Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A mirror of theblog.christogenea.org

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A mirror of theblog.christogenea.org

    Misogeny is "hatred of race"
    6/24/08 (rewritten & revised 10/06/08):

    There are only two possible options: one is either racial, or one is genocidal. The racist seeks to preserve the genetic heritage, the nature and the culture of his own race. The opposite is the misogenist (not to be confused with misogynist), which is one who hates his race, because miscegeny ? the mixing of the races ? is a cause of genocide, and is a destroyer of all races. Genesis chapter eleven, where even one race ? the Adamic or White ? was separated into separate nations by Yahweh their God, along with Deuteronomy 32:4 and Acts 17:26, demonstrate the fact that racial and national separatism is defined and mandated by Yahweh God. Therefore, multiculturalism is rebellion against Yahweh God. The Tower of Babel event, although only the White race which descended from Noah was involved, is nevertheless representative of a model of multi- culturalism. Babel, from which we also have the name Babylon, is a Hebrew word which means confusion.
    Last edited by wmfinck; 06-25-2009, 06:25 PM.
    sigpic

    "Stain clear water with mud and thou shalt never find sweet drink" - Aeschylus, Eumenides, 694-695

    http://christogenea.org
    http://williamfinck.net

  • #2
    White Liberal Misogeny and the agenda of non-Whites

    White Liberal Misogeny and the agenda of non-Whites
    6/25/08:

    The White liberal is a misogenist: he must hate his race, because he insists that it should be mixed with the non-White races. Therefore, the White liberal is a cancer cell in the body of the White race, and every mongrelized family is a malignant tumor. If the average White liberal (usually a simple-minded follower of ideas which are perceived to be lofty, just, and good, but in reality are purely evil) could know what is really in the mind of the average negro or ladino, chances are that he may very well rethink his support of multiculturalism and diversity, unless, of course, he truly does relish the idea of the destruction of the White race. When the White liberal hears the slogan “social justice”, it very often invokes thoughts such as those represented by the slogans of the wicked French revolutionaries, such as “Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite”, and the supposed “universal brotherhood of man”, or that idea - always taken out of context - that somehow “all men are created equal”, which was expressed in the American Declaration of Independence.

    Yet what the White liberal does not realize – even though it is glaringly evident in negro art and literature – is that when the average negro hears the term “social justice”, he thinks of something quite different. To the negro, this term means the enslavement of the White man, the absconding of all property, and the enthronement of the negro. Every negro becomes a plantation owner, and every White man a slave. Every negro would have a stable of White women to abuse, and there would be no more White children. This – to the negro – is heaven and redemption and “social justice”. It is also the common rhetoric of negro religions such as Rastafarianism, the Nation of Islam, and black so-called Christian “Liberation Theology” (as if there could possibly ever be black Christians), which is popular and prominent in so many black churches today. This negro mindset is justified as retribution for the perceived sins of the practice of slavery which is attributed by the negro to all Whites, even though only a very small percentage of Whites had ever engaged in slavery. And in spite of the fact that a much greater number of Whites labored and suffered to end slavery, without any appreciation from the descendants of the slaves, who would rather conquer them instead of expressing any form of gratitude.

    Again, what the White liberal does not realize – even though it is glaringly evident in ladino art and literature – is that when the average ladino (often they are misnamed “latino”) hears the term “social justice”, once he is taught to understand the words, he also thinks of something quite different than the White liberal understands the phrase. To the ladino, “social justice” is the driving off or the destruction of the White man from their perceived “Aztecland”, which includes much of Central and North America and which will eventually be redefined to include the entire North American continent, if not the hemisphere, as soon as their numbers embolden them to do so .. This driving off of the White man from the land includes the pillaging of White property, the raping and pillaging of White women, the destruction of White culture and society, and the return to the heathens’ own lawless, violent tribalism and animalistic practices.

    Furthermore, the White liberal, not wanting to ever even appear to be discriminatory or racist, ignores the glaringly evident fact that negroes and ladinos are responsible for nearly all of the violent crime in America today. While most White people customarily live by the rule of law, and while there is very little real crime in all-White communities, in all of the places where there are prominent populations of negroes and ladinos crime is rampant, and especially violent crime. Negroes and ladinos cannot live by the rule of law and, in fact, White law is contrary to the spirits of the non-White races. They can only be made to live by White law under threat of force, which they comply with only so long as they are in the minority.

    The White liberal media brushes aside the rantings – and the more sober and serious designs – of racist negro and ladino groups with the excuse that such desires belong to only a small, extremist, percentage of negroes or ladinos. Therefore, the stated goals of groups such as La Raza, the Nation of Islam, Wahabist muslims, liberation theologians, etc. are virtually unknown among the general White population. Therefore, Whites are deceived into accepting, or even embracing, the very people who actively espouse the destruction of White society and Christian civilization, and the subjugation and eventual elimination of the White race. The policies of the negro and ladino groups are by no means secret, and are held by a much broader population among negroes and ladinos than the White liberal media would ever reveal, or even acknowledge. In addition to negroes and ladinos, islamic arab groups are also infiltrating the Western Christian nations in large numbers, and seek to overthrow Christian civilization. While they pretend to be peace-loving, they only buy the time, until they can perceive an opportunity when White society is sufficiently weak, and their own numbers sufficiently large enough to assert their religious precepts and culture as an alternative, and then a replacement, for that of their host nations. That this is their plan is already evident in France and Britain today, and has also been manifested in places here in America. Arabs do not immigrate into Western nations in order to assimilate, something which would be just as destructive of the White race anyway. Rather, arab immigrants into Western nations are in fact the vanguard of a renewed attempt to subjugate and islamize the West and Christendom. As recently as the 1680’s, the islamic armies of the Turks had Vienna under siege, attempting to subjugate and islamize Europe. Today, they are allowed to enter freely and do as they wish. Where are the modern day Charles Martels of the world?

    The role of the jew in all of this cannot be ignored. The jew was the first infiltrator and subverter of Christendom. Not being wholly White in blood, but rather having descended from the mixed-race Canaanite and Edomite tribes of the Old Testament, the jew has taken full advantage of his near-White appearance and usurped and perverted religion in order to work towards the destruction of Christianity and the demise of the true White Adamic race. The jew was the first proponent of secularism, or secular humanism, and after that the jew was found at the leadership of all so-called “civil rights” movements: the jew founded the NAACP, led the integrationist movement, the open-borders and immigration “reform” movements, and all other movements which help to destroy White nationalism. Globalism is the mantra of jewish capitalism. The jew was also the catalyst of most of the civil wars of Europe, and the two great “World” wars, effecting the destruction of the White nations. The jewish-controlled media is even adept at creating strife where there is none, for example with the so-called “war between the sexes” which was at the political forefront in the 1970’s, and the trumpeting of “feminists” – mostly jews themselves- and their perverted agenda, at the expense of Western culture. Then it was feminism and the Equal Rights Amendment, and now it is sexual deviancy and so-called “Gay Marriage”, another jewish conception that can’t possibly exist in reality. Today, and since the early 20th century, the jew has been in full control of the media outlets throughout Western society. All so-called “news” is filtered and propagated by the will of the jew. This may sound incredible, but the jewish ownership and/or executive control of the media outlets of the West is easily and fully verifiable.
    Last edited by wmfinck; 06-25-2009, 06:29 PM.
    sigpic

    "Stain clear water with mud and thou shalt never find sweet drink" - Aeschylus, Eumenides, 694-695

    http://christogenea.org
    http://williamfinck.net

    Comment


    • #3
      Notes on the mongrelization of nations

      Notes on the mongrelization of nations

      Originally written 6/29/08, revised 10/06/08, minor revisions 1/15/09:
      For the reasons opined here in previous posts – even without discussing the perils of miscegenation – it can clearly be countenanced that the racist nation is the nation which endures, and a non-racist nation cannot possibly continue in its traditions and cultural institutions without falling into intermittent states of chaos, strife, and poverty: its culture eventually decaying into a shadow, even a remnant, of its former grandeur.

      No mongrel nation ever rose to a position of renown and scientific and cultural achievement in the world. The non-White empires of history, the Mongols, Arabs, and Turks, have all been causes of destruction rather than of creation. Of course, there were advances in some of the civilized disciplines in the early centuries of the islamic arab empire, yet those advances came on the shoulders of the vestiges of Byzantine Greek civilization which the arab empire replaced, and were not the original work of arabs themselves. Even some early arab writers admit that they had studied the Greek books which they fell onto, from which they acquired the sciences. The only achievements of the arab nations today are made possible by Western engineering and Western oil money. (The arab, oriental, ladino and negro races would not even use oil if it were not for the inventions of the White man which have unlocked its capability.) Every great White nation which became an empire (and therefore “multicultural”), from the Cushite Empire of Nimrod (the first Babylonian Empire), to Egypt, Assyria, Media, Persia, Greece, and Rome, all decayed with miscegenation, leaving a mongrelized sewer in place of the great nation which founded the empire in the first place. Today Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Greece and even Italy are all, to one degree or another, among the poorest, most backwards of nations, although at one time each was the greatest of nations. Only racially pure nations perpetuate their cultures and civilizations. Mongrel nations cannot possibly succeed, being full of disparate spirits and naturally full of strife and hostility.
      Last edited by wmfinck; 06-25-2009, 06:31 PM.
      sigpic

      "Stain clear water with mud and thou shalt never find sweet drink" - Aeschylus, Eumenides, 694-695

      http://christogenea.org
      http://williamfinck.net

      Comment


      • #4
        Fascism vs. Capitalism

        Fascism vs. Capitalism
        6/29/08 (rewritten & revised 10/06/08, 1/15/09):

        Fascism is not the ideal political system for Christians, however it is a far better system than the two alternatives which the popular social theorists and the princes of this world offer to us today: Socialism (Marxism) or Capitalism (maybe it should be called Rothschildism).

        In the capitalist system, capital is invested in an enterprise, which then functions solely for the advantage of the ?owner?, or shareholder, in a way that stresses the maximization of profits at the expense of all else. The only legal responsibility of any corporation is to work for the enrichment of the shareholder ? aside from the restrictions which the government places upon it, such as tax laws and agency compliance.

        In the fascist system, capital may indeed profit the owner, or shareholder, yet the State ensures that the capital is invested and functions in such a way that the nation as a whole benefits, or at least that the interests of the nation are safeguarded. In many ways, even the United States has adopted a sort of fascism, albeit a pharisaical sort, through the burdensome regulations of its many agencies. Yet these do not protect the interests of the nation in the same manner or to the extent that the fascist system would.

        In the capitalist system, intellectual property is regarded as belonging to the shareholders, who may withhold or dispose of it at their own pleasure. The fascist system recognizes that intellectual property, i.e. innovations and inventions, are created by members of a community, and that the community, not the corporation, creates the environment and those individuals working within that environment who make such innovations and inventions possible. Therefore, intellectual property belongs to the culture and nation as much as it belongs to the individual member who created it, or the corporation which funded the development process, and fascism safeguards the interests of both. (For the development process can only be successful if ventured in a community of people who have the ability, interests and culture to foster such development.) The fascist system would therefore not allow that the technology and manufacturing ability and sciences of a nation be freely turned over to the enemies of that nation, as we have witnessed to actually have happened to the west ? and particularly to the United States ? under the capitalist system today.

        The capitalist system is the ideal system for the jew, since he may invest the fruits of his usury as he pleases with no care at all for the host nation. For the jew ? himself being stateless ? has no care for any nation. No matter what nation the jew is inhabiting, it is alien to him, and he cares only to rape it of its resources and riches, and make the most profit from them. Capitalism, under the guise of ?democracy?, is the system which the jew has developed in order to accomplish this pillage, and is especially ideal for this purpose since it operates while the people of the host nation imagine themselves to be ?free?, while in reality their masters, the international bankers and merchants who alone create the capitalist system?s ?money?, have them fully enslaved. This is why fascism is given such a bad name by the jew-controlled press, for the fascist system is wholly adverse to the interests of the jew.

        The rise of fascism in Germany, Italy, Spain and elsewhere in the early 20th century was a reaction to the injustices of capitalism, and the jew-controlled media in Britain and America responded sharply in adversity to it. The first ?World War? was fought so that the jewish central banking system could ensure its control over western civilization, in conjunction with the jewish-controlled and financed Bolshevik revolution in Russia. The second ?World War? was fought to protect that system from fascism, and to ensure that Christendom would remain enslaved to the jewish bankers.

        Today?s ?liberalism? in America is ? even as a certain jew recently proposed in a popular book ? a veiled and perverted sort of fascism. However in today?s circumstances, fascism cannot truly serve the nation, because the nation has already become an empire. An empire, by proper definition, is a single central government which rules over multiple disparate ethnic groups, or races. In an empire, the various ethnic groups will forever be hostile to one another, and seek to take advantage of one another. For fascism to be truly effective ? as it certainly was in Herr Hitler?s Germany ? it must be an ethnic, national fascism: it must be racist, a nation by proper and natural definition being an ethnically homogenous entity. As no man can serve two masters, neither can any government serve multiple disparate peoples who naturally have conflicting interests. For as the American Declaration of Independence correctly acknowledges, governments govern rightfully only with the consent of the governed, and not by disaffecting large portions of the governed, something which is inevitable in an empire. Only a tyranny can hold together an empire, as history has demonstrated consistently throughout the ages. Today?s liberalism is rather Marxism in disguise. It offers handouts to those who produce little or nothing, at the expense of those who work and who are successful through that work. Hitler?s fascism was adverse to handouts (i.e. Mein Kampf, vol. 1 chap. 2), as is Christianity (i.e. 2 Thes. 3:10). It also insists upon the dissolution of racial and cultural barriers, foolishly esteeming that all cultures are somehow equal, and that culture and language are merely choices, personal preferences, akin to brands of consumer goods at a market. Therefore, and in many more respects than this example, today?s liberalism is adverse to both Hitler?s National Socialism, which was an ethnic nationalism, and to Christianity, which also insists upon the maintenance of ethnic barriers (i.e. Acts 17:26).

        Today?s ?liberalism?, a thinly veiled form of Marxist communism, is evil. It redistributes the wealth of a nation not only to those of other races, who are often hostile to the benefactor nation, but also regardless of the moral condition of the recipients. Therefore the host nation?s members, ideally an ethnically homogenous, upright and moral people, are forced to support both those of other races as parasites, and also those of low moral character such as homosexuals, substance abusers, and others, regardless of their race. That the people of substance in such a nation infected by this ?liberalism? is indeed ?an ethnically homogenous, upright and moral people? can be taken for granted is evident, because no disparate, mongrel people, and no immoral, base race has ever risen to a position where it could be so magnanimous in the first place. Yet Christianity excludes sinners (i.e. I Cor. 5:1-13), and is ethnically homogenous (i.e. Matt. 15:24, 25:32; Acts 17:26). Christian community is also voluntary (i.e. 2 Cor. 8:1 ff.). State-enforced redistribution of wealth is stealing, plainly and simply, and ?thou shalt not steal?.
        sigpic

        "Stain clear water with mud and thou shalt never find sweet drink" - Aeschylus, Eumenides, 694-695

        http://christogenea.org
        http://williamfinck.net

        Comment


        • #5
          Worshipping the Image of the Beast

          Worshipping the Image of the Beast
          January 27th, 2009
          The Bible tells us that Yahweh (simply ?God? to most people) created Adam. The creation of Adam is first described in Genesis 1:26-27. The word translated ?man? in this passage is indeed the same word, and refers to the same being, described in more detail in the next part of Genesis, which begins at 2:4. Many years ago these were separate scrolls and separate accounts ? albeit about much the same thing ? later consolidated into a single ?book? by men. The third part of Genesis begins at 5:1, and in another way the story of the creation of ?adam? man is again related. It turns out, however, that the Hebrew meaning of ?adam? isn?t quite the same as the modern meaning of the word ?man?, which nowadays is basically used to describe any full-grown male anthropoid. In fact, ?adam? signifies only those full-grown anthropoids of which the blood can be seen through the skin. This condition is called ruddiness, and is peculiar to the (true) White race. This is also evident further on in the Bible, to anyone who actually knows history. A thorough examination of the families of Genesis chapter 10 reveals that many of these nations can be identified in history and archaeology, and that they were all originally White nations. Many of them eventually became ?arab? (a Hebrew word which means ?mixed?), or even negroid, through a process known as miscegenation, but originally they were all White.

          A further examination into the Bible reveals that the other so-called ?races? of men, the non-Whites, were not mentioned as having been created by Yahweh (God). Rather, the Bible describes ?beasts?, or ?beasts of the field?, who have the power of reason to some extent, and humanoid traits such as hands and speech, and who have the ability to consciously mate with White women. Examples of note which make reference to this sort of beast are found at Genesis 9:5, Leviticus 20:15-16, and Hebrews 12:20. So if Yahweh (God) did not create the other races, from where did they originate? The answer to that is not in the Bible, and thus it can only be inferred. In the apocryphal Hebrew literature it is explained that a race of fallen ?angels? went and mixed themselves with every kind of creature on the planet. This race of fallen ?angels? is alluded to in the Bible in many places, such as in the ?serpent? of Genesis chapter 3, in Genesis chapter 6, in the gospel of Luke, in the epistles of 2 Peter and Jude, and in Revelation chapter 12. (A full study of this topic, The Problem With Genesis 6:1-4, is available at http://christogenea.org.) Therefore it only follows that the non-Adamic races descended from these fallen ?angels? and their violation of Yahweh?s (God?s) law of Kind after kind, which is so often repeated in the Book of Genesis. This can be substantiated from several other Biblical passages that discuss the ?worshipping of angels? (Colossians) and the offspring of ?strange? (i.e. foreign) gods (Malachi). Where Yahshua Christ says that ?Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up?, He certainly wasn?t making a botanical reference.

          With all of this background, we may now discuss the last U.S. Presidential election, and the worship of the beast. For certainly there was no election in the history of the country like this past election. There were women swooning and fainting at Barak Obama appearances, while the supposedly ?unbiased? media openly hailed him as some sort of ?messiah?, clearly being not only adored, but actually even worshipped by crowds. It would never before have been believed that so many otherwise ?normal? White men and women would be so anxious to have a negro be the President of this nation, even a negro whom the great majority of them know absolutely nothing about. And all this in spite of the fact that he is a Marxist ? something which is absolutely evident in his own books ? and that he has both a wife and a long-time pastor, along with a string of close friends and associates, who have repeatedly expressed a hatred for everything represented by the United States of America in particular, and Western Christian Civilization as a whole. Yet behind the scenes, Barak Obama ? the candidate for ?change? - is propped up by a clique of Wall Street and Washington insiders, many of whom are jewish, and many of whom cut their teeth in the administration of the first so-called (at least quite frequently in some circles) ?black president?, Bill Clinton, all led like marionettes by a former ballet dancer, the jew Rahm Emanuel, his top advisor and Chief of Staff at the White House.

          From Revelation chapter 13: ?4 And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?? While this passage is clearly discussing a different beast in a different age (as can be demonstrated at length), is it not indicative of today?s circumstances? The Bible, and specifically the Book of Revelation, identifies the Edomite-jew as the Dragon. This is apparent in Revelation chapter 12: for only Herod, who was also an Edomite-jew, could possibly be the dragon being described here. An examination of all of our recent presidential administrations, as well as the administrations of many world leaders in recent and not-so-recent history, reveals the Edomite-jew operating in support positions behind the scenes, and as the primary instigators and financiers behind most elections and most revolutions. Even the Bush administration, elected two times primarily with the support of conservative ?Christians?, is staffed and run by Edomite-jews, and it is suspected that the Bush family itself has descended from Edomite-jew blood. With certainty it can also be shown that the same dragon behind this modern beast of today was behind the beasts of old. That dragon, the Kenite-Canaanite-Edomite jew, is shown to have its descent from Cain through Canaan and then Esau, mixed with many other races along the way, as the Bible in both the Old Testaments and New fully informs us.

          Yet no U.S. President before this current one was clearly and openly a mamzer, the Hebrew word for someone of mixed blood, and therefore certainly a beast. At Deut. 17:15 we read: ?one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother. Being a mamzer, Barak Obama is in every way the ?image of the beast?. Revelation chapter 16 speaks of a time closer to our own, and it may or may not have already commenced: ?1 And I heard a great voice out of the temple saying to the seven angels, Go your ways, and pour out the vials of the wrath of God upon the earth. 2 And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.? Such is the fate that all of those unsuspecting, poorly informed Whites who voted for the beast in this last election have invited upon themselves.
          sigpic

          "Stain clear water with mud and thou shalt never find sweet drink" - Aeschylus, Eumenides, 694-695

          http://christogenea.org
          http://williamfinck.net

          Comment


          • #6
            Who is your god?

            Who is your god?
            Posted 3/2/09 at the Christogenea Blog
            The Saxon and Keltic peoples who colonized the North American continent in the 17th and 18th centuries were self-reliant Christian men and women, who for the most part were moral and faithful, whose God was the God of the Bible and whose guiding light was Yahshua (or Jesus) Christ. As Christians everywhere should do, they looked to their God for His inspiration of their own ability and initiative to solve all of their problems and to meet all of their challenges. From these ideals alone came the founding documents of this nation ? some of the greatest political documents Man has ever devised - and in short time the greatest, most ingenious and productive nation which the world has ever known emerged upon that sure foundation: for these United States are the only nation (properly a federation of nation states) in the history of Man which was ever founded wholly upon Christian principles.

            Investigating the writings of the founders of this nation, the ideas of plurality which they had did not include any thoughts of multiculturalism or a diversity of aliens which are the supposed ideals of this day, but which in reality are little more than a fulfillment of the perverse fantasies of the anti-Christ jews. Rather, and for example, Benjamin Franklin in the 18th century had hypothesized concerning how many Englishmen could populate such a large country in little time, even at the exclusion of their kindred Germans, whom he called ?Palatine boors?. Discussing the importation of African slaves, Franklin further stated ?Why increase the sons of Africa, where we have so fair an opportunity, by excluding all blacks and tawnys, of increasing the lovely red and white? (See Benjamin Franklin by Carl Van Doren, The Viking Press, New York, 1938, p. 216-218. On these same pages it is also fully evident that Franklin saw the White man alone, from his ruddiness, as being the ?red and white?, and he counted for these only the English and the Saxon Germans to the exclusion of most other Europeans ? even the Swedes.) While Franklin?s express views may not reflect all of the beliefs of all of the founders of this nation, they are a true and clear reflection of the general principles among them: that ?freedom of religion? meant a freedom of Christian religion, and that any reference to plurality meant a plurality of White people.

            However, by the second half of the 19th century much of the political class in this nation was already composed of corrupt men, who read Marx rather than Paul of Tarsus, and who worshipped the jewish gods of secular humanism rather that the Aryan God of Abraham and David. The reasons for this rather abrupt change in the quality of American leadership are succinctly described in the parable of the trees of the forest told by Jotham, as recorded in Judges Chapter 9 of our Bibles. It is no coincidence that a single American president ? the first to fully and publicly grasp onto the ideas of jewish internationalism ? gave this nation not only the jewish-owned and operated Federal Reserve Bank to be the stewards of our economy, but also our first zionist and radical jew Supreme Court Chief Justice, our first involvement in a European war, and had also relented to the so-called ?right? of women to vote, which is clearly anti-Christian. (The proper reading of 1 Cor. 14:33-34, from the Greek and read literally, is with certainty: ?? As in all of the assemblies of the saints, 34 the women in the assemblies must keep silent, indeed they are not to be entrusted to speak in them; rather they are to be obedient, just as the law says.? A vote is exactly the same as having a voice in the assembly.) No outside enemy could ever have damaged the Republic the way Woodrow Wilson damaged it from the inside, while also paving the way for many of those who came after to damage it even more.

            The so-called ?Great Depression? was the direct result of the turning over of the economy of this nation to the international jew under the guise of the ?Federal Reserve? banking system. And with the depression, a different form of politics ? that of giving ones vote to whoever could promise one the largest portion of other men?s money ? finally allowed the unscrupulous to consistently capture majorities of the electorate. This phenomenon was assisted greatly by both the woman voter ? the vast majority of which make such decisions based upon empathy, and the introduction of large numbers of aliens into the electorate once the immigrants from the fringes of Europe started coming to America in significant numbers. Franklin Roosevelt was the first great beneficiary of this change in the makeup of the nation.

            How far we had already fallen by this time, from the ideals upon which our Republic was founded. The founding fathers of this nation were certainly readers of the Greek and Roman Classical Histories. Surely they must have been aware of the way politicians quickly learn to use promises of favors or money to aliens and minorities as a means of helping to secure votes at the expense of the Patrician class (in this nation, that would have at that time been the true ?middle class?), from whom most of the funds available to the State are actually raised. Livy tells the story of one Spurius Cassius, a Roman politician of the 5th century BC, who had attempted to curry the favor of certain divisions among the people by promising them monies from the state treasury, and how the people of Rome condemned and executed him for that very reason ? thereby setting an example for centuries to come. (Livy, History of Rome, 2.41.8-12.) Who knows how high the course this nation may have taken, if Americans had been so vigilant in 1913 when the Federal Reserve was formed, or in 1933 when the Marxist ?New Deal? was launched, or in 1964 when the ?Great Society? speech was given.

            Now this simplification of American history is provided for a purpose other than to discuss politics at all. Rather, it is how Christians even make political decisions which must be discussed, because that is the root of the problem. For over a hundred years now, politicians have been running on platforms promising giveaways of one sort or another, or security of one form or another, and this trend has done nothing except plunge our nation deeper and deeper into tyranny. When Christians relied on their God for sustenance and security, they were relatively free to live and work as they chose, and this great nation resulted from that very freedom which our founders intended for us to have: an economic freedom to the fruits of our labors, and the freedom to live in an environment adapted to our own state of morals, in which we worship our God in the manner in which we ourselves choose, and not at the dictation of either Rome or the State. But when people rely upon the State for sustenance and security, the State seeks in turn to regulate the lives of the people. The State then gains the right to dictate morality and the terms of acceptable behavior. The State becomes the god of the people, because the people grant to the State that authority to solve their problems. Subsequently, the State demands more and more of the fruits of the labors of the people. Americans paid relatively very little in taxes up until the time of the ?Great Society?, and now over half of our income is eaten away by both direct and hidden taxes. The God of the Bible only asked for a tenth, at most, and that of one?s increase, not of one?s income.

            Over the past one hundred or so years, at the same time that the State has slowly become the god of the people, the State has also slowly torn down the moral barriers of the old God ? the God of the Bible ? and has replaced the morality of Christianity with a new morality: that of Diversity, Inclusion, and Multiculturalism. Old taboos such as divorce, homosexuality, and miscegenation have become the norm, and are even protected from Christian admonishment by legislation. The momentum of the growth and development of this nation which has lasted into this century was spurred by the many freedoms achieved upon our foundation, and while White Christians are still the backbone of all meaningful progress today, that backbone now has severe deficiencies, and is gravely ill due to the many parasites which infest the body, as it gets weaker and weaker with each passing year. Finally the aliens are on the threshold of overrunning the founding race of this nation, while an alien sits in its highest political office.

            From this situation, there is no political redemption. The Saxon has only one choice for salvation: to abandon the government god and the religious doctrines of jewish capitalism and humanism, along with the rites of wanton consumerism, and to return to the God of the Bible and Christian foundations with a humble and contrite heart.
            sigpic

            "Stain clear water with mud and thou shalt never find sweet drink" - Aeschylus, Eumenides, 694-695

            http://christogenea.org
            http://williamfinck.net

            Comment


            • #7
              There Is No Political Solution

              There Is No Political Solution
              Posted 4/17/09 at the Christogenea Blog
              There are many apparently well-intentioned Christians today who are promoting certain forms of political activism, wishing to reform the government of this once-great republic, and to turn it back to the interests of its natural-born citizens. For this reason we see and hear of demonstrations, ?tea parties?, appeals to the original Constitution of the nation, and even state secessions, civil war and armed insurrection. Yet none of this is Scriptural, and indeed, the parasite-infested carcass that was once our body of government certainly cannot ever be reformed. While surely it is possible that the schemers on Wall Street may be able to breathe some new life into the beast, and keep its heart beating awhile longer, the final outcome is nevertheless inevitable, and Babylon shall fall.

              Yes, Babylon. The root of the word means confusion, and while surely that is all that we get from our government today, the correlation is much deeper than that. Here are the telltale signs that our Western governments are indeed under the spell and control of the enigma which the Bible calls ?Mystery Babylon?:

              ? The democratic form of government can be traced back beyond Athens to ancient Sumer, a district of which Babylon was the chief city. This is established in several ancient Mesopotamian inscriptions. Therefore it is not a new idea, and it has always failed, leading to war and eventual tyranny. The federation of these United States of America was not founded as a democracy.
              ? The commercial laws of the West, and of Britain and the United States in particular, have their origin in the Shetar, a book of the jews found in the Babylonian Talmud. Scholarly sources have demonstrated this. Usury was a practice forbidden by Christians, and alien to our Saxon and Keltic ancestors, until the jew was admitted into the lands of our fathers. The capitalist system as practiced in the west is truly jewish in nature, and self-destructive to those who fall victim to it. America was originally a free-enterprise, and not a usury-based capitalist nation. There is a difference.
              ? The romish catholic church, its rituals, many of its beliefs, and its practice of universalism in spite of the specificity of the covenants of Yahweh the God of Israel (none of whom are jews) also may be traced back to the ancient pagan cults of Babylonia and Mesopotamia. The romish church is in actuality a pagan church, Christian only to the extent of its own spurious claims. It has never been the ?true church? of Christ, which is actually the Keltic and Saxon and related Christian people as a body, and not an organization. Neither have any of the protestant sects truly lived up to the Bible. They have rather merely replaced many romish church teachings with equally insidious dogmas, and systematically ignore, or even reject, sound Christian doctrine.

              It is surely evident that Mystery Babylon has political, religious and economic aspects. Yet all of this is driven by one thing: the desire for open-border free trade and the flow of monies by those international merchants and bankers who have no allegiance to any particular race or country, but rather have historically been parasites feeding off of all the other races ? but especially the White race. Henry Ford called them ?the international jew?. The 16th, 17th and 18th chapters of the Book of Revelation relate Mystery Babylon directly to international trade. The government of this nation, and of all of the other so-called ?democracies?, has fallen into the control of these merchants through the central banking system which they own and are in full control of. That is a part of the confusion which the term Babylon describes: the Bank of England is owned not by the English, but by certain jewish families. The Federal Reserve is not federal, nor is it a reserve, but rather it is merely another instrument of those same jewish families. Yes, it is owned by banks which are ?public? companies, however those companies are closely controlled by an elite minority through the use of devices such as special share classes and ?voting? shares.

              Yahweh God created nations and borders (i.e. Deut. 32:8, Acts 17:26). It is the goal of Satan to eradicate them, confusing the nations in a Babylonish hodge-podge of multiculturalism and diversity. It is not a mistake that this program of confusion is only being carried out in White Christian nations: an assault by the enemies of God upon His people. Globalism, multiculturalism, and diversity are all programs of the international jewish merchant: the dragon which gives its power to the beast. This dragon uses both international capitalism and socialist marxism to achieve its goals.

              So, what is a Christian to do? The most sensible thing to do is simply to stop feeding the dragon! Scripture commands that a Christian be separated from the cares of the world. As the apostle James informs us, ?Adulterers! Do you not know that the love of Society is hatred for Yahweh? He therefore who would desire to be a friend of Society establishes himself as an enemy of Yahweh!? (James 4:4, CNT). This is also evident in the parable of the sower, found in Matthew chapter 13 and Mark chapter 4, among other places in Scripture.

              Rather than trying to somehow take back the corrupted system of government, Christians are explicitly told to separate themselves from the corrupt society. Here that is evident from both the writings of Paul, and the Revelation of Yahshua Christ:
              ?And what agreement has a temple of Yahweh with idols? For you are a temple of the living Yahweh; just as Yahweh has said, ?I will dwell among them, and I will walk about; and I will be their God, and they will be my people.? On which account ?Come out from the midst of them and be separated,? says the Prince, and ?do not be joined to the impure, and I will admit you?.? (2 Corinthians 6:16-17, CNT)
              ?And I heard another voice from out of heaven, saying: ?You come out from her, My people, that you should not partake in her errors, and that you would not receive from of her wounds, because her errors have built up as far as heaven and Yahweh has called to mind her injustices!? (Rev. 18:4-5, CNT)

              Rather than attempting to take back Babylon, the Scripture instead commands first an obedience to the laws of Yahweh, and He will heal our nation, as we read in Deuteronomy chapter 28:1-7: ?And it shall come to pass, if thou shalt hearken diligently unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to observe and to do all his commandments which I command thee this day, that the LORD thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth: And all these blessings shall come on thee, and overtake thee, if thou shalt hearken unto the voice of the LORD thy God. Blessed shalt thou be in the city, and blessed shalt thou be in the field. Blessed shall be the fruit of thy body, and the fruit of thy ground, and the fruit of thy cattle, the increase of thy kine, and the flocks of thy sheep. Blessed shall be thy basket and thy store. Blessed shalt thou be when thou comest in, and blessed shalt thou be when thou goest out. The LORD shall cause thine enemies that rise up against thee to be smitten before thy face: they shall come out against thee one way, and flee before thee seven ways.?

              Only the children of Israel can be obedient. This is because only the children of Israel were given the law, circumcised hearts, redeemed, cleansed, and purchased by the blood of Yahshua Christ. This applies only to the Keltic, Saxon and related White Christian nations, all whom descended from the Israelites of the Old Testament. Being obedient, we cannot have communion with the unclean ? the alien races. It is those same internationalists who have caused the flood of aliens to come over the White nations in the first place. Peter told our predecessors ? those Aryan Christians of Anatolia who had also descended from the Biblical Israelites - that we were ?an elect race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a peculiar people? (CNT, 1 Pet. 2:9), a precept given to our fathers as far back as Exodus chapter 19. The only way to stay elect, holy, and peculiar is to be separate.

              Therefore it should be wholly evident that the Christian should separate himself from the beast, from the unclean, and from the programs of international jewry. While one must get by in society, work, pay taxes, in order to keep a home and raise a family, one doesn?t have to keep feeding the dragon in order to manage. Yahshua Christ told us to ?render to Caesar the things of Caesar, and to Yahweh the things of Yahweh!? Those movies and television programs that the jews make in Hollywood? Stop buying them, or at least stop paying to see them. The same for all of that pop music produced by the jewish-controlled record companies, most of which is laced with globalist or egalitarian propaganda. Organized sports is idol-worship and elevates the children of strange gods: the Christian should have no part in their promotion or support. The jewish owned and operated mainstream press? It is wholly evil and should be absolutely avoided by Christians. Say goodbye to the New York Times, CNN, The Wall Street Journal, Time, Newsweek, USA Today, the major television networks and all other such trash, for it is all complete internationalist zionist propaganda. All of these outlets promote nothing but evil. The pulp-novel industry is also evil. Expose these as such in public and inform your brethren daily. Stop partaking in usury. Save up money to buy the things that you need. If you can, pay off all debts early and stop borrowing money! Interest payments are the oil of the internationalist jew machinery.

              Love thy brother. Charity begins at home. All of the internationalist charities magnify the non-Christian heathens at the expense of the White Christian, and at the same time they create comfortable and well-paid positions for the zionists and their flunkies. We Christians have hungry and needy White children here in our own nation! Do you have money to spare? Find a worthy White family ? especially one trying to raise children ? and give it to them! And if not, then perhaps there are elderly White men and women who could use the help. Do not let your local pastors or so-called churches burden your consciences with pleas for your help or demands for tithes. Often they have set all of the precepts of Yahweh?s laws aside except for their demand for the tithe! A hundred years ago, when the local church was the primary provider for widows and orphans, it was much more worthy than it is today. Now, the organized religions have ceded their responsibility to the community to the marxist government, which also fails White widows and orphans. Tithe Yahweh your God by providing for your brethren.

              Love thy brother. This command is economic as much as it is anything else. Hire White men. Do business with White men. Buy as much locally-produced food and goods as possible, even if it costs more. White men are the only race who would cut off each others? subsistence to save a few dollars! Is that a display of love for one?s brother? How does your brother feed his family, if you love the aliens? In my 2007 paper Translating Luke16:8&9, I wrote the following: ?If White men were truly concerned with their brethren, we could never be in the trouble which we are in today! One cannot love his brother, yet hire a Mexican to do labor, saving a few dollars an hour while putting his brother out of work. One cannot love his brother, yet shop at a Korean-owned grocery store rather than a White-owned store, to save ten or twenty cents on grocery items. One cannot love his brother, and buy an appliance made in China, rather than one made in Minnesota, because it is a few dollars cheaper. One?s desire to save a few dollars would put all of his brethren out of work! Our care for riches has, therefore, precluded our ability to serve Yahweh by loving our brethren (John 13:34-35; 1 John 2:7-11; 3:11-17). And this is precisely what has been happening in the White nations for the past hundred years! Our care for riches and the desire to save a few dollars ? or to buy more material goods for the money we have ? has enriched the Mexicans, the Japanese, the Chinese, the Arabs, the Turks, all of those who truly hate us, and especially the jews! The jews, of course, have orchestrated and have taken full advantage of this situation, and thus is our predicament. Notice that the global trade system is described as ?Mystery Babylon? in the Revelation, fully evident as it is described at Revelation chapter 18. This system is doomed to fail, as it is written. Shall White men recognize it, and those behind it, when it does fail? Pray that they shall! Shall the jews seek and gain refuge with our enemies, as the unrighteous steward hoped to find a place to dwell with his master?s debtors? They may try, but I think not (Rev. 20:9-15)! 1 John 2:9 says: ?He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now.? To support the alien is equivalent to hating one?s brother!?

              There is an old saying that all politics is local. This is true. If one feels a need to get involved in the community, to do so at a local level is good, always being ready to rebuke evil and setting a good Christian example for one?s brethren. However all party politics at the State and national levels ? and often at even lower levels ? is corrupted by internationalist corporate dollars and will not serve the people regardless of the claims being made. The Christian must always be aware of this, and speak out against it, but to participate in reform of this system is futile.

              All of these things are only a start, but the more a Christian does them, the closer he comes to departing from Babylon. For the internationalist jewish system of debt and slavery certainly is going to fall. And only Yahweh knows the time.
              sigpic

              "Stain clear water with mud and thou shalt never find sweet drink" - Aeschylus, Eumenides, 694-695

              http://christogenea.org
              http://williamfinck.net

              Comment


              • #8
                The Crimes of the ADL, Part One

                The Crimes of the ADL, Part One

                The ADL, or Anti-Defamation League, a sort of legal protection racket that endeavors to ensure that no Jew is ever criticized, regardless of the merits of the criticism, has recently mentioned both Eli James and myself in an article on their website (click here for the article). Upon mentioning the common name which describes, in part, our particular Christian theology, ?Christian Identity?, they immediately give a link to a description of a list of men who were all allegedly Christian Identity adherents and who all supposedly committed crimes of one sort or another (for which click here).

                Of course, the ADL?s inference is that all Christian Identists are criminals, or at least potential criminals. This is pre-judgement, and guilt by association. Is it not true that in practically every facet of life today people are instructed not to pre-judge anyone, by faith or by association? Hasn?t such a practice recently been called ?profiling? and condemned in the Jewish-controlled media, with much fanfare? In fact, a search of the word ?profiling? on the internal search engine of the ADL?s own website produces a list of articles over five pages long. This list of articles makes it quite clear that the ADL is highly concerned with nearly every type of racial profiling too, and not only against Jews. However the ADL is certainly not concerned with the profiling that they themselves do: the profiling of White Christians! For this reason Jesus (Yahshua) Christ warned us repeatedly concerning the hypocrisy of the scribes and Pharisees ? His murderers.

                But if the ADL wants to claim that we are criminals simply because some other Christian Identists have committed crimes in the past, so be it. Let us accept that premise, at least for the purpose of the moment. However, is it only Identists who are guilty of the crimes of their fellow religionists?

                Now, without saying another word, it is proven that by the ADL?s own twisted logic; by their own perverted reasoning, that they themselves are history?s greatest criminals! That is right, the members and supporters of the ADL are history?s greatest criminals because they are Jews, or supporters of Jews, and it was the Jews who killed God! That is right, Jesus Christ is God, and the Jews killed Him! So the ADL is guilty of Deicide, and what crime could ever be considered greater?

                Whatever bad things could be said by Jews about any Christian sect are far surpassed by all of the vile statements found in the true religious book of the Jews: the Babylonian Talmud. This is the most evil book in all the world, the absolute contradiction of the Christian Bible, which teaches Jews to be double-minded (i.e. the Kol Nidre) and to circumvent the laws of Yahweh God at every turn, while dealing deceitfully with non-Jews whenever they can get away with it. A million times more crimes have been encouraged and committed in the name of Talmudic Judaism than have ever been imagined to be attributable to Christians.

                When are Christians going to wake up and realize that the Jews are evil ? that their twisted and perverted reasoning is destroying Christian Civilization, and that they actually want it that way? Now why are Christians forsaking Christianity on account of the Jews? How do Christians let the Jews even get away with such a thing? For unequivocal proof that Christians are instructed to reject the Jews, see the essay Should Christians Embrace the Jews? at Christogenea.org. Christians you are warned: stop accepting evil in the name of another Jewish idea: ?Political Correctness?!
                sigpic

                "Stain clear water with mud and thou shalt never find sweet drink" - Aeschylus, Eumenides, 694-695

                http://christogenea.org
                http://williamfinck.net

                Comment


                • #9
                  The New Weimar Republic (and a Very Brief and Partial History of Modern Christendom)

                  The New Weimar Republic (and a Very Brief and Partial History of Modern Christendom)
                  Before the dawn of the 20th century, Jewish bankers and merchants had long been using their pocketbook influence to work their way into a position where they began marrying into the aristocratic families of Germany. This situation is inevitable where you have a minority that works its way into a host population, and where that minority also happens to have the ability to create its own paper money - therefore having practically unlimited funds with which to corrupt the host society. The average Christian had no use at all for money, and especially paper money. Trade was conducted in barter and taxes were paid in kind. For many centuries in Medieval Europe usury was an abomination, since it is antithetical to Christianity, and so the Jews - who have always been usurers - naturally became the bankers to European nobility, profiting immensely in those circumstances by pandering to the desires of the weak. This same situation long existed in Britain too, since in that nation Jewish families had controlled the economy from the founding of the so-called Bank of England in the 17th century. Before the First World War, much of the British aristocracy was actually Jewish, or as a result of intermarriage had Jewish cousins or in-laws. In fact, a Jew had become the Prime Minister of Great Britain even long before the First World War. To the honest inquirer of history, it is quite clear that by the dawn of the 20th century Europe was ruled by an aristocracy permeated by and beholden to the Jews, and increasingly hostile to Christianity, because Jews are naturally hostile to Christianity. Jews are also hostile to anyone else who is not a Jew ? as their Talmud plainly and directly states in many places. It is quite clear that once they acquire control of a nation?s ruling classes, having no allegiance to or kinship with the population of the nation itself, they only use that control in order to further increase their own advantage. Even to the extent of intermarrying with them. To the Jew, like to all aliens, a White wife is a trophy ? a mark of conquest - and not a partner. (Such was also the situation in first century Judaea where the Edomites - today?s Jews - had infiltrated and taken over that government and society by 40 B.C.)

                  The Jewish campaign against the German people discreetly began long before the First World War, in the propaganda that was circulated throughout intellectual circles in Britain and which was designed to alienate the two kindred peoples from one another ? the English Saxons and the German Saxons. This is because under the Kaiser, the Jews did not have a Jewish-owned central bank, and therefore did not have complete control of the German economy. But they certainly wanted it. The same situation existed in Russia, where the Czar would not have a Jewish central bank. All of the other so-called reasons for the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and the destruction of Germany in the First World War are sheer nonsense ? the power behind the creation of those wars were the Rothschilds and their Jewish kindred. The Bolshevik Revolution was a Jewish conquest of Russia, orchestrated and financed in lower Manhattan. The Jewish minority in Russia ? using every other minority that they could incite, along with every White Russian they could deceive with their empty talk of egalitarianism and social justice ? were the foot soldiers for the Jewish bankers of New York and London.

                  Yet during the First World War, many of Germany?s Jews actually did lend their support to the German cause, and German victory was seemingly inevitable in 1917, especially when the Russian front began to collapse and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia ended that nation?s part in the war effort against the Germans. But in 1917, something else happened. Lord Balfour signed a declaration assuring the Jews a homeland in Palestine if Britain won the war. The Ottoman Empire, a vestige of which remains as modern Turkey, controlled Palestine at the time, and the Ottomans were allies of the Germans. It was Jews in Germany who through their capitalism controlled much of the country?s industrial power, and once this declaration was signed, these Jews, along with their lower-class kinsmen, became hostile to the German war effort, becoming more or less a fifth column in German society. At the same time, Jewish leaders in Germany instigated and organized labor disruptions at the German munitions factories. With all of this, and with American entry into the war on behalf of the British, Germany?s fate was sealed and her defeat was assured.

                  After the First World War was over, and the Kaiser removed by what more or less amounted to treason, a ?Republican? form of government was instituted in Germany amidst much prolonged political and civil strife. This new government is now referred to as the ?Weimar Republic?, and it lasted until 1933. This republican government, dominated by the ?Social Democratic? parties, was actually very socialist in nature, and had large factions of communists and communist sympathizers, but it was not itself truly communist. The Weimar Republic was marked by rampant inflation and a cowering of the German people to the extravagant reparations and demilitarization demands resulting from losing a war which Germany did not start. Along with those reparations came the loss of much historically German territory, which Germany was forced to cede to the whims of the victors. The monetary inflation itself was to a great degree the cause of the tremendous reparations burden. The Weimar government also suffered heavily from a failure to reel in the communists and communist factions of the controlling political parties. The communists stridently attempted to install a government of their own during these years, and actually succeeded in doing so by force in Bavaria, at least temporarily, and again in a part of the Ruhr region. These communist uprisings, along with others in Hamburg and in Saxony in the early 1920?s, were not put down by the Weimar government, but by coalitions of patriotic Germans known as the Freikorps, and factions of the military operating independently and in spite of the Weimar government.

                  The Jewish hand in all of this civil discord in Germany could not go unnoticed. Many of the communists in Germany were lower-class Jews, and a great majority of the Jews were communists. Additionally, due to the rampant inflation, for it literally did take a wheel-barrow full of money to buy a loaf of bread, the only people who were able to buy either property or goods were those who could obtain money from outside of the country. In 1914, a German mark was valued at around twenty-five cents of American money. In 1923, one million units of that same currency were only worth a mere dollar. During this period many German families were forced to sell everything they had in order to survive. Hence the upper-class Jews with foreign financial connections were able to buy up much of Germany?s material wealth for incredibly low sums. Jewish carpetbaggers abounded, consuming the nation like so many parasites consume a cadaver. All classes of Jews in Germany had a feast in the Weimar years, glorying in their perceived victory over the heart of European Christendom, for now they would own it. While all of this transpired, there was an earnest endeavor by the radical communists, who had much political influence in the major parties which were Socialist themselves, to stifle all serious political opposition.

                  Adolf Hitler ? who was truly a champion of traditional German culture and of Christianity ? things which all Jews everywhere despise, was not the only such politician to gain a following in the wake of the Judaization of Germany, where engagements in pornography and substance addiction were rapidly becoming the norm (things which are hallmarks of the Jewish domination over culture wherever they appear). Hitler?s eventual success was nothing but a reaction to the Jewish-dominated society of the Weimar republic, and the fear among Germans of eventual communist domination. Certainly the average German was well aware of the destruction of millions of Christians occurring in the Soviet Union under the Bolshevik Jews and Stalin, who himself was a Jew by race. Yet Hitler was not the only one who attempted to take Germany back from such Jewish domination. Other nationalist, Christian & conservative politicians in Germany were beaten down at their own meetings by Marxist thugs. It was commonplace for Marxists in Weimar Germany to look for conservative political gatherings, and to disrupt them with violence. This happened with regularity while the government turned a blind eye to the violence perpetrated by the Marxists. But Hitler was one of the only opposing politicians who successfully countered them. The Sturmabteilung (SA), commonly called the Brownshirts, were formed out of a need to protect the fledgling party?s rights of free speech and assembly from Marxist thugs who wish to reserve that right exclusively for themselves. Many of the Brownshirts came from the ranks of the old Freikorps, the German equivalent to the American idea of the militia. Where the government refuses to maintain order and uphold the basic rights of the people, the people must retain the right to do it themselves.

                  When Hitler finally gained power, he took the German economy back into the hands of the German people, refused to allow a Jewish-controlled central bank to run the nation, and immediately World Jewry openly declared war against Germany again, in 1933. The rest is history, and it need not be discussed here. The Jews have long used propaganda against Germany and against the czars of Russia. In both Great Britain and the United States, everything believed by the people in respect to both Germany and Russia has been told through a Jewish perspective, since Jews have long controlled all of the major media outlets in both nations. Everything that the average person thinks that he knows about Germany in the 20th century is a lie. The Jews in Britain and the United States have used their power over the media to perpetrate the greatest hate crimes ever: the extermination of many tens of millions of White Christians in Europe, while at the same time they are falsely accusing White Christians of hate crimes! There was no holocaust of Jews by Germans, not in the 20th century, and not ever. The holocaust is a huge lie perpetrated by the Jews, perpetuated by the Jewish-controlled media, and promulgated so that the Jews gain the advantage of muzzling all of their critics with a single slur, that of being a ?Nazi? or an ?Anti-Semite?. With this same slur, they place an obstacle before any reasonable and scholarly inquiry into the real Hitler, the true reasons for his rise to power, and the reasons for Germany?s success in the 1930?s under Hitler?s policies. This success came while the rest of the West was mired in the Great Depression, another device of the Jewish bankers to assist in their accumulation of the wealth of the West and to gain the political control of Christendom. It is no accident of language, that the word so often translated ?devil? in English Bibles is actually a Greek word which means false accuser.

                  It took only a few decades for the Jews to affect the takeovers of both Russia and Germany in the early 20th century. Winning the minds of most Americans took much longer, even several decades; however the Jews have long accomplished that. Hidden from the eyes of most Christians, both Jewish Capitalism and Jewish Marxism are but two heads on the same beast which seeks to devour all of Christendom and to destroy the White race. Henry Ford knew this, and wrote about it, but the Jews found a way to silence him. Adolf Hitler knew it too, and he also wrote about it, and the Jews went to great lengths to silence him. This country has been kept in a constant state of war since capitalist agents used the accidental sinking of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor as an Imperialist tool. This constant state of war, whether foreign or domestic, keeps the people perpetually distracted, and has enabled the Jews to win a cultural battle here that most people are totally unaware ever happened. Usually that battle was packaged as a noble pursuit, such as ?civil rights?, ?women?s rights?, ?gay rights?, ad nauseum. If one does not think that all of this was a part of the Jewish war against Christendom, one is obviously ignorant of the declarations of the Jews themselves.

                  Foremost are the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. While declaimed by the Jews as a Czarist forgery when they were revealed in the early part of the last century, every element of these writings have been carried out over the past several decades by the Jews and the institutions which they control. The fact that every one of the things described therein have actually come to fruition proves their original authenticity, and that the negative Jewish effect on Western Civilization is not perceived, but is indeed a real conspiracy.

                  At the dawn of the ?civil rights? movement, and just before the so-called ?Sexual Revolution? of the 1960?s, the Jew Alan Ginsburg wrote a collection of so-called poetry which was greatly lauded by all of the Jewish media and academia. It contains material such as: ?I?m with you Rockland where you accuse your doctors of insanity and plot the Hebrew socialist revolution against the fascist national Golgotha? (from Howl). What garbage is praised by the Jews as art! To Ginsburg, Christianity (?Golgotha?) and nationalism are both evil, and these are what he is railing against. A generation of Jews followed suit, and the Jewish media has praised all of them glowingly ever since, openly worshipping devils while the average American stares blindly at the television screen, getting his daily dose of ?entertainment?. While Ginsburg may appeal to the basest sorts in society, this same mentality exists throughout academia. For instance: ?Barack Obama is Destroying Our Economy on Purpose ? A pair of radical Columbia University professors by the name of Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven wrote an article in the radical magazine known as The Nation. The article was published on May 2, 1966 and laid out what is now known as the ?Cloward-Piven Strategy?. The plan calls for the destruction of capitalism in America by swelling the welfare rolls to the point of collapsing our economy and then implementing socialism by nationalizing many private institutions. Cloward and Piven studied Saul Alinsky just like Hillary Clinton and ? Obama? (Quoted from worldviewradio.com). It should be quite evident why ever since the ?Great Society? speech given by Lyndon Johnson, this nation has sunk deeper and deeper into socialism, which is nothing but a euphemism for Marxism. These early statements, and the fact that this nation has obviously followed this path laid out by so many Jews, makes it no coincidence why we have done so.

                  This Jewish war against true liberty and Christendom in America began long before the 1950?s. In fact, at the same time that the Jews were using their propaganda in company with staged operations such as the Lusitania and Pearl Harbor to incite America into joining in the wars of Europe, they were also infiltrating Christian institutions here in order to pervert them. While the profits from usury bought out the department chairs in all of our academic institutions, so that by the 1930?s many of the American universities were already leaning far to the left, they also planned something much more treacherous, and fully executed that plan: the total corruption of Christian American theological thinking.

                  In 1890 a small-time Dallas pastor started a Bible Correspondence Course which gained quite a following, and was taken over by the Moody Bible Institute in 1914. This pastor had also been part of a group which sought to revive the much earlier Niagara Conferences of the Pentecostal Charismatic Charles Darby. Influences by the work of men such as Darby and the dispensationalist J. R. Graves had a tremendous impact on the formulation of this pastor?s doctrines. With a few books under his belt and having developed much greater aspirations, he left his Dallas congregation in 1901. This pastor went to New Hampshire, where he purchased a plot of land and planned to build on it, and then on to the big city ? New York ? where he was admitted to the very exclusive Lotus Club founded by the Jewish attorney Samuel Untermeyer and others. Untermeyer himself was on the committee which approved this pastor?s application. His name was Cyrus Scofield, and no earthly door was closed to him from this time forward.

                  Students of history may recognize the name of Samuel Untermeyer from elsewhere. It was he who had bribed Woodrow Wilson when Wilson was in a jam over an affair he had while he was employed at Princeton, and not wanting his Presidential aspirations destroyed, Untermeyer was more than willing to assist him. So Woodrow Wilson had two terms as President, and the American people got their first Jewish Supreme Court Justice, Louis Brandeis, and also the Jewish-controlled central bank, the Federal Reserve, women?s suffrage, a graduated income tax, involvement in the First World War, and many other curses. What a productive time in office Woodrow Wilson had ? or at least if one happens to be a Jew and a New York banker one may think so.

                  There is much more to the Scofield story, however after his Reference Bible was published by Oxford University Press in 1909, the false doctrine of Dispensationalism caught on in America?s churches. The Jews, the people of God?s curse, became ?God?s Chosen People?, as if such a thing were possible. It also wasn?t long before the oxymoronic term ?Judaeo-Christian? and its variants came into the vocabulary. Scofield was a major tool in the effort to Judaize Christianity. Of course, the Jews were its primary proponents, but certainly not in public. Scofield did not develop any of his doctrines on his own, rather he borrowed them all from others. He was not a Bible Scholar, but a man who borrowed, sometimes reformulated, and often received credit for the work of others (if indeed it wasn?t simply handed to him). Yet while he didn?t develop his false doctrines alone, he did collect them all into one place, and with a little help from his Jewish friends they managed to become quite popular. American Seminaries would never be the same again.

                  At this same time many other forces were at work, helping to bring about the Judaization of America. The Jewish banking families would stop at nothing, and could fund almost anything, in their attempt to gain world domination. A New York Jew coined the term ?melting pot?, and wrote a play to that effect in 1910. The entire idea is an outright lie, but today most Americans believe it and repeat it. That same Jew, Israel Zangwill, helped conceive the idea of Fabian Socialism along with another Jew, Israel Cohen, and George Bernard Shaw, who probably should have been born a Jew, but whom was accidentally Irish, at least apparently. All three of these men were ardent Marxists and strived towards the goal of a communist world. Shaw was a strident critic of Christianity and, of course, was another darling of the Jewish Western media. In 1913 Jews founded both the NAACP and the ADL. Jews were inciting the negroes in the South to rise up against Whites, and they continue to incite them to this very day. A long litany of proofs can be supplied to support these statements. By 1952 Jewish rabbis were openly trumpeting the death of the White race, and their final victory over Christendom.

                  In 1935, the Communist Party?s Workers Library Publishers issued a pamphlet entitled ?THE NEGROES IN A SOVIET AMERICA.? It urged the Negroes to rise up, especially in the South, and form a Soviet State in the South, and apply for admission into the Soviet Union ... it contained implicit assurance that the ?revolt ? would be supported by all American Reds [i.e. Jews]. This is outright treason, however in the Roosevelt administration no Jew would ever be prosecuted for such a thing, and the Jewish-controlled mainstream media would never point a finger at it! The wolves have been devouring the sheepfold for a hundred years now, and none of the shepherds raise an objection!

                  War and revolution were not necessary in order for the Jews to conquer Britain, for they have controlled that nation entirely since at least the days of Napoleon. Neither were they necessary in order for them to conquer America. Rather, like the British, the population most often simply went along with whatever they were told. The media, in concert with the government, either silenced or simply ignored all opposition. Those few who opposed who could not be easily contained, such as Charles Lindbergh and Henry Ford, were silenced in other more serious ways. Most Americans [except for the radical Jews], in the exact opposite of that spirit by which the founders had fought for and formed this nation, never questioned the things which they were being told, never questioned their pastors or professors or political leaders, but just followed along like meek sheep going to the slaughter. Americans never evaluate the sources of their news, editorials, movies or books. It is only taken for granted that all these things are healthy and legitimate, because they bear one commonly known brand-name or another.

                  Today, if one does not fit into the typical Jewish-approved ?mainstream? mode of thinking, but is to the left of the political spectrum, one?s crimes are either ignored by the media, or upheld as exemplary models of idealistic achievement, but never openly criticized by the media. However if one does not fit into this same mold and is on the political right one is branded as a criminal and a demon. Just like the Weimar Republic of the 1920?s, Marxist ? or often Negro, or Ladino - gangs can roam the streets acting like thugs, and the media ignores their criminal activity. They can even brag about their criminal activities publicly, and nobody in the public eye seems to notice or mind ? even though they are certainly well known to the ADL and other mostly Jewish organizations. But if a nationalist group or a traditional Christian group tries to meet in peaceful assembly, it is either lambasted by the media, or if it is small enough not to warrant media attention, it is interrupted ? sometimes violently - by the Marxist thugs. And the ADL trumpets this activity with glowing satisfaction! In fact, the way that the ADL has announced certain events, and announced them with glee, events that the ARA ? a motley collection of Marxist thugs recruited as ?anti-racist activists? from various college campuses - has taken credit for, betrays as a certain fact that the ARA is nothing but a militant tool of the ADL itself. In that manner, the ADL can use violence and criminal activity to interrupt any group which has a profession contrary to those of Judaism.

                  This is currently happening on a small scale. Soon ? and especially when the so-called ?Hate Bill? is finally enacted ? it will get larger, and even to the point where no Christian group will be able to meet in public at all, without its meetings being punctuated by the Marxist thugs and their Janissaries, supported and encouraged by the ADL. It is absolutely obvious to anyone who has eyes to look (never mind see), that non-White racist groups such as La Raza or the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) are never harassed by the Jews and their front organizations. In fact, blatantly racist La Raza is billed as a ?civil rights? group by the ADL! Only White nationalists and Christians are harassed. The same is true in the mainstream media, which was instrumental in the election of a patently racist negro president ? while purposely ignoring all of the plainly racist statements which he made in his own books. To the Jew, it is good to be a racist - unless you are White ? and only then is racism evil (with perhaps the exception of a handful of openly anti-Jewish muslim groups). Why isn?t the ADL protesting the apartheid in Palestine? Because they are double-minded, and not at all pious. In reality they are little but Jewish hypocrites of the same sort which Christ Himself condemned in Matthew chapter 23. It is no figment of the imagination, that these Jews of today are descendants of the Christ-killers.

                  Radical Jews tried to promote so-called ?holocaust? stories after the First World War, claiming that the Germans killed ?six million? innocent Jews. Of course, back then even most Americans had more sense than to believe these Jewish lies. After World War II, there were all sorts of wild stories again, most of them now forgotten in the black hole of the American memory (which easily forgets everything that the Jewish media does not constantly remind them of). In fact, ninety-nine point nine percent of the wild holocaust tales contrived by lying Jews in the 1940?s and 1950?s are now even conveniently forgotten, if not actually denied, by Jews themselves. They realize that most of these stories are easily discredited, regardless of the claims of supposed eyewitnesses. However the most reasonable-sounding of the holocaust tales of the post-war era were pounded down the throats of the American and European peoples, and ever more vigorously since the 1970?s, when Jews like Elie Weasel (not a typo) and Simon Rosenthal were made famous by Jewish media and cinema companies.

                  The result of the success of this propaganda ? which actually is itself a hate crime of the second-greatest magnitude (the murder of the Christ being first) ? is that now the Jews have elevated themselves above all criticism: anyone who dares criticize any Jew for practically anything is immediately branded a Nazi and an ?anti-Semite?. Anyone who questions the historical accuracy of any Jewish holocaust tale is also branded in this manner and ? if one is foolish enough to visit Europe or have European citizenship ? thrown in prison simply for doing so. Additionally, the reasons for Hitler?s popularity and Hitler?s own policies are never evaluated objectively, since anyone who mentions him in any other-than-negative light is immediately branded and excoriated by the Jews and the media.

                  Zionism and the holocaust religion amount to an attempt to replace the Biblical Christian Messiah with the Jews as Messiah as according to the Talmud. In Rome before the time of Constantine, the Jews had special privileges to practice their religion, and Christianity was criminalized. The Jews, having these privileges, used their power and influence to make sure that the Romans persecuted the Christians mercilessly. It is a fact of history, attested to by Tertullian and many other early Christian writers, that Jews were behind all of the Roman persecution of Christians. The Jews also took advantage of the Arian heresy to drive a wedge between the various Christian factions and cause them to attack each other. Today, mostly because Christians give heed to outfits like the ADL, the ?Judeo-Christian? propaganda of Scofield and all of his followers, and all of the holocaust propaganda, Jews are again garnering for themselves a special distinction of privilege above other all citizens. And Christians are again being persecuted! This is the new Weimar Republic! And even worse, this is pagan Rome all over again! But Constantine cannot deliver us from it, and Hitler cannot deliver us from it. Only Christ Himself can deliver us from it ? and surely He will!

                  William Finck
                  http://Christogenea.org/
                  sigpic

                  "Stain clear water with mud and thou shalt never find sweet drink" - Aeschylus, Eumenides, 694-695

                  http://christogenea.org
                  http://williamfinck.net

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X