LibberToon NWO Party
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rpf_2/message/198
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=2240#post2240
Dear Al:
The LibberToons are even more goofy than you figured. Recently,
Harry Brown, the likely presidential nominee of the Libertarian Party
said a number of stupid things concerning the wonderfulness of unrestricted
Mexican immigration. A journalist named Don Feder from the Boston Herald
of course made this LibberToon look ridiculous, with an article called
"Goofy is a Libertarian" or something like that.
I am trying to show LibberToons (my name for them) how ridiculous
and idiotic and corrupt and treasonous they look to normal people.
After all, if LibberToons really believed in the wonders of getting
to live next to Mexicans or Chinese or Africans, then they would
already live in Mexico City or Peking or Lagos Nigeria. But they are
liars as well as fools.
However, I think this article you wrote a while ago might well
be what is necessary to show LibberToons why they are justly despised
by most Americans. There are a few who might listen and grow up, if
the consequences of their folly are explained to them.
--Martin Lindstedt
Missouri Reform Party Candidate for U.S. Senate
.
LibberToon NWO Party
by Powerstroke/Al
A READER OF MY WEB PAGE sent me this email which was sent
to him in reply to some questions he had asked about what the
Libertarian Party (LP) stood for from a representative of the LP:
Joseph W. Dehn III. Perhaps in the past you have thought the LP was a
possible alternative to the big two parties. After reading this, if
you are racially conscious at all you will no longer be interested
in the snake oil that they are selling.
When asked if he could clarify his position on immigration he replied:
.
.
When asked about examples of how massive immigration results in a
lower standard of living for native born Americans the reply was:
.
.
When having the fact pointed out that Americans have cut their birth
rate to the zero growth level, and then being asked why should we not
be able reap the benifits in our environement, quaility of schools and
medical care, that a smaller population would allow, Mr. Dehn said:
.
.
When next asked about the children of immigrants who arrive to work
today, and as to what their role would be in the area of jobs and
educational oportunitys, in comparision with the role of the children of
the native Americans here today, the reply was:
.
.
===================
.
Nothing like a cold shot of stupidity to wake you up in the morning eh?
1. LP thinks that the limiting factor, and therefore the only
consideration, as to whether people should be allowed to immigrate to
the US is whether or not they "want to live here."
This is a complete rejection of the idea of country and nation. It is a
complete acceptance of the NWO agenda of destroying all the
national boundaries of the earth. What it does is rob the United States
citizens of their birthright. Just like the communists who nationalize
private property so those who have earned more cannot pass it on to
their children, these socialist minded people think that the blood that
our fathers have shed for us, and the effort, creativity, and pure honest
sweat they invested in our future counts for nothing, and is to be given
to those who are not rightful heirs to this land.
2. LP considers any barriers such as quotas to be "arbitrary."
This is absurd on the face of it. Is a levy along a river bank arbitrary?
Is a fence around your yard arbitrary? How about a fence around a
prison? A desire to protect what is yours is neither arbitrary nor wrong.
The asinine suggestion that you have no right to protect that which is
yours, both individually and nationally, is arbitrary and contrary to all
the United States history. This is a land of capitalism and of the right
to the private ownership of property. That implies, by definition, that
you have the right to defend what is rightfully yours. Our nation is
rightfully ours and therefore we have a right to protect it with quotas
or with guns if necessary!
3. LP feels that citizens have no more right to their own country than
non-citizens.
Again this absurd idea flies in the face of what America was made to
be, and what it has been throughout its history. The LP obviously has
no concern or love for American historical thought. I wonder if Joseph
W. Dehn III would object to a bunch of gypsies camping out in his back
yard? Or perhaps if a drug gang purchased the house next door to his,
and started plying their trade with his kids? I fail to see any difference
between that and what he suggests, except he would be the one suffering
instead of mainstream Americans.
4. LP is completely unconcerned with the rise in crime, the lowering of
security and quality of life for those who are American citizens when
foreigners arrive in large quantities LP's only concern is whether
someone will hire these aliens and rent to them.
People hire and rent to illegals every day. Those illegal aliens clearly
do not raise the standard of living of those around them and they do
not create jobs or educational opportunities for anyone. Instead they
disrupt the community, alter the schools to suit their own needs at the
expense of the folks already attending the schools, and generally run
the entire area down into a lower strata of human existence from
where it was before. LP doesn't care.
5. LP does not consider protection of the jobs, neighborhoods,
security and happiness of the citizens of the United States to be of any
concern of the US government.
Protecting the borders of the US is the primary job of the US
government. Welfare, social security, integration/desegregation,
feminism, and education are not inside the sphere of tasks that were
originally assigned the federal government. Protecting our borders
as and is inside that sphere. LP has no understanding of the
concepts of country, nation, and citizenship. Instead they have a
communistic idea that the whole world is an equal brotherhood, and
personal accomplishment is nothing, and should not be rewarded.
According to LP, all citizens of the world are equal and have equal
rights to all property and opportunity, and a nation of people has no
right to pass the fruits of is own labor down to only its own children. It
must instead, share them with the world. (Boy does this sound familiar!)
6. The LP is so arrogant that it believes that the US should do the
impossible -- set policy for the world, and "limit overall population
growth" -- rather than the easily accomplished -- set policy for the US
to control how foreigners "moving around" from their country into ours.
Here we have the standard liberal ploy. They are always proclaiming
an ideal (see WHY LIBERALISM FAILS ) that is a "utopia" that can
never be in this world -- in this case, zero world population growth --
while using pursuit of that "ideal" as justification for destroying an
important and beautiful part of our way of life. (e.g., The oneness, and
the harmonious meshing, of Americans who were born and raised in
this country, living their lives in their own communities, safely, securely
and happily.) LP throws away the rights of the citizen with a simple
wave of the hand by calling the loss of the control of our borders
merely, "allowing others to move around."
7. The LP is skeptical that zero population growth is a real benefit, and
if any such benefits are real, that US citizens should not reap those
benefits, even though they achieved zero growth.
More of the same. It is a clear indication that LP does not respect the
right to own property or to pass the property down to your heirs.
Instead all people have a right to all things. Karl Marx would love this
organization. Lenin could use it to start up another revolution should he
be alive to do so.
8. The LP sees no real difference in a citizen of the US moving from
one part of the country to another part of the country, and a citizen of
Communist China moving from his country into our country.
Again our country is not our own. It belongs to the world. All that we
have is really the Chinese's as much as it is ours. The Mexicans
should be given Los Angeles, just because the white man built it
doesn't matter. LP thinks that building a country does not create a right
to own the country. I ask again if Mr. Dehn would feel that way about
his own house that he built? Does the bum down on skid row have as
much right to Mr. Dehn's living room as does Mr. Dehn's family? How
about if Mr. Dehn should die? Does his family have any right to inherit
his property, or should it all be given to a nice family from Iraq?
9. The LP refuses to see that in all areas where large scale nonwhite
immigration has occurred, the standard of living has gone down, the
crime rate has gone up and the final result is always negative. There
are no additional jobs, and there are no additional educational
benefits for the native born Americans from immigration.
I would be willing to bet that members of the LP are not willing to move
their families into neighborhoods where foreign born nonwhite families
are the majority. Yet they lie to us all and say that diversity is a
wonderful thing, when they prove by their own actions that they know
better!
They are zeroing in on your country and mine folks. They hate the white
side of America and they are doing all they can to wipe it out. Time is
growing short.
Home: http://www.ilovewhitefolks.com/TOC.html
Originally posted on Mon May 22, 2000 5:29 am
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rpf_2/message/198
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=2240#post2240
Dear Al:
The LibberToons are even more goofy than you figured. Recently,
Harry Brown, the likely presidential nominee of the Libertarian Party
said a number of stupid things concerning the wonderfulness of unrestricted
Mexican immigration. A journalist named Don Feder from the Boston Herald
of course made this LibberToon look ridiculous, with an article called
"Goofy is a Libertarian" or something like that.
I am trying to show LibberToons (my name for them) how ridiculous
and idiotic and corrupt and treasonous they look to normal people.
After all, if LibberToons really believed in the wonders of getting
to live next to Mexicans or Chinese or Africans, then they would
already live in Mexico City or Peking or Lagos Nigeria. But they are
liars as well as fools.
However, I think this article you wrote a while ago might well
be what is necessary to show LibberToons why they are justly despised
by most Americans. There are a few who might listen and grow up, if
the consequences of their folly are explained to them.
--Martin Lindstedt
Missouri Reform Party Candidate for U.S. Senate
.
_+_+_+_+_+_+_+
.LibberToon NWO Party
by Powerstroke/Al
A READER OF MY WEB PAGE sent me this email which was sent
to him in reply to some questions he had asked about what the
Libertarian Party (LP) stood for from a representative of the LP:
Joseph W. Dehn III. Perhaps in the past you have thought the LP was a
possible alternative to the big two parties. After reading this, if
you are racially conscious at all you will no longer be interested
in the snake oil that they are selling.
When asked if he could clarify his position on immigration he replied:
.
Originally posted by Joe Dehan/LibberToon Activist
When asked about examples of how massive immigration results in a
lower standard of living for native born Americans the reply was:
.
Originally posted by Joe Dehan
When having the fact pointed out that Americans have cut their birth
rate to the zero growth level, and then being asked why should we not
be able reap the benifits in our environement, quaility of schools and
medical care, that a smaller population would allow, Mr. Dehn said:
.
Originally posted by Joe Dehan
When next asked about the children of immigrants who arrive to work
today, and as to what their role would be in the area of jobs and
educational oportunitys, in comparision with the role of the children of
the native Americans here today, the reply was:
.
Originally posted by Joe Dehn
===================
.
Nothing like a cold shot of stupidity to wake you up in the morning eh?
1. LP thinks that the limiting factor, and therefore the only
consideration, as to whether people should be allowed to immigrate to
the US is whether or not they "want to live here."
This is a complete rejection of the idea of country and nation. It is a
complete acceptance of the NWO agenda of destroying all the
national boundaries of the earth. What it does is rob the United States
citizens of their birthright. Just like the communists who nationalize
private property so those who have earned more cannot pass it on to
their children, these socialist minded people think that the blood that
our fathers have shed for us, and the effort, creativity, and pure honest
sweat they invested in our future counts for nothing, and is to be given
to those who are not rightful heirs to this land.
2. LP considers any barriers such as quotas to be "arbitrary."
This is absurd on the face of it. Is a levy along a river bank arbitrary?
Is a fence around your yard arbitrary? How about a fence around a
prison? A desire to protect what is yours is neither arbitrary nor wrong.
The asinine suggestion that you have no right to protect that which is
yours, both individually and nationally, is arbitrary and contrary to all
the United States history. This is a land of capitalism and of the right
to the private ownership of property. That implies, by definition, that
you have the right to defend what is rightfully yours. Our nation is
rightfully ours and therefore we have a right to protect it with quotas
or with guns if necessary!
3. LP feels that citizens have no more right to their own country than
non-citizens.
Again this absurd idea flies in the face of what America was made to
be, and what it has been throughout its history. The LP obviously has
no concern or love for American historical thought. I wonder if Joseph
W. Dehn III would object to a bunch of gypsies camping out in his back
yard? Or perhaps if a drug gang purchased the house next door to his,
and started plying their trade with his kids? I fail to see any difference
between that and what he suggests, except he would be the one suffering
instead of mainstream Americans.
4. LP is completely unconcerned with the rise in crime, the lowering of
security and quality of life for those who are American citizens when
foreigners arrive in large quantities LP's only concern is whether
someone will hire these aliens and rent to them.
People hire and rent to illegals every day. Those illegal aliens clearly
do not raise the standard of living of those around them and they do
not create jobs or educational opportunities for anyone. Instead they
disrupt the community, alter the schools to suit their own needs at the
expense of the folks already attending the schools, and generally run
the entire area down into a lower strata of human existence from
where it was before. LP doesn't care.
5. LP does not consider protection of the jobs, neighborhoods,
security and happiness of the citizens of the United States to be of any
concern of the US government.
Protecting the borders of the US is the primary job of the US
government. Welfare, social security, integration/desegregation,
feminism, and education are not inside the sphere of tasks that were
originally assigned the federal government. Protecting our borders
as and is inside that sphere. LP has no understanding of the
concepts of country, nation, and citizenship. Instead they have a
communistic idea that the whole world is an equal brotherhood, and
personal accomplishment is nothing, and should not be rewarded.
According to LP, all citizens of the world are equal and have equal
rights to all property and opportunity, and a nation of people has no
right to pass the fruits of is own labor down to only its own children. It
must instead, share them with the world. (Boy does this sound familiar!)
6. The LP is so arrogant that it believes that the US should do the
impossible -- set policy for the world, and "limit overall population
growth" -- rather than the easily accomplished -- set policy for the US
to control how foreigners "moving around" from their country into ours.
Here we have the standard liberal ploy. They are always proclaiming
an ideal (see WHY LIBERALISM FAILS ) that is a "utopia" that can
never be in this world -- in this case, zero world population growth --
while using pursuit of that "ideal" as justification for destroying an
important and beautiful part of our way of life. (e.g., The oneness, and
the harmonious meshing, of Americans who were born and raised in
this country, living their lives in their own communities, safely, securely
and happily.) LP throws away the rights of the citizen with a simple
wave of the hand by calling the loss of the control of our borders
merely, "allowing others to move around."
7. The LP is skeptical that zero population growth is a real benefit, and
if any such benefits are real, that US citizens should not reap those
benefits, even though they achieved zero growth.
More of the same. It is a clear indication that LP does not respect the
right to own property or to pass the property down to your heirs.
Instead all people have a right to all things. Karl Marx would love this
organization. Lenin could use it to start up another revolution should he
be alive to do so.
8. The LP sees no real difference in a citizen of the US moving from
one part of the country to another part of the country, and a citizen of
Communist China moving from his country into our country.
Again our country is not our own. It belongs to the world. All that we
have is really the Chinese's as much as it is ours. The Mexicans
should be given Los Angeles, just because the white man built it
doesn't matter. LP thinks that building a country does not create a right
to own the country. I ask again if Mr. Dehn would feel that way about
his own house that he built? Does the bum down on skid row have as
much right to Mr. Dehn's living room as does Mr. Dehn's family? How
about if Mr. Dehn should die? Does his family have any right to inherit
his property, or should it all be given to a nice family from Iraq?
9. The LP refuses to see that in all areas where large scale nonwhite
immigration has occurred, the standard of living has gone down, the
crime rate has gone up and the final result is always negative. There
are no additional jobs, and there are no additional educational
benefits for the native born Americans from immigration.
I would be willing to bet that members of the LP are not willing to move
their families into neighborhoods where foreign born nonwhite families
are the majority. Yet they lie to us all and say that diversity is a
wonderful thing, when they prove by their own actions that they know
better!
They are zeroing in on your country and mine folks. They hate the white
side of America and they are doing all they can to wipe it out. Time is
growing short.
Home: http://www.ilovewhitefolks.com/TOC.html
Originally posted on Mon May 22, 2000 5:29 am
Comment