though, we began laying new plans for the future. First, we decided to maintain our program of public recruiting. In fact, we intensified it and deliberately made our propaganda as provocative as possible. The purpose was not only to attract new members with a militant disposition, but at the same time to purge the Organization of the fainthearts and hobbyists — the “talkers.”

    We also tightened up on discipline. Anyone who missed a scheduled meeting twice in a row was expelled. Anyone who failed to carry out a work assignment was expelled. Anyone who violated our rule against loose talk about Organizational matters was expelled.

    We had made up our minds to have an Organization that would be ready the next time the System provided an opportunity to strike. The shame of our failure to act, indeed, our inability to act, in 1989 tormented us and drove us without mercy. It was probably the single most important factor in steeling our wills to whip the Organization into fighting trim, despite all obstacles.

    Another thing that helped-at least, with me-was the constant threat of rearrest and prosecution. Even if I had wanted to give it all up and join the TV-and-funnies crowd, I couldn’t. I could make no plans for a “normal,” civilian future, never knowing when I might be prosecuted under the Cohen Act. (The Constitutional guarantee of a speedy trial, of course, has been “reinterpreted” by the courts until it means no more than our Constitutional guarantee of the right to keep and bear arms.)

    So I, and I know this also applies to George and Katherine and Henry, threw myself without reservation into work for the Organization and made only plans for the future of the Organization. My private life had ceased to matter.

    Whether the Organization actually is ready, I guess we’ll find out soon enough. So far, so good, though. Our plan for avoiding another mass roundup, seems to have worked.

    Early last year we began putting a number of new members, unknown to the political police, into police agencies and various quasi-official organizations, such as the human relations councils. They served as our early-warning network and otherwise kept us generally informed of the System’s plans against us.

    We were surprised at the ease with which we were able to set up and operate this network. We never would have gotten away with it back in the days of J. Edgar Hoover.

    It is ironic that while the Organization has always warned the public against the dangers of racial integration of our police, this has now turned out to be a blessing in disguise for us. The “equal opportunity” boys have really done a wonderful wrecking job on the FBI and other investigative agencies, and their efficiency is way down as a result. Still, we’d better not get over-confident or careless.

    Omigod! It’s 4:00 AM. Got to get some sleep!



    Posted on January 12, 2013 by INCOG MAN

    I'm Little Butt I'm Loud!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      The Cost of the Union: Obama’s Gun Control Press Conference

      The Cost of the Union: Obama’s Gun Control Press Conference


      http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...ss-conference/
      http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7601#post7601


      District of Corruption

      As expected, Obama proposes to ban “assault weapons” in a calculated effort to exploit statistical outliers in gun violence to disarm law abiding White conservatives who are concentrated in the Red States:

      Note: Were it not for the existence of the Union, Obama wouldn’t be holding this press conference, and there would be no serious effort underway to ban assault weapons, or any serious effort to give amnesty to illegal aliens, or any serious effort to raise taxes and the debt ceiling again without serious cuts to federal spending.

      Texas has an economy twice the size of New England, but only has 2 senators in this Union compared to the 12 from New England. Alabama, Tennessee, and Georgia have an economy the size of New England, but only have 6 senators in this Union compared to the 12 that come from New England.

      New England is only 71,991.8 square miles. Texas is 268,581 square miles. There are 26 million people in Texas compared to 14 million in New England. Yet because of the existence of the Union with New England the whole country is pulled inexorably to the Left of its own center of gravity.

      Dissolving the Union is the silver bullet that takes out everything from gay marriage to amnesty for illegal aliens to gun control to abortion to affirmative action to the welfare state. In one stroke, it rids us of 4 out of 5 Jews in America and over 90% of the insanity that emanates from the Northeast, Upper Midwest, and the West Coast.
      .



      Posted on January 16, 2013 by Hunter Wallace



      The quality of people I am reaching is much higher than I ever did with a forum.
      I'm now at the top of the racialist intellectual community in the United States.
      I was a nobody when I ran The Phora.

      Comment


      • #4
        Obama makes biggest gun-control push in decades

        Obama makes biggest gun-control push in decades


        http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...90F0NU20130116
        http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7602#post7602



        .


        By Matt Spetalnick and Steve Holland
        WASHINGTON | Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:46pm EST

        (Reuters) - President Barack Obama launched the biggest U.S. gun-control push in generations on Wednesday, urging Congress to approve an assault weapons ban and background checks for all gun buyers to prevent mass shootings like the Newtown school massacre.

        Rolling out a wide-ranging plan for executive and legislative action to curb gun violence, Obama set up a fierce clash with the powerful U.S. gun lobby and its supporters in Congress, who will resist what they see as an encroachment on constitutionally protected gun rights.

        Obama presented his agenda at a White House event in front of an audience that included relatives of some of the 20 first graders who were killed along with six adults by a gunman on December 14 at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

        "We can't put this off any longer," Obama said, vowing to use "whatever weight this office holds" to make his proposals reality. "Congress must act soon," he said, flanked by schoolchildren.

        In a sign of how bitter the fight over gun control could get, the National Rifle Association released an advertisement hours before Obama spoke that accused him of hypocrisy for accepting armed Secret Service protection for his daughters. The White House condemned the ad as "repugnant.

        Until now, Obama had done little to change America's gun culture. But just days before his second inauguration, he appears determined to champion gun control in his next term, which also will be dominated by debt and spending fights with Congress and a likely debate over immigration reform.

        His plan calls on Congress to renew a prohibition on assault weapons sales that expired in 2004, require criminal background checks on all gun purchases, including closing a loophole for gun show sales, and pass a new federal gun trafficking law - long sought by big-city mayors to keep out-of-state guns off their streets.

        He also announced 23 steps he intends to take immediately without congressional approval. These include improving the existing system for background checks, lifting the ban on federal research on gun violence, putting more counselors and "resource officers" in schools and better access to mental health services.

        ASSAULT WEAPONS BATTLE

        Obama, who has called the day of the Newtown massacre the worst of his presidency, looked down into the audience and addressed the parents of one of the Sandy Hook victims, Grace McDonald, 7, saying he had hung one of her paintings in his private study.

        "Every time I look at that painting, I think about Grace, and I think about the life that she lived and the life that lay ahead of her, and most of all I think about how when it comes to protecting the most vulnerable among us, we must act now," he said.

        As he announced the gun measures, Obama was accompanied by four children chosen from among those who sent letters to him about gun violence and school safety. "We should learn from what happened at Sandy Hook. I feel really bad," 8-year-old Grant Fritz wrote, in a portion Obama read from the podium.

        The most contentious piece of the package is Obama's call for a renewed ban on military-style assault weapons, a move that is unlikely to win approval because Republicans who control the House of Representatives are expected to oppose it.

        The Newtown gunman, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, used a Bushmaster AR-15 type assault rifle to shoot his victims, most of them 6- and 7-year-olds, before killing himself.

        Law enforcement experts have noted, however, that the tighter background checks that Obama is proposing would not have prevented the Connecticut school massacre because the gunman's weapon was purchased legally by his mother.

        New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a staunch gun control advocate, said tighter controls were needed no matter what.

        "No piece of legislation is perfect and no piece of legislation is 100 percent effective. Think of it like a speeding limit. You may every once in a while violate the speeding limit, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't have speeding limits - they protect people's lives," he told reporters.

        At the firearm industry's largest trade show in Las Vegas, Gary Svecko - adding a Glock 17 pistol to his gun collection - dismissed Obama's bid to ban assault weapons purchases and blamed video games for inciting violence.

        "You know the old saying, 'Guns don't kill people. People kill people'," Svecko, 58, said, citing a common argument of gun enthusiasts. "I think they should ban those stupid video games."

        Shares of gun manufacturers, including Smith & Wesson and Sturm Ruger, rose more than 5 percent after Obama unveiled his proposals. Since Newtown, FBI background checks required for gun purchases have soared, indicating more people are trying to buy weapons, likely out of concern that new restrictions may be imposed.

        CONTROVERSIAL NRA AD CAMPAIGN

        Underscoring the tough political battle ahead, the NRA launched an advertising campaign against Obama's gun control effort and deployed its lobbyists in force on Capitol Hill.

        The NRA, in a TV and Internet spot, accused Obama of being "just another elitist hypocrite" for accepting Secret Service protection for his young daughters but turning down the lobby group's proposal to put armed guards in all schools.

        "Only honest, law-abiding gun owners will be affected and our children will remain vulnerable to the inevitability of more tragedy," the group said in response to Obama's proposals.
        .

        .

        Administration officials sketched out legislative goals in a conference call with reporters but offered no draft legislation or any clear explanation of how they would overcome the hurdles. They said the list of executive actions would cost $500 million in the federal budget for the 2014 fiscal year.

        With gun ownership rights enshrined in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, gun restrictions have long been a divisive - and risky - issue in American politics.

        But polls show public sentiment shifted in favor of tighter gun control fueled by outrage after Newtown, and Obama hopes to take advantage while there is a mood for action in Washington. The pattern after shooting tragedies is that memories of the events soon fade, making it hard to sustain a push for policy changes.

        Obama acknowledged the political challenges but made clear he is prepared to take on the NRA, despite its support among Republicans and significant backing among Democrats.

        He warned that opponents of his effort would try to "gin up fear" and urged lawmakers to put children's safety above getting an 'A' grade from the gun lobby that supports their campaign."

        Michael Steel, a spokesman for Republican House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, was noncommittal. "House committees of jurisdiction will review these recommendations. And if the Senate passes a bill, we will also take a look at that," he said.

        Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a pro-gun-rights Democrat from Nevada, also responded cautiously, saying "all options should be on the table" to reduce gun violence.

        Obama's initiative treads carefully on whether violent movies and video games contribute to gun violence. An administration official said, however, that Obama would seek $10 million to fund studies of the causes of gun violence, including any relationship to video games and media images.

        Wednesday's proposals stem from a month-long review led by Vice President Joe Biden, who met advocates on both sides, including officials from the arms and entertainment industries.


        (Additional reporting by Jeff Mason, Steve Holland, Roberta Rampton, Thomas Ferraro in Washington and Timothy Pratt in Las Vegas; editing by Alistair Bell and Philip Barbara)

        lying jewspapers

        Comment


        • #5
          In Missouri, we won't follow Obama's gun laws

          In Missouri, we won't follow Obama's gun laws


          http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2013/...bamas-gun.html
          http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7606#post7606


          (The following is my latest Huffington Post blog.)

          The worth of a person can be determined by how he or she responds in time of crisis.

          After 20 children were murdered in a shooting spree last month at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. the New York legislature quickly took steps to try to stop the gun madness that has enveloped this country.

          Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed a bill Tuesday that places stiff restrictions on assault weapons and magazines. The bill was passed by an overwhelming majority of both houses.

          That’s New York. In Missouri, our elected representatives acted in an entirely different manner.

          As we wait to hear the proposals President Obama will make today, most likely reinstating the assault weapons ban, restricting magazines, instituting universal background checks, and closing the gun show loophole, 62 of our legislators made it known how they would react to anything the president says or does.

          They do not plan to obey any federal law or regulation concerning guns from this point on.

          “Law of the land.” To Rep. Casey Guernsey, R-Bethany, that phrase is a myth. HB 170, which Guernsey is sponsoring, corrects that myth- the law of Missouri is the only law that matters and if the federal government disagrees with that, we are in open rebellion.

          HB 170 calls for the following:
          It shall be unlawful for any officer or employee of this state, or any political subdivision, or any federal firearms dealer licensed under 19 U.S.C. Section 923 to enforce or attempt to enforce any act, law, statute, rule, or regulation of the federal government relating to a personal firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition that is owned or manufactured commercially or privately in the state of Missouri and that remains exclusively within the boundaries of the state of Missouri.

          2. Any official, agent, or employee of the federal government who enforces or attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule, or regulation of the federal government upon a personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is owned or manufactured commercially or privately in the state of Missouri and that remains exclusively within the borders of the state of Missouri shall be guilty of a class D felony.

          It will be a felony to follow federal law.

          And Missouri taxpayer money will be spent to defend anyone who crosses the federal government, according to the bill. Anyone who disobeys a federal gun law will be able to call on the state’s attorney general for help.

          Guernsey’s bill has 61 co-sponsors, including all five who represent the Joplin area of the state where I live.

          Following the same principle that state legislators have used concerning Obamacare, our officials have simply said, “It does not apply to us.”

          Meanwhile, the state takes its own approach to fighting the problem of gun violence in our schools and our society. We have a bill that would require all first graders to take NRA gun safety courses. Another bill would put weapons in the hands of classroom teachers.

          And the latest, filed late last week, would put a tax on violent video games.

          Anything except address the problem.

          The message sent by Casey Guernsey’s law is clear:

          -This state will do nothing to limit access to the kind of high-powered weapons that no one outside our police or military need.

          -This state will do nothing to ensure that criminals or those with mental problems have no access to guns.

          -This state will do nothing to close the gun show loophole.

          This state will do nothing, except cross our fingers and hope that it is not one of our elementary schools that is the next target of a crazed gunman.

          That brings all all-new meaning, and a horrifying one, to the term “Show-Me State.”


          Posted by Randy at 5:14 AM*WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2013

          ___666___666___666___



          The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

          Comment

          Working...
          X