Tweet
Eric Thomson: The Big Con Which Hides Much Wrong, If We Let It
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=1141#post1141
Ancient Greeks, when they were Aryan, used to discuss the pros & cons of a written language. Some said that putting things into writing "destroys men's memories." As many know, memory is a major enemy of tyranny, since alleged facts are used to justify tyranny. Alleged dangers of others' policies are justification for wars, taxation, tyranny & privations inflicted upon the governed by the government. The allegation of Iraq's infamous "weapons of mass destruction" is a recent example, which is already going down the Orwellian Memory Hole in the shallow minds of the Goyim, alias Orwellian sheeple.
In politics, it is dangerous to contradict a king by interpreting his words to mean the opposite of what he intended, for a king can say, "That is not what I said (or meant), so off with your head!" On the other hand, a written document can be interpreted to mean anything a reader can concoct in his owwn head. Books touted as 'holy' to supernatural cults are supposedly 'inerrant', but they do not escape from often arbitrary interpretation, which may lead to the concoction of entirely new cults, as with Protestants & Catholics, which allegedly originate in Judaism.
The U.S. CONstitution is a 'paper king' whose armed minions are employed by their paymasters to enfore the king's word. The paymasters interpret the words of this king to please themselves & to gull their Goy sheeple into acceptance of their plutocratic policies. As I said, there are many possible interpretations of words as there are men to read them, especially if the men do not agree on what is good. Plato pointed out this problem: We all believe in "the good," but we cannot agree on what that is, especially in a multi-cultural society, where values differ, i.e. the definitions of right & wrong, good & bad. Dr. Oliver wrote that the ancient Germans knew what as good or bad, so it did not have to be written down. Stealing & lying were deemed 'bad', but with the advent of Christinsanity, the definitions were subject to reference in the jew-book: stealing & lying were bad if a jew said so. On the other hand, such writing could be used to define stealing & lying as their exact opposites. Ancient Greeks recognized this self-serving interpretation as sophistry, which became a school of argumentation. Christians refined sophistry into casuistry, as to debate 'how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.' Jews excel at such argumentation with their talmudic interpretations.Perhaps that is why courtrooms resemble synagogues so much, complete with their often black-robed priesthood. Sophistry& casuistry are basically applied hypocrisy, a way of obtaining what one wants, regardless of the wording of a law. It is often noted that the words of a law are used to defeat the spirit or purpose of a law, as when the proverbial devil quotes scripture.
In reality, laws & principles serve to protect people, not vice versa. The question is: which people? Laws are often interpreted to punish the majority in order to reward the few, through no merit of their own, aside from their ability to BUY 'justice.'
In law, Orwell noted that "Who defines controls," & jew Teddy Roosevelt declared that "Might makes right." Hence, law in practice is defined by those who command the most guns. This is the CONtext of the U.S. CONstitution.
Jews claim that 'holy writ' has magical powers of its own. Scrawl some magic symbols on a slip of paper, & Golem made of mud become mobile & motivated by the master. In reality, this occurs when slips called 'money' are inserted into the pockets of Goyim alias Golem. Hence, U.S. soldiers & politicians swear to "defend the CONstitution." Note that they don't swear to defend U.S. citizens nor U.S. territory, but a piece of paper! What a joke. This means that our Zionist Occupation Government (ZOG) promises only to defend a peice of paper, so it may inflict all manner of abuses on the citizens & tax-payers of this land. Such a deal! The felons known as Freemasons prate that "We have a government of laws, not men," but the truth is, government & armies are comprised of men, not laws or uniforms, & that oaths (promises) are only as good as those who make them. Consider the jew I.O.U.s alias Federal Reserve Notes: 20 years ago, a wage-slave was told that his hours of work were worth so many FRN's or zogbucks. 20 years later, he is told that his wages may now buy a fraction of what they could 20 years ago. In other words, he worked for 8 hours a day, but is only paid for one hour thereof. That's why inflation is theft resulting from a CON, i.e. a broken promise. The promise was not false, but those who made it were & are.
We may believe that we know what is promised in our CONstitution, but ZOG's con-artists know what they can get away with since the founding of the USA. Mestizos alias Injuns have complained that their treaties are not honored to the letter, but the CONstitution states that treaties are on par with it: Hence, treaties are treated by ZOG exactly as the CONstitution, subject to interpretation by those few empowered to interpret. There are no big secrets. ORION!
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=66625
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=1141#post1141
Ancient Greeks, when they were Aryan, used to discuss the pros & cons of a written language. Some said that putting things into writing "destroys men's memories." As many know, memory is a major enemy of tyranny, since alleged facts are used to justify tyranny. Alleged dangers of others' policies are justification for wars, taxation, tyranny & privations inflicted upon the governed by the government. The allegation of Iraq's infamous "weapons of mass destruction" is a recent example, which is already going down the Orwellian Memory Hole in the shallow minds of the Goyim, alias Orwellian sheeple.
In politics, it is dangerous to contradict a king by interpreting his words to mean the opposite of what he intended, for a king can say, "That is not what I said (or meant), so off with your head!" On the other hand, a written document can be interpreted to mean anything a reader can concoct in his owwn head. Books touted as 'holy' to supernatural cults are supposedly 'inerrant', but they do not escape from often arbitrary interpretation, which may lead to the concoction of entirely new cults, as with Protestants & Catholics, which allegedly originate in Judaism.
The U.S. CONstitution is a 'paper king' whose armed minions are employed by their paymasters to enfore the king's word. The paymasters interpret the words of this king to please themselves & to gull their Goy sheeple into acceptance of their plutocratic policies. As I said, there are many possible interpretations of words as there are men to read them, especially if the men do not agree on what is good. Plato pointed out this problem: We all believe in "the good," but we cannot agree on what that is, especially in a multi-cultural society, where values differ, i.e. the definitions of right & wrong, good & bad. Dr. Oliver wrote that the ancient Germans knew what as good or bad, so it did not have to be written down. Stealing & lying were deemed 'bad', but with the advent of Christinsanity, the definitions were subject to reference in the jew-book: stealing & lying were bad if a jew said so. On the other hand, such writing could be used to define stealing & lying as their exact opposites. Ancient Greeks recognized this self-serving interpretation as sophistry, which became a school of argumentation. Christians refined sophistry into casuistry, as to debate 'how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.' Jews excel at such argumentation with their talmudic interpretations.Perhaps that is why courtrooms resemble synagogues so much, complete with their often black-robed priesthood. Sophistry& casuistry are basically applied hypocrisy, a way of obtaining what one wants, regardless of the wording of a law. It is often noted that the words of a law are used to defeat the spirit or purpose of a law, as when the proverbial devil quotes scripture.
In reality, laws & principles serve to protect people, not vice versa. The question is: which people? Laws are often interpreted to punish the majority in order to reward the few, through no merit of their own, aside from their ability to BUY 'justice.'
In law, Orwell noted that "Who defines controls," & jew Teddy Roosevelt declared that "Might makes right." Hence, law in practice is defined by those who command the most guns. This is the CONtext of the U.S. CONstitution.
Jews claim that 'holy writ' has magical powers of its own. Scrawl some magic symbols on a slip of paper, & Golem made of mud become mobile & motivated by the master. In reality, this occurs when slips called 'money' are inserted into the pockets of Goyim alias Golem. Hence, U.S. soldiers & politicians swear to "defend the CONstitution." Note that they don't swear to defend U.S. citizens nor U.S. territory, but a piece of paper! What a joke. This means that our Zionist Occupation Government (ZOG) promises only to defend a peice of paper, so it may inflict all manner of abuses on the citizens & tax-payers of this land. Such a deal! The felons known as Freemasons prate that "We have a government of laws, not men," but the truth is, government & armies are comprised of men, not laws or uniforms, & that oaths (promises) are only as good as those who make them. Consider the jew I.O.U.s alias Federal Reserve Notes: 20 years ago, a wage-slave was told that his hours of work were worth so many FRN's or zogbucks. 20 years later, he is told that his wages may now buy a fraction of what they could 20 years ago. In other words, he worked for 8 hours a day, but is only paid for one hour thereof. That's why inflation is theft resulting from a CON, i.e. a broken promise. The promise was not false, but those who made it were & are.
We may believe that we know what is promised in our CONstitution, but ZOG's con-artists know what they can get away with since the founding of the USA. Mestizos alias Injuns have complained that their treaties are not honored to the letter, but the CONstitution states that treaties are on par with it: Hence, treaties are treated by ZOG exactly as the CONstitution, subject to interpretation by those few empowered to interpret. There are no big secrets. ORION!
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=66625