Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should Christians Embrace the Jews?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Should Christians Embrace the Jews?

    Should Christians Embrace the Jews?

    [

    Recently there was much media chatter concerning the current head of the Romish “church”, Herr Ratzinger (I ought not use any of the usual self-proclaimed titles, cf. Matt. 23:8-9), and his visit to the United States. One of the highlights of his trip, according to the media, was his stop at a New York City synagogue, and his embrace of the Jews there, where he gave a speech which stressed the so-called “Jewish” roots of Jesus (Yahshua) Christ and of Christianity. Yet nothing could be further from the truth. In reality – which reality shall continue to escape the notice of most people in society – Herr Ratzinger’s homage to the Jews of New York surely demonstrates the truth of such New Testament verses as Luke 4:5-6, John 14:30 and 1 Cor. 2:8, among others. For those whom we see in positions of authority are not the true wielders of power: it is the dragon (Rev. 12:7-9) which gives authority to the beast (Rev. 13:4). While this statement may seem enigmatic now, it may become clearer later, as this essay proceeds.

    During His earthly ministry Yahshua Christ continually distinguished Himself from the Jews, and there are clear examples of this in the words of Christ recorded at John 8:31-47 and John 10. Such distinction is also made by the gospel writers, especially by John, such as at 7:1 and 9:22. In order to understand this distinction, and the reason for the division recorded in the New Testament, it is fitting to examine the history of Judaea in the period leading up to the birth of Christ: for why were Herod and all Jerusalem troubled – even at an announcement of His birth – and why did they conspire to kill Him, rather than rejoice as the Magi and the shepherds did (Matt. 2:1-23; Luke 2:8-20)?

    Many centuries before the birth of Christ, from approximately 745 B.C. to 676 B.C., almost all of the population of ancient Israel and Judah were destroyed or removed to other lands by the invading Assyrians, outlined briefly in 2 Kings chapters 17 and 18. The Assyrians left only the inhabitants of Jerusalem, for which see 2 Chron. 32. Ancient Assyrian inscriptions have been found which corroborate these histories, and show that hundreds of thousands of Israelites were taken and resettled in the north. These Israelites are the “lost” sheep of Ezekiel chapter 34, and the subject of many Biblical prophecies made even long after their deportation. Yet none of these people were ever called “Jews”, and therefore they are not the subject of this discussion, although it surely can be demonstrated that – for the most part – these people developed into the Christian nations of later history.

    By 585 B.C., nearly all of those left behind by the Assyrians had been taken away by another invader, the Babylonians, who destroyed Jerusalem and removed the people to Babylon (2 Kings 25; 2 Chron. 36). Of all of these, only about 40,000 people returned to Jerusalem some years later, as recorded by both Ezra and Nehemiah. From these 40,000, some of whom settled in Galilaia but most of whom settled in and around Jerusalem, descended Yahshua Christ and the apostles and their countrymen, and the “Jews” of Judaea and Jerusalem. Yet it is fully apparent that the Hebrew religion and prophecies of the Old Testament belonged to a much wider group than these, who never returned to Judaea nor whom were ever called “Jews” – something quite difficult to discern from all of today’s propaganda.

    At Ezra 10 and Nehemiah 13 we see that these people who returned to Jerusalem began intermarrying with the Canaanites – the ancient enemies of Israel who were accursed by Yahweh the God of Israel – and upon being admonished and repenting, they put off their foreign wives. This occurred in the 5th century B.C., and the Old Testament records end here, over 400 years before the birth of Christ. Yet much of these 400 years which are wanting in our Bibles are described by secular historians, and especially by the Judaean historian, Flavius Josephus.

    From Josephus and others it can be seen that the Edomites – the descendants of Esau and his Canaanite wives (Gen. 36) – had moved into the lands of Simeon and Judah after the Israelites were deported. By 130 B.C., under the Maccabees who were the high priests at Jerusalem, the people of Jerusalem had grown quite strong and after throwing off the yoke of the Greek rulers of Syria to whom they had been subject, they conquered all of the Canaanites and Edomites who had inhabited the surrounding areas, and forced them all to convert to the religion of Judah, already called by this time “Judaism” in the Greek and Roman tongues, and all of those people – Israel’s traditional enemies – became known as Judaeans, or “Jews”. Once converted to Judaism and practicing circumcision, it became quite easy for the true Israelites of Judaea (the descendants of the 40,000) to begin intermarrying with the Edomites and Canaanites of Judaea, and this time without any apparent religious guilt or criticism. By 80 B.C., many Edomites had gotten themselves into positions of power and authority in the kingdom of Judaea, and especially the family of Herod. By 40 B.C. the first Herod (that of Matthew chapter 2) had become the de facto king of Judaea, having slain the last of the Maccabees, and being bribed by Herod, Marc Antony persuaded Octavius Caesar and the Roman Senate to make Herod the official king, about 36 B.C. Once Herod became king, the high priesthood and other positions at the Temple in Jerusalem became political tools, and over the years many of Herod’s friends and kinsmen were granted appointments to such offices – a practice which continued until the Temple was finally destroyed in 70 A.D.

    Understanding this history, it is evident how the Judaeans whom Christ reproved could claim to be Abraham’s offspring, and yet Christ denies that they were true children of Abraham (John 8). For being descendants of Esau, their claim was valid, yet Yahweh the God of Israel hates Esau (Mal. 1:1-3), as Paul reminds us in Romans chapter 9, where the apostle tells us that not all of those in the Israel of his day were actual Israelites, and he proceeds to contrast Jacob and Esau! Describing the Israelites as “vessels of mercy” and the Edomites as “vessels of destruction” (Rom. 9:22-33), here he explains the reasons for the division among the first century Judaeans, also evident in many passages elsewhere, such as Rev. 2:9 and 3:9. Being, in part, descendants of Canaanites, they were also descendants of the Kenites – the children of Cain – and the Rephaim, all of whom mingled together (i.e. Gen. 15:19-21). This is why the Edomite Herod was representative of “the great red dragon ... that old serpent, called the devil, and Satan” (Rev. 12) who attempted to kill the infant Christ, for the Kenites and the Rephaim were descendants of the serpent and the fallen angels of Genesis!

    For this reason Yahshua Christ told those Judaeans whom He reproved that “Ye are of your father the devil” (John 8:44), and “But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you” (John 10:26). Note that He did not say “ye are not of my sheep, because ye believe not”, as the Romish and Protestant “churches” teach. No, He said “ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep”, where we see that the Jews – the non-believing, anti-Christian Judaeans – were never His sheep in the first place! Indeed, the Bible and history show that they are Canaanites and Edomites – the enemies of Israel cursed and hated by Yahweh God.

    Paul separates the Judaeans into two groups: vessels of mercy and vessels of destruction, as the prophet Jeremiah separated the inhabitants of Jerusalem into two groups: good and bad figs (Jer. 24). Of the bad figs, Jeremiah prophesied that they were to be “removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all the places whither I shall drive them” (Jer. 24:9). Likewise Yahshua Christ, surely alluding to Jeremiah, standing in Jerusalem in 32 A.D. and prophesying about the coming destruction of the city and temple – which happened in 70 A.D. – is recorded as having said “... for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people. And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations ...” (Matt. 21:23-24), and He said this speaking of the unbelieving Judaeans, the bad fig, “not of my sheep”, Edomite Jews! This diaspora of 70 A.D. was not the dispersion of the people of God once known as Israel – for that had happened centuries before, in the Assyrian and Babylonian deportations. Rather, the diaspora of the Jews was – as both Jeremiah and Christ attest – the diaspora of the enemies of God and of Christ! From these people descend – again, in part – the Jews of today, who have mingled themselves with people from many other races along the way, yet who have kept their religion as a common bond – except for the converts to Romish catholicism in certain places in the Middle Ages, especially in Italy and Spain. For nearly 40 years, from the crucifixion in 32 A.D. to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D., the gospel was the filter which separated many of the good figs from the bad. Most of the good Judaeans, as Josephus attests, had fled Jerusalem before its destruction. Christians, of course, had the warnings of Christ.

    It is often claimed by the Jews of today that the Romans killed Christ, being responsible for the crucifixion, and both the Romish and many Protestant “churches” often parrot this nonsense. For at Luke 19:27, at the end of the “parable of the ten pounds”, as it is often called, we find Christ saying “But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.” Elsewhere we see the Jews exclaim “We have no king but Caesar” (John 19:15) and “His blood be on us, and on our children” (Matt. 27:25). After the crucifixion, the apostles clearly fix the murder of Christ on the people of Judaea, and never on the Romans, as can be clearly seen at Acts 2:23; 4:8-10; 7:52-53 and 1 Thess. 2:14-15. The Romans did not kill Christ! The record is clear that the Judaeans (Jews) killed Christ. The Romans were merely the hammer in the hand of the Jews! Can a murderer blame his crime on the weapon? It is also clear that while many good people in Judaea went along with the crucifixion, they were merely following along with the masses and the propaganda of their leaders, the Pharisees and Sadducees, the great number of whom were bad-fig Edomite Jews. Politics then was no different than it is today! For this reason Paul explains that those who deny Christ shall receive much greater punishment than those who transgress the laws of Moses, and that God shall indeed take vengeance upon the Christ-deniers (Heb. 10:28-30). The Jews, claiming to be the people of God, bring much greater punishment upon themselves even if they are! Yet in reality they are not: they are rather the synagogue (assembly) of Satan (the Adversary), i.e. Rev. 2:9 and 3:9.

    In another oft-repeated Jewish claim, they justify their religion – which is not the valid Hebrew religion, for indeed Christianity is the fulfillment of the law and the prophets – by claiming that there is more than one “path” to “God”, and that these different paths are reflected by the various religions of the world. Yet the words of Yahshua Christ Himself clearly refute this, for at John 14:6 He is recorded as having said: “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” At John 10:7-9 He says “... I am the door of the sheep ... I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved ...”, and so it is evident that there is only one path to Yahweh God, and it is also evident that only His sheep pass through that door! Furthermore, Paul, in his epistle to the Hebrews (1:6), says in reference to Christ: “And let all the angels of god worship Him”. An “angel” is a messenger, the meaning of the Greek word. If one claims to be a messenger of God and does not worship Christ, then his religion is vain, and its promises empty. Throughout the Old Testament are prophecies and promises concerning Christ. Those who claim to find their religion in it, and yet are not Christians, are frauds who deceive even themselves. The Jews are foremost among these!

    The Greek word anathema means “accursed”. A valid argument may be presented that the word maranatha, found at 1 Cor. 16:22, is actually a Hebrew phrase which means “a rebel to be destroyed”. This interpretation derives mara from Strong’s Hebrew dictionary #4754 (see also 4775, 76, 77, 79 and 4784) as a rebel, and natha from #5421 (see also 5422, 23) as to destroy or in the Passive, to be destroyed. It can even be argued that this interpretation is more defensible than those of the mainstream scholars, where there is disagreement in the lexicons even as to how the phrase maranatha should be parsed, and the words derived are not – so far as I have seen – identified precisely. Nevertheless, mainstream scholars insist that the phrase means “O Lord, come”, or something similar, even though this is forced into the context of the preceding words. Rather, it is quite evident that 1 Cor. 16:22 should read: “If anyone does not love the Lord Yahshua Christ, he must be accursed (anathema), a rebel to be destroyed [maranatha]!” This reading of the phrase is much more natural in the context of the words which precede, and is quite legitimate, being derived from identifiable Hebrew words. And such are the Edomite Jews – accursed by God – whom Paul calls “vessels of destruction” in Romans 9. Yet we need not rely upon this one statement – having to decipher the enigmatic and argue over its meaning – to see that Christians must reject Jews. For there are many other such statements left to us by the apostles of Christ which instruct us in like manner.

    In the first epistle of John, at 2:22-23, we read: “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Yahshua is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father”, and in the historical context of John’s writing, the apostle can only be describing the Jews. John continues at 4:1-3: “Behold, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Yahshua Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesseth not that Yahshua Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.” While naive catholics and other adherents to the mainstream sects await “The Antichrist” whom they believe to be some future beastly ruler often depicted with science-fiction quality abilities, the truth is that the antichrists have walked among us for thousands of years already! Many of them today are called “Jews”! Their spirits are not from God, but are rather from their own father – the devil (John 8:44). John speaks of them further, at 1 John 5:10: “He that believeth on the Son of God hath witness in himself; he that believeth not God hath made him a liar: because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.” The Jews, by rejecting Yahshua Christ, esteem God to be a liar! Should Christians embrace Jews?

    In John’s 2nd epistle, the apostle reinforces the instruction that those who deny Yahshua are the antichrists, at verse 7: “For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Yahshua Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.” So we see that the Jews are liars, deceivers, and antichrists! In the same epistle, at v. 9: “Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.” John proceeds to instruct his readers how to treat those who reject Christ, at vv. 10 & 11: “If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him Godspeed: For he that biddeth him Godspeed is partaker of his evil deeds.” To “bid Godspeed” is archaic language meaning simply “to greet”. So it is evident that Christians certainly should not embrace Jews, nor even so much as greet them!

    Paul makes a statement similar to 2 John 9-11, while discussing sound Christian doctrine, at 1 Tim. 6:3-5: “If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Yahshua Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.” And so, Christians must reject the Jews!

    In the first century, the Jews used the organized religious sects, the Pharisees and Sadducees, to oppose Christianity, and through these their power to persuade the Roman authorities against it. Unto this day the Jews continue to oppose Christianity, both with their own cries of religious persecution and with the “secular” organizations which they have founded and operate, such as the ACLU and the ADL, among others, which employ once-Christian court systems in order to oppress Christianity. While these groups seek to extinguish Christianity, Christian morals, and Christian ideals, Christians suffer these groups, engage with them, even make donations to them, and embrace the Jews who support them! Such is contrary to the advice of Paul, who warned Christians to “Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. Be not ye therefore partakers with them ... And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them” (Eph. 5:6, 7, 11), and “Only let your conversation be as it becometh the gospel of Christ ... that ye stand fast in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the faith of the gospel; And in nothing terrified by your adversaries: which is to them an evident token of perdition, but to you of salvation, and that of God. For unto you it is given in the behalf of Christ, not only to believe on him, but also to suffer for his sake” (Ph’p. 1:27-29). The “token of perdition” comment shows that these adversaries of Christ are those “vessels of destruction” Paul discussed in Romans chapter 9 – the Edomite Jews. Paul discusses them again at Ph’p. 3:18-19: “For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, the enemies of the cross of Christ: Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things.” These are indeed the “antichrists” of John’s epistles. For a few verses before, at Ph’p. 3:2, Paul warned: “Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision”, and the lines which followed show that by “concision” Paul meant those practitioners of Judaism who insisted that men be circumcised in the flesh.

    Not all Judaeans who in the first century converted to Christianity did so with sincerity. Rather, often they were infiltrators, attempting to subvert the Gospel. Peter and Jude both warned about these (2 Pet. 2; Jude 4-16). Paul tells of them again at Gal. 2:1-10, where he calls them “false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Yahshua, that they might bring us into bondage”, since they attempted to compel Titus to be circumcised. Elsewhere, Paul warned the elders of the Ephesians that “after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.” This is why John warned in his epistle, “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.” Therefore everything touted as doctrine must be measured against the entire Bible.

    These “false brethren” were more interested in gaining control over men (Gal. 2:5) than in being true Christians themselves. And those whom they couldn’t subvert, they persecuted. Paul says at 1 Thess. 2:14-15: “For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Yahshua: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: Who both killed the Lord Yahshua, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: Forbidding us to speak to the [nations] that they might be saved, to fill up their sins always: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.” The problems in Thessalonica which Paul refers to here are described at Acts 17:1-9, where it is evident that common Thessalonians were incited to act against the Christians by certain Jews. They do this same thing in our society today! Early Christian history shows that it was the Jews who were behind all the Roman persecutions of Christians – as Tertullian also attests in his Apology (21.25). However, not being able to stifle Christianity from the outside, history is replete with examples of Jews who “converted” to Christianity, only to later subvert it with false doctrine from within. The results of this continue to plague the mainstream “Christian” sects to this very day, and especially Romish catholicism.

    Why don’t Christians actually follow the New Testament? Why do they disregard all of these admonitions and warnings, and embrace the Jews? Today, all of Western Civilization is in a state of drastic decline because we have embraced the Jews! Here in America, the Jews – who have been here in significant numbers for only about 130 years – have led us into racial integration and a world full of drugs and pornography. Our cities are destroyed, our economy ever teetering on the verge of collapse. Inflation of the money supply is rampant. Our formerly world-leading manufacturing base is disappearing, along with our middle class. Most of our technology has been freely transferred to our enemies. Jewish Marxist ideology has become the standard throughout all of our academia, and now holds the center ring in our political circus. If one doesn’t believe that the Jews are indeed responsible for all of this, one must investigate just who it is running all of the major banking houses, such as Goldman-Sachs and Solomon Bros., Morgan Stanley and Citibank, along with the hedge funds and holding companies, such as KKR, which are really just corporate raiders with improved public relations. One must investigate how such a large percentage of positions on the White House staff, the houses of Congress and their staffs, and all of the cabinet departments are filled by Jews. In addition, all of the most powerful media companies, such as Disney, Time-Warner, Viacom, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and many others, are owned and/or managed by Jews. Like Judaea at the time of Christ, most all of the so-called “upper-crust” of American society is now occupied by the antichrist, Edomite Jews! Christians very naively pity Jews when they cry “persecution”, while at the same time the Jews devour the substance of the Christians! Those whom – as Paul says – “might bring us into bondage” have done so indeed through oppressive taxes and laws – and “who mind earthly things” have through fraud and deceit come to possess all of our earthly things! When will Christians ever start actually practicing what it is that they profess to believe? Only then can our nation – and the other White nations of the world who suffer in like manner – ever begin to be healed.
    sigpic

    "Stain clear water with mud and thou shalt never find sweet drink" - Aeschylus, Eumenides, 694-695

    http://christogenea.org
    http://williamfinck.net

  • #2
    Heirs of the Covenant

    Heirs of the Covenant
    Many commentators often construe Paul?s statements at Galatians 3:15-16 to mean that there is only a single heir of the covenant of Yahweh God, which is Yahshua Christ Himself. If this is a true interpretation, then Paul conflicts with many of his own statements, where we see several times that Paul tells us elsewhere that there is a plurality of heirs to the covenant. For instance, concerning the New Covenant Paul says at Titus 3:7: ?That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.? Then again concerning the New Covenant Paul says at Hebrews 6:17: ?Wherein God, willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability of his counsel, confirmed it by an oath?. In Hebrews chapter 6, while discussing Yahshua Christ and the New Covenant, Paul illustrates that the heirs of that covenant were selected before the confirmation of the covenant by the Sacrifice made by Yahshua Christ. For this reason he also told the Romans at 15:8: ?Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers?.

    Whenever there are such apparent conflicts in statements in the Bible, the reader is either incorrectly understanding the passage in question, usually because it is being taken out of context, or there are translational errors ? something that happens often in the King James Version, and also in every other version of Scripture translated by men. Here Galatians 3:15-16 shall be examined, and it shall be seen that any apparent conflicts are resolved once the context and the translation of the passage are more thoroughly understood. First, the context of the promises found in the New Testament itself must be examined.

    The making of a ?New? Testament by Yahweh with the children of Israel was a matter of Old Testament prophecy. This is found at Jeremiah chapter 31, and here verses 31 through 36 are cited: ?31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: 32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: 33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. 35 Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name: 36 If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever.?

    From this passage in Jeremiah we see that the New Covenant is made exclusively with the house, or family, of Israel, and the house, or family, of Judah: the very Israelites of the old covenant. It is also apparent that as long as there are a sun, moon, and stars, the children of Israel shall always be a nation, and that it is the sins of these very same children of Israel which are to be forgiven. Grace, which may have been better translated ?favor?, is also a matter of prophecy, and we find in this same chapter of Jeremiah, at verses 1 and 2: ?At the same time, saith the LORD, will I be the God of all the families of Israel, and they shall be my people. 2 Thus saith the LORD, The people which were left of the sword found grace in the wilderness; even Israel, when I went to cause him to rest.? Here it is evident, that Yahweh is the God of Israel even after they were cast off, and that those cast off Israelites would be the ones to find grace with Yahweh in His new covenant, which He would make with them. Likewise Isaiah attests to the permanency of Yahweh?s covenant relationship with the children of Israel: ?As for me, this is my covenant with them, saith the LORD; My spirit that is upon thee, and my words which I have put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor out of the mouth of thy seed, nor out of the mouth of thy seed's seed, saith the LORD, from henceforth and for ever.?

    It can be fully demonstrated from classical history that many of the tribes of the Mediterranean basin indeed descended from Old Testament Israelites. These Israelites colonized many areas long before the Assyrian and Babylonian deportations of Israel, which began around 741 BC and ended with the destruction of the temple in 585 BC. Of the Israelites who were taken away by the Assyrians, Micah the prophet says (4:7-8) ?7 And I will make her that halted a remnant, and her that was cast far off a strong nation: and the LORD shall reign over them in mount Zion from henceforth, even for ever. 8 And thou, O tower of the flock, the strong hold of the daughter of Zion, unto thee shall it come, even the first dominion; the kingdom shall come to the daughter of Jerusalem.? It is this passage to which Matthew 21:43 should be cross-referenced.

    Going back to examine the ?promises made unto the fathers? which Paul mentions in Romans 15:8, we see that Abraham?s seed (offspring) ? according to a promise made to him by Yahweh - were to become an innumerable multitude, and grow into many nations with their kings (Genesis 12:2-3, 13:14-16, 15:1-6, 17:1-10). Yet these promises were not to all of Abraham?s seed (offspring). We see that Ishmael was sent away, because even though he was circumcised and ?believed? (Genesis 17:25-26), he was not to become an heir (Genesis 17:20-21, 21:9-13). Additionally, the children which Abraham had later with Keturah were also sent off, since neither were they to become heirs (Genesis 25:1-6). The promises of Yahweh would fall to Isaac exclusively (Genesis 18:9-15, 21:12, 26:3). Of Isaac?s descendants, Jacob and Esau, Esau sold his birthright, and by it his share of the promises. Yet Esau?s selling of his birthright may be viewed as a mere formality. He actually lost it by going against the desires of both Abraham his grandfather and Rebecca his mother, by marrying accursed Canaanite women (Genesis 24:3, 27:46, 36:1 ff.). Therefore the promises given to Abraham were passed down exclusively to Jacob-Israel. By these promises and other Biblical prophecies, we see that Jacob?s offspring were to become innumerable, and were to become nations and companies of nations (Genesis 28:10-16, 35:9-15).

    ?For the LORD will not cast off his people, neither will he forsake his inheritance.? (Psalm 94:14)

    While this is a mystery to most people, even in the churches and the halls of academia, this is not the fault of Yahweh God or of the apostles. All of these promises were surely fulfilled in history, and this fulfillment is revealed upon a study of both the classics and archaeology. Many of the Greek tribes, namely the Dorians and Danaans, along with the Trojans and those who sprung from them, such as the Romans and the Illyrians, had descended from Israelites dispersed long before the Assyrian invasions. Yet from the Assyrian and Babylonian invasions and deportations of Israel are descended the Kimmerians, Scythians and Parthians, from whom came all of the Germanic tribes of later history. The Word of Yahweh God is sure, and the seed (offspring) of Israel did indeed inherit the desolate heritages, as the prophet Isaiah also foretold (60:21-22): ?21 Thy people also shall be all righteous: they shall inherit the land for ever, the branch of my planting, the work of my hands, that I may be glorified. 22 A little one shall become a thousand, and a small one a strong nation: I the LORD will hasten it in his time.? Furthermore, the fulfillment of all of this prophecy may be seen where Isaiah says of Israel, at 54:1-5: ?Sing, O barren, thou that didst not bear; break forth into singing, and cry aloud, thou that didst not travail with child: for more are the children of the desolate than the children of the married wife, saith the LORD. 2 Enlarge the place of thy tent, and let them stretch forth the curtains of thine habitations: spare not, lengthen thy cords, and strengthen thy stakes; 3 For thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles, and make the desolate cities to be inhabited. 4 Fear not; for thou shalt not be ashamed: neither be thou confounded; for thou shalt not be put to shame: for thou shalt forget the shame of thy youth, and shalt not remember the reproach of thy widowhood any more. 5 For thy Maker is thine husband; the LORD of hosts is his name; and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall he be called.? This was fulfilled in history by the dispersed of Israel who ultimately became what are known today as the Celtic and Germanic peoples. Paul quotes from this very passage of the Galatians in chapter 4 of his epistle.

    Several decades after the dispersion of Israel which began to take place following the Assyrian and Babylonian deportations of the people from Palestine, a small remnant returned to Judaea to rebuild the temple. This remnant was to provide Yahweh with the means by which He would ultimately redeem Israel through His sacrifice as Yahshua Christ. After this sacrifice, the news of which was to be brought to the ?lost? sheep of Israel (Ezekiel chapter 34), the city of Jerusalem was to be destroyed. This is prophesied in Daniel chapter 9. The destruction of Jerusalem was necessary because ?satan? (the adversary) had taken it over (Ezekiel chapter 35), which Paul attests to at Romans 16:20. For this reason, Paul explained in Romans chapter 9 that he was concerned only for his ?kinsmen according to the flesh? in Judaea, and then he goes on to compare Jacob, the vessels of mercy, and Esau, the vessels of destruction (Romans 9:1-13, 21-22).

    This process of ?satan? taking over Jerusalem began when the Edomites moved into much of the lands of Israel and Judah after the deportations. Then shortly before 130 BC, the reigning Maccabean high priest (who had all the authority of a king), John Hyrcanus, decided to conquer all of the cities of ancient Israel inhabited at that time by Edomites and Canaanites, and to either convert them to the religion of Judaea (first called ?Judaism? by the Greeks) or to let them leave the land, or to be slain. (Maccabee was a name given to the Asamonean dynasty of high priests who ruled Jerusalem from about 150 BC down to about 36 BC, when the last of them was slain by Herod.) The greater numbers of these people readily converted to Judaism, and thenceforth were known as Judaeans (?Jews? in most translations). This is described in detail by the historian Josephus, who wrote after 70 AD, and is also summarized by the Greek geographer Strabo nearly a century before Josephus wrote. Strabo, writing from a general Greek perspective, says in the 16th book of his Geography: ?The Idumaeans [Edomites] are Nabataeans [an arab tribe], but owing to a sedition they were banished from there, joined the Judaeans, and shared in the same customs with them? (16.2.34). In another place, Strabo attests that the Judaeans were ?mixed up? with the Idumaeans (16.2.2). When the first Herod, whom Josephus on at least four occasions attests was an Edomite, through treachery and bribery became king of Judaea, he destroyed the last Maccabean high priest and all of the possible rival claimants to the position. From that time he used the position of high priest as a political tool. By the time of Christ, the high priests and many of the influential men of the temple and its religious sects were actually Edomites. There are many New Testament statements which reveal this, which become fully evident to those who first understand the history surrounding these events.

    The children of Israel are the anointed of Yahweh. Yes, Yahshua Christ is the Anointed One, however He is the Head of the Body. Generally, the children of Israel are ?the anointed? as a collective group, and this is evident throughout the Old Testament in many scriptures, among which are 1 Sam. 2:10, 35; 1 Chron. 16:22; Psa. 2:2; 20:6; 28:8; 84:9; 89:38; 105:15; 132:17; Lam. 4:20 and Hab. 3:13. In the New Testament this is evident at Heb. 11:24-26 and 1 John 2:27, but also in many other passages where it is obfuscated because the translators insist upon translating the word ?anointed? as ?Christ? upon nearly every occasion that the word appears (for clear instances, see Rom. 9:1-5; 1 Tim. 5:11-12; and 1 Cor. 1:10-13 in the Christogenea New Testament, available online).

    In Galatians 3:1-14, Paul discusses the faith of Abraham. In Romans chapter 4, Paul explained that the faith of Abraham was that Abraham believed Yahweh when he was promised that his offspring would become many nations (not, as the churches errantly teach, that many nations would somehow become his offspring). In Romans chapter 9, Paul discounts the Edomites as ?vessels of destruction?, since they are not included in the promises. Although these things are not stated explicitly here in the epistle to the Galatians, they are wholly representative of Paul?s teachings. The Galatians had descended from the ancient Kimmerians of the Israelite dispersion, and so, in Galatians 3:19-29 Paul explains the relationship of Israel to the laws given at Mount Sinai, and in chapter 4 we see that Paul tells the Galatians at verse 28 that ?we, brethren, down through Isaak, are children of promise?. He then repeats the statements which tell us that the children of Ishmael are excluded from the promises of Yahweh, and reassuringly says to the Galatians ?Well, brethren, we are not children of a servant woman, but of the free.?

    Seeing that Paul was teaching the exclusion of both Edomites and Ishmaelites from the covenants and promises of Yahweh God - and many more Biblical passages may be cited to support this - only then can the statements made by Paul at Galatians 3:15-16 be properly interpreted in context. First, however, some background in the Greek words of the passage must be given.

    Firstly, concerning verse 15, the Greek word translated in the King James Version as ?addeth thereto? is epidiatassetai, the Present Passive or Medium 3rd person singular of epidiatassomai (Strong?s # 1928), and it appears only here in the NT. Properly, since in Greek verbs of the Medium voice indicate that both the recipient and the doer of the action being described are one and the same, the word may therefore be translated here ?makes additions to for himself?. Liddell & Scott in their lexicon define the word as ?to add an order, N.T.? but at diatasso Liddell & Scott have ?...Medium to arrange for oneself, get things arranged...?, and so the propriety of the translation for this verse which will be given here is readily evident.

    Secondly, concerning verse 16, here Paul contrasts spermati, the Dative singular of sperma (4690), with its Dative plural, spermasin. Thayer says of sperma that ?the singular is used collectively of the grains or kernels sown?, although later Thayer claims that this is not so here, perverting Paul?s use of the word and calling it ?genius?. In the context of this and other of Paul?s epistles explained here, I must therefore read this verse to be a comparison of the several races sprung from Abraham: Jacob-Israel being contrasted with Ishmael (Gal. 4:21-31), with Esau-Edom (Rom. 9, 10, and 11), and even with those from Keturah. The word ?seed?, as in English, also in Greek and Hebrew is a singular used collectively, of many of a single type. The Greek plural of sperma appears in the N.T. only at Matt. 13:32 and Mark 4:31, where diverse types are meant. This is true in Old Testament Hebrew also, where zera‛ (2233, ?seed?) only occurs in the plural at I Sam. 8:15, where it is used of crops and diverse varieties are implied.

    With all of this, I will now quote the version of Galatians 3:15-16 from the Christogenea New Testament, translated properly and in the context of the promises of Yahweh God found throughout the Bible and explained in part here in this paper. I will also quote verses 17-18, so it may be seen that Paul indeed teaches that these promises are still to this day exclusive to the descendants of the ancient Israelites, the chosen descendants of Abraham: ?15 Brethren, (I speak as befits a man,) even a validated covenant of man no one sets aside, or makes additions to for himself. 16 Now to Abraham the promises have been spoken, and to his offspring. It does not say ?and to offsprings?, as of many; but as of one: ?and to your offspring,? which are anointed. 17 Now this I say, a covenant validated beforehand by Yahweh, the law which arrived after four hundred and thirty years does not invalidate, by which the promise is left idle. 18 For if from law, the inheritance is no longer from promise, but to Abraham through a promise Yahweh has given it freely.?

    Paul is explaining to the Galatians that the Edomites and the Ishmaelites and the children of Keturah are excluded from the covenant, which is only for the literal, physical, genetic children of Israel. Then he proceeds to explain their relationship to the law, which only makes sense to those who had descended from the Israelites, since Scripture attests in many places that only Israel was ever under the law! An example of this testimony is found at Psalm 147:19-20: ?19 He sheweth his word unto Jacob, his statutes and his judgments unto Israel. 20 He hath not dealt so with any nation: and as for his judgments, they have not known them. Praise ye the LORD.? At Galatians 3:29, the word found in the final clause which the King James Version translates ?and? is not found in any ancient Greek manuscript whatsoever, and does not belong in the text. This verse must be translated: ?29 But if you are Christ?s, then of the offspring of Abraham you are heirs according to promise.? And it is fully evident that if you are not offspring of Abraham through Jacob, then you have no part in that promise! For this reason did Yahshua Christ state that ?I have not been sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel!? (Matt. 15:24). Paul reaffirms this at Hebrews 11:9, speaking of Abraham: ?By faith he sojourned in the land of promise, as in a strange country, dwelling in tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise.? Of course, Yahshua Christ could raise up children of Abraham from stones, but they would not be Israelites, and neither were the Edomite Pharisees and Sadducees whom He was addressing!

    The beginning of Luke?s gospel reflects the context of the entire New Testament. Here we shall read 1:67-80 from the Christogenea New Testament, where Zacharias prophecies concerning the infant John the Baptist and the coming Redemption of Israel: ?67 Then Zacharias his father was filled with the Holy Spirit and prophesied, saying: 68 ?Blessed is Yahweh the God of Israel, that He has visited and brought about redemption for His people, 69 and has raised a horn of salvation for us in the house of David His servant, 70 just as He spoke through the mouths of His holy prophets from of old: 71 preservation from our enemies and from the hand of all those who hate us! 72 To bring about mercy with our fathers and to call into remembrance His holy covenant, 73 the oath which He swore to Abraham our father, which is given to us: 74 being delivered fearlessly from the hands of our enemies to serve Him 75 in piety and in righteousness before Him for all of our days. 76 And now you, child, shall be called a prophet of the Highest: for you shall go on before the face of Yahweh to prepare His path. 77 For which to give knowledge of salvation to His people by the dismissal of their errors, 78 through the affectionate mercies of our God, by whom dawn visits us from the heights 79 to shine upon those sitting in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet in the way of peace.? 80 And the child grew and was strengthened in spirit, and was in the wilderness until the day of his manifestation to Israel.?

    It is absolutely clear, if the Bible were read in context and not ? as the Judeo-Christians do ? one passage at a time, that in Galatians 3:15 and 16 Paul is informing us that only one group of the descendants of Abraham had expectation in the promises and the covenants of Yahweh, those being the descendants of Jacob-Israel, and that the others, the descendants of Esau and the descendants of Ishmael, were and still are excluded. Today, the Edomites and the descendants of Ishmael are for the most part found amongst both the jews and the arabs. The descendants of Jacob-Israel are found in the White Christian nations of Europe, and they are the heirs of the covenant.

    William Finck
    Christogenea.org
    May 26th, 2009
    sigpic

    "Stain clear water with mud and thou shalt never find sweet drink" - Aeschylus, Eumenides, 694-695

    http://christogenea.org
    http://williamfinck.net

    Comment

    Working...
    X