+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Discussion, Bryan Reo v Lindstedt, Aryan Nations Verdict

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    168

    Default Discussion, Bryan Reo v Lindstedt, Aryan Nations Verdict

    Discussion, Bryan Reo v Lindstedt, Aryan Nations Verdict


    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...9900#post19900
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...9893#post19893
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...9900#post19900


    Looks like there will finally be a trial in Lake County Court as regardless of Bryan Reo's antics this matter will finally heard by a jewry.

    So let's start a new thread what with the new admin post and see what is said.


    .


  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    141

  3. #3
    Fatkike Sock is offline Now that Fatkike has his own show we need me Member Fatkike Sock is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Outside Shitcagoland
    Posts
    69

    Default Fatkike Returns & Finds Out About the Bryan Reo v Pastor Lindstedt, Aryan Nations Case Being Lost (For Now)

    Fatkike Returns & Finds Out About the Bryan Reo v Pastor Lindstedt, Aryan Nations Case Being Lost


    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...9939#post19939
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...9939#post19939
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...9939#post19939


    I had just received the e-mail from the Lake County Judge Patrick Condon about his rulings and was mulling it over when for the first time in over 2 months Fatkike calls me via Skype. The desktop speakers are not plugged in and the mike doesn't work. And Fatkike is being a tard as jewsual.

    However, we get things lined out and I do a shoah with Fatkike as like old times.







  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Granby, State of Missery, ZOG
    Posts
    4,977

    Default Very Good Questions from someone who doesn't know the legal system

    Very Good Questions from someone who doesn't know the legal system


    http://thebeerbarrel.net/threads/bry...7/#post-270903
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...0067#post20067
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...0067#post20067


    Quote Originally Posted by Mandalore, post: 270888, member: 8


    Wtf is this shit about you allegedly having to pay two THOUSAND fucking dollars for a transcript? I'm pretty damn sure its a crime to impair a citizen's access to his own legal records. And was I correct that the lawyer who demanded such a fee is a nigger?
    .

    More than likely I'll indeed have to pay $2,276 for the transcript from Judge Condon's kort secretary. In fact, I'll probably want to do so as founding capital for my Aryan Nations of Missouri sub-corporation Lake County Geldings and Walking Wombs in which I am applying the principles of Biblical Castration as applied to Daniel and its three friends Shadrach, Mesach, & Abednego by Nebuchadnezzar for Hezekiah's curse for showing the Babylonians the riches of Judah and Solomon's Temple 120 years previous, cf. 2 Kings 14-19.

    The correct procedure in how to deal with whigger regime-criminal race-traitors is to force them to bite off they's spawn's nuts and sodomize theys' daughters with a broom handle before giving cutting they's fallopian tubes and forcing then to bear the children of a new Master Race. These nitwits are already fantasizing about "A Handmaid's Tail" well, let their castration anxieties cum true.

    You see, it makes their racial treason unprofitable. When Daniel got his nuts cut and becum a eunuch he served his new master Nebuchadnezzar faithfully and well because Daniel had no other loyalties other than to YHWH. You cut off the regime-criminal ZOGling whigger traitor ass-clowns' spawn's nuts then they have no other choice other than to do what they is told.

    The trial was a cumplete farce. An Africoon sheboon was forced onto the Lake County Lynch Mob jury over my objections by the hibernigger judge Patrick Condon and Plaintiff Bryan Reo / Ol' Niggerlips the Mamzer from Mentor. Look at old posts in the jewlag and you will see how with Daryl Basarab / Kane12345666 they both got Da MamzerBarrell kicked off of HostMamzer.cum back in late 2010. Then Kane12345666 sent me sum Xuqa.com pics of Ol Niggerlips.

    http://www.whitenationalist.org/foru...hey-re-Fooling

    http://www.whitenationalist.org/foru...n-Reo-Pictures

    So me and Ol' Niggerlips have been going at it since 2010. Niggerlips sued me for $10.75 million in federal kort, lost, then sued me in Lake County kort, then Roxie and my Church of Jesus Christ Christian / Aryan Nations of Missouri after it lost in federal kort.

    Reo was on the Board of Directors of the Foundation for the MarketPlace of Ideas / ZOGbot Poverty Flaw Center. At trial it denied knowing Rabbi Baal Finck or being a White Supremacist. I'm going to be suing those Board Members, including the League of the South and the Charlottesville Fuktards. But not Bradifer Griffith / Cunthair Walrus as the pore shithead is my friend even though a bi-polar mattoid.

    Anyways the Ohio Statute of Limitations is one year. The case must be thrown out on appeal. And for lack of jurisdiction as the case against my Church and Roxie was filed in the Mentor Municipal Kort.

    Mentor is the home of James Garfield, 20th so-called President and Union General. They still hate Southern Whites, and were slavering to coonvict upon hearing the name "Aryan Nations". Bryan Reo kicked off all the old White Men, especially an old Serb or Croat who worked for the IBEW at the North Perry Nuclear Power Plant, where Ol Niggerlips got fired when my web page revealed after numerous nuclear accidents that SwordBrethren was a self-loathing non-white White Supremacist.

    I was not allowed to present any evidence and Niggerlips was allowed to cherry-pick from my web page. The trial was a total farce. I deliberately spurred on the Lake County Lynch Mob because I want Southerners to feel proud of lynching Emmitt Till because gliberal whigger Yankees force niggers onto juries to lynch White Men.

    I've never won a single jury trial in my life and I sure wasn't about to start messing up my perfect record on 24-26 June 2019.

    Ol' Niggerlips filed a post-trial pre-appeal Motion for Pre-Trial Interest. I've mailed off a Reply Brief Saturday -- and then got Ol' Niggerlip's Certified Copies of its Brief i9n my mailbox after filing the Motion. Niggerlips is dishonest.

    The purpose of litigation is to lose and in losing to set a precedent for Resistance Military Tribunals processing ZOGling whigger ass-clown traitors and regime-criminals like on a Tyson Foods processing plant. The only way to treat sick diseased sub-animals is worse than they treated White People in theyz' power. After all they cannot claim to have any rights when they have done nothing but run a kangaroo kort of theyz' own, now can they?

    By the way, I'm working on getting the security video of the proceedings in low-fi. I'll be posting it here for jewr amusement if not kicked off again by Puto Seattlekike. As I recollect it was a hoot. Bryan Reo is the most vicious golem that I have ever fought, worse even than TraitorGlenn Miller.

    Hail Victory !!!

    Pastor Martin Luther Dzerzhinsky Lindstedt
    Church of Jesus Christ Christian / Aryan Nations of Missouri




  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,008

    Default Federal judge tosses March for Life attendee's $25M defamation lawsuit against Washington Post

    Federal judge tosses March for Life attendee's $25M defamation lawsuit against Washington Post

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times
    - Friday, July 26, 2019



    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...m-defamation-/
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...0088#post20088
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...0088#post20088


    .

    A federal judge dismissed Friday the $25 million defamation lawsuit filed against the Washington Post by Kentucky teen Nicholas Sandmann over the newspaper’s coverage of his viral encounter with an elderly Native American activist at the Lincoln Memorial.

    Senior U.S. District Court Judge William O. Bertelsman found that activist Nathan Phillips may have been wrong when he said he was “blocked” by the teen and not allowed to “retreat,” but that such statements represented opinion protected by the First Amendment.

    “And The Post is not liable for publishing these opinions, for the reasons discussed in this Opinion,” said the 36-page ruling.

    The judge examined seven articles and three tweets covering the Jan. 18 incident following the March for Life and the Indigenous Peoples March, which occurred on the same day.

    “Accordingly, Sandmann cannot maintain a claim based on any of the Post’s publications, and the Court will dismiss the Complaint in its entirety,” said Judge Bertelsman of the Eastern District of Kentucky.

    Attorneys for Nicholas Sandmann and his parents sued the Post for $25 million, accusing the newspaper of defaming the teen by suggesting he instigated the confrontation and participated in “racist taunts” against the elderly man, fueling a social-media uproar.

    The Sandmanns have also filed $275 million lawsuits against CNN, which the cable network has sought to dismiss, and NBC/MSNBC.

    Attorneys for the Sandmanns, L. Lin Wood of Atlanta and Todd V. McMurtry of Fort Mitchell, Kentucky, said they planned to appeal the decision.

    “The law must protect innocent minors targeted by journalists,” said Mr. McMurtry in a statement.

    Ted Sandmann, the father of the student at Covington Catholic High School in Covington, Kentucky, said, “I believe fighting for justice for my son and family is of vital national importance.”

    “If what was done to Nicholas is not legally actionable, then no one is safe,” Mr. Sandmann said.

    Shani George, Post communications director, said the newspaper was “pleased” by the decision.

    “From our first story on this incident to our last, we sought to report fairly and accurately the facts that could be established from available evidence, the perspectives of all of the participants, and the comments of the responsible church and school officials,” she said in an email. “We are pleased that the case has been dismissed.”

    In its motion to dismiss filed in April, the Post denied having an “anti-Trump bias,” as alleged by the Sandmanns, arguing that the newspaper had given front-page coverage to the teen’s version of events and that, “Politics has nothing to do with this case.”

    Defamation lawsuits against media outlets are notoriously difficult to win, but Mr. Wood said there were “many strong appellate issues” that could resurrect the case.

    “We look forward to having an appellate court take a fresh look at the issues in this important case,” said Mr. Wood.

    The lawsuit asked for $250 million in damages, with attorneys noting that it was the amount paid by Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos to buy the Post in 2013.


    ____________________________
    I am The Librarian
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/
    http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/forum/

  6. #6
    Bryan Reo's Avatar
    Bryan Reo is offline Satanic Mongrel Abomination Veteran Member Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    The Mamzer from Mentor Ohio
    Posts
    215

    Default How about because I'm a crazed schidzo-paranoid homophiliac Satannic mongrel shyster working for ZOG formerly pretending to be a White Supremacist?

    How about because I'm a crazed schidzo-paranoid homophiliac Satannic mongrel shyster working for ZOG formerly pretending to be a White Supremacist for $6,666,666.66 Alex?

    What are good explanations for having a firearm inside your car?



    https://www.quora.com/What-are-good-...an-Anthony-Reo
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...0271#post20271
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...0271#post20271


    I keep an AR-15 in my truck.

    Why?

    I have won a number of cases against high profile, less than stellar, less than savory, defendants.

    Aryan Nations/Sovereign Citizens, they have an open contract on me.

    Mafia affiliated loan-shark front companies/cash advance lenders [with thinly veiled ties to organized crime].

    So yes, I keep multiple pistols and an accessible AR-15 in my truck.

    In case some coward Aryan who has contented himself to harass my wife and threaten my father finally decides to come at me, in which case he better come heavy and loaded for bear.
    .

    Bryan Anthony Reo, Ohio Attorney
    Answered Thu 29 Aug 2019



    ___666___666___666___


    This profile of a limited-purpose public figure Attorney Bryan Reo is definitely NOT authorized by Bryan Reo, but is meant to keep the public informed as to what this delusional deranged Satanic Mongrel Abomination is up to in pretending to be a genuine White Supremacist.

    Under NO Circumstances is anyone who hears my voice to harm or molest or have anything to do with Bryan Reo or anyone who will have anything to do with Bryan Reo.
    Stay away from Bryan Reo.

    Hail Victory !!!
    Pastor Martin Lindstedt, Church of Jesus Christ Christian / Aryan Nations of Missouri


  7. #7
    Bryan Reo's Avatar
    Bryan Reo is offline Satanic Mongrel Abomination Veteran Member Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    The Mamzer from Mentor Ohio
    Posts
    215

    Default When you are a crazed mongrel antifa ZOGbot pretending to be a non-white White Supremacist some crooked local county kort will give you your enemy's p

    When you are a crazed mongrel antifa ZOGbot pretending to be a non-white White Supremacist some crooked local county kort will give you your enemy's property

    How do you legally prove libel?


    Bryan Anthony Reo
    , Ohio Attorney
    Answered Sun, 1 Sept 2019



    https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-legally-prove-libel
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...0279#post20279
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...0279#post20279


    Not all jurisdictions have libel per se as a cause of action.

    We would first have to differentiate if we are discussing libel per quod or libel per se. Per quod requires a demonstration of damages [damages is an element of the cause of action], per se does not require a showing of damages because damages are presumed.

    Libel in a civil case in Ohio is proven on a preponderance of the evidence standard, meaning “more probable than not” or “more likely than not.”

    Some basic notes I had from preparing jury instructions in a recent defamation case [won after a 3 day jury trial].

    Libel—Definition

    Libel is a statement *(of fact) which is false in some material respect and is communicated to a third person by [ printing / writing / signs / pictures ] and has a tendency to harm a person’s reputation.

    Slander—Definition

    Slander is a statement *(of fact) which is false in some material respect and is communicated to a third person by [ words / gestures ] and has a tendency to harm a person’s reputation.

    Libel, Slander—Statement of and Concerning the Plaintiff

    The statement must have been of and concerning the plaintiff.

    Libel, Slander—Meaning of a Statement

    The meaning of a statement is that meaning which, under the circumstances, a reasonable person who [ hears / sees ] the statement reasonably understands to be the meaning intended.

    Libel, Slander—Burden of Proof

    Plaintiff has the burden of proving that

    (a) defendant made the statement *(of fact) complained of to a third person by

    [ printing / writing / signs / pictures / words / gestures ], and

    (b) †(the statement was of and concerning the plaintiff, and)

    (c) the statement was false in some material respect, and the statement had a

    tendency to harm the plaintiff’s reputation, and

    (d) ‡(as a result of the statement, the plaintiff suffered some damage)

    Your verdict will be for the plaintiff if you decide that all of these have been proved.

    Your verdict will be for the defendant if you decide that any one of these has not been proved.

    Libel or Slander of Private Person—Nonprivileged Communication

    The plaintiff has the burden of proving that the defendant was negligent in making the statement.

    When I use the word “negligent,” I mean the failure to do something which a reasonably careful *person would do, or the doing of something which a reasonably careful *person would not do, under the circumstances that you find existed in this case. It is for you to decide what a reasonably careful *person would do or would not do under such circumstances.


    .

    ___666___666___666___


    This profile of a limited-purpose public figure Attorney Bryan Reo is definitely NOT authorized by Bryan Reo, but is meant to keep the public informed as to what this delusional deranged Satanic Mongrel Abomination is up to in pretending to be a genuine White Supremacist.

    Under NO Circumstances is anyone who hears my voice to harm or molest or have anything to do with Bryan Reo or anyone who will have anything to do with Bryan Reo.
    Stay away from Bryan Reo.

    Hail Victory !!!
    Pastor Martin Lindstedt, Church of Jesus Christ Christian / Aryan Nations of Missouri


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Zimbabwe
    Posts
    323

    Default A Reasonable ZOGling: How do you legally prove libel?

    A Reasonable ZOGling: How do you legally prove libel?


    https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-leg.../John-Devlin-4
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...0282#post20282
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...0282#post20282


    The answer will vary from place to place.

    Where I’m from, to prove libel, you have to prove:

    There’s a defamatory factual statement about you (statements of opinion don’t count; just statements of fact) that exists in a permanent form (usually writing). If it’s not in a permanent form, your cause of action is for slander, not libel.

    The defendant published the statement to at least one person other than you.

    A statement is “defamatory” if it would harm your standing in the community — in other words, if it would cause a reasonable person to think less of you.

    Even if the Plaintiff proves 1 & 2 above, the action will be dismissed if the Defendant can establish a defence. Defences include:

    The statement was true.

    The statement was privileged (eg. it was made in a court document or on the floor of the legislature)

    The statement was “fair comment” (i.e. the statement concerned a matter of public interest, was reasonable and based on provable facts, and was made without malice)

    The United States tends to be extra strict about this due to the First Amendment. A statement concerning a public figure or a matter of public interest is, in the United States, practically inviolate. That’s why Alex Jones is probably going to get away with publicly lying about Sandy Hook victims.


    John Devlin
    Answered Sun, 1 Sept 2019



    Numero Uno of Meercats


  9. #9
    Bryan Reo's Avatar
    Bryan Reo is offline Satanic Mongrel Abomination Veteran Member Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    The Mamzer from Mentor Ohio
    Posts
    215

    Default This paranoid psychotic mamzer just knows Pope Marty always has His Eye on This Satanic Mongrel Abomination's Niggerlipped Mangina, cum-cum, cum-cum

    This paranoid psychotic mamzer just knows Pope Marty always has His Eye on This Satanic Mongrel Abomination's Niggerlipped Mangina, cum-cum, cum-cum !!!

    What do you think your worst enemy is doing right now?



    https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-th...oing-right-now
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...0309#post20309
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...0309#post20309


    He is searching through all of my Quora answers and then posting them on his website with his own commentary, he is defaming my wife and my father, and he is filing frivolous motions in various cases telling the judges that they have no jurisdiction over him and he is accusing them of being corrupt and crooked.

    That isn’t what I think he is doing, that is what I know he is doing because he is posting about it on his website and some of my affiliates, clients, colleagues, and friends are telling me about it.

    Considering I have a lien on his house in excess of $100,000 he should be getting ready for the sheriff sale of his house instead of searching over my Quora answers. You can’t sovereign citizen your way out of a sheriff’s sale.

    Bryan Anthony Reo, Ohio Attorney
    Answered Aug 28 2019



    .

    ___666___666___666___


    This profile of a limited-purpose public figure Attorney Bryan Reo is definitely NOT authorized by Bryan Reo, but is meant to keep the public informed as to what this delusional deranged Satanic Mongrel Abomination is up to in pretending to be a genuine White Supremacist.

    Under NO Circumstances is anyone who hears my voice to harm or molest or have anything to do with Bryan Reo or anyone who will have anything to do with Bryan Reo.
    Stay away from Bryan Reo.

    Hail Victory !!!
    Pastor Martin Lindstedt, Church of Jesus Christ Christian / Aryan Nations of Missouri


  10. #10
    Bryan Reo's Avatar
    Bryan Reo is offline Satanic Mongrel Abomination Veteran Member Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts Bryan Reo is infamous around these parts
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    The Mamzer from Mentor Ohio
    Posts
    215

    Default I'm all for "haet speech" unless it is by Pope Marty and the Aryan Nations of Missouri against me, Bryan Reo / Ol' Niggerlips Esquirrel

    I'm all for "haet speech" unless it is by Pope Marty and the Aryan Nations of Missouri against me, Bryan Reo / Ol' Niggerlips Esquirrel the ZOGbot Mamzer From Mentor

    Should the U.S. get rid/ban hate speech just like Canada and Germany did?



    https://www.quora.com/Should-the-U-S...nd-Germany-did
    http://christian-identity.net/forum/...0339#post20339
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...0339#post20339


    Nobody can define or agree on what constitutes hate speech. What if I decide your questions are hate speech, what then.

    Hate speech is a nebulous concept and those seeking to ban it are generally hostile to free speech and want the ability to stifle and silence their political and personal enemies under the guise of enforcing good manners and politeness.

    I would rather have a society where a handful of losers can openly call for genocide, receive wide rejection and condemnation by the majority of the public who recognize what they hear as trash, and everybody moves on, as opposed to a society where a politician cannot articulate opposition to the adopting of sharia law without fear of being indicted on speech law charges.

    The denizens promoting hate speech statutes generally demonstrate a willingness and a desire to use such provisions to stifle debate on cultural issues, foreign policy, border security, etc.

    As it is now in the USA they are limited to smearing their opposition as “racist” while with actual hate speech laws they can set themselves up as commissars of political correctness and indict those they want instead of just socially smearing them as “racist.”

    Hate speech laws would give them the power to judicially and formally use the law to silence those with whom they disagree.

    We live in an era where a Vietnam Veteran with an Asian wife wearing a MAGA hat can be attacked as “racist” or a Latin woman with her Anglo husband can be attacked as “racist” by members of antifa for being at a Trump rally. I am not about to support giving anybody, let alone the authoritarian left, the ability to decide what constitutes permissible speech and what is hateful.

    It is, from my view, a naked power grab on their part.


    Bryan Anthony Reo, Ohio Attorney
    Answered 3:00pm 15 Sept 2019


    .


    .

    .


    ___666___666___666___


    This profile of a limited-purpose public figure Attorney Bryan Reo is definitely NOT authorized by Bryan Reo, but is meant to keep the public informed as to what this delusional deranged Satanic Mongrel Abomination is up to in pretending to be a genuine White Supremacist.

    Under NO Circumstances is anyone who hears my voice to harm or molest or have anything to do with Bryan Reo or anyone who will have anything to do with Bryan Reo.
    Stay away from Bryan Reo.

    Hail Victory !!!
    Pastor Martin Lindstedt, Church of Jesus Christ Christian / Aryan Nations of Missouri


+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts