+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Reo vs Starkist Co 15CV002197

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Filing bogus DMCA cumplaints & Taking Down Web Pages
    Posts
    199

    Default Reo vs Starkist Co 15CV002197

    ___666___666___666___

    Anti-Racist Activist Destroying Internet Free Speech Through Bogus Litigation


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Zimbabwe
    Posts
    321

    Default Nigger-lipped Tuna lover Mamzer from Mentor suing StarKist for allegedly underfilling cans

    Nigger-lipped Tuna lover Mamzer from Mentor suing StarKist for allegedly underfilling cans

    By Tracey Read, The News-Herald
    POSTED: 12/23/15, 4:42 PM EST | UPDATED: ON 12/23/2015



    http://www.news-herald.com/article/H...NEWS/151229818
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3837#post13837
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3837#post13837


    A Mentor man who claims StarKist Co. has fishy business practices is seeking $64,000 in damages.

    Acting as his own attorney, Bryan Anthony Reo filed a lawsuit Dec. 23 in Lake County Common Pleas Court against the Pittsburgh-based company.

    According to the suit, StarKist committed statutory violations of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act by underfilling cans of tuna by about three-tenths of 1 ounce to four-tenths of 1 ounce each and then placing the cans “into the stream of commerce” to be sold to customers.

    During 2013 and 2014, Reo said he bought at least several hundred cans of StarKist chunk light tuna to have an emergency food reserve and because he often eats a can a day.

    Advertisement
    “I like it. It’s low-fat, high protein,” said Reo when contacted by telephone.

    Reo, who is not an attorney, said he still has numerous unopened cans from 2013 and 2014.

    Reo said he is seeking between $200 to $3,000 per can for the 20 cans he can prove were underfilled, and other costs, for a total of $64,000.

    Another man sued the company in 2013 with similar claims. StarKist agreed to settle the case while not admitting fault.

    In the class action case, the company agreed to pay customers who bought at least one can of tuna over the last five years either $25 in cash or $50 in tuna — no receipt necessary, according to Consumerist.com.

    The deadline to join the class action suit was Nov. 20.

    “I decided to opt out of the class action suit and proceed as an individual,” said Reo. “I typically eat three to five cans a week, so $25 wasn’t adequate.”

    Michelle Faist, StarKist’s senior manager of corporate affairs, did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

    The case has been assigned to Judge Richard L. Collins Jr.



    Tracey Read covers the court beat in Cuyahoga, Lake and Geauga counties. Reach the author at tread@news-herald.com or follow Tracey on Twitter: @TraceyReporting.

    Full bio and more articles by Tracey Read

    Numero Uno of Meercats


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts