OBAMANATION '09
Charles Gavan O'Lanahan
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=1335#post1335
What follows is the most recent update to the MISSIVES FROM THE BRIARPATCH page on my website. It's a really long-ass article, the longest I've ever written, in fact, so it will be posted increment by increment.---CGO.
-------------------------------------------------------
__________________________________________________ _____ __________________________________________________ _____
EPILOGUE: OBAMANATION '09
How The Two-Legged Diarrhea Monster Ate Amerika
Well, as you all know, and as I predicted, the Beige Baboon won.
However, I must now admit that I was wrong in my other predictions, namely that, if the Beige Baboon won, either Amerikan Whites, and, particularly, my fellow Southrons would rise up in arms to prevent the nigger from ever being sworn in, or, otherwise, the niggers themselves would rise up, and start looting, burning, killing and raping Whites, the minute they heard the news that one of their own had been elected President. Unfortunately, neither of those scenarios played out.
Why those things failed to happen will be discussed at length, but, first, we must broach the issue of *HOW* and *WHY* he was elected in the first place.
As you well know, I was initially skeptical of there even being an election last year, and with good reason. No one as well-informed as I am could be expected to think a member of the ultra-powerful Illuminati Bush family would simply step down and allow someone else to seize power in his stead.
Grant it, some people have pointed out the fact that Obama admitted, even during the primaries, to being a distant cousin of Dick Cheney's, and come to the conclusion that, therefore, he must, somehow, actually outrank Bush in the World Power Structure, since these are the type of people who generally see Cheney as having been Bush's puppeteer all along, which, of course, is SHEER HORSESHIT.
While Obama does have a tangential connection to the Elite bloodlines, (Otherwise, they would never have allowed him to become President in the first place.) he is certainly *NOT* of the Ruling Council of 13, as Bush was.
Why, then, was he allowed to assume power? This is the question that must be answered.
Personally, I am about 90% convinced that Obama was and is sponsored by the Kennedy family. You will recall that Ted Kennedy was among his strongest supporters, early on, and campaigned with him until the bitter end, even though he was dying, and he knew it. Now that should tell you something.
Of course, I realize there will be people who will say: "Well, Ted Kennedy simply supported Obama because he's a liberal." "What's unusual about that?" "Liberals support other liberals." These people generally fall into two camps: The Oliver Stone Liberals and the Willis Carto Conservatives, both of whom still stupidly worship at the Shrine of JFK, much to the chagrin of myself and anyone else who realizes what a COLOSSAL SWINE that man really was.
These people tend to see the Conspiracy as being either of an ideological or racial nature, and, by "racial", I mean in the usual sense of the word. In fact, it's both, and it's neither. It is ideological, if you can call the mere desire to dominate humanity, and the smug, arrogant conviction that they are somehow entitled to do so an "ideology". And, I suppose, it is also "racial", if you can call the literal Spawn of Satan (Lineal descendants of Nephilim "Fallen Angels") a "race". But, really, SPECIES would be the more accurate term.
They either believe that the Jews aren't involved in it at all, or, conversely, that they are the only ones involved. In either case, THEY ARE BLITHERING IDIOTS.
In fact, the Jews only make up about 25% of the Illuminati, and the rest of them are Gentiles. (Although I despise the term, I feel obliged to use it here, since no other word really seems to fit. The word "Aryan" certainly isn't appropriate, because not all of them are White. There are Asian and Middle Eastern Illuminati as well. The only other term I can even think of would be "non-Jew", which, to me, sounds downright sophomoric.) Or, at any rate, they don't admit to being Jews, and the ones who claim to be European certainly look as Aryan as your average White. So, to me, if someone has a European name, rather than a Jewish one, looks European, and says he's a European, it's hard for to think of him as being anything other than a European, although, in fact, he is probably not even HUMAN, let alone White.
But, anyway, we on the Right are plagued with these deluded Kennedy-worshippers, all of whom view the Great Conspiracy as merely a Jewish concern, who will never believe in a million years that their precious Kennedys could ever be generational Satanists, no matter how much evidence you present them with. So it really does no good to tell them to read Fritz Springmeier's BLOODLINES OF THE ILLUMINATI, because they will simply respond by saying that Springmeier is a tool of the seemingly omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent Jew.
I, for one, see no need to delude myself with the notion that there is a Jew hiding under every bed, merely because I happen to know that he would like to be there. After all, wishin' ain't gettin'. In fact, their Jew-paranoia turns out to be quite self-serving, because, if the Jews did everything all by their little lonesomes, without any belp from anyone else, that lets the Whites off the hook entirely, doesn't it? Why, we're just as pure as the driven snow. Can't you see the halos over our heads? Can't blame *US* for anything, by God!!! Pretty goddamned nauseating.
But, anyway, here's what I think happened: Back in 1945, as World War II was winding down, and FDR was on his deathbed, Prescott Bush and Joseph Kennedy Sr. made a deal. Their families would each run the world for 40 years, starting with Rosenfeld's death. Most likely, they flipped a coin to decide whose family would go first, and the coin, undoubtedly, would've been provided and flipped by some objective, disinterested third party, (Probably a waiter, since I suspect the deal was made in some upscale restaurant, when no other customers were around.) since neither really trusted the other.
As it turned out, the Kennedy family won the flip, and got the first forty years, from 1945, as it turned out, until 1985. At the time, Prescott Bush seemed to accept his loss gracefully, but he was secretly scheming to cheat the Kennedys out of their 40 years and take the whole 80 for his family.
So, in 1963, either he or his son, George Sr., (Not sure whether Prescott was still alive at this point.) made a deal with Aristotle Onassis to have JFK removed from power, and from this planet. The rest, as we all know, is history.
However, I don't maintain that the Bushes seized the reigns of power immediately after the death of JFK. There was, after all, one little obstacle in their way, namely Bobby, who, in 1968, as we all know, was to meet the same fate as his brother. And, from that point until November of last year, the Bushes literally ran the world.
Bush Sr. actively campaigned for Richard Nixon, who was to be elected that November. (I've got a television ad from that campaign of Bush endorsing him on a DVD.) He was merely a Bush puppet, allowed to assume the Presidency, only because he had agreed to take on Henry Kissinger, an agent of the Bush family, to be his virtual brain, much as Edward Mandell House was to the infamous Southern Judas, Woodrow Wilson.
It is my belief that Nixon had secretly plotted to have Kissinger fired, and, as a result, was forced to resign from office. Six years later, Ronald Reagan, who had cleaned Bush Sr.'s clock in the primaries, was forced to take the homosexual pedophile as his running-mate, in order to become elected President that November.
Eight years of Reagan/Bush, with Bush Sr. *TOTALLY* controlling the nation's foreign and financial policies followed, with another four years of Bush Sr. at the helm after that. When he ran afoul of the most militant wing of the Zionists, however, they plotted to have him removed from office, and replaced with one William Jefferson Clinton, who is alleged to be either a secret Rothschild or Rockefeller, depending on who you believe.
What these ignorant kikes didn't realize, however, was that Clinton was a life-long friend of the Bush family, and basically Bush Sr.'s adopted son. They spend more time together than he and Bush Jr. ever have or ever will. What the homosexual pedophile and the notorious skirt-chaser could possibly have in common, I will simply leave to your imaginations, but I guarantee you it's nothing good.
So, anyway, even though Clinton had technically assumed the Presidency, he continued to do the will of his "Daddy" on pretty much every meaningful issue, and the Republicunts weren't long in the wilderness, anyway, managing to retake both houses of Congress for the first time in over 40 years, a mere two years after Clinton's election. They would retain that control until 2006, and, as we all know, by that time, another Bush was in the Oval Office.
So the Bush family got their 40 years, make no mistake about that.
Charles Gavan O'Lanahan
http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=1335#post1335
What follows is the most recent update to the MISSIVES FROM THE BRIARPATCH page on my website. It's a really long-ass article, the longest I've ever written, in fact, so it will be posted increment by increment.---CGO.
-------------------------------------------------------
__________________________________________________ _____ __________________________________________________ _____
EPILOGUE: OBAMANATION '09
How The Two-Legged Diarrhea Monster Ate Amerika
Well, as you all know, and as I predicted, the Beige Baboon won.
However, I must now admit that I was wrong in my other predictions, namely that, if the Beige Baboon won, either Amerikan Whites, and, particularly, my fellow Southrons would rise up in arms to prevent the nigger from ever being sworn in, or, otherwise, the niggers themselves would rise up, and start looting, burning, killing and raping Whites, the minute they heard the news that one of their own had been elected President. Unfortunately, neither of those scenarios played out.
Why those things failed to happen will be discussed at length, but, first, we must broach the issue of *HOW* and *WHY* he was elected in the first place.
As you well know, I was initially skeptical of there even being an election last year, and with good reason. No one as well-informed as I am could be expected to think a member of the ultra-powerful Illuminati Bush family would simply step down and allow someone else to seize power in his stead.
Grant it, some people have pointed out the fact that Obama admitted, even during the primaries, to being a distant cousin of Dick Cheney's, and come to the conclusion that, therefore, he must, somehow, actually outrank Bush in the World Power Structure, since these are the type of people who generally see Cheney as having been Bush's puppeteer all along, which, of course, is SHEER HORSESHIT.
While Obama does have a tangential connection to the Elite bloodlines, (Otherwise, they would never have allowed him to become President in the first place.) he is certainly *NOT* of the Ruling Council of 13, as Bush was.
Why, then, was he allowed to assume power? This is the question that must be answered.
Personally, I am about 90% convinced that Obama was and is sponsored by the Kennedy family. You will recall that Ted Kennedy was among his strongest supporters, early on, and campaigned with him until the bitter end, even though he was dying, and he knew it. Now that should tell you something.
Of course, I realize there will be people who will say: "Well, Ted Kennedy simply supported Obama because he's a liberal." "What's unusual about that?" "Liberals support other liberals." These people generally fall into two camps: The Oliver Stone Liberals and the Willis Carto Conservatives, both of whom still stupidly worship at the Shrine of JFK, much to the chagrin of myself and anyone else who realizes what a COLOSSAL SWINE that man really was.
These people tend to see the Conspiracy as being either of an ideological or racial nature, and, by "racial", I mean in the usual sense of the word. In fact, it's both, and it's neither. It is ideological, if you can call the mere desire to dominate humanity, and the smug, arrogant conviction that they are somehow entitled to do so an "ideology". And, I suppose, it is also "racial", if you can call the literal Spawn of Satan (Lineal descendants of Nephilim "Fallen Angels") a "race". But, really, SPECIES would be the more accurate term.
They either believe that the Jews aren't involved in it at all, or, conversely, that they are the only ones involved. In either case, THEY ARE BLITHERING IDIOTS.
In fact, the Jews only make up about 25% of the Illuminati, and the rest of them are Gentiles. (Although I despise the term, I feel obliged to use it here, since no other word really seems to fit. The word "Aryan" certainly isn't appropriate, because not all of them are White. There are Asian and Middle Eastern Illuminati as well. The only other term I can even think of would be "non-Jew", which, to me, sounds downright sophomoric.) Or, at any rate, they don't admit to being Jews, and the ones who claim to be European certainly look as Aryan as your average White. So, to me, if someone has a European name, rather than a Jewish one, looks European, and says he's a European, it's hard for to think of him as being anything other than a European, although, in fact, he is probably not even HUMAN, let alone White.
But, anyway, we on the Right are plagued with these deluded Kennedy-worshippers, all of whom view the Great Conspiracy as merely a Jewish concern, who will never believe in a million years that their precious Kennedys could ever be generational Satanists, no matter how much evidence you present them with. So it really does no good to tell them to read Fritz Springmeier's BLOODLINES OF THE ILLUMINATI, because they will simply respond by saying that Springmeier is a tool of the seemingly omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent Jew.
I, for one, see no need to delude myself with the notion that there is a Jew hiding under every bed, merely because I happen to know that he would like to be there. After all, wishin' ain't gettin'. In fact, their Jew-paranoia turns out to be quite self-serving, because, if the Jews did everything all by their little lonesomes, without any belp from anyone else, that lets the Whites off the hook entirely, doesn't it? Why, we're just as pure as the driven snow. Can't you see the halos over our heads? Can't blame *US* for anything, by God!!! Pretty goddamned nauseating.
But, anyway, here's what I think happened: Back in 1945, as World War II was winding down, and FDR was on his deathbed, Prescott Bush and Joseph Kennedy Sr. made a deal. Their families would each run the world for 40 years, starting with Rosenfeld's death. Most likely, they flipped a coin to decide whose family would go first, and the coin, undoubtedly, would've been provided and flipped by some objective, disinterested third party, (Probably a waiter, since I suspect the deal was made in some upscale restaurant, when no other customers were around.) since neither really trusted the other.
As it turned out, the Kennedy family won the flip, and got the first forty years, from 1945, as it turned out, until 1985. At the time, Prescott Bush seemed to accept his loss gracefully, but he was secretly scheming to cheat the Kennedys out of their 40 years and take the whole 80 for his family.
So, in 1963, either he or his son, George Sr., (Not sure whether Prescott was still alive at this point.) made a deal with Aristotle Onassis to have JFK removed from power, and from this planet. The rest, as we all know, is history.
However, I don't maintain that the Bushes seized the reigns of power immediately after the death of JFK. There was, after all, one little obstacle in their way, namely Bobby, who, in 1968, as we all know, was to meet the same fate as his brother. And, from that point until November of last year, the Bushes literally ran the world.
Bush Sr. actively campaigned for Richard Nixon, who was to be elected that November. (I've got a television ad from that campaign of Bush endorsing him on a DVD.) He was merely a Bush puppet, allowed to assume the Presidency, only because he had agreed to take on Henry Kissinger, an agent of the Bush family, to be his virtual brain, much as Edward Mandell House was to the infamous Southern Judas, Woodrow Wilson.
It is my belief that Nixon had secretly plotted to have Kissinger fired, and, as a result, was forced to resign from office. Six years later, Ronald Reagan, who had cleaned Bush Sr.'s clock in the primaries, was forced to take the homosexual pedophile as his running-mate, in order to become elected President that November.
Eight years of Reagan/Bush, with Bush Sr. *TOTALLY* controlling the nation's foreign and financial policies followed, with another four years of Bush Sr. at the helm after that. When he ran afoul of the most militant wing of the Zionists, however, they plotted to have him removed from office, and replaced with one William Jefferson Clinton, who is alleged to be either a secret Rothschild or Rockefeller, depending on who you believe.
What these ignorant kikes didn't realize, however, was that Clinton was a life-long friend of the Bush family, and basically Bush Sr.'s adopted son. They spend more time together than he and Bush Jr. ever have or ever will. What the homosexual pedophile and the notorious skirt-chaser could possibly have in common, I will simply leave to your imaginations, but I guarantee you it's nothing good.
So, anyway, even though Clinton had technically assumed the Presidency, he continued to do the will of his "Daddy" on pretty much every meaningful issue, and the Republicunts weren't long in the wilderness, anyway, managing to retake both houses of Congress for the first time in over 40 years, a mere two years after Clinton's election. They would retain that control until 2006, and, as we all know, by that time, another Bush was in the Oval Office.
So the Bush family got their 40 years, make no mistake about that.
Comment