+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Steve Sailer on Northern White Voters

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    In the South, where he wants it made
    Posts
    739

    Default Steve Sailer on Northern White Voters

    Steve Sailer on Northern White Voters


    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...-white-voters/
    http://www.whitenationalist.org/foru...=7866#post7866


    VDARE

    Here’s a link to an excellent analysis of the 2012 election by Steve Sailer:
    “Here are some other north central states where Romney came fairly close:

    Pennsylvania: 54 percent of the white vote
    Iowa: 48 percent
    WI 49 percent
    Minnesota 47 percent
    Michigan 53 percent

    Romney couldn’t get the job done in these northern states, not because of the tidal wave of Hispanics, but because he just didn’t get enough whites to show up and vote for him.”
    .

    Bingo.

    If Whites in the Lower North and Midwestern states (48% to 54%) voted Republican at the same rate as Whites in Upper South states (66% to 71%), then Mitt Romney would have easily won the 2012 election.

    Romney barely won North Carolina. He lost Virginia and Florida. That’s because he only got a pathetic 61% of the White vote in Virginia, 61% of the White vote in Florida, and 68% of the White vote in North Carolina.

    The Republican share of the White vote in these three Southern states is their lowest share of the White vote anywhere in the South – unless you count Maryland as a Southern state, where Romney only got 56% of the White vote.

    Romney lost the 2012 election because Northern White transplants in NOVA/Hampton Roads, the Research Triangle, and the I-4 Corridor in Central Florida are turning Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida into another Maryland. He also lost because he couldn’t get White voters in Pennsylvania and the Midwest to vote like Whites in Kentucky, Tennessee, and West Virginia.

    The most important reason Romney lost the 2012 election though is because the Northeastern phalanx delivered all 112 of their electoral votes to Obama within minutes of each other on election night. The “Hispanic vote” is a sideshow compared to the Yankee vote in the Northeast, Upper Midwest, and the West Coast and the enclaves (think Boulder, Asheville, Austin, Missoula, Jackson (WY), Cary, etc.) it has established in the South and West.

    The Yankee vote is why states like Iowa, Ohio, and Pennsylvania vote Democrat where there are lots of White rural conservatives there who otherwise vote like the Whites in West Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Western Iowa, Pennsyltucky, and Southern Illinois and Southern Ohio are reliably and predictably Republican because Yankees aren’t predominant in those areas in contrast to Eastern Iowa, Philadelphia, Chicagoland, and Cleveland and the Western Reserve.

    If you look at the county level map of the Western states, you can see a massive divide between the Whites who live in the coastal and inland Pacific Northwest and those who live in coastal and inland California. Once again, the Whites who live in the coastal areas are responsible for tipping those states into the Democrat column.

    This division in the White vote, not the “Hispanic vote,” is why the Democrats are winning presidential elections – the effect of minorities is simply to augment and nullify White Republican voters, but it is not sufficient by itself to, say, to elect non-Whites to statewide offices outside of extreme cases like Hawaii.

    American politics can be summed up as one group of Whites based in the Northeast, Upper Midwest, and West Coast aligning themselves with non-Whites to gain an electoral advantage over a rival group of Whites who are based in the South, Interior West, and the Lower North.

    .

    Posted on February 18, 2013 by Hunter Wallace



    The quality of people I am reaching is much higher than I ever did with a forum.
    I'm now at the top of the racialist intellectual community in the United States.
    I was a nobody when I ran The Phora.


  2. #2
    Fatt Parrott's Avatar
    Fatt Parrott is offline Fat Hoosier Intellectual Ass-Clown Member Fatt Parrott has a little shameless behaviour in the past
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Going ass-to-mouth with bigger swinging intellectual dicks
    Posts
    39

    Default This data doesn’t support your anachronistic and antagonistic “Yankee vs. Confederate” narrative at all.

    This data doesn’t support your anachronistic and antagonistic “Yankee vs. Confederate” narrative at all.


    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...omment-1397098
    http://www.whitenationalist.org/foru...=7867#post7867


    This data doesn’t support your anachronistic and antagonistic “Yankee vs. Confederate” narrative at all. It fits a narrative wherein a growing share of Whites are becoming alienated from the GOP leadership, with White Southerners showing up anyway because their (valid, learned) fear of Black rule outweighs their contempt for and frustration with the GOP leadership.

    This rift is a macrocosm of the rift within the White Advocacy community, with those in the South soft-pedaling the JQ and seeking ways to influence mainstream conservatives and local Republican leaders in their direction while non-Southerners are radicalizing and dropping out of the mainstream political process. Time will tell which direction is more advisable, but what’s definitely not happening is non-Southerners becoming more enamored with Obama, multiculturalism, and leftism in general.


    Matt Parrott says:
    February 18, 2013 at 7:08 pm

    .

    Trad Yoot ZOGbots, cum-cum, cum-cum!!!

    http://www.tradyouth.org/

    .

  3. #3
    Jack is offline Formerly TrashCanMan72 Veteran Member Jack is a jewel in the rough Jack is a jewel in the rough Jack is a jewel in the rough Jack is a jewel in the rough
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    ZOG-occupied, whigger-infested East Tennessee.
    Posts
    277

    Angry He Didn't DESERVE A Single Southern Vote, Though.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunter Wallace View Post
    Steve Sailer on Northern White Voters


    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...-white-voters/
    http://www.whitenationalist.org/foru...=7866#post7866


    VDARE

    Here’s a link to an excellent analysis of the 2012 election by Steve Sailer:
    “Here are some other north central states where Romney came fairly close:

    Pennsylvania: 54 percent of the white vote
    Iowa: 48 percent
    WI 49 percent
    Minnesota 47 percent
    Michigan 53 percent

    Romney couldn’t get the job done in these northern states, not because of the tidal wave of Hispanics, but because he just didn’t get enough whites to show up and vote for him.”
    .

    Bingo.

    If Whites in the Lower North and Midwestern states (48% to 54%) voted Republican at the same rate as Whites in Upper South states (66% to 71%), then Mitt Romney would have easily won the 2012 election.

    Romney barely won North Carolina. He lost Virginia and Florida. That’s because he only got a pathetic 61% of the White vote in Virginia, 61% of the White vote in Florida, and 68% of the White vote in North Carolina.

    The Republican share of the White vote in these three Southern states is their lowest share of the White vote anywhere in the South – unless you count Maryland as a Southern state, where Romney only got 56% of the White vote.

    Romney lost the 2012 election because Northern White transplants in NOVA/Hampton Roads, the Research Triangle, and the I-4 Corridor in Central Florida are turning Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida into another Maryland. He also lost because he couldn’t get White voters in Pennsylvania and the Midwest to vote like Whites in Kentucky, Tennessee, and West Virginia.

    The most important reason Romney lost the 2012 election though is because the Northeastern phalanx delivered all 112 of their electoral votes to Obama within minutes of each other on election night. The “Hispanic vote” is a sideshow compared to the Yankee vote in the Northeast, Upper Midwest, and the West Coast and the enclaves (think Boulder, Asheville, Austin, Missoula, Jackson (WY), Cary, etc.) it has established in the South and West.

    The Yankee vote is why states like Iowa, Ohio, and Pennsylvania vote Democrat where there are lots of White rural conservatives there who otherwise vote like the Whites in West Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Western Iowa, Pennsyltucky, and Southern Illinois and Southern Ohio are reliably and predictably Republican because Yankees aren’t predominant in those areas in contrast to Eastern Iowa, Philadelphia, Chicagoland, and Cleveland and the Western Reserve.

    If you look at the county level map of the Western states, you can see a massive divide between the Whites who live in the coastal and inland Pacific Northwest and those who live in coastal and inland California. Once again, the Whites who live in the coastal areas are responsible for tipping those states into the Democrat column.

    This division in the White vote, not the “Hispanic vote,” is why the Democrats are winning presidential elections – the effect of minorities is simply to augment and nullify White Republican voters, but it is not sufficient by itself to, say, to elect non-Whites to statewide offices outside of extreme cases like Hawaii.

    American politics can be summed up as one group of Whites based in the Northeast, Upper Midwest, and West Coast aligning themselves with non-Whites to gain an electoral advantage over a rival group of Whites who are based in the South, Interior West, and the Lower North.

    .

    Posted on February 18, 2013 by Hunter Wallace



    Well, I can tell you this: HE DIDN'T DESERVE ONE SINGLE SOUTHERN VOTE!!! Not one.



    Back in 2007, at a debate in South Carolina, the Yankee sack of whiggershit was shown a video of a guy with a Confederate Battle Flag on his wall, asking the candidates where they stood on returning the flag to the State Capitol Dome, and Romney replied that the flag was a symbol of "rebellion against the United States of America" and that it was "unfortunate" that it was shown. If we were the kind of people we OUGHT to be, that alone would've prevented him from receiving one single vote down here, not in 2008, 2012, or any other year.



    Honestly, it blew my mind when Mississippi, Alabama, and my native Tennessee went to that shitskin dago mackeral-snapper, Santorum, instead of Gingrich in the primaries, (though I suppose that attests to the power of Fux Jooz Channel and its common-traitors) but it *DID NOT* surprise me at all that they picked him over Romney. Being a gun-grabbing, fetus-frying homo-hugger doesn't exactly endear one to the electorate down here.



    Now, the fact of the matter is that Romney lost because he lost 3 million of the Republican votes that had gone to McCain in 2008. That didn't surprise me much, since I didn't see even 1/4 as many Romney bumper stickers as I had seen McCain stickers in 2008, and only one yard sign, while I saw three or four for Obongo. I have no doubt that a good chunk of those 3 million non-voters came from the South, and that's as it should be. It burns my butt that ANY of us voted for his sorry ass.



    I have to admit, nonetheless, that it *DOES NOT* surprise me, though. Nor do I agree with Fat Parrott's conclusion that we supported him due to "fear of black rule". Absent the declaration of martial law, "black rule" is only dangerous at the state or local level, not at the national. So far, Obongo's silly little socialist shenanigans haven't really effected us much. Grant it, the economy certainly hasn't gotten any better, but things haven't really changed much since late 2008, either, aside from the price of gas going up.



    No, the real reason that these Southern whiggers cast their votes for Romney is because, much as it pains me to admit it, these dirty little cocksuckers just plain looooooooooooooooooove "Amurrica" more than anybody else in this godforsaken shithole of a country. Delusional whiggers that they are, they were voting to "save Amurrica" rather than to save themselves from Obongo.



    And this is EXACTLY what is so misguided about Hunter's silly little secession scheme. The petitions were one thing. That was just a bunch of pissed-off whiggers blowing off steam. It's irrelevant now. The point is, it doesn't take any damn GUTS to sign a petition, begging to be allowed to peacefully secede, and knowing all along there wasn't a chance in hell of it actually happening. Actually picking up a gun and firing on the nearest Federal courthouse is another matter entirely. Hell, most of these fucking pussies won't even shoot back when Obongo sends his jewps in to TAKE their guns, let along do anything proactive. Southern males are the most reactionary, ZOG-loving sacks of whiggershit on the face of this earth.



    And that's only the baby-killing old Boomenschwein. As for the younger ones, they're either pro-Obongo, or, otherwise, could care less. All they care about is their video games, nigger rap, and nigger weed. Like their parents, though, they're a bunch of chickenshits, too. Woudn't have the balls to say boo to a gnat.



    But what can you do? North, South, East, and West, the majority of so-called "White people" are nothing but WORTHLESS WHIGGERS, and whiggers will be whiggers, after all.

    http://www.whitenationalist.org/foru...=7872#post7872
    Last edited by Jack; 02-20-2013 at 05:57 PM.
    IF YOU STILL LOVE AMERIKA, YOU'RE A NIGGER-LOVER!!! ---CGO. 1/20/'09.



    "Lay down your silver and your gold
    I am a man who won't be sold
    And even when my heart grows cold
    I'll curse your evil stranglehold."---Horslips, from "Trouble With A Capital 'T'", 1977.

  4. #4
    Meercat #4's Avatar
    Meercat #4 is offline A Meercat, not a Meercunt Veteran Member Meercat #4 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in a hole near jew!!!
    Posts
    251

    Default A data-dump of figures

    A data-dump of figures


    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...omment-1397262
    http://www.whitenationalist.org/foru...=7874#post7874


    One glaring problem with the Reuters-Ipsos exit polls that Sailer cites are the Hawaiian numbers. Supposedly Romney won the white vote there 56-44. But in 2008, Obama’s strongest performance among white voters (aside from in DC) was in Hawaii, where he won 70% of the white vote. Are we supposed to believe that Obama’s vote cratered by 26 points in his (alleged) home state among white voters? Especially when he more or less maintained the same share of the white vote almost everywhere else, with Maryland being the only notable exception where his share fell by 12 points. So with regards to Hawaii, either the 2008 or, more likely, the 2012 exit polls must be wrong.

    Overall, the Reuters numbers show Romney winning the white vote 58-42 (with the third party vote eliminated), compared to the Edison exit polls which show him winning 59-39. Making it hard to compare the two sets of numbers is the fact that Edison has no exit polls for 19 states plus DC. Making it even harder is the fact that there are two sets of Edison exit polls floating around: the original numbers which can be seen at the Fox News website, and the revised numbers at CNN.com.

    The original set of Edison data shows Romney winning the white vote in New York and tying Obama in Connecticut, while the revised numbers show Obama winning in Connecticut and tying Romney in New York. If we split the difference, then Edison shows Romney winning the white vote in New York, Wisconsin, Minnesota and California, while Reuters shows Obama winning those states. Both sets of exit polls show Obama winning the white vote in all 6 New England states, DC, Iowa, Oregon and Washington. Edison has no data for Hawaii, but it seems highly unlikely that Obama would fall from 70% of the white vote in 2008 to less than 50% in 2012, no matter what the Reuters numbers say.

    But regardless of who won the white vote in the 4 contested states (NY, WI, MN, CA), Hunter’s conclusion that . . .
    .
    American politics can be summed up as one group of Whites based in the Northeast, Upper Midwest, and West Coast aligning themselves with non-Whites to gain an electoral advantage over a rival group of Whites who are based in the South, Interior West, and the Lower North.
    .

    . . . is undoubtedly the correct one.


    jeppo says:
    February 18, 2013 at 7:52 pm

    ==========

    Itz Fun Being A Witless Meercat!!!


+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts