Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Turner Diaries

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    No place for Rush Limbaugh in Hall of Famous Missourians

    No place for Rush Limbaugh in Hall of Famous Missourians


    http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...n-hall-of.html
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/randy-...b_1322888.html
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=5381#post5381


    .


    (The following is my latest blog for Huffington Post, and my latest column for the Newton County News.)

    The timing of Missouri Speaker of the House Steve Tilley’s announcement that he had named Rush Limbaugh to the Hall of Famous Missourians could not have been any worse.

    It has only been a few days since Limbaugh went on a verbal rampage, referring to Georgetown student Sandra Fluke as a “slut” and a “prostitute,” simply because she advocated expanded access to birth control.

    Tilley noted that Limbaugh is “famous,” and that certainly is true. But then the speaker had the audacity to compare Limbaugh to other famous Missourians who have already been enshrined in the hall and who had their detractors- the Show-Me State’s only president, Harry S Truman, former Attorney General John Ashcroft, and former Gov. Warren Hearnes.

    For Steve Tilley to compare a radio host who has made millions by dividing America to people who devoted their lives to public service is an insult. Limbaugh has always referred to himself as “an entertainer,” but there is also no legitimate comparison between Limbaugh and such entertainers as St. Louis Cardinals legend Stan “The Man” Musial and Walt Disney, both of whom are in the Hall.

    Some have called Limbaugh a journalist (though journalists are required to provide a least of modicum of truth). In that field, the Cape Girardeau native pales in comparison to Walter Cronkite, another member of the Hall.

    Even if you could forgive Tilley, who as Speaker has the sole province to select the new members, for preferring someone from his own area of the state, there is no forgiving him the insult to enshrine Limbaugh during the same year that he selected Buck O’Neil and Dred Scott for induction.

    That would be the same Dred Scott, whose efforts to escape slavery were thwarted by one of the worst decisions in U. S. Supreme Court history, and Buck O’Neil, who nearly singlehandedly brought the Negro Baseball Leagues Museum in Kansas City into existence, was the first African American coach in major league baseball, and who was a long-time all-star with the Kansas City Monarchs in the Negro Leagues, where he played because the doors to major league baseball were closed to people of his color.

    What a cruel joke for Steve Tilley to invite Rush Limbaugh into the Hall of Famous Missourians the same year as Buck O’Neil and Dred Scott.

    After all, though it is his sexist comments that have brought a firestorm upon Limbaugh over the past few days, he has a long history of peppering the airwaves with racially-charged remarks.

    Nine years ago, it was his disparaging comments about Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb, saying McNabb had been built up by a media that wanted to see a black quarterback and black coaches succeed. Limbaugh asserted that McNabb’s success was completely owed to the Eagle defense. The controversy over that remark led to Limbaugh’s resignation from ESPN.

    Since the election of Barack Obama in 2008, Limbaugh has teetered on the edge of racist comments on nearly a daily basis, referring to the president as a “Halfrican-American,” and offering alleged humor based on President Obama’s skin color including a song called “Barack, the Magic Negro.”

    A man such as this has no place in an institution designed to honor the best of Missouri. While the world has moved into the 21st century, Rush Limbaugh and those who hang on his every word steadfastly cling to a lily-white past that shames all of us.


    Last edited by PastorLindstedt; 03-07-2012, 12:49 AM.

    ___666___666___666___



    The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

    Comment


    • #62
      The case against class warfare (when done by Republicans)

      The case against class warfare (when done by Republicans)


      http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...s-warfare.html
      http://www.occidentaldissent.com/for...=6009#post6009
      http://stumbleinn.net/forum/showthre...356#post354356
      http://previousdissent.com/forums/sh...8806#post28806
      http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=6693#post6693


      (This was my June 28 Huffington Post blog, but I feel the timing to run it again is just right. Them left-wing faggots let me whine at [s]will over there, and I'm [S]Will now.)
      .


      The cold day in hell has arrived. I think I need to find one of them little gaywads that I punked out at the Middle Skrewl and poke my perverted gliberal whigger butthole faggot pecker up itz warm poop-chute.

      If you had asked me a year ago if I would ever agree with Congressman Paul Ryan about anything, you would have either received derisive laughter or a challenge to a duel. Ladysticks at zero paces, on the ruins of the McClellan Park mens' restroom glory-hole.

      After all, this is a man who is praised by people who should know better because he is willing to sacrifice Social Security and Medicare "for the good of his country."

      But when he told an interviewer last September, "Class warfare . . . may make for really good politics, but it makes for rotten economics," Paul Ryan stumbled onto the truth. He was so farsighted to bail out them Wall Street jew banksters whose indoor gambling on derivatives and Credit Default Swaps and sub-prime mortgages means that us pub[l]ic skrewl teachers will have theyz' (401)k's becum-cum None-O-One k's. (I majored in skrule teechin' and not economics.)

      This election season has been marred by people who have tried to stoke a feud between those who struggle to make ends meet and those who worry if the elevator they installed for their cars is down for repairs.

      Class warfare does make for rotten economics and it is time to tell Paul Ryan and his colleagues, whether they classify themselves as simply conservative or Tea Party, that as gliberal whigger butthole fags just trying to get our 'fair share' of a declining trough we are sick of it. And you don't want me puking up a cup full of gaywad cum on jewr spats, I shit you not.

      It is class warfare when a bunch of white middle-aged men with six and seven-figure incomes fight tooth and nail to keep people from having affordable health care, making the same arguments that were made before Medicare and Social Security were passed. It is NOT class warfare when grey old senile gliberal whigger butthole faggots who turned pretty much the entire economic order to shit want to be paid for doing so.

      It is class warfare when public school teachers are attacked for being the cause of education problems in the United States while these same men do everything they can to eliminate the programs designed to battle the poverty that is the biggest cause of failures in our inner-city schools. Well, not actually poverty. Niggers. Niggers are the biggest cause of poverty in our inner-shitty skrewls because niglets are born stupid and violent and nobody, including me, wants to be around them.

      It is class warfare when anti-union and anti-worker legislation is touted as vital to bringing jobs to states when the whole idea is to get every state to pass these bills and reduce the wages and benefits that these "job providers" offer. As said before, it wasn't economics which was my major. Edjewmacation, or rather gliberal whigger butthole faggotry was. I've always been in favor of the unions pricing their members out of a job and making the working-class whites have to pay for it all.

      It is class warfare when you lower taxes again and again for these "job providers" who never seem to provide any jobs. With taxes so low, no money is left to pay for essential services, which makes it necessary to launch attacks against the middle class public servants whose jobs relied on that money and upon piglice to make sure that the taxes were paid..

      It is class warfare when you blame the dysfunctional educational system for not providing job-ready workers (which was never the purpose of public education in the first place -- indoctrination and providing us gliberal whigger butthole fags with young whigger gaywad man-pussy was), to cover up the shipment of those same jobs to other countries to save a few dollars. It wasn't until there was no longer any private-sector jobs left that it occurred to us pub[l]ic servants to whine about job outsourcing.

      It is class warfare when you begin the systematic elimination of campaign finance limits, the only thing that offered the possibility of an even break in the electoral process to those moderate and liberal incumbents who cannot afford to wine and dine their politicians and offer them carpet bags full of cold cash like you right-wing corporate-crony ass-clowns can.

      It is class warfare when the corporations are given unlimited free speech, while one impediment after another is placed in the path of unions or anyone else who represents workers. Of course when I was a reporter and editor of a local lie-paper, I certainly didn't give an even break to all the working poor and literal nazis and klansmen who had a different opinion from mine. So I censored them, just as I do today on my pathetic gliberal whigger butthole fag blog. Free speech for me and mine, censorship for thee and thine you nazi swine.

      It is class warfare when legislators continue to offer bills designed to strip money from public schools and have it sent to private institutions, while making no effort to make sure that those same private institutions will open their doors to anyone, including those with physical, emotional, and behavioral problems. Since we simply have no ability to turn White children into useful productive citizens who will be able to look out for their own welfare, well might as well whine about how the beaners, niggers and retards who NOBODY can edjewmacate are sucking hind tit and us pub[l]ic skrewl swineherds are having to be doing less with less.

      The most horrific part of the class warfare that the American people have been subjected to the past few years is that the more times we are told that class warfare (against the 1 percent) won't work, the more effectively it is working for that same one percent. See. Advocating class envy against the one percent while pretending that as a gliberal whigger butthole fag drone that I'm not into the class envy thang -- worthless.

      We automatically accept, almost without question, that Medicare and Social Security, success stories by anyone's definition, must be altered, or perhaps dismantled, in order to save these unsustainable programs.

      We accept the statement that public schools are failing, when the overwhelming majority of them are not and the inner-city schools that are full of untrainable and violent beaners and niggers always having problems are being hurt just as much by politicians' disdain for dealing with poverty and societal problems, as by poor teachers of their own racial kind.

      We accept the idea, and it is far more insidious than anything else I have mentioned, that those who are poor, those who are diseased, those whose religion or sexual preference is different from the majority, those who have come to this country because of what the United States represents, and I pray will continue to represent, are somehow the root of this nation's problems. I prefer to pretend that when you have filled this nation with the shit-colored offal that has created these horrific conditions common to the Third World that we can continue to maintain a White Western First-World Civilization in which the rights of us sodomistically correct gliberal whigger perverts to keep on calling the shots will long endure.

      We have all been victims of class warfare. Some much, much more than others, as my own sphincter can testify. What has been most shameful has been the way the word "conservative" has been destroyed by these zealots. You need us gliberal whigger butthole fags to define it. Like Claire McCaskill as opposed to Todd Akin. There is nothing conservative about systematically destroying the ideals and values that have made this country great. Why can't you 'conservatives' be the sort of conservatives that gave us gliberal whigger butthole fags whatever we wanted and bitched to achieve and then when we did get it refused to pay for it because there was nothing left to pay for it.

      Zombie whigger apocalypse. Belch & felch about it.


      Posted by Cousin Randy Randy at 9:33 PM WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 05, 2012


      ___666___666___666___



      The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

      Comment


      • #63
        Teachers do not have to be political eunuchs

        Teachers do not have to be political eunuchs


        http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...political.html
        http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=6759#post6759


        (The following is my latest Huffington Post blog and Newton County News column.)


        During my first year of teaching eighth grade writing, I took a gamble on a lesson plan that seemed destined to end badly- I showed an early debate between the Republican candidates for president.

        As you might expect, the students grumbled, wondered why we had to do something so boring and made their case for another video (As far as I know, this Nemo still hasn’t been found.)

        They finally settled down and began watching the video, and though I was anxious about whether it would happen, they quickly became absorbed as the candidates spouted their talking points.

        After the video, we discussed the debate and took a vote.

        If my eighth graders had their way Ambassador Alan Keyes would have become the Republican candidate for president, with Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch finishing second and John McCain third. Coming in dead last was the man who eventually became president, George W. Bush.

        Keyes, of course, was a glib and entertaining speaker, while the surprising show of support for Hatch came from one of my students who had lived in Utah and made the case quite eloquently for the only candidate she had heard of before.

        During my second year as a teacher, I had the good fortune of being able to teach about the presidential election that never ended, and while some people thought the 2000 election was a nightmare, I found it to be a wonderful time to be teaching, with students who came into class every day wanting to talk about the latest developments in the ongoing battle between whether George W. Bush or Al Gore would take the oath of office.

        I have never shied away from bringing politics into the classroom and over the years I have been criticized for bringing issues into the classroom, not by students, parents, or administrators, but by those who read my blog posts and disagree with my views, and automatically assume I am imposing them on my students.

        I am not; that is not my job.

        Last week, in a Huffington Post blog, Larry Strauss, a high school English teacher and coach, expressed his pride that students could not tell his political leanings and, in fact, thought of him as a Republican though he had never voted for a Republican in his life.

        Strauss quite rightly emphasized having the students research the candidates and their stances on the issues:
        And so, for example, the students in my class will analyze the stump speeches of both major candidates along with those of some lesser known candidates and when we evaluate the claims and support and utilize factcheck.org to study the art of political deception, we will do so for everyone. We will pick apart the rhetorical strategies of every candidate, use criticalvoter.com to reveal the linguistic tricks of their trade and understand how words can change the world -- or be used to maintain the status quo.
        .

        Strauss talks about his colleagues who cannot keep their political viewpoints out of the classroom and try to bring students around to their way of thinking. He disapproves of that approach and so do I.

        His method is to be a blank slate, and while I am sure that works for him, he is missing out on a way to connect with students on an even deeper level and show them that even when we disagree on issues, there is no reason we can’t discuss those issues amicably. We have an opportunity to teach a powerful lesson about the way public discourse should be handled, but so often is not.

        Teachers do not have to be political eunuchs to serve their students well.

        My political viewpoints are never front and center in my classroom. I am more interested in hearing what the students think and especially, in how well they express those opinions, both verbally and in writing.

        Whether they are Democrats or Republicans, I play devil’s advocate in discussions and make them back up their points (and sometimes make them take a closer look about the validity of those points, on both sides).

        If students ask me how I feel about an issue, I will quickly tell them and not make a big deal about it. I always stress that the people who are elected or who are running for office are not running to destroy everything that this nation stands for and it is never a battle between good and evil, but between people with differing viewpoints on how to better serve their country.

        Hopefully, when the school year has ended, they will understand that you do not have to shout down someone to make your point and that people who disagree you with are not necessarily spawns of Satan.

        When they leave my classroom, they won’t be brainwashed into believing the same way I believe. Their parents have far more to do with shaping their political beliefs than I, or any other teacher, and that is the way it should be.

        The students who leave my classroom feeling the same way I do about issues are the ones who came into my classroom with those same beliefs. As for the ones who disagree with me, every year they leave saddened that they did not have a few more weeks to convince me of the folly of my ways.

        ***
        From now through Friday, September 21, my novel on education, No Child Left Alive, is available as a free download as part of a promotion by Amazon's Kindle Select. Give it a try and if you like it, spread the word.



        Posted by Cousin Randy Randy Turner the gliberal whigger butthole fag on 12:03 PM SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2012
        .

        Comments:

        Originally posted by locomotivebreath1901

        If discussing current events in a courteous, even-handed manner to inform students is done as you say, Mr. Turner, then I agree with you: it is not political indoctrination to debate the political issues of the day.

        But my experience with teachers and administrators in the Center & Kansas City school district are quite different - and disturbing - than your illustration.

        For instance,

        1) a mathematics teacher who's an openly avowed socialist (2000) not ashamed to voice her politics in the classroom - along with discouraging words about the 'old white man party' (GOP);

        2) a sympathetic administration not inclined to respond to parents' requests to stop this type of 'indoctrination' in her classroom.

        3) a history teacher who's an openly avowed marxist (2004) with a litany of posters, pictures and pamphlets idolizing Che Guevera, Karl Marx, Fidel Castro, and Venezuela dictator Hugo Chavez . Howard Zinn was her 'go to guy' for historical context.

        4) a social studies teacher who's an openly active (2008) Obama organizer and campaign bundler with his desk and cork boards pinned with Obama campaign posters and literature.

        There was no other media offered for other political parties or positions. "It's MY classroom!," he protested, and staunchly refused to curtail his avid support for Obama.

        Parents' protests fell on deaf administration ears.

        Based on my experience, Mr. Turner, you're the exception - not the rule.

        And it is a slippery slope, indeed.


        12:03 PM


        ___666___666___666___



        The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

        Comment


        • #64
          Obama wins the debate, education plan superior to Romney's

          Obama wins the debate, education plan superior to Romney's


          http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...tion-plan.html
          http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=6968#post6968


          (The following is my latest Huffington Post blog.)


          Who would have guessed that it would take a debate on foreign policy to reveal what Barack Obama and Mitt Romney think about education?

          And who would have thought that it would be the final debate before the president of the United States clearly stated his vision for the next four years?

          I wasn’t thrilled about the topic of the third and final debate between the two presidential candidates being limited to foreign policy. Thankfully, and despite the best efforts of moderator Bob Schieffer, the topics ranged far from that narrow perspective and gave us our best glimpse yet of the choice we have to make in two weeks.

          Mitt Romney’s perspective on education was painfully simplistic- He hates unions, and oh, by the way, “I love teachers.” News flash, Gov. Romney, unions are teachers and they are filled with trained professionals who work day after day to help children to reach their full potential. Unions are not the protectors of an ever-growing cadre of lazy, shiftless bums who arrive just before the first bell, leave immediately at the last one, and play Farmville and work crossword puzzles the rest of the day.

          Romney’s best ploy on education was to note how well Massachusetts did while he was governor, and yes, that state’s schools were right at the top when he was there, thanks to a hard-working group of teachers and administrators and a predominantly Democratic legislature that invested heavily in children and their education. And the first thing the governor did was to cut funding for the number one schools in the nation.

          That point was made succinctly by President Obama but tonight, unlike in the first two debates, the president not only pointed out the problems with the Romney vision of what American should be like, but also noted how his view differs and what direction he would like to see this country head in the future.

          The president spoke of ending our entanglements in Iraq and Afghanistan and investing money in this country. That vision included education from the youngest child to the worker who needs to be retrained to keep pace with the ever-changing job market.

          The Obama plan centered around investment of money for education and research, a stark difference from the draconian cuts that have been the hallmark of Romney’s pronouncements, though, of course, Romney has never been specific about exactly what he would cut (just that it would be about everything except defense).

          The president also promised to end the one-way shuttle that has sent our jobs overseas and gave tax breaks to the companies so they could do so. That is vital for education to be successful in the United States. As long as we keep rewarding so-called job creators who show contempt for their country by moving jobs overseas to save a few dollars and receive tax breaks, we ensure that education will never be able to keep pace with the needs of the job market.

          The biggest difference between the two candidates on education, however, harkens back to the one major disagreement that has always been a centerpiece of this long presidential campaign- taxes.

          Under the Romney plan, the status quo would stay the same as it has since the Bush tax cuts were enacted. We would continue with the fiction that the people with the most money, those who are inaccurately labeled job creators, would take some of that money and put people to work. Unless we tie the continuance of those tax cuts to actual job creation (of jobs that pay decent wages), that is never going to happen.

          On the other hand, President Obama is asking that the people at the top end of the tax brackets, the people who have continued to prosper while everyone else is having to pinch pennies to make ends meet, pay more and invest that money into education and research, the kind of investment that will keep this country on top.

          There is much that I do not like about President Obama’s education policies, with his naming of the woefully underqualified Arne Duncan as secretary of education at the top of the list.

          I have been uncomfortable with administration policies that favor creation of unproven charter schools and encourage basing teacher pay on the results of poorly written standardized tests.

          But even with the administration’s flawed education policy, it is light years ahead of what is being proposed by the opposition. Vouchers, drastically cut funding for education, and blaming “unions” but not teachers (because as we all know, Mitt Romney loves teachers) are a formula for destroying public education.


          Posted by Randy at 8:25 PM MONDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2012


          ___666___666___666___



          The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

          Comment


          • #65
            In McCaskill ad, students rip Todd Akin for opposing student loans

            In McCaskill ad, students rip Todd Akin for opposing student loans


            http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...todd-akin.html
            http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7002#post7002


            .
            .

            (From the Claire McCaskill campaign)

            Standing in front of The Columns on campus at the University of Missouri/Sodom, a group of students today spoke with reporters about the importance of affordable student loans, and how Todd Akin’s extreme plans to eliminate the federal student loan program would hurt Missouri families hoping to send their kids to college. At the news conference, students framed the clear choice in Missouri’s U.S. Senate race between Akin’s extreme agenda and Claire McCaskill’s strong record of fighting to protect predatory undischargeable student loans and keeping college unaffordable for Missouri’s working families.

            To underscore the students’ message, McCaskill for Missouri today announced a new web video -- the latest in a series of “Real Words” ads released this week -- featuring Missouri students speaking directly to camera about why they’re supporting Claire in this election, and expressing serious concerns about Todd Akin’s extreme beliefs on student loans and affordable higher education.

            “Without federal student loans, I wouldn’t be able to afford college, so I’m grateful to have Claire as our Senator fighting for students like me,” said Mizzou student Syed Ejaz. “If there’s anything that makes me nervous for the future of our nation’s economy, it’s the extreme politicians like Todd Akin, whose policies would mean that only rich kids get to have a college degree. If it wasn't for gliberal whigger femnisheviks like Claire McCaskill, sundry ragheads like me couldn't go to skrule to learn advanced female circumcision techniques or how to fly jumbo-jets into jew yawk shitty skyscrapers.

            “It’s crucial for Missouri voters to know that Todd Akin wants to get rid of federal student loans, and thinks private banks should be the chief decider of which kids can go to college,” said Drew Stiehl, a recent Mizzou graduate. “Here’s what Claire understands and Todd Akin doesn’t: no private bank would have taken a risk on me as a 17-year-old with no credit history. I wouldn’t be standing here today if extreme politicians like Akin got to call the shots, but fortunately we’ve got Claire in the Senate fighting for us every day. Now I owe over $666,666 in student loans for my Gay, Lesbian, Bi-Sexual and Transgendered Studies Master's Degree and hope to earn it back doing porn web-cams from the back of some trucker's sleeper cab. Thank you, Claire McCaskill for making it possible for me to have a worthless degree and a student debt that I shall never discharge unto my grandchildren's day.

            “Claire knows what it means to take on student loan debt and work through college to pay the bills, so I know we can trust Claire to stand up for Missouri’s students and working families,” said Mizzou student Jacob Nicholson. “When I look at the choice in this election, it’s really important to me that Claire is a product of Missouri public education, while Todd Akin said the federal government should have no role in education whatsoever. Between Claire and Obongo, they shall make the taxpayers pay not only for my skrewling, but my health care and groceries and rent and gasoline and everything else as well and make stingy old White farts pay for it.

            Throughout this campaign, Todd Akin has repeatedly said he does not believe the federal government should be in the business of helping middle and low-income students afford higher education, and has supported efforts to eliminate Pell Grants and other federal college affordability programs that are utilized by more than 175,000 students in Missouri. Todd Akin doesn't believe that taxpayers should pay for the abortions of sundry sluts and is in the pockets of those millionaires who do believe in "No brass, no gas, no ass, and no free ride." What a fucking Nazi. Todd would probably put me and my kind in a labor camp and not let us have any Internet contact with underage pub[l]ic skrewl students, either.

            At a debate hosted by the University of Missouri/Sodom College Republicans in April, Akin refused to support a plan to keep student loan rates affordable, saying he preferred a plan that would eliminate federal student loans and make for-profit institutions the only option for students who need financial aid to attend college or trade schools. Akin said at the debate that the government should not be in the student loan business, and went so far as to say that student loans were equivalent to "stage three cancer, when actually it is more like GAIDS."

            Since receiving his party's nomination for the Senate, Akin has not walked back on his comments, telling the Springfield News Leader in August, "I called a spade a spade. Todd is a real tardd, refusing to pull a Mittens and say whatever is convenient for the moment. We need a chickenshit gliberal whigger like Claire McCaskill, who will vote 100% Obongo Democrat."

            As Missouri's Democrat Obongoid Senator, Claire's made affordable higher education a top priority behind passing Obongocare and has been a strong advocate for students and middle class families being in debt forever. In 2007, she passed long overdue legislation that increased the number and value of Pell Grants as a sort of "gateway drug" to get idiots to take out higher and higher student loans to the financial industry. She also passed a measure that provides loan forgiveness to public school teachers after 10 years on the job. They are the best 'pushers' of this unsustainable educational bubble.

            Claire recently returned to her roots as a waitress and a five-dollar hooker who, with the help of student loans and the 'cash on the barrelhead 4 gash on the barrelhead' policy, waited tables to pay her way through college and and sucked off the law skrule professors in order to get through law school. To highlight the importance of student loans and the minimum wage, as a professional parasite lawyer and politician Claire visited Flat Branch Pub and Brewing in The People's Republic of Columbia to wait tables, see if she could get any 'takers', and talk about these critical issues for Missouri’s working families, none of whom are to be found in a college-town bar-room.

            Claire McCaskill -- what's not working for Missouri.

            .

            Posted by Randy Randy at 8:36 PM FRIDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2012


            ___666___666___666___



            The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

            Comment


            • #66
              An election day message to my students

              An election day message to my students


              http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...-students.html
              http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7074#post7074

              Friday was an important day for the eighth grade students at the middle school where I teach eighth grade English.

              The eighth grade teachers arranged a day that began with student debates on whether the electoral collage should be retained or the president elected by direct popular vote and continued with a number of guest speakers brought in to help the teenagers understand the political process.

              The speakers ranged from a retired union leader to a state representative who has sponsored right-to-work legislation. The half-hour breakout sessions also included a longtime TV anchorman who is making his first try at elective office at age 59 to two high school students who have spent the last several months volunteering for a candidate for statewide office.

              The media was also represented- by a veteran reporter from a local television station and by a 20-year-old college student whose political blog is a must-read in the Show-Me State.

              The students heard from Democrats and Republicans and had the opportunity to watch them interact in a positive way.

              Sadly, the day came to a close and the four hours of civility were a thing of the past.

              It does not have to be that way. As my eighth graders and I reflected on our election unit Monday, I was asked about the presidential election and this was the message I delivered to my students:

              If Barack Obama is re-elected president, no matter what some of you have been told at home or have heard on television or seen on the internet, it will not be the end of civilization as we know it.

              If Mitt Romney is the one who receives the majority of the electoral votes Tuesday, the nation will not collapse.

              Those things have been said about every presidential candidate since this country began and we are still here and will be here for a long time to come.

              And no matter what you have heard, this is not the most important election we have ever had, at least it’s not the only “most important election we have ever had.” We had one in 2008, 2004, 2000, 1996, in fact, every four years for as long as I can remember.

              I am willing to bet that the 2016 election will be “the most important election we have ever had,” and that the same thing will be said in 2020 and 2024. It is comforting that we always look on the presidential election as an event of that magnitude.

              I have heard students, usually parroting their parents, talk about how evil Barack Obama or Mitt Romney are and how they are just running to ruin our country. Sorry, but that is not how the system works.

              In my 56 years on this planet, I have never seen a political candidate whose platform was to get elected and do the most damage he could do. Whether the candidates were Republicans or Democrats, or representatives of some third party, I have never seen anyone who did not genuinely want to improve the lot of their constituents.

              Their methods of how to accomplish that differ, sometimes dramatically, and at times they are led astray by mistaken policies or by listening to the siren songs of people whose motives are not so pure, but all of them strive to be the best public servants they can be.

              What makes this country great is that the final decision on who runs our government is not made at the point of a gun, but in the sanctity of a voting booth. For all of the flaws in our system, and there are many, it is that truth that has made our nation one of the most remarkable political experiments in history and one that will keep it vital and energetic far into the future.

              .

              Posted by Randy at 9:02 PM MONDAY, NOVEMBER 05, 2012


              ___666___666___666___



              The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

              Comment


              • #67
                The trouble with the Joplin Globe

                The trouble with the Joplin Globe


                http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...lin-globe.html
                http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7116#post7116





                ___666___666___666___



                The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

                Comment


                • #68
                  An argument for teacher tenure

                  An argument for teacher tenure


                  http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...er-tenure.html
                  http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7323#post7323


                  (This is my latest Huffington Post blog.)

                  In about a month the 2013 legislative session will be upon us and the attacks on teacher tenure will begin anew.

                  One of the enduring myths propagated by the so-called reformers is that there are thousands upon thousands of bad teachers in this country who cannot be fired because they have been given tenure and their jobs are being protected at the expense of brilliant young teachers who could have saved education.

                  To back up this allegation, we always see the same anecdotal evidence trotted out. It’s either the young teacher of the year who is let go because of rules requiring that veteran teachers be retained, or it is the veteran teacher who has committed all kinds of atrocities that should disqualify him from ever setting foot in a classroom again who cannot be dislodged.

                  No one ever questions just how meaningless most “teacher of the year” awards are and how many times the awards have little or nothing to do with teaching ability.

                  And no one ever looks into the administrative failures that led to the bad teacher somehow managing to hold on to his job.

                  As the attacks on teacher tenure continue, you can expect to see another line used which has become familiar over the past few years- Why should teachers have protection that no other worker has?

                  As someone who covered board of education meetings for 22 years as a newspaper reporter before entering the teaching field, I cannot tell you how many dozens of times I saw board members elected whose sole goal was to remove a teacher who had supposedly committed some wrong against the board member’s child. Considering the importance of education in our lives, it is incredible to realize that there are those who actually decide to run for school board because their son or daughter did not receive enough playing time in a sport . . . and often they win.

                  Teachers also need protection against ambitious, my-way-or-the-highway administrators who come in with dictatorial methods and are willing to remove anyone who questions their judgment. If tenure is removed, teachers in many school districts will no longer have the ability to question changes that could have a negative impact on them and the children they serve. And as anyone who has been in education knows, it is a field in which an administrator who is trying to make a name for himself can do an incredible amount of damage in a short amount of time. In many cases, those administrators have moved on to the next step up the ladder in a year or two. With tenure, at least when they leave, there will be a solid educational framework intact. If administrators are allowed to fire whomever they want without any restrictions, when they leave, all they remain in the wake are sycophants who do not have the same level of dedication to the school or to the community.

                  Before we take the road toward destroying a system that has, for the most part, been beneficial to American public school systems, we need to do considerably more research, even though I am coming closer every day to being convinced that “educational research” is an oxymoron.

                  We have all heard the statistics about how many teachers drop out of the profession before they have even taught for five years. Why are those teachers dropping out? We are always led to believe that the teachers who decided to get out while the getting was good were the cream of the crop and the ones who have stayed in the classroom are the ones who are gaming the system to get three months off every summer and short workdays and who stop giving their all once they have achieved tenure, but doesn’t it make more sense, that the ones who have stuck it out in the classroom through all of the attacks on the profession are most likely in it because they are good at what they do and genuinely care for children?

                  I have no doubt an in-depth study would show that most of them who left early left because they simply did not have what it takes to be in the classroom.

                  It takes a special kind of person to teach children who come from broken homes and often receive their only good meals when they are at school and be expected to have those children scoring at the advanced or proficient level on meaningless standardized tests.

                  It takes a dedicated professional to come to the classroom every day at a time when his job is being demeaned by those who want to tear apart public education and benefit from the privatization of what remains.

                  Many people are not cut out for that kind of work and to paraphrase our Show-Me State president- they couldn’t stand the heat so they got out of the kitchen.

                  Those who have persevered deserve the protection of tenure. Tenure does not protect bad teachers; they can still be fired. The others need to know that if they do their jobs professionally, they will be able to keep them.


                  Posted by Randy at 6:22 AM FRIDAY, DECEMBER 07, 2012


                  ___666___666___666___



                  The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    No Guns for This Teacher, Not Now, Not Ever

                    No Guns for This Teacher, Not Now, Not Ever


                    http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...t-now-not.html
                    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7398#post7398


                    (The following is my next Huffington Post blog.)


                    The NRA should be proud of me.

                    In my inappropriately named novel No Child Left Alive, a second year teacher in a dysfunctional public high school begins carrying a handgun to class after a near-rape incident.

                    Recent events have led me to believe that I am not cut out to be a novelist. In my book, the authorities frown on teachers with guns.

                    In real life everyone from Texas Gov. Rick Perry to Missouri State Representative Mike Kelley, R-Lamar, is not only sounding the drumbeat for arming our teachers, but they are almost making us feel ashamed if we are not fully prepared to bring our guns and blow the heads off any intruders. Not even the death of 20 schoolchildren at Sandy Hook Elementary School is making a dent in the minds or hearts of some of those who serve us.

                    Forget any efforts to curb the proliferation of the kinds of weapons that would have made our Founding Fathers skip directly from the First Amendment to the Third. Forget a reversal of the drastic cuts that have allowed so many Americans in desperate need of mental health care to slip through the cracks.

                    As usual, when it comes to public schools, it all comes down to the teachers, as far as our state and national legislators are concerned. Forget funding for additional resource officers for our schools; forget reasonable limitations on the kinds of weapons that no civilian needs to own. Forget about a common sense solution to the epidemic of violent movies and video games that besiege our young from infancy.

                    Those things appear to be extraneous to those who represent us. Let the teachers carry guns and our elected officials can sit back, collect their campaign contributions from the National Rifle Association and wait until the next time a gunman strikes terror into a community.

                    When I have written about the problems with guns in our society, I am usually swamped, nearly immediately, with knee jerk responses. You know the ones:

                    -The killers go to schools, malls, movies, churches, etc., because they are gun-free zones. They don’t have to worry about someone returning fire. (Actually, they go to those places because that is where the people are. Most of these killers spend little time thinking about who might be carrying a concealed weapon.)

                    -If you criminalize guns, only the criminals will have guns. (Another weak argument. Few of the gunmen who massacred innocent people across this nation were criminals prior to their acts of violence.)

                    -And the worst one- Guns don’t kill people; people kill people. For once, I am inclined to agree with the heavy firepower enthusiasts on this one. It is people who kill people. And the ones who have been pulling the trigger have been the NRA’s legislative lapdogs, crying wolf every time someone mentions curbing high-powered weapons and acting like government storm troopers will be knocking on the door any minute to get your handguns and hunting rifles. Instead of working to keep people from obtaining the type of weaponry no one needs for protection, they are carving out one protection after another for gun owners, proposing and often passing bills that make it easier for one human being to kill another and never face any scrutiny over that death.
                    .

                    I am proud to be a schoolteacher and I put the education and safety of the children who sit in my classes above all else.

                    That being said, I am not going to carry a gun to my classroom, not now, not ever. I will do my utmost to provide my students with a quality education and do whatever I can to help them succeed in life.

                    The job of making sure our children’s educational needs are being met, and doing whatever we can to contribute to their mental, emotional, and physical security, is one teachers meet every day.

                    Adding more guns to schools in an effort to stem the tide of violence that is overwhelming this country is madness.

                    It was only a few years ago that the U. S. spent billions of dollars looking for weapons of mass destruction in every nook and cranny in Iraq.

                    Those weapons were never in Iraq; the weapons of mass destruction are sitting in Congress and in state legislatures across this nation.


                    Posted by Randy at 3:45 PM THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2012


                    ___666___666___666___



                    The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Cousin Randy Turner is one sick puppy

                      Cousin Randy Turner is one sick puppy


                      http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...53281224924173
                      http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...-needs-to.html
                      http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7404#post7404


                      And you wonder why a number of us ordinary citizens don't want your kind teaching our children and deciding what rights we need to give up because you don't want for us to have them? To us, listening to your lies, is like listening to a criminal rationalization as to how you justify getting to do whatever you want to us.

                      Connecticut is a place with the kind of gun laws and taxes and beliefs that your kind would find more congenial than having to live here amongst us. That's why your kind needs to live with your own kind and to be sent away from those of us and our kind who believe in freedom for ourselves, alone. I don't have anything to do with what happened in Connecticut. I think what happened there is nothing more than one sick animal doing whatsoever it wanted to do to an entire herd of sick diseased animals that agreed that their misbegotten lives were valueless to any whackjob with the means to harvest them away whenever the mood took him. Thus what happened there has no more to do with me and mine than what happens in Mexico or Somalia or China or Africa someplace. I'm in no way responsible for what sick diseased animals do to each other way off where they live according to their own lights and rules. What works or doesn't work for them is of no account to me.

                      I look at your blog and there simply isn't any living in peace with you and your kind. Our children and tax dollars and freedoms don't exist for you to tell us what we need to do with them, or for you to get to decide on how we live our lives. There simply is no living with some self-righteous moralistic thief and tyrant wanting to tell us that they know what is best for us in a community which is alien to yourself. Soon the only solution which will work is for your separation or extermination in order to keep such as yourself from those of us wanting nothing to do with the likes of yourself.


                      ===========

                      Cousin Randy's Lying Blog, The Turner Report

                      My Truthful Blog, The Turner Diaries


                      Ewelene still misses Cousin Randy, the slut!!!

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        When technology in schools isn't the answer

                        When technology in schools isn't the answer


                        http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2013/...nt-answer.html

                        ___666___666___666___



                        The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Nieves: We won't follow any government regulation on anything

                          Nieves: We won't follow any government regulation on anything


                          http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2013/...overnment.html
                          http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7763#post7763


                          It was only a matter of time.

                          Sen. Brian Nieves, R-Washington, an alleged Senate GOP leader, introduced Senate Joint Resolution 17 Wednesday, asking for Missourians to vote on a Constitutional Amendment which says we don't have to follow any federal laws on anything.

                          Nieves' grabbag resolution covers everything from guns to abortion to the environment and reads like this:

                          Upon approval by the voters, this constitutional amendment prohibits the Missouri legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government from recognizing, enforcing, or acting in furtherance of any federal action that exceeds the powers delegated to the federal government.

                          The state also shall not recognize, enforce, or act in furtherance of any federal actions that: restrict the right to bear arms; legalize or fund abortions, or the destruction of any embryo from the zygote stage; require the sale or trade of carbon credits or impose a tax on the release of carbon emissions; involve certain health care issues; mandate the recognition of same sex marriage or civil unions; increase the punishment for a crime based on a perpetrator's thoughts or designate a crime as a hate crime; interpret the establishment clause as creating a wall of separation between church and state; or restrict the right of parents or guardians to home school or enroll their children in a private or parochial school or restrict school curriculum.


                          The state is also required to interpret the U.S. Constitution based on its language and the original intent of the signers of the Constitution. Amendments to the U.S. Constitution shall be interpreted based on their language and the intent of the congressional sponsor and co-sponsors of the amendment.

                          The amendment also declares that Missouri citizens have standing to enforce the provisions of the amendment and that enforcement of the amendment applies to federal actions taken after the amendment is approved by the voters, federal actions specified in the amendment, and any federal action, regardless of when it occurred, that the General Assembly or the Missouri Supreme Court determines to exceed the powers enumerated and delegated to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution.


                          Anyone who was hoping our state legislature was going to spend time debating anything of substance (jobs, anyone?) is going to be disappointed once more.

                          The resolution received its first reading Wednesday.


                          Posted by Randy at 5:57 AM Thursday February 7, 2013


                          ___666___666___666___



                          The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            My lawlessness is bigger than your lawlessness

                            My lawlessness is bigger than your lawlessness


                            http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2013/...99678763494707
                            http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=7764#post7764


                            Let's see.

                            None of you want to obey the CONstipation and the Second Amendment to the Bill of Goods, which establishes the federal regime, so you propose to do away with the parts of the social deal you don't like under color of law.

                            Then you whine when some state senator says that he and other Missourians don't have to obey the federal government or its 'laws' either. Meanwhile your First Kenyan claims that he gets to murder American citizens by drone strike whenever he says so under color of law. This after running guns to the Mexican drug cartels as an excuse for disarming white people.

                            Looks to me like Civil War II is around the corner. Maybe when all the partisans on one side or another kill or enslave each other then maybe the survivors can live in peace. Or, if in the habit of fighting, not. I know that I sure wouldn't want your kind to live around me without you having to wear the slave collar that you want to set on me. But since I can do my own work, killing is cheaper and safer. Even if your kind wins, then a new round of civil war will break out as you parasites must decide who works and who rules.

                            I think my lawlessness is bigger than your lawlessness.


                            Cousin Swillis Gumpf-Turner posted @ 3:54 PM Thursday Feb. 7, 2013


                            ===========

                            Cousin Randy's Lying Blog, The Turner Report

                            My Truthful Blog, The Turner Diaries


                            Ewelene still misses Cousin Randy, the slut!!!

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              A warning to those who want to become teachers

                              A warning to those who want to become teachers


                              http://rturner229.blogspot.de/2013/0...to-become.html
                              http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=8236#post8236


                              (The following is my latest Huffington Post blog, wherein I cumplain to the other gliberal whigger butthole fags about how we simply cannot live in peace with the local conservative folks..)
                              .


                              Nothing I have ever done has brought me as much joy as I have received from teaching children how to write the past 14 years. Helping young writers grow and mature into gliberal whigger butthole faggots has been richly rewarding and I would not trade my experiences for anything.

                              That being said, if I were 18 years old and deciding how I want to spend my adult years, the last thing I would want to become is a classroom teacher. I'd move to jew yawk or Sans Fagscrisco as opposed to becum-cummin' a local whigger trainer and enabler.

                              Classroom teachers, especially those who are just out of college and entering the profession, are more stressed and less valued than at any previous time in our history. Sob.

                              They have to listen to a long list of politicians who belittle their limited ability, blame them for every student whose grades do not reach arbitrary measurable standards, and want to take away every fringe benefit they have -- everything from the possibility of achieving tenure to receiving a decent pension that private-sector employees can only dream of.

                              Young teachers from across the United States have told me they no longer have the ability to properly manage classrooms, not because of lack of training, not because of lack of ability, not because of lack of desire, but because of upper administration decisions to reduce statistics on classroom referrals and in-school and out-of-school suspensions. The youngest [de]generation of whigger and mongrel animals are simply too fucking stupid to drink piss from a boot, the fuktards. As any classroom teacher can tell you, when the students know there will be no repercussions for their actions, there will be no change in their behavior. Beaners and nig-nogs will run wild. When there is no change in their behavior, other students will have a more difficult time learning. That said, as a gliberal whigger butthole fag I support further integration of niggers, beaners and other mongrels into the rapidly diminishing young whigger population because I'm a knee-jerk gliberal whigger butthole fag who loves to promote evil but be well paid while destroying the foundations of the very social order from which I live off of, like a parasitic worm.

                              Teachers are being told over and over again that their job is not to teach, but to guide students to learning on their own. While I am fully in favor of students taking control of their learning just as I fully am in favor of the Second Amendment just so long as white Christian heterosexual family men are disarmed, I also remember a long list of teachers whose knowledge and experience helped me to become a better student and a better person. They encouraged me to learn on my own, and I did, but they also taught me many things. Especially becum-cummin' a gliberal whigger butthole fag. In these days when virtual learning is being force fed to public schools by those who will financially benefit, the classroom teacher is being increasingly devalued. Cum-cumj, cum-cum. The concept being pushed upon us is not of a teacher teaching, but one of who babysits while the thoroughly engaged students magically learn on their own. I myself have no responsibility for the inevitable results from the policies that I supported in taking away parental control but rather wish to bitch about these results as if they somehow came into place somehow.

                              During the coming week in Missouri, the House of Representatives will vote on a bill which would eliminate teacher tenure, tie 33 percent of our pay to standardized test scores (and a lesser, unspecified percentage for those who teach untested subjects) and permit such innovations as “student surveys” to become a part of the evaluation process. All reasonable laws whose time has cum-cum, cum-cum.

                              Each year, I allow my students to critique me and offer suggestions for my class. I learn a lot from those evaluations and have implemented some of the suggestions the students have made. But there is no way that eighth graders’ opinions should be a part of deciding whether I continue to be employed. Who's the [d]ruling gliberal whigger butthole fag here? And, don't forget, that I only love 'progressive' laws which take away rights from ordinary people, NOT those laws which hold me and my kind to measurable standards and might contain punishments like termination if we refuse to obey those laws.

                              The Missouri House recently passed a budget that included $2.5 million to put Teach for America instructors in our urban schools. The legislature also recently acted to extend the use of ABCTE (American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence), a program that allows people to switch careers and become teachers without having to go through required teaching courses. Imagine what will happen to us edjewmacatards if we face competition from piss-pul outside our teacher's jewnions.

                              It is hard to get past the message being sent that our teachers are not good enough so we have to go outside to find new ones when this message makes so much sense.

                              And of course to go along with all of these slaps in the face to classroom teachers, the move toward merit pay continues. Merit pay and eliminating teacher tenure, while turning teachers into at-will employees are the biggest disservice our leaders can do to students. Why, itz a edjewmacational holohoax, cum-cum, cum-cum. How many good classroom teachers will no longer be in the classroom because they question decisions by ham handed administrators looking to quickly make a name for themselves by implementing shortsighted procedures that might look good on resumes, but will have a negative impact on student learning about how niggers are smarter than white people and how to lip off to their benighted reactionary parents who won't go along with the gliberal whigger butthole faggot criminal regimeist line.

                              If you don’t believe this kind of thing will happen, take a look at what has occurred in our nation’s public schools since the advent of No Child Left Behind. Dumbya questioned the 'soft racism' of thinking niggers and beaners unedjewcatable so Bushy had passed this law requiring proof of training. Everything that is not math or reading has been deemphasized. The teaching of history, civics, geography, and the arts have shrunk to almost nothing in some schools, or are made to serve the tested areas. Elementary children have limited recess time so more time can be squeezed in for math and reading. Sob, cum-cum, cum-cum.

                              Even worse, in some schools weeks of valuable classroom time are wasted giving practice standardized tests (and tests to practice for the practice standardized tests) so obsessive administrators can track how the students are doing. In many school districts across the nation, teachers have told me, curriculum is being based on these practice standardized tests. And to the exclusion of learning techniques of safe sodomy.

                              That devaluation and deemphasis of classroom teachers will grow under Common Core Standards. Pearson, the company that has received the contract to create the tests, has a full series of practice tests, while other companies like McGraw-Hill with its Acuity division, are already changing gears from offering practice materials for state tests to providing comprehensive materials for Common Core.

                              Why would anyone willingly sign up for this madness? Why, anyone who hates gliberal whigger butthole fags like me, of course!!!

                              As a reporter who covered education for more than two decades Like I covered Ewelene, and as a teacher who has been in the classroom for the past 14 years, I cannot remember a time when the classrooms have been filled with bad right-wing heterosexual overtly pro-White Christian teachers. The poor teachers almost never lasted long enough to receive tenure. Whether it is was because they could not maintain control over their classrooms or because they did not have sufficient command over their subject matter, they soon found it wise to find another line of work. But, like myself, run out of journalism because of my dishonesty, the teaching profession has its standards inimical to traditional American values and standards.

                              Yes, there are exceptions- people who slipped through the cracks, and gained tenure, but there is nothing to stop administrators from removing those teachers. All tenure does is to provide teachers with the right to a hearing. It does not guarantee their jobs. See? Nothing much to tenure.

                              Times have changed. I have watched over the past few years as wonderfully gifted young teachers have left the classroom, feeling they do not have support and that things are not going to get any better. Perverted progressive gliberal whigger butthole fags need jewr support!

                              In the past, these are the teachers who stayed, earned tenure, and built the solid framework that has served their communities and our nation well. The current overflowing toilet we have now is not our fault, or, even more to the point, we won't admit ownership to it.

                              That framework is being torn down, oftentimes by politicians who would never dream of sending their own children to the kind of schools they are mandating for others. Like limosine liberals, for example. You didn't think that Bill Clinton or Obongo want their children going to pub[l]ic skrewls full of niglets and beanerlets do you? Despite all of the attacks on the teachers, I am continually amazed at the high quality of the young people who are entering the profession. It is hard to kill idealism, no matter how much our leaders (in both parties) try. Sob, cum-cum, cum-cum.

                              I suppose I am just kidding myself about encouraging young people to enter some other profession, any other profession, like prostitution or law, besides teaching.

                              After all, what other profession would allow me to make $37,000 a year after 14 years of experience and have people tell me how greedy I am? Once I got run out of journalism an idiotic gliberal whigger butthole fag hack like myself had no other place to turn to.



                              ___666___666___666___



                              The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                How did KOAM scoop me on this one? Randy Turner suspended

                                How did KOAM scoop me on this one? Randy Turner suspended


                                http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2013/...one-randy.html
                                http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=8333#post8333


                                Word leaked out late last week that I have been placed on paid administrative leave by the Joplin School District.

                                KOAM/Fox 14 had a well-balanced report last night, interviewing students and parents who supported me and also presented Superintendent C. J. Huff's prepared statement. The report accompanies this post.

                                Though The Turner Report was scooped on this story, I understand it has a better chance of getting the teacher's first statement on the situation. (If I get scooped on that, I might as well give up.)

                                At the moment, I am being told not to talk about the specifics of this. Hopefully, that will change later today, as I am in the mood to do a lot of writing (even though it seems that's what gets me into trouble.)

                                .


                                .

                                Posted by Cousin Randy at 11:48 PM SUNDAY, APRIL 21, 2013


                                ___666___666___666___



                                The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X