+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 112

Thread: The Show-Trial of TraitorGlenn Miller, Drunken ZOGbot Lumbee Melungeon Rat

  1. #61
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,136

  2. #62
    Meercat #4's Avatar
    Meercat #4 is offline A Meercat, not a Meercunt Veteran Member Meercat #4 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in a hole near jew!!!
    Posts
    252

  3. #63
    Potok's Avatar
    Potok is offline $PLC/ADL jew mamzer Veteran Member Potok has a little shameless behaviour in the past
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    In the Poverty Palace in Montgomery
    Posts
    158

    Default White Supremacists React to Frazier TraitorGlenn Miller guilty verdict

    White Supremacists React to Frazier TraitorGlenn Miller Guilty Verdict


    https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/...guilty-verdict
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...ed=1#post13251
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...ed=1#post13251


    The announcement yesterday that anti-Semite and white supremacist Frazier Glenn Miller was found guilty of shooting three people to death in April 2014 at Jewish facilities in Overland Park, Kan., was met with mixed reaction by the hate movement.

    On the neo-Nazi Vanguard News Network (VNN) forum, where Miller was a frequent poster, support was widespread. “Crowe” wrote: “It looks like Miller is sticking to his guns and not giving the system what it wants - a sniveling apology for being an evilracistnaziwannakill6millionjooz in an effort to appeal for leniency.” Crowe went on to praise Miller for “not showing any weakness.”


    “B. Amy” praised Miller last week for being a “sole human being” standing up to this “genocidal insanity” against whites supposedly perpetrated by Jews.

    Miller’s biggest fan is Alex Linder, who runs VNN. Linder has been acting as a virtual research assistant to Miller, collecting items that supposedly were going to help Miller prove that Jews are out to get whites, and thus that Miller’s murder spree was justified.

    Linder, who has said he’d be willing to testify for Miller, has posted anti-Semitic tidbits from extremists including Pat Buchanan and Ted Pike that he feels would have helped Miller’s defense prove that Jews are the real enemy of whites. Just yesterday, Linder posted an email to Miller’s lawyers asking them if “you could put this bit of research on a disk or drive” in Miller’s hands.

    Linder has staunchly supported Miller’s actions, and as the trial has worn on and Miller’s ability to make his anti-Semitic points has failed, Linder has become more hardline. Last week, Linder, clearly worked up given the state of trial, posted rather ominous plans for his own future plans.

    “On the hard side: organizing against the enemy,” was Linder’s first promise for VNN’s future. He went on to comment that “this is not being done on any substantial scale in the U.S.” and that white nationalists “have not organized because they are being prevented from organizing.”

    “There is another vanguard move to be made in the online world, and VNN will take it. But more on this in a few weeks,” Linder said.

    Other VNN posters have sounded similarly harsh since the verdict. A Canadian using the handle “Michael G.” wrote, “If any of us decide to take the path Glenn has taken do not get taken alive and do not kill yourself.” He went on to say, “The only major mistake this man made was not taking out the systems [sic] soldiers when they came for him. Feel free to disagree, my mind how ever is firm in the actions we must take if we are to ever free ourselves of the fucking jews [sic] and their brainwashed majority.”

    Things were quite different over on the racist forum Stormfront, where little support for Miller was to be found. “Commissioner Ferris” wrote, “By every objective standard, Glenn Miller is an abject failure. His mission failed.”

    “Gilamut” wrote, “By indiscriminately killing 3 random white people to include a 14 yr old boy, he was contributing to White Genocide, wasn't he?,” pointing to the fact that though Miller thought his victims were Jews, they were not. Gilamut went on to say that Miller’s actions would be portrayed as those of “a complete incompetent moron.”

    “Icantguessaname,” labeled Miller “a child killer” as one of his victims was a teenager.

    Other hate sites also seemed to be ignoring the verdict—and Miller. No mention was made of the trial on white nationalist sites such as that of the National Policy Institute, Occidental Dissent or American Renaissance. Perhaps it is understandable that white nationalists, who usually consider the kind of guttural anti-Semitism espoused by Miller and Linder as beneath them, were ignoring Miller. But even the anti-Semitic cesspool The Daily Stormer had no reference to the verdict on its site as of this morning.

    Most surprising of all is that Miller’s longtime friend Will Williams, who heads the National Alliance (NA), has not come to his defense. Not a word about Miller or the verdict has appeared on the NA websites National Vanguard or White Biocentrism.

    In the past, Williams seemed much more interested in Miller’s views and his reasons for killing three people. This past fall, he had apparently tasked Kevin Strom, his media guru, to call Miller in prison and tape his confession. The audio, which was later posted on VNN, is chilling.

    “My biggest fear [was] that I would die before I killed Jews,” Miller tells Strom. After the killings, Miller said he had “never felt such exhilaration. It was overpowering.” The defense played portions of the audio at trial.



  4. #64
    $permFart Meercat 1 is offline One of ten-thousand Junior Member $permFart Meercat 1 is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    3

  5. #65
    $permFart Meercat 1 is offline One of ten-thousand Junior Member $permFart Meercat 1 is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    3

    Default I don't like murderous drunken Lumbee Melungeon ZOGbot rats with dicks

    I don't like murderous drunken Lumbee Melungeon ZOGbot rats with dicks


    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t111.../#post13009198
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3252#post13252
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3252#post13252


    Quote Originally Posted by FeeMamzerMeercat/Kentucky Chomo-Melungeon
    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t111.../#post12998063

    Which part of his life do you want to experience? His sexual relationship with a South Asian that produced a mixed child? His alcoholism? His "war on the Feds" that ended up with him being captured while drunk and wearing urine soaked pants? His ratting on anyone and everyone that he thought the Feds wanted to hear about? His stabbing his two partners in the "war" in the back? His constant begging for money? His clown like running for office that did nothing but make whites look stupid? His inability to raise any children that were not failures? His mission to kill the enemy that ended up killing 3 innocents?

    That is TTGM's story
    .

    I guess in the minds of some people we are just supposed to forget all of that so some people can push the all-white-men-are-innocent-victims-and-should-get-an-excuse-no-matter-what-they-have-done way of thinking that seems to be so common around here.

    Glenn Miller is a worthless piece of crap who has mixed children and killed three white people. Now does that sound like someone that any logical person would defend?

    Glenn Miller and his defenders come across as mentally unhinged. I have no idea why anyone would take either seriously.


    I suck off Milton Munster

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Living in Double-Wide Comfort
    Posts
    6

    Default Rabbi Linder & TraitorGlenn Miller -- ZOGbot jews & mamzers locked in ZOGbot bleeding-assed twat ass-to-mouth financial and moral relationsheep

    Rabbi Linder & TraitorGlenn Miller -- ZOGbot jews & mamzers locked in ZOGbot bleeding-assed twat ass-to-mouth financial and moral relationsheep


    https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t11...5#post13009490
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3253#post13253
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3253#post13253

    Quote Originally Posted by SnowWhiteQueen

    I don't like murderous drunken Lumbee Melungeon ZOGbot rats with dicks


    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t111.../#post13009198
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3252#post13252
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3252#post13252

    Quote Originally Posted by FeeMamzerMeercat/Kentucky Chomo-Melungeon
    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t111.../#post12998063

    Which part of his life do you want to experience? His sexual relationship with a South Asian that produced a mixed child? His alcoholism? His "war on the Feds" that ended up with him being captured while drunk and wearing urine soaked pants? His ratting on anyone and everyone that he thought the Feds wanted to hear about? His stabbing his two partners in the "war" in the back? His constant begging for money? His clown like running for office that did nothing but make whites look stupid? His inability to raise any children that were not failures? His mission to kill the enemy that ended up killing 3 innocents?

    That is TTGM's story
    .

    I guess in the minds of some people we are just supposed to forget all of that so some people can push the all-white-men-are-innocent-victims-and-should-get-an-excuse-no-matter-what-they-have-done way of thinking that seems to be so common around here.

    Glenn Miller is a worthless piece of crap who has mixed children and killed three white people. Now does that sound like someone that any logical person would defend?

    Glenn Miller and his defenders come across as mentally unhinged. I have no idea why anyone would take either seriously.
    .

    Alex Linder has no choice but to support TraitorGlenn Miller, even in the evasive and weaseling way he did so. There could be civil litigation against Linder by the families concerned and Linder won't be able to resist a civil lawsuit. Listening to Linder as a witness on behalf of TraitorGlenn Miller I heard nothing but a sorta trapped chutzpa at work. It is a wonder that Linder didn't get a Crohns attack out of it.

    Ever since 2004, when TraitorGlenn Miller gave financial support to Linder as Miller was trying to get back into the Movement, Linder supported Miller and Miller supported financially Linder. It got so bad that Billy Roper had to pull his v-bulletin license and his server during the "Christmas Coup of 2004." Both the CI and the Order people served notice that the TraitorGlenn Miller cancer had to be cut out.

    Nobody except Linder and a few others who are already marginalized will support TraitorGlenn Miller. The owner of this forum and David Duke and Dr. Kevin McDonald have made it clear that they will not testify favorably for TraitorGlenn Miller.

    The best option is to make it quite clear that TraitorGlenn Miller was working for his federal witness protection handlers in order to use the dead and dying rat for one last provocation. The only other option is to not even mention this vicious mongrel creature as being one of us -- ever. There is some dispute when TraitorGlenn Miller started snitching and ZOGbotting. Before the Greensboro Incident in Nov. 1979. Before "Peaches" or before getting $250,000 in Order loot. Before declaring "War on ZOG" and losing the weaponry of the North Carolina Klan militias. Before snitching at Ft. Smith Sedition Trial. Or snitching over the Selby County jew bookstore killings against those who weren't there.

    I believe since 1976 or 1977 and getting caught passing out Klan fliers and snitching out junior enlisted to get a full twenty years in and retirement.

    Either talk about TraitorGlenn Miller with contempt or don't talk about the drunken Lumbee Melungeon ZOGbot rat at all. There is no slop in anyone's trough for doing otherwise.



    I know more than jew

  7. #67
    Rabbi Alex Linder's Avatar
    Rabbi Alex Linder is offline Gut-Sick kikenweasel With Crohns/jew Ass-GAIDS Veteran Member Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Granny's basement, Kirksville, Missery, 'Kwa
    Posts
    170

    Default I refused to answer on the grounds that I'm a self-loathing jewboy out to give a character reference to a drunken Lumbee Melungeon ZOGbot twat rat.

    I refused to answer on the grounds that I'm a self-loathing jewboy out to give a character reference to a drunken Lumbee Melungeon ZOGbot twat rat.


    http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...17#post1902517
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3254#post13254
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3254#post13254


    Quote Originally Posted by Vargina The Colostomy-Bag Likkin' Meercat

    http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...74#post1902274

    http://fox4kc.com/2015/09/01/cross-s...egins-tuesday/

    Cross then called Alex Linder to the stand, his first witness. Linder said he vouches for Cross' character, calling him "selfless" and "a good man." He said, "Miller [Cross] is a man of my same way of thinking of things." Linder runs a white supremacist website. When prosecutors asked in cross-examination whether Linder supported Cross' murders, Linder paused silently for about ten seconds before responding, "I don't want to answer that."
    http://www.turnto10.com/story/299286...h-site-murders


    Linder, whose time on the stand was interrupted with a string of objections and was threatened with courtroom ejection, said Miller was "a man of my own thinking" and "a good man." But asked on cross-examination whether he condoned Miller's actions, Linder said, "I won't answer."
    That's not what he said at all if you listen to the cross-examination video Jimmy posted above.
    This is why you don't do interviews with the media, because, as here in court, they always cherrypick the most defensive thing you say. It doesn't matter if my real answer was I need an hour to answer it, and that is why I won't answer in the way you want. They just go with whatever makes you look defensive and guilty.

    I can't simply condemn or condone what Miller did. They refuse to give me the time to make a full answer, so I won't (will not) answer the question.



    .

    Ick bin ein gut-sick guido-kikenweasel with Crohns/jew ass-GAIDS.
    Cornholing Forum Caligula [/URL]




  8. #68
    Rabbi Alex Linder's Avatar
    Rabbi Alex Linder is offline Gut-Sick kikenweasel With Crohns/jew Ass-GAIDS Veteran Member Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts Rabbi Alex Linder is infamous around these parts
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Granny's basement, Kirksville, Missery, 'Kwa
    Posts
    170

    Default As a self-loathing cuck jewboy with a bleeding mangina, I'm always willing to testilie for muh bull, TraitorGlenn Miller

    As a self-loathing cuck jewboy with a bleeding mangina, I'm always willing to testilie for muh bull, TraitorGlenn Miller


    http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...17#post1902517
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3262#post13262
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3262#post13262


    [just a brief recounting]

    I went out there and testified yesterday. I was the first witness on Miller's side in the sentencing hearing. The indigent defense team drove me out and back. It's a three-hour ride from where I live in Kirksville to Olathe.

    Miller has a number of witnesses scheduled, including relatives, friends and death-penalty experts. I had thought I was the only one. One irritating thing about this type of stuff is you are basically kept in the dark until stuff is sprung on you. You're not allowed even to listen in to the trial before or after you appear, just sit in soundproof waiting room. That said, Miller's defense team has been extremely helpful, not just to me but to Miller. He effectively has 5-6 professionals helping him for free. I really appreciate their getting me back home same-day.

    I did what I could. This was the first time I did a true testifying, as opposed to some pro-forma technical questions.

    The prosecutor did his level best to make sure he averaged one objection for every three words I uttered, so I did my best to make him appear the buffoon. Miller's technique of simply following his own agenda is all you can really do, though you risk contempt or just being kicked out. As always, what is good for whites guides my actions, and the right way to act here was to verbally hit them harder than they hit me, regardless of what technical court procedure is supposed to be. Never let yourself be pushed off your agenda. Miller has shown how to do this.

    It was just a constant battle, and I grew increasingly angry at the prosecutor for not shutting mouth and letting me answer - anything. He was clearly using this as a technique, which is illegal, and the judge was allowing him. So I had to talk over him. Not to mention I could hardly hear him due to bad hearing. In my opinion, the judge was too lenient with the prosecutor. I mean I start characterizing Miller in answer to his questioning, intending to culminate with 'selfless,' which indeed I did get in at the end of my portion, and he interrupted me with an objection. That was completely invalid yet the judge allowed it and cut Miller off when he tried to reopen it. Just one example.

    I did get one full and complete answer on how the jews jewed America's immigration policy, and that was satisfying. I got a lot of information out there, but not in a natural podcast-like evolutionary flow, because this is immediately objected to as 'narrative' 'evasive' 'irrelevant' whatever adjective they want to throw at it. But I just talked over them and made sure the main points were heard. But the matter of fact is that the jury hears everything you say and takes it into account no matter what the judge says. Of course I try to follow the judge's rules but there are larger considerations too. I instantly disliked the prosecutor on seeing his face. I read him as a fake hard-ass. So I started rolling my eyes at him. I remember Elisha Strom went nearly apoplectic at the idea some cop was rolling her eyes at her - people who are extremely self-important find this extremely insulting. So it worked. He rather childishly said "He's rolling his eyes at the court, your honor!" I said, "No, I'm rolling my eyes at you." I think these people are used to dominating by their position and they don't like it when you act as contemptuous and condescending to them as they do to others.

    Thinking it over, the reason I don't talk the junkmedia comes pretty close to applying to getting involved in this hearing. It was damn close to a show trial from my perspective because they would not let me speak connected words for 90% of it. Just objection after objection. Remember - they have the conviction in their pocket. The issue is decided. This is supposedly the looser phase of the proceeding.

    My purpose in going out there was to help Miller, in a difficult time, because I respect him and his achievements in life in general, and in building the White Patriot Party in particular. I wanted to give context to his actions. I didn't need more than maybe ten minutes to do this. I wasn't given it. I tried to speak to the jury directly and emotionally in an explanatory way. The murder of three people is serious. The explanation for the context has to give that heaviness, called gravitas, due consideration. But it was all objections, with the judge agreeing or not stopping the prosecutor from doing this. I made plenty of points, but it is difficult to sustain an effect when someone else is allowed to interrupt you continually. This was my first rodeo, but I just can't believe that most court proceedings are like this. If the witness is not allowed to testify, why is he here? And I said a version of this at least a couple times.

    My impression of our typically crappy Anglo-Saxon system is that it is incredibly weighted toward the prosecution. It is basically designed so that only the narrowest questions can be asked and answered. No true momentum can be built. No genuine contextual understanding can be advanced. Maybe if sick old Miller and I had eight hours together rather than occasional taped, monitored, interrupted prison calls to plot out some sequence. But even then, the effect is lost when they simply will not give you even FIVE GODDAM MINUTES to lay out Miller's political context. Well, maybe he got it after I went on. I hope he did.

    I tried to make the jury feel the weight of the thing from the OTHER side. I had to make the crudest grossest appeal because of the constraints, looking at them directly and saying "I am not a liar." This appeal 99% of the time is wrong, because you should trust your material (they can figure out if you're not a liar), but when you have zero time, you have to cut to the bottom line, and I'm trying to let them see into me to measure, and just giving them helpful executive summaries of the man they're dealing with. To this end I dressed as nicely as I could, had my hair done, new shoes socks pants, old blazer from my forebears.

    Boy they don't like any direct appeal to the jury, but they need to see within us to draw their conclusions. They need to understand that, as Miller said, his intent is not criminal, it's political. Regardless of the opinion or legal standing of his particular execution.

    The minute I turned to the jury, repeatedly, with any kind of direct emotional appeal, they just flared up. They are absolutely worried about any approach like this. They don't want the jury to get any ideas of a different way of looking at things.

    The jury was hard to read. The layout of the court made things difficult. As in Knoxville, I want the people who are judging what I'm saying to look me in the eyes, because that's where they will learn the truth about whether I'm honest or dishonest, a clown or a serious man. From the witness chair, Miller is off to the far left. Judge to immediate left. Prosecutor straight ahead. Jury off to right. Monitor in front of you. Chair to sit in, which was immensely helpful.

    The courtroom was not full. Behind the lawyers/assistants row, it was probably about half to 2/3 full. I think most of these were journalists, given they're of a type, at least the women. The jury itself seemed to be all white. It was very hard to get a straight look at it. My eyes kept going back to one white man, probably 37-40. He just appeared haunted and horrified, perhaps sick of the whole thing. I did not sense any particular receptiveness or rejection. Definitely had their attention, but no real reaction from any of the jury. But it was very hard to look at them when I had to listen to three other parties, two of whom were continually breaking my flow.

    My view is that Miller has earned our and my loyalty for his lifelong racial efforts, and my testifying was to lend my voice and whatever reputation I have in his support. At the same time the people he shot were at most unwitting dupes in a System they almost certainly did not understand, and their extinguishing cannot simply be waved off as trivial. Therefore, the right answer, which I gave, was that I cannot answer the question simply. Of course the enemy uses this to make me appear defensive and guilty. There's no real way around it in this case other than falsifying my true belief, so I will take the hit as they score the cheap point. As best I can make it out, I did what was good for whites and the movement on the whole.

    Some technical matters for any who might find themselves in similar situations.

    1) I don't know how many even charged and disputatious court testimonies are this interrupted. If this is how it normally works, then there is little point to testifying. But if this is an outlier, due the politics, then my advice to other comes down to: work out the questions you want asked you as a witness as closely as possible before you take the stand. You have to anticipate objections and word your way around them before they are made. Of course, the prosecution can object to anything. But you make it harder for him and easier for the judge to tell him to shut up. That is the main lesson I took from this. I was hoping and was somewhat led to expect that I would have an hour or two to expatiate on the jews, and provide the political context of Miller's actions. Um, no. Flat no. Completely the opposite of open ended this was.

    2) Not all court cases are taped by the courts for documentation. I don't know where I got the idea they were, but this was what I thought. I guess because it's 2015 and videotape seems a pretty easy way to record what happens. But no. This is not the case. The record is purely and only the court stenographer, right in front of you in the witness box, with her body like a pointer dog on your lips.

    3) The media in this case have a pool, with two cameras in the newsroom. I think. It was explained to me that I had the option of telling the media to turn the cameras off, and not take any still pictures or videos. I exercised this option. The media still have access to either or both the audio and the transcript, but can't take pictures or video if the witness denies them. I knew they would only use what made me look bad, defensive, guilty, weak or ugly, so I said no. Also, the key is that this media pool can take whatever pictures it wants - it is NOT a complete record of what happened. Just whatever stills and moving video they decide to record. So it makes sense not to allow them to do anything. I don't know why the court itself doesn't keep a video record. I mean, a damn 7-11 keeps a surveillance video, but maybe it's a matter of costs. I just dont know, but it surprised me. Another thing one doesn't know about beforehand that one hears about in the room before going on. Whenever you can fuck the junkmedia, do it, is my advice.

    4) Dealing with the media. When we got there at 11:30am or so, there were a couple news trucks outside. But no scene or anything, with public or throng of media, as you sometimes see. No cops or anything else. Just an ordinary county courthouse. We walked in, and the courtroom was on the second floor, I think it was. Not a huge room. Not a huge number of people around, but plenty. Guards, various assistants, lawyers. Medium busy. I'd forgotten how sexy professional women look dressed up. Man, I'm a small towner now. Without a car for several years, I was gaping like a country hank at them big bildins' as we drove through Kansas City down to Olathe. I really enjoyed the ride with the defense helpers, Ray and, on the way back, Phil. Learned a bunch about cows and hogs, their slaughtering, people on death row in Kansas (there are nine, and Phil brought up the Carrs, unbidden - clearly the most horrible murder in that state in years). All these people are against the death penalty, but we didnt get into that. My personal impression is the same as with Breivik. When someone does what Miller did and is not taken out back and shot, society is degenerate. It may feel nice to tolerate and explain, but basically it's just a sign that proper respect is missing. This does not mean Miller's politics are wrong. They can be right. But society simply can't tolerate people killing other people (dozens in Breivik's case) and then solicitously providing loads of medical, legal and other help. It's sick. Miller's treatment, which is quite fair, apart from not letting him speak in court, is really symptomatic of the disease he is fighting. We are a society that is not confident enough to make basic judgments.

    I got so mad in that court, apart from wanting to punch the fake-tough-guy prosecutor that I gave them all my drooling retard face, which means I want someone quicker on the uptake to contend with. I want some human reaction from one of these people. It's just that no one wants anything hard. No responsibility. "Above my pay grade." These are just things I'm intuiting from eyes and demeanors and if not the zeitgeist the sitegeist or the hofgeist - the spirit of or in the court. Nothing has any weight. This is where leftism has led us. We know nazis are evil. And racism is bad. But those are our only judgments. And we dont even really know those, we just know it's safest and best to parrot those judgments.

    After testifying I cooled my heels alone back in the witness room, waiting for the driver to show up. Within an hour, he did. We exited the room, adjacent to the courtroom, and entering into it thru different doors. We exited into the hall. Immediately a fat old white man in a red sports jersey with a radio station, I think it was KFAG, asked for an interview. I said no. Then some woman accosted me. A newscunt type. Easily identifiable because of good looks and sexy-classy dress. I said I don't talk to jew-controlled junkmedia. Save for 10k in my hand before we begin. She started babbling about the 10k as I ignored her but she kept chasing. Then we walked back past the metal detector toward the stairs. A point here:

    - I brought a shoulder bag because it looked initially like I would have to stay overnight, indeed they had made a reservation. But I was first witness and really did not want to hang around after testifying. If they would have let me sit in, would be one thing but basically these trials are pretty sealed off. I had brought some scissors and had to dump them. So treat a courtroom the same as an airplane. Don't bring anything sharp you might have to leave behind.

    So as we walked by the metal detector, someone bellowed at me in a cop/prison guard voice. I turned my head, because it was the deep masculine voice of brawny-forearmed authority, and it was saying my name. But no, it was just the red whale radio guy. Using a neat vocal trick... Just a little thing to notice.

    We went down the stairs and out the lobby, soon as we hit the doors, the cameras and reporters descended, exactly like one of those 40s movie scenes. I just kept walking, straight to the car. Not turning or acknowledging them. The newstwat started up some loaded questions to goad a response - what do you have to say about the deaths of three innocent people, so you only talk behind a screen blah blah. As we walked I pulled out a card with a dozen hush-crime victims on it. Which I had scribbled down, as I stated not looking at them (which would indicate respect, always treat them like canaille chasing your feet for crumbs), I said you only care about victims that promote your agenda, and I read off the names of 12 - which Pam Ross and Ian Smith Son had provided recently at vnnforum.com, I read them off loudly as I was walking and said no one cares about the victims of these hush crimes, you liars won't do any reports on them. As we neared the car the 'twat who seemed latina launched one last question about Reat Underwood and the "singing competition" and I said loudly enough for anyone to hear and tape and broadcast that To Kill a Mockingbird is anti-white propaganda meant to groom white girls to be raped blacks. And when that happened, this junkmedia would cover it up. The driver by this time had opened the doors, we got in and left the dogpack in the dust.

    5) Dress. I tend to wear a tweed coat that was my dad's back in the day. It has a couple moth holes in it. So what. It is just slightly too long (past the break in the wrist). But you have to look closely to observe either. If I'm going for odd flashy, I fold the sleeves up. But I didn't today. I went for bonolike large purple sunglasses - when outside. I was going for the Ion Tiriac look and feel, although I am far too slender a fellow truly to emulate him nevertheless, I came in good swooping Tiriac dress mode (without the beard, or manchu which nature didn't gift me). I try to come in above it, and be as condescending as humanly possible to people, rather media, I consider the absolute scum of the earth. I cut my hair myself the day before I went. And shaved as closely as I could. Had some alopecia last couple years, and thank got it has grown back, but it's left my upper lip looking funny, like I didn't shave right. But there's little I can do about this. I am not going to die any beard or hair, that's for damn sure. But I had a nice Ralph Lauren white dress shirt on under the tweed. New shoes, nice socks, new pants. I dressed in order to focus attention on my words. So there would be no way to reject me for appearances. I think that is right way to play it. I never appeal to anybody. I simply try to get them to focus on what I'm saying, not on my person. I should also note, I decided not to wear a tie, in order to indicate a precise degree of disrespect for this court proceeding. A man who was a green beret and master sergeant for 20 years, lied to and set up by his own federal government - he has the right to explain his actions, given his lack of criminal background and honest attempts to work within the law. When you want to treat him right, my full respect for your proceedings will be reflected in my wearing a full formal suit rather than merely a casual-nice.

    6) The right way to conceive these things. It is not about you. Or how you feel about yourself. If you want to feel good about yourself, go jerk off. I you want to feel heroic, go read Superman comics. I can't stand this childishness stupidity of "doing something is better than doing nothing." Doing something unconsidered and unintegrated into a strategy is worse than nothing, unless by accident. It is the message you are bringing that is important. It is your duty to this cause, if you support it, to get past the fear through practice, and to be able to put your message in the form best suited to the particular audience. I honestly don't think a more difficult situation than yesterday is even conceivable, save an overt lynch mob, but it still can be handled to some profit. As the critic said, but few WN pay attention to, WN are too often driven by their own emotional concerns rather than the objective demands of the situation. I keep this in mind and always try to puzzle out the objective demands before entering any particular setting.

    Anyway, that's what happened yesterday from my POV. If you have questions I will answer them. I want to thank Varg and Jimmy Marr (now a moderator, as of perhaps a week ago) for tending the shop while I was out for an unclear length of time.

    As I have said, I am going change VNN's direction in 2016. All of you registered here are fine under the existing terms, but I am going to revise what we're looking for in newcomers in the new year. I will post these changes on Oct. 1.

    [afterthoughts or things i forgot to mention]

    7) Voice. I did 4 hours of podcasts the two days before testifying in order to get my voice in the perfect baritone grainy way. Just another small technical thing that can give you an extra 1-2% edge, particularly with women.

    8) I took two self pictures just for historical reasons (attachments) upon arriving back at the homestead.

    .



    .




    .

    Ick bin ein gut-sick guido-kikenweasel with Crohns/jew ass-GAIDS.
    Cornholing Forum Caligula [/URL]




  9. #69
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Downtown KCMo
    Posts
    26

    Default Assistant DA Chris McMullin cross examines Alex Linder

    Assistant DA Chris McMullin cross examines Alex Linder


    http://www.kansascity.com/incoming/article33226095.html
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3255#post13255
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3255#post13255



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1TcBMOTzOY


    Chris McMullin, assistant district attorney, cross examines Alex Linder, who is a witness for defendant F. Glenn Miller. (POOL VIDEO)


    The Kansas City [Red] Star

    https://www.kansascity.com/


  10. #70
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Downtown KCMo
    Posts
    26

    Default Testimony: F. Glenn Miller Jr.’s son loves his dad but not his hateful beliefs

    Testimony: F. TraitorGlenn Miller Jr.’s son loves his dad but not his hateful beliefs

    BY TONY RIZZO
    trizzo@kcstar.com



    http://www.kansascity.com/incoming/article33226095.html
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3263#post13263
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3263#post13263




    Other family members do not possess the anti-Semitic views that prompted F. Glenn Miller Jr.’s deadly shooting spree outside Jewish facilities last year in Overland Park, the convicted killer’s son testified Wednesday.

    “I don’t know where he learned all the things he learned about hating Jews and about hating other races,” Frazier Glenn Miller III told jurors in the second penalty-phase day of his father’s capital murder trial.

    The Johnson County jury, which already convicted Miller Jr. of capital murder, now is hearing testimony on whether Miller Jr. should be sentenced to life in prison or death for three ambush killings on April 13, 2014.

    Miller III, a 39-year-old truck driver, described his dad as a good father who took care of his family and looked out for other people in need.

    Though they had many political disagreements over the years, Miller III said he still loves his father.

    Later, while speaking to reporters outside the courthouse, Miller III expressed sympathy to relatives of his father’s victims.

    “We prayed for the families,” he said.

    Although his father had espoused hateful beliefs for decades, no family member had any inkling that he was going to kill people over them, Miller III said.

    “I cannot tell you why,” he said. “I’ll never understand the reasons.”

    His father always treated others with respect and tried to help the underdog, he said.

    Miller III struggled with the decision to testify but finally decided to after speaking on the phone with his father Tuesday night.

    “I love my dad; that’s why I’m here,” he said outside the courthouse. “I don’t want to see him die.”

    Miller Jr., who believes Jews too deeply influence American politics and finances, plans to call more witnesses as he tries to convince jurors to spare his life.

    According to trial testimony, a heavily armed Miller drove from his Aurora, Mo., home to Johnson County intent on killing as many Jews as he could while a high school talent competition was taking place at the Jewish Community Center. Instead, he fatally shot three Christians.

    He killed William Corporon, 69, and his grandson Reat Underwood, 14, outside the Jewish Community Center. He killed Terri LaManno, 53, outside the nearby Village Shalom retirement community.

    Prosecutors say that Miller’s “heinous, cruel and atrocious” actions deserve the death penalty.

    Other witnesses Miller called Wednesday included friends who testified about his character.

    Dan Clevenger, the operator of a small engine repair business who previously served as mayor of Marionville, Mo., said he had known Miller for 13 years. He described him as honest and one of his best customers.

    Clevenger also said he shared some of Miller’s political viewpoints but did not condone his actions.

    Geraldine Perry testified that without Miller’s financial help she would have lost her home after her husband died. Although she said she could not comprehend that he was capable of the crimes he committed, she still loves him, she said.

    Miller asked if she wanted to see him executed.

    “The death penalty is wrong for anybody,” she said.

    Earlier Wednesday, before testimony began, Miller asked District Judge Kelly Ryan if he could tell jurors that he had offered to plead guilty to all charges if prosecutors dropped the death penalty.

    Prosecutors refused the plea deal.

    Miller said he wanted to show his willingness to accept responsibility. Prosecutors objected, arguing that Miller could have pleaded guilty at any time without a deal.

    Ryan took the matter under advisement.



    The Kansas City [Red] Star

    https://www.kansascity.com/


+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 12 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts