The Turner Diaries

[Swillis Gumpf Turner]

Cousin Randy Turner is an obsessed tard

Cousin Randy Turner is an obsessed tard


http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2014/...53404471570654
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...1332#post11332
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...1332#post11332

Well, the obsession isn't limited to CJ Huff.

You wrote a semi-pornographic poison-pen novel and advertised it on an ostensible "school" blog. You were fired for cause and knew that it would be a waste of time and money to appeal.

Concentrate on CJ Huff going through the tax money, Turner. Whenever you whine about the "unfairness" of your firing CJ Huff gets a free pass to waste another million of taxpayer levied funds.

It is when your enemies over-reach and piss off their base of the Good Ol' Boys that they get gone, Turner. Your whining about your deserved and long overdue firing by CJ Huff enables CJ Huff.

But asking you to stop whining is like asking you to stop breathing, Turner.


5:32 PM Monday, Sept 8, 2014

[Cousin Randy Turner]

Ed Emery and the 20 minutes I'll never get back

Ed Emery and the 20 minutes I'll never get back


http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2014/...never-get.html
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...1803#post11803
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...1803#post11803

It was during one of those early book signings, back in the days when being an author was still something new to me.

I can't remember which book it was, but I do remember it was near the front of the now defunct and sorely missed Hastings store in Joplin.

I had sold a few books and had a steady stream of people either stopping to buy a book, stopping, looking it over and moving along, or just stopping to say hi.

I recognized the tall man who came through the front door and made a beeline for where I was sitting. I had seen his photo in the news and on his government website.

He introduced himself, sat down and for the next 20 minutes, not noticing (or caring) that a line was forming behind him, proceeded to lecture me about the dangers of public education. The man favored educational vouchers and completely eliminating teacher tenure so school districts could finally remove all of the "bad" teachers who he seemed to believe were filling the classrooms in Missouri schools.

A couple of times during that marathon session, I tried to contest his points, but I soon stopped trying. It only kept him around longer (and there were people patiently waiting) and besides, it was obvious that to him, my opinion did not mean anything unless I came around to his opinion.

Finally, he left. Twenty minutes gone from my life, never to be recaptured...and he didn't even buy a book.

Several years have passed and that man whose presence darkened that book signing, then a state representative, now a senator, has not changed his opinions on public education one bit.

It doesn't even matter that Missouri voters soundly rejected Amendment 3 last month, which would have eliminated teacher tenure and forced school districts to evaluate teachers based on student scores on standardized tests.

The years have not mellowed Sen. Ed Emery, R-Lamar, who has pre-filed SB 27, which would eliminate tenure to any teachers hired after the beginning of the 2015-2016 school year. Emery also wants to eliminate the current type of salary schedules, based on years of experience and advanced degrees, which are used in nearly all Missouri schools, and replace them with a "merit" type plan, which would be based on supposedly non-subjective evaluations, which would include student test scores.

Those who oppose teacher tenure always use the same arguments:

-Once a teacher has tenure, it is almost impossible to fire him or her. If you are able to do so, it costs a fortune.

-The problem with public education is bad teachers. (Poverty, crime, and poor home environment don't play any role at all.)

-Administrators could run wonderful schools, if only they could hire and fire people whenever they wanted and didn't have to worry about tenure and seniority.

-Why should teachers have tenure when no one else does?

.


And teachers have not done a good job of defending themselves and their profession. Once you eliminate tenure, you are not only eliminating protection for teachers, but also for parents and students.

Good teachers are often the only thing standing between misguided policies and curriculum decisions that might boost administrators' resumes, but will not be in the best interest of the children. And for anyone who has been around education, there are administrators who fall for every fad that comes around, even if that fad was first tried and failed under a different name 20 or 30 years ago.

After all, the administrators who always seem to land the positions at the bigger schools are the ones who tried something totally different from what everyone else was doing (and then landed the next job before the results were in on whether this innovative approach actually worked).

If left to their own devices, some administrators would remove any teachers who raised concerns, replace them with compliant rear-end kissers, and then flee the district in a few years, leaving an almost entirely new faculty with no experience at standing up for what the children and the community need.

It is almost never mentioned that while some states give teachers tenure after two years, it is a much different situation in Missouri, where a teacher has to teach five years in one school district before tenure is reached on the first day of the sixth year. It certainly should not take five years for administrators to find out they have a bad teacher on their hands. It is also not true, as some have claimed, that teachers earn tenure and then become burned out and lazy.

Those instances are few and far between. Good administrators should be able to catch the poor teachers and remove them from the classroom, and in fact, many teachers realize they are in the wrong profession and are gone long before they have reached the five-year mark.

Contrary to the message that people like Ed Emery have been sending, there is nothing wrong with having a core of veteran teachers in a school district, teachers who can provide the foundation for a solid education for thousands of students for years and also provide welcome advice and instruction to younger teachers.

All bills like SB 27 do is remove the incentive for people to become classroom teachers. Why would young people want to join a profession where they are blamed for everything that goes wrong even when much of it is totally out of their control? Why would they want to become teachers when all they hear in the news is how legislatures are stripping their low-paid profession of the things that made it an attractive option- tenure, incentive for continuing higher education, health benefits, and pensions and also their power to unionize and fight for their rights?

It is time to send the Ed Emerys of Missouri a message that teachers are not the problem facing education. Look in a mirror, Sen. Emery, and you will see a large part of the problem.

One of the things that irritates me the most when I see Ed Emery's anti-public school legislation is that as a classroom teacher at the time I had that book signing at Hastings, I didn't just send him on his way.

All of us can look back on time we have wasted and have regrets.

I can never get those 20 minutes back.
.

Posted by Randy at 6:39 PM Monday December 8, 2014

[Cousin Randy Turner]

http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3096#post13096
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3096#post13096

[Cousin Randy Turner]

Due to being a whining lying gliberal whigger pussazoid . . . I am not running those comments any more

Due to being a whining lying gliberal whigger pussazoid . . .

Sorry, I am not running those comments any more

http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2015/...-comments.html
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...3104#post13104
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3104#post13104

Creepy ol perv no longer a teacher of anythang
.

A few hours ago, I noticed that I had five new anonymous comments for the Turner Report. Hostile, hurtful comments which prove that everyone is out to get me, a creepy old perv practicing lavender journalism from behind a keyboard in my shuttered locked apartment.

I only go out at night to buy food every week or so when the food stamps cum in or on weekend nights to McClellan Park where I have "dates" with other faggots and suck down warm protein through a suitable six-inch meat-straw.

Since they all came within a few seconds of each other and I have not written anything remotely controversial over the past few days, I figured the comments were probably from the same person. Yup, either CJ Huff or Dwight Douglas or that racist maniac Pastor Martin Lindstedt or any of 777 others working for the jewplin Chamber of Commerce, cum-cum.

It turns out I was right. Don't you know that pretty much everyone is out to get me? That is why I must stay inside during the daytime and not because I'm a gay vampire, buttt because I'm gliberal whigger butthole faggot.

This person thinks it is amusing to take whatever subject I have written about and write something to the tune of "You can blame C. J. on this," or "It must be C. J.'s fault." Never mind that I keep on posting CJ's picture as my main demon who ended muh teaching career while there is nothing much to do with Da Huffster. Did I forget to mention that everyone is out to get me, especially the Hufftards, and Pope Marty and the entire Chamber of Commerce and those working with them?

That was the type of comment on each of the five and the comments were placed on five separate posts. Fukkin' broad-based coonspiracy, itz!!!

I deleted four of the comments and published the fifth, since the fifth was actually on a post that mentioned C. J. Huff. But not the real hurtful ones, that irritated muh mangina.

This same person has been leaving this comment on numerous posts ever since C. J. Huff "retired." That CJ Huff got a third-million golden parachute and all I got for muh CJ Hufftard-engineered "retirement" was a dry cornholing and a disability check and a golden shower from CJ pissing all over me when I went to beg him on bended knee-pads to not fire muh old perv ass.

If he or she wants to continue to do so, that is fine. I have to deal with hundreds of junk e-mails every day, so spending a few minutes deleting useless comments is not going to be much of a hassle. It is not as if I got anythang else to do while barricaded behind muh door waiting for everyone to go home and go to sleep so that I might feed.

I have gone above and beyond and under and with knee-pads in my efforts to include as many reader comments as possible. As I have mentioned before, the primary reasons I have deleted comments in the past is because they either contained profanity, included racist comments, or libeled someone, including occasionally me. Especially that racist profane maniac Martin Lindstedt and Cousin Swillis Gumpf-Turner. I am amazed at how many people think they can say things that are not true about me as I claim and that I will publish them.

On the other hand, I welcome people who disagree with me and will happily continue to publish those comments if they will kiss my ass or let me suck theys dick in the McClellan Park men's room, especially the stall with the three gloryholes. Somethang is always gonna turn out "just right".

Another type of comment that will no longer be found on any new Turner Report posts is the one that refers to everyone with the suffix "tards." Here's looking at you, Cousin Swillis. I probably should have stopped that one a long time ago but for the fact that you called the Hufftards names as well. It is possible to write something critical without being offensive. There will be no more hurtful things said here unless they be fully homophiliac anally aggressive in a gay sort of way.

Perhaps this is an attempt to be politically correct, but well reasoned politically correct fag-friendly pro-gliberal whigger butthole faggot comments will always have a home here on this pathetic blog owned by some pore feeb who has been ass-raped by the local establishment and enjoyed most of it and especially every single inch involved. When a person's idea of intellectual discourse includes that suffix of the t-word, he or she has left the concept of a well reasoned fag-friendly comment behind.

Some of the critics of this blog have jumped all over the fact that I allow people to comment anonymously. That is because there sure are a lot of other perv teachers who want to "teach" somethang not on the oafishul curriculum and letting them as sanctimonious sexual and moral predators continue to have access to your children without fear of detection is not going to change. Anyone who has read this blog for the past couple of years has been able to find thoughtful comments and often valuable information from anonymous fellow skrule teachers with an agenda with self-serving comments, whether they were positive toward the Turner Report or not.

Returning to the subject that began this post- the commenter who thinks it is funny to add a C. J .Huff comment to every post- the idea he or she seems to be trying to put across is that C. J. Huff is gone so it is time for the Turner Report to follow suit. After all, now that the tornado money is drying up and CJ Huff has been runnt-off, you would think that a creepy old perv with no other talent other than lavender journalism wouldn't have anything more to write about.

Sorry, I am not planning on going anywhere. The food stamps cum in last Friday, I went out to buy some supplies, sent out and paid the bills for my electricity, sewer, gas, water and Internuts. I also got muh "secret energy drink" fill-up from the McClellan Park men's room this weekend. The barricade went back up and so I'm pimped, pumped, and ready to roll for another month, here in the gliberal whigger butthole faggot Turner-tard bunker, cum-cum, cum-cum!!!

When the area's newspaper of record fails to inform its readers about problems in the city government and in the school district according to my selective notions and then raises its prices, there is a need for an alternative news source which isn't beholden to the local Chamber of Commerce and itz advertisers and which caters to pub[l]ic skrule teachers wanting unauthorized access to your children and which hews the gliberal whigger butthole faggot line.

When newspapers decide they want to increase their revenue by turning what has always been news, for instance, obituaries, into another commodity for sale, there is a need for an alternative news source. Let the Turner blog be jewr oafishul buzzard.

When people know they will be fired if they step forward and talk about serious problems cooncerning how they don't have sufficient access to jewr wallet and children, and the area's homophobic newspaper of record will not even listen unless they reveal their names and perverted unaccountable natures to the readers, then there is a need for an alternative homo-friendly politically correct news source.

On Sunday, I revealed to readers on the Inside Joplin Facebook page and on my Facebook page that I am beginning another attempted expansion of the Turner Report/Inside Joplin trying a new approach to offering coverage that readers are not able to get anywhere else. We'se talking toilet-cams, first in McClellan Park, then in select gay bars and private residences in jewplin.

The Turner Report/Inside Joplin has been growing for the past couple of years, but we are just getting started whining and bitching and pissing and moaning and censoring opposing opinions. I will reprint that Facebook post in a few minutes.

Cum-cum, cum-cum!!!

***

You can pay your $275.76 a year to the Joplin Globe when prices increase September 1 or you can pay $30 a year (or $3 a month) to the Joplin area's alternative news source, a creepy old perv who practices lavender jewrnalism from behind a blog, or make a contribution in any amount you choose. If you would prefer not to use PayPal or a credit card, feel free to send a contribution to The Creepy Ol Perv Practicing Lavender jewrnalism, 2306 E. 8th, Apt. G, Joplin, MO 64801

.

+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+

.

Just another anonymous CJ Huff quasi-supporter said...

What some of us all love about the Turner Report is Turner's amoral witless hypocrisy. And how Turner relentlessly makes his sundry whinings all nothing more than a bogus claim to where his censorship and lies are far superior to his local establishmentarian enemies because . . . get this . . . he means well.

I was one of the four or five commenters who ridiculed Turner's still blaming CJ Huff for everything wrong in Joplin. You see, everyone knows full well that Turner is nothing more than a disgruntled ex-employee fired for cause with nothing else to do but whine against those who cast him out for ample cause.

But like the Hilldebeast it is all a vast right-wing conspiracy to get Turner because Turner is simply the pest who won't go away but rather sits on the sidelines endlessly whining that we need more of Turner's kind -- teachers who want to teach things not approved of by accountable adults elected or appointed to teach a certain curriculum.

But allegedly like CJ Huff, Turner obsesses over his blog looking for criticism or ridicule from commenters while at the same time whining about the editorial content of the Joplin Globe and the former CJ Huff administration detecting and weeding out rogue teachers like Turner.

The purpose of commenters like myself is to keep Turner and Turner's blog marginal. By making comments which sting of the truth, and then having Turner censor them, we make sure that everyone knows -- starting with Turner -- that Turner is simply a liar and a hypocrite. There are -- were -- other blogs and web pages in which ribald commentary about Turner and this blog can be printed as well. The First Amendment is a double-edged sword and Google is not Turner's or any other blogger's friend, or at least not all the time.

So go ahead Turner. Whine about the faults of the Joplin Globe and of Mark Rohr, Bruce Speck and CJ Huff. Think all you want that there is someone who is out to get you using the very same methods you use against others. The truth is that all of the above public officials were gotten rid of because they misused public funds and annoyed them who had raised them up, and less because you harped endlessly concerning their low crimes and misdemeanors. Then when you post a picture of CJ Huff on one of your disposable rants and four or five people at much the same time ridicule you about your CJ Huff fixation, decide to "crack the whip" using your limp wet noodle of editorial control.

I'm certainly not going to recommend that you get out more. Certainly not when "we" keep you marginalized to where you are staying in your apartment scared to go out and feverishly posting blog post after blog post about your sundry petty hatreds and paranoid fantasies. It is cheaper on the taxpayer that you self-medicate your seething hatreds and hurt self-entitlement using google-therapy and thankfully you are too much of a quivering coward to buy a gun and go postal.

It was the comments section which was the most interesting part of your idiot lying blog however. The pub[l]ic loves being entertained by conflict. Hence Donald Trump brought in the largest ratings for a cable news show last week with the menstrual-blood libel holoco$ting yet another oppressed-by-biology "minority". Likewise with the comments ridiculing your pompous silliness. Ever since you have cracked your limp wettt noodle of editorial control, why even your Most Right Worsesheepfool Turner- (must not use the t-word which rhymes with lard which is most appropriate) "groupies" seem to have skedaddled what with Master being suddenly all out of sorts. You used to be the Managing Editor of the Carthage Press. Still wondering why that gig went south?

Live long but do not prosper in the Turner-bunker, Moan Randy.

7:05 AM

[Cousin Randy Turner]

Message to the Joplin Globe: We were not shocked by the audit

Message to the Joplin Globe: We were not shocked by the audit


http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2015/...-were-not.html
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3154#post13154
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...3154#post13154

[Cousin Randy Turner]

School shootings, rape, discipline and Joplin High School -- All the Fault of CJ Huff

School shootings, rape, discipline and Joplin High School -- All the Fault of CJ Huff


http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2016/...pline-and.html
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...4217#post14217
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...4217#post14217

A freshman student is arrested for compiling a hit list and threatening a school shooting.

A student says she was raped in a hallway.

Sadly, incidents like these happen in schools across the country. They are not necessarily a sign that a school is out of control. We have had news reports of shocking shootings and other incidents happening at the best schools in the country.

It is also not just something that happens at sprawling urban schools. This modern nightmare has occurred at small schools, private schools, and schools that are highly regarded.

Some of the comments on this blog since the arrest of a Joplin High School ninth grader Thursday was reported have laid the blame on school officials for this threatened school shooting and for the reported rape.

One thing that should be noted is what went right this week. Whether a shooting would have occurred is something we will never know. What we do know is that students had the courage to come forward and tell administrators what they knew, making sure there was no chance of Joplin joining the ranks of Columbine and Jonesboro.

That is what worked right.

What should concern taxpayers is a situation that was allowed to develop over the past several years by an out-of-touch Board of Education that was more interested in basking in the reflected glory of a "hero" superintendent and the approval of an unelected group of community elites than in doing what was best for the children.

How else can you explain moving toward one of the biggest high schools in the state of Missouri at the same time that you are guaranteeing that it will be staffed by one of the most inexperienced faculties in the state?

It took the election of new board members for the focus to finally turn on the departure of more than half of the district's teachers, including a disproportionate number of veteran educators. It is always important to bring in a blend of passionate young teachers each year, not only to bring their energy and enthusiasm, but to make sure that they have the time to learn from experienced teachers before taking their place among the faculty leaders.

That model was never taken seriously by former Superintendent C. J. Huff and his Assistant Superintendent Angie Besendorfer. An average of more than 100 teachers have left Joplin per year for the past four years. While some of those were inexperienced teachers replacing inexperienced teachers, more than half of the district's approximately 600 teachers have left.

Instead of taking this problem seriously, the board backed Huff, even while he changed his reasoning each time someone asked him why teachers were leaving.

At first, it was the tornado. That made it seem as if teachers were abandoning their school district because they, unlike the superheroes in upper administration and on the board of education, were heading for calmer pastures. Few, if any, teachers left the R-8 School District because of the tornado. An overwhelming majority of teachers place the future of the children ahead of their own personal comfort. Many of the teachers who have left the school district only did so after it became apparent that nothing was going to be done about Huff and Besendorfer.

Huff then took the sexist route, claiming that teachers were leaving because their husbands took jobs in other communities. That happened a couple of times. There was even at least one instance of a male teacher leaving because his wife received a better job in another state, but it was not a major factor in teachers continuing to flee the district.

After those excuses did not work, Huff, never a strong supporter of the classroom teacher during his seven-year tenure in Joplin, threw his former employees under the bus, claiming they were leaving because they were not capable of performing up to "Joplin standards." On the contrary, some of the teachers who left had no problem being hired by school districts which not only offered the teachers higher salaries and better benefits, but in many cases, performed up to a much higher standard than that set in Joplin.

At the same time, the area's newspaper of record, the Joplin Globe, did its level best to serve as a public relations trumpet for Huff. On the one time that it focused on the problem of teachers leaving the district, it did so in such a way that it made it appear as if there was nothing unusual in having that many teachers leave.

And when Interim Superintendent Norm Ridder has mentioned the mass teacher flight as being one of the biggest, if not the biggest, problem facing the Joplin R-8 School District, it has been relegated to the inside jump of board of education articles, if it is mentioned at all. This is being done despite statistics revealed in a recent board meeting that more than 50 percent of the teachers across the district have less than five years of classroom experience.

While Ridder and the current board of education have accurately termed this as the number one problem facing the school district, it has yet to receive page one coverage in the Joplin Globe.

Yet, during the past several weeks, the Globe has offered its prime real estate, space on page one of its Sunday edition, to the efforts of a woman to have an empty chair designated at the Joplin High School graduation for her son, who would have been a member of the Class of 2016, but he was killed in the Joplin Tornado.

While I wrote in favor of the seat and disagree with the high school administration's decision, pushing this story two times on page one of their biggest-selling newspaper of the week and not addressing the biggest problem that faces this district appears to be another case of the Globe editors putting their thumb on the scale against those who have attempted to restore sanity to the district.

That brings us back to the events of the past couple of weeks at Joplin High School.

While these things could have happened with a faculty consisting of 100 percent experienced teachers, the parents I have spoken to have mentioned time after time their concern about the number of first and second year teachers in the classroom, teachers who not only do not have the background to deal with some of the disciplinary problems that have arisen, but who have a dwindling number of veterans to consult.

Young teachers learn, not only by having to deal with situations in the classroom, but then by meeting with veteran teachers and asking them what they would have done differently. Under the Huff Administration, not only were those teachers no longer around, but teachers were seldom given the opportunity to meet with the ones who remained to receive that valuable guidance.

That, combined with edicts from up above to write less referrals to make discipline statistics look better, left the teachers sometimes feeling they were working in a war zone instead of a place of learning.

A larger number of veteran teachers may cost more in terms of salary and benefits, but the rewards are far greater. Students feel safer, parents are more satisfied, and younger teachers have a much greater opportunity to develop to their full potential by benefiting from those who have been in the trenches.

Ironically, this week as events came to a head at Joplin High School, the man who drove more than half of the teachers out of his school district, C. J. Huff, was speaking at the third annual Bright Futures USA Conference at Missouri Southern State University and being praised for his work as a "child advocate."

Real child advocates know that the best way you can support children is by ensuring that they have the best classroom teachers.

Not surprisingly, that was not one of the topics addressed at the Bright Futures USA Conference.
.

Posted by Randy at 12:19 PM Saturday, March 05, 2016

[PastorLindstedt]

It's Always CJ Huff's Fault

It's Always CJ Huff's Fault


https://rturner229.blogspot.com/2016...98828807104988
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...4220#post14220
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...4220#post14220

This entire blog has but one premise: It is ALWAYS the fault of CJ Huff and anyone and everyone who had something to do with the inevitable firing of Turner. This entire blog is nothing but Randy Turner trying to re-write history in favor of simply letting the teachers teach whatever they please without accountability or restraint.

Forcing young people into confinement in which they have no ability or willingness to learn whatever foolishness is fashionable at the time there might well be incidents in which like prisoners they get all violent or at the very least unruly. The solution is to segregate classes upon the ability and willingness to learn the necessary curriculum offered, teach them up to the limits of their abilities, and let the rest go do something which they find profitable to themselves and their future.

Turner's solution to everything: Listen to Turner and punish CJ Huff and the former school board who detected Turner and gave Turner a hearing and fired Turner for cause. Otherwise Joplin will become another Columbine or Sandy Hook.

This is not only self-serving but patently ridiculous.

The last thing anyone should do is to listen to Turner other than to figure out what not to do. The basis for public education is that taxpayers and parents elect school board members who set policies as opposed to public educrats doing so. Any teacher who wants to personally set school policy and curriculum will end up like Randy Turner and usually sooner rather than later. These mental and moral mediocrities get into something that they think is easy going for those of their limitations and for a few years they energetically do what they are told. Then they get some "experience" and think about how easy it would be if only the school board comprised of non-educrats would listen to their "wis-dumb". Then they try to implement on a limited fashion on their own limited classroom their pet theories, and either get slapped down and buckle under back to democratically-elected policy or they get rebellious and are caught again, fired, or made to resign.

The CJ Huff Administration, for all its faults, was excellent in detecting such teachers like Turner and sending them packing. The glaring fault of the CJ Huff Administration and the Joplin R-8 School Board of the time was in going through the tax money while blaming the tornado. CJ Huff and the board of that time was sent packing by the taxpayers for such financial wastage, and NOT for firing incompetent teachers like Turner.

Turner got caught out several times, given the choice to "move on", decided to publicly fight the matter as opposed to sneaking into another district and then either behaving or getting detected again, given an open and fair hearing in which all sides were heard, and then publicly terminated.

Now in Turner's forced early retirement -- nobody will ever hire Turner as a teacher ever again -- Turner re-writes his memoirs in the form of this dishonest whining blog.

Now lest anyone of Turner's groupies and peers yawp about how "Nobody needs to read this blog", which is irrelevant as well as correct, let's say that many of us just love to read how Turner is suffering, how neither Turner nor Turner's fellow flunkies have any intention of learning from the consequences of their stupidity, and how upon every occasion Turner and those like Turner will seek to blame "society", i.e. the very foundation of public education (elected local officials to disburse and set policy for local tax moneies and local public property), which gives them employment in the first place.

They think that they all are Socrates -- who came to a bad end when the restored democracy has enough of Socrates "teaching" the very traitors and tyrants who destroyed Athens' Golden Age. Rather, these "teachers" are more like Daffy Duck and Wile E. Coyote: Unable to learn from their mistakes but wanting everyone else to suffer from their failed amoral stupidity.
.

2:35 PM Saturday, March 5, 2016

[Cousin Randy Turner]

http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2016/...-c-j-huff.html
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...4612#post14612

[Cousin Randy Turner]

Rigor, relevance, and relationships- memories from Joplin R-8

Rigor, relevance, and relationships- memories from Joplin R-8


https://rturner229.blogspot.com/2016...tionships.html
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...4838#post14838
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...4838#post14838



.

A few years ago, teachers at East Middle School were told that we would be concentrating on the three Rs during the coming school year.

If any of us had the dream that we were going to actually be concentrating on the basics of reading, writing, and arithmetic instead of teaching to the tests (and teaching to the practice tests), our hopes were quickly dashed when our principal Bud Sexson let us know that the three Rs were rigor, relevance, and relationships.

When I heard Sexson stressing the importance of adding rigor to the educational process, something did not seem right.

As an English teacher and someone with a knowledge of the English language, I knew that rigor was the last thing that the students at East or in the Joplin R-8 School District needed.

The definition of rigor is "harsh, unyielding. Why were we wanting to push harsh and unyielding education on children?

At first, I thought this was just another phase that Joplin was going through. Instead, it turns out Joplin was latching on to another one of these fads to which education often falls victim.

Though the time of relevance and relationships appears to have come and gone, schools all across the nation are still pushing rigor.

I was reminded of those professional development meetings at East, when I read the latest blog post from educational historian Diane Ravitch, who served in the U. S. Department of Education under President George H. W. Bush:

The post is about a letter from a Brooklyn teacher who had the same reservations about "rigor" that I had.

The letter contained the Merrian-Webster definition of rigor:

a (1) : harsh inflexibility in opinion, temper, or judgment : severity (2) : the quality of being unyielding or inflexible : strictness (3) : severity of life : austerity

b : an act or instance of strictness, severity, or cruelty
2
: a tremor caused by a chill
3
: a condition that makes life difficult, challenging, or uncomfortable; especially : extremity of cold
4
: strict precision : exactness
5
a obsolete : rigidity, stiffness
b : rigidness or torpor of organs or tissue that prevents response to stimuli
c : rigor mortis

.

Considering the nonsense that educational charlatans, all of whom seem to be making steady money as consultants, have been touting since No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top and so-called reform have swept the nation, it should come as no surprise to those of us who have had to deal with the results (and that's all of us) that these geniuses do not even know the meaning of the words they are shoving down our throats.
.

Posted by Randy at 6:51 PM Wednesday, July 06, 2016

[Swillis Gumpf Turner]

Turner-Trotsky whines about how Huff-Stalin destroyed Bolshevik Edjewmacation

Turner-Trotsky whines about how Huff-Stalin destroyed Bolshevik Edjewmacation


https://rturner229.blogspot.com/2016...tionships.html
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...4841#post14841
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...4841#post14841

Turner whines about "fads" in edumacation. The test scores on the SAT have gone down since 1957, which was three years after Brown v. Board of Education in which negroes with at least a standard deviation lower in Intelligence Quotients were "integrated" into white schools in which no amount of indoctrination could overcome basic racial differences in intelligence. The curriculum was dumbed down with the end result of white kids not having to study in order to meet the lowered standards. In a futile effort to overcome Nature, sundry fads were implemented all of which failed over the past 60 years.

So by the time that Dumbya Bush cum in and decided to "overcum" the "racism of lower expectations", i.e. reality by setting up "No Child Left Intelligent" in which there would be massive testing to measure the outputs on raised wasting inputs, the "Department of Education" imposed increasing the mandates along with the federal monies. The states accepted these tax dollars and left until later worrying about how to meet the rising impossible standards. Of course the schools failed in overcoming the inevitable decline in test scores, although massive fraud was attempted in school districts in Atlanta and Houston. Today the way the System "works" is to have the white kids try to keep up the test scores as best they can as they are taught to "game" the tests. Not to think independently or rationally because Independent Rationality might well lead to Rebellion.

So we have Turner, who cannot ascribe the genuine reason for the decline in test scores to lowered intelligence of the subjects imprisoned by a failing System, and will not take the responsibility for the liberal achievement of doing away with quality by the enforcement of e-quality. So Turner writes a nasty libellous semi-pornographic book aimed at his bosses, gets caught, fired, and now blames the very System which elected and selected the Joplin School Board and Superintendant and bureaucracy which followed the funding of what has become a "Disneyland for Dummies."

In short, Turner is like Trotsky blaming the failures of Communism on Stalin, er C.J. Huff.

The only time Turner has any sort of Truth on his side is when Turner blames the wastage of tax dollars on how the rebuilding proceeded after the Tornado.

Under our System of Public Schools, the taxpayers elect a School Board. The School Board members, with public input, hire a Superintendant. The Superintendant hires his staff and teachers. A teacher who cannot obey his supervisors, elected or appointed, is to be fired when detected.

The System worked as intended. Turner was caught, given due process, and fired. Now Turner has a blog bemoaning the reality of what happened. Which is fine. Even a blind pig sniffs out a truffle every so often.

The System isn't working for the public or the students, however. Property taxes skyrocket as the general economy declines. The students don't even learn the basics of literacy. Neither Turner nor CJ Huff is in favor of simply teaching enough for a GED for those who want to learn, and then calling for "free babysitting" where the subjects will be fed and housed for ten hours five days a week until they reach the age of majority and then expelled to . . . the streets or the military or the prisons.

The current System is not reformable. There can be no reform until there is truth which can be said, then acted upon. The truth is that most "AmurriKwans are stupid and unfit for higher education." Nothing more than the bare minimum should be expected -- and paid for. So the System will totter on like a zombie, feeding upon the young and productive until there is none left and the entire System collapses.

That said, I greatly like to listen to Turner-Trotsky whine about how Huff-Stalin destroyed the True Faith of Bolshevik Edjewmacation via Test-Score Lyshenkoism.

.

1:07 PM Thursday July 7, 2016 (Censored by Cousin Randy Randy Turner)

[Cousin Randy Turner]

Grand jury indicts Neosho businessman on child porn charge

Grand jury indicts Neosho businessman on child porn charge


https://rturner229.blogspot.com/2015...sinessman.html
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...4873#post14873
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...4873#post14873

.

A federal grand jury indicted Neosho businessman Blake Altman on a child pornography charge June 16.

Altman, 31, former general manager at Sam's Cellar, is free on a personal recognizance bond, offer opposition from the U. S. Attorney's office, which noted that not only was Altman downloading child pornography, but he told investigators that "his preference was for girls between 10 and 14 years old."

Altman is being represented by Springfield attorney Dee Wampler.

The government made the following argument for keeping Altman behind bars while he awaits trial:

The defendant was utilizing peer-to-peer file sharing software to receive and distribute images and videos depicting child pornography. The imagery in question depicted children, some as young as infants, engaging in sexually explicit conduct. The defendant, at the time of the search warrant, possessed a rifle loaded with armor piercing bullets, two sets of body armor, and a Kevlar helmet.

The defendant was accused by a family member of inappropriately touching her when he was 16 years old. The accusation was never reported to the police. The defendant told the investigators that his preference was for girls between 10 and 14 years old. This case involves a minor victim..The evidence against the defendant is overwhelming

The indictment came more than eight months after a search warrant was executed on Altman's arrest, which was noted in the October 3, 2014 Turner Report:

Though no arrests have been filed anywhere at this point, a search warrant request filed in the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri indicates child pornography had been traced to an IP address belonging to a Neosho businessman.

The affidavit, written by Joplin police officer Charles Root, working with the FBI as a member of the Southwest Missouri Cyber Crimes Task Force, detailed the reasons the search warrant was being requested:

On August 14, 2014, Southwest Missouri Cyber Crimes Task Force Officer James Smith conducted an undercover investigation into the distribution of child pornography. Utilizing an undercover computer, TFO Smith was able to make a direct connection with the target computer and browse the files available for sharing.

The target computer contained approximately 116 files believed to contain depictions of child pornography.

Smith was able to download 33 of the files, according to the affidavit:

Each of 33 files downloaded depicted minors, some as young as infants, engaged in sexual contact or posed in a sexually explicit manner. The imagery depicted minors engaging in such sexual acts as sexual intercourse and digital penetration of the minors' anus and vagina.

(The post has been amended to note that Altman is the former general manager at Sam's Cellar.)



Posted by Randy @ 3:14pm Wednesday July 8, 2016

[Cousin Randy Turner]

Why Donald Trump's critics are wrong about the Access Hollywood video

Why Donald Trump's critics are wrong about the Access Hollywood video


https://rturner229.blogspot.com/2016...are-wrong.html
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...5323#post15323
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...5323#post15323


.

When the time comes to write the story of the 2016 presidential campaign, historians should note that the key moment took place in the first Republican debate.

When Megyn Kelly of Fox News asked Donald Trump her first question- "You've called women you don't like 'fat pigs,' 'dogs,' 'slobs,' and 'disgusting animals.' Does that sound to you like the temperament of a man we should elect as president?" she was accused of grandstanding, of trying to make a name for himself, and for unfairly attacking Trump.

In retrospect, Kelly, who came under vicious attack from Trump and his supporters after her opening question, was able to see through right through the GOP nominee from the start.

No matter what happens next month, Donald Trump has been defined, likely forever, as someone with no respect for women.

And that is the way it has been seen ever since the Access Hollywood video outtakes were leaked to the Washington Post Friday.

One political figure after another, in both parties, has condemned Trump's demeaning comments about women, his bragging about making a play for a married woman, and his talk of how he used his wealth and his star power to get any woman he wanted.

Many of them referred to their daughters, their mothers, or their wives. How could they look them in the eyes if they did not rebuke his statement, they asked.

Every one of them missed the point.

It's not just daughters, mothers, and wives- it's sons, fathers, and husbands.

When we allow someone to demean, diminish, and bully anyone and fail to take a stand, we make it that much easier for others to follow the same path.

No doubt there are still many who find Donald Trump amusing, who revel in his defiance of political correctness, people who love to whoop and holler when Trump talks about the size of his hands, the heroism of John McCain, and belittles his opponents by giving them childish nicknames.

It is true that political correctness gets out of hand at times, but common courtesy, as lacking as it may be in politics, has never gone out of style.

What Donald Trump, in his first apology, described as "locker room talk," is a feeble attempt to make it look as if this is something all guys do.

It isn't, not even in the locker room.

Most men do not treat women in that fashion.

When Donald Trump treats women like possessions or playthings and shows no respect for them, he doesn't just diminish women- he diminishes all of us.


Posted by Randy at 10:58 PM Friday, Oct. 7, 2016

[Meercat #1]

A tail of two moralities

A tail of two moralities


https://rturner229.blogspot.com/2016...48372613833322
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...5326#post15326
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...5326#post15326

Yes, yes, like Hillary, Turner understands how calling women names is so much worse than actually raping them like Bill Clinton did and then having Hillary cover it up or actually threaten women if they tell on Bill's past actual sexual assaults.

Not saying that Donald Trump is anything other than a boor. But at least he pays for what he humps, unlike Bill and Hillary.

Best of all, Donald knows how to talk his business on a secure line, and knows how to buy a politician and/or whore cheap. Unlike Hillary who has bought and sold influence while running the state department and giving arms to "moderate" Islamic terrorists. Oh well, as Benjamin Franklin would have said if he had lived to see Benghazi, 33,000 deleted e-mails and a dead fruit-fly ambassador running guns to Islamic rebels tell no tales . . .

The best thing is that what with Hillary and Turner all being all sanctimonious and self-righteous and all is when Hillary steals the general election like she did with Bernie Sanders is that it will prove that half the country cannot live any longer with the other half of the country and there will be a breakup soon enough, after the financial bubble bursts.

Thanks Turner. We love your sanctimonious hypocrisy but have serious doubts about how well you actually get along with women who get along with men. Who says evil is strong when it can't even live off itself?



Posted on Saturday October 8 2016 @ 5:13 AM

[Meercat #2]

As a moralizing LibberToon faggot I already know the answer and it doesn't involve me grabbing pussy

As a moralizing LibberToon faggot I already know the answer and it sure doesn't involve me grabbing pussy


https://rturner229.blogspot.com/2016...05491599211143
http://christian-identity.net/forum/...5331#post15331
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...5331#post15331

Steve Holmes said...

Some Republicans today are defending Trump by saying, "We are electing a President, not a Pope." Fair enough, but strange coming from the party that cloaks itself in "family values." Next time a Republican criticizes a Democrat over infidelity or other moral issues, the perfect rebuttal will be, "Did you support Trump?" If the answer is yes, end of debate. The moral high ground, if it ever existed, is gone.

By the way, no, I'm not supporting Hillary. I am planning to vote libertarian. So if you're gonna come at me, you're gonna have to use some other line than socialist liberal. How do you explain patriotic Americans and Republicans like John McCain withdrawing their support? Or Condaleeza Rice? Or Colin Powell? Or the 30 GOP ex-office holders who said Trump was unfit to be President? Can you explain them away as liberal socialists?

What would Trump have to do to make you stop supporting him? Or does "anyone but Hillary" justify absolutely, positively anything?

Never mind. I know the answer.


Saturday, Oct. 8, 2016 3:45 PM

[Swillis Gumpf Turner]

Could you please just go crawl off and die like an animal someplace where we won't have to look or at smell you?

Cousin Randy, you gliberal whigger sack of shit, Could you please just go crawl off and die like an animal someplace where we won't have to look or at smell you and further spare us your sermonizing hypocrisies?


https://rturner229.blogspot.com/2016...33079486704176
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...5334#post15334
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...5334#post15334

No creepy old lying hack left behind / Swillis Gumpff-Turner said...

We don't expect you to act in any way other than a complete hypocrite given that you are nothing more than a political hack for whom Bill and Hillary always get a free pass for whatever criminal things they do and Trump never gets any pass for what Trump says, but now that you are going to get all preachy about what was said privately to others about that which doesn't concern you, what say that you stop whining about how CJ Huff and the School Board found that what you wrote about them got you justly fired and banned for life as a teacher of the young?

That's what we like about Trump and not Hillary and to a lesser extent Bill: Trump has never pretended to be anything other than someone who will buy whatever some whore will sell or give away just as long as the price is right. If she has something to sell sometimes Trump would buy. But Bill Clinton would sexually assault oridinary women who didn't have any intention of having that sort of relationship with Bill Clinton. Then Hlllary would ruin those women. Ordinary women of all ages are perfectly safe with Trump as long as they don't try to throw themselves at him. Both the ex-wives of Trump have gotten huge divorce settlements and Trump cares for his children, unlike Bill who used his official power to assault numerous women, then leave them with his bastards to do as best they can with Hillary enabling.

None of us really know what we are getting with Trump but we sure know that we are getting more of the same stuff that is destroying this country with Hillary and we will be judged as "deplorables" by the sick, degenerate and vicious like yourself, Turner.

Still wondering why we are so sick of you liars and degenerates who think you ought to rule over us while we want nothing much more to do with you?

Could you please just go crawl off and die like an animal someplace where we won't have to look or at smell you and further spare us your sermonizing hypocrisies?



Saturday, Oct. 8, 2016 5:12 PM