Tweet
Who Rules The World? - Part 1
The Origin Of Evil : Ancient
Mythology Or Occult Reality?
By Philip Jones
7-4-9
http://www.rense.com/general86/whopr.htm
Who Rules The World? - Part 2
The Origin Of Evil: Ancient Mythology Or Occult Reality?
By Philip Jones
7-9-9
http://www.rense.com/general86/whorules2.htm
Who Rules The World? - Part 3
The Origin Of Evil - Ancient Mythology Or Occult Reality?
By Philip Jones
7-16-9
http://www.rense.com/general86/whorules3.htm
Ye Offspring Of Vipers: That Jesus spoke of two distinct seeds, one that came from God through Adam, and another originating from Satan and the Fallen Angels, is a part of the Biblical record (which we shall examine in greater detail below). In Chapter Eight of the Gospel Of John, Christ states unequivocally when addressing the Pharisees, that they, the High Priests of Judaism, were the seed of the Satan. Jesus makes reference in a number of places to Satan's children. In the parable of the `Tares and the Wheat,` he spoke of the farmer who sowed good seed in his field and his enemy came along during the night-time and sowed poisonous weeds, the tares among the wheat. When the farmer's servants saw the tares growing among the wheat they asked him if they should go and pull them. The farmer said: "No, you might pull up some of the wheat with them. Let them grow together until the time of the harvest, and then the reapers will first gather the tares into bundles to be burned, and then put the wheat in my barn."
In Matthew 13:38-39 Jesus explains, that the field is the world; the `Wheat,` the good seed are the children of Adam but the Tares are the children of Lucifer. One time, when addressing the Pharisees, Jesus says in Matthew 12:34: "O generation of vipers, how can ye being evil, speak good things? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh." Since the very beginning, they had borne the characteristics of their `father` Satan, and Jesus knew who they were!
In Matthew 23:29-35 it is recorded: "Woe unto you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, and say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye genema (ye offspring, children) of vipers. How can ye escape the damnation of hell? That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, son of Barachias, whom you slew between the temple and the altar."
It is my contention that Jesus was identifying the Pharisees and their kind as an evolution entirely apart from the children of God through Adam and Seth. One which through intermarriage had eventually embodied in any or all races, retaining the characteristics of the proud and lustful, murderous and slanderous Fallen Angels from which they descended. The established Christian Churches have refused to acknowledge what Jesus taught outright; that the `Tares,` the sons of Satan have been genetically sown among the good seed of the son's of Adam through Seth, and that they even today walk among us as Fallen Angels incarnate, and their offspring, who maintain the meticulous outward appearance of men and women, but whose blood seethes with hatred and wantonness, lacking entirely any sense of Godly righteousness. As in the story told by Christ, the seed of God is embodied in every race, nation and tribe, and the seed of Lucifer/Satan has been sowed amongst them all. Throughout the Bible it records the two seed lines; Yahweh and Lucifer's. For example in the Weymouth translation, this same verse, John 3:12 reads, "We are not to resemble Cain who was a child of the evil one and killed his brother." The Phillips' translation reads, "We are none of us to have the spirit of Cain who was a son of the devil and murdered his brother." The superlative New English Bible reads: "Unlike Cain who was a child of the evil one and murdered his brother."
The Biblical verses that theologians often use as a basis to denounce the belief that there are on this earth today the literal descendants of Cain and therefore Satan, is John 8:31-33, in which Jesus is speaking to the Judeans;
"If ye continue in My doctrines indeed, then ye shall be My disciples; and you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." They answered Him, "We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man." But even a casual reader of the Bible will know that all of Abraham's children had been in bondage at one time or another? Here is evidence that these people whom Jesus was addressing were not descendants of Abraham.
If they had been of any of the twelve tribes of Israel, they would have been in bondage the first time in Egypt. If they belonged to the ten northerly tribes, they would have been in bondage the second time in Assyria. If they were of the two tribe southern kingdom of Judah, they would have been in bondage the second time in Babylon. Yet the Judeans admitted they had never been in bondage to any man, thus demonstrating they weren't of Israel or Judah. Who of them could say that the Hebrew Patriarch Abraham was one of his ancestors?
http://www.rense.com/general86/whorules3.htm
The Origin Of Evil : Ancient
Mythology Or Occult Reality?
By Philip Jones
7-4-9
http://www.rense.com/general86/whopr.htm
Who Rules The World? - Part 2
The Origin Of Evil: Ancient Mythology Or Occult Reality?
By Philip Jones
7-9-9
http://www.rense.com/general86/whorules2.htm
Who Rules The World? - Part 3
The Origin Of Evil - Ancient Mythology Or Occult Reality?
By Philip Jones
7-16-9
http://www.rense.com/general86/whorules3.htm
Ye Offspring Of Vipers: That Jesus spoke of two distinct seeds, one that came from God through Adam, and another originating from Satan and the Fallen Angels, is a part of the Biblical record (which we shall examine in greater detail below). In Chapter Eight of the Gospel Of John, Christ states unequivocally when addressing the Pharisees, that they, the High Priests of Judaism, were the seed of the Satan. Jesus makes reference in a number of places to Satan's children. In the parable of the `Tares and the Wheat,` he spoke of the farmer who sowed good seed in his field and his enemy came along during the night-time and sowed poisonous weeds, the tares among the wheat. When the farmer's servants saw the tares growing among the wheat they asked him if they should go and pull them. The farmer said: "No, you might pull up some of the wheat with them. Let them grow together until the time of the harvest, and then the reapers will first gather the tares into bundles to be burned, and then put the wheat in my barn."
In Matthew 13:38-39 Jesus explains, that the field is the world; the `Wheat,` the good seed are the children of Adam but the Tares are the children of Lucifer. One time, when addressing the Pharisees, Jesus says in Matthew 12:34: "O generation of vipers, how can ye being evil, speak good things? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh." Since the very beginning, they had borne the characteristics of their `father` Satan, and Jesus knew who they were!
In Matthew 23:29-35 it is recorded: "Woe unto you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, and say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye genema (ye offspring, children) of vipers. How can ye escape the damnation of hell? That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, son of Barachias, whom you slew between the temple and the altar."
It is my contention that Jesus was identifying the Pharisees and their kind as an evolution entirely apart from the children of God through Adam and Seth. One which through intermarriage had eventually embodied in any or all races, retaining the characteristics of the proud and lustful, murderous and slanderous Fallen Angels from which they descended. The established Christian Churches have refused to acknowledge what Jesus taught outright; that the `Tares,` the sons of Satan have been genetically sown among the good seed of the son's of Adam through Seth, and that they even today walk among us as Fallen Angels incarnate, and their offspring, who maintain the meticulous outward appearance of men and women, but whose blood seethes with hatred and wantonness, lacking entirely any sense of Godly righteousness. As in the story told by Christ, the seed of God is embodied in every race, nation and tribe, and the seed of Lucifer/Satan has been sowed amongst them all. Throughout the Bible it records the two seed lines; Yahweh and Lucifer's. For example in the Weymouth translation, this same verse, John 3:12 reads, "We are not to resemble Cain who was a child of the evil one and killed his brother." The Phillips' translation reads, "We are none of us to have the spirit of Cain who was a son of the devil and murdered his brother." The superlative New English Bible reads: "Unlike Cain who was a child of the evil one and murdered his brother."
The Biblical verses that theologians often use as a basis to denounce the belief that there are on this earth today the literal descendants of Cain and therefore Satan, is John 8:31-33, in which Jesus is speaking to the Judeans;
"If ye continue in My doctrines indeed, then ye shall be My disciples; and you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." They answered Him, "We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man." But even a casual reader of the Bible will know that all of Abraham's children had been in bondage at one time or another? Here is evidence that these people whom Jesus was addressing were not descendants of Abraham.
If they had been of any of the twelve tribes of Israel, they would have been in bondage the first time in Egypt. If they belonged to the ten northerly tribes, they would have been in bondage the second time in Assyria. If they were of the two tribe southern kingdom of Judah, they would have been in bondage the second time in Babylon. Yet the Judeans admitted they had never been in bondage to any man, thus demonstrating they weren't of Israel or Judah. Who of them could say that the Hebrew Patriarch Abraham was one of his ancestors?
http://www.rense.com/general86/whorules3.htm
_________________________