Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pastor Martin Luther Dzerzhinsky Lindstedt For US Senate Campaign Headquarters Sub-Forum

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=2273#post2273



    ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

    Pastor Lindstedt's Web Page
    Pastor Lindstedt's Archive Page & Christian Nationalist Forum

    Comment


    • #17
      My Final Rebuttal to Plaintiffs' Final Petition to the FCC

      My Final Rebuttal to Plaintiffs' Final Petition to the FCC


      http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.p...76#post1139376



      I just now emailed this to the FCC (5:50 AM, CST, 2 June 2010). I decided to combine my rebuttal with an official Glenn Miller for Senate press release, which I'll email today to 35-40 media outlets:



      Press Release # 4 (3 June 2010)

      By: Glenn Miller for US Senate

      SUBJECT: Successful Plot to Silence My Political Campaign Commercials from Missouri Broadcast Air Waves

      As was widely reported in the media, both in Missouri and nationwide, the Missouri Attorney General, joined by the Missouri Broadcasters Association and Zimmer Radio of Mid Missouri, Inc., filed a petition on 16 April 2010, to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), demanding that the FCC issue a ruling declaring that I am not a qualified, bonafide write-candidate for the U.S. Senate.

      As a result of that April 16th action, all radio station companies in the state of Missouri, except for two local ones, have refused to broadcast my campaign commercials ever since, while stating to me via email, that they had decided to await the FCC?s ruling before agreeing to broadcast my ?controversial? campaign commercials.

      Clear Channel Radio company in Springfield (Kelli Presley), and Talon Radio Company in Aurora (Duane Gandy) are the only two radio companies in Missouri that decided not to silence my campaign commercials from Missouri broadcast air waves, and both companies have broadcasted a Glenn Miller-for-Senate campaign commercial a total of approximately 150 times on 5 of their local radio stations, since April 16th.

      It should be noted by all individual employees of the establishment media, that thus far, there have been no protests of any kind by any investigative reporter, or by any so-called protectors of free speech and the right to engage in the political process, or even by the ACLU, even though I emailed the St Louis ACLU my request that they represent me in this case. They didn?t even reply to my email.

      In furtherance of their plot to silence my campaign, the same cabal of censors mailed the FCC their final demand on 27 May 2010. The following is my rebuttal to their demand, submitted to the FCC this date, 3 June 2010. Be it known I have absolutely no confidence in a fair FCC ruling. In fact, the ?fix is in? and has been since my first ?controversial? radio campaign ad was broadcasted in March. And every media journalist in the state and nation, familiar with this case, knows it, but are too yellow to say so publicly.

      Do you controlled, thoroughly politically correct (PC), therefore silent journalists, actually believe the MO Attorney General or the Missouri Broadcasters Association or the Obama bureaucrats in the FCC, give a damn about my political qualifications ?? Are you all deaf, dumb, and blind ?? Shame on every damn one of you. Your silence makes you accomplices of the censorship cabal.

      Here?s my rebuttal to the cabal?s latest communistic jibberishes:

      In the Matter of:

      PETITION FOR DECLATORY RULING

      File No: 100401

      TO: Federal Communications Commission
      Washington, DC

      Here?s my rebuttal to petitioners? latest attempt to have my campaign for the US Senate silenced on Missouri?s broadcast air waves.

      Be it noted that FCC Attorney Mark Berlin stated to me over the phone in late May that the FCC is not required to hold a hearing in this case, nor required to give this case a docket number (only an inter-office control number), nor required to provide the public with access to the FCC?s proceedings. In other words, these proceedings amount to little more than a secret ?hearing? conducted in the old USSR by one of it?s Bolshevik commissars, such as Leon Trotsky.

      I find that the latest filing by the petitioners adds little or nothing to what they provided in their original petition filed on April 16th.

      They claim I have not proven to the FCC that I am a legally qualified, duly filed, and bonafide write-in candidate for the US Senate from Missouri.

      I claim that I have proven I am. My proofs lie in my previous filings to the FCC, and at my campaign website: www.whty.org. (Click on ?radio broadcasts?), and at www.govnn.com/glennmiller. Additional photographic proofs are the dozen or so photo graphs showing me campaigning out in the public in several Missouri towns and cities, including a photo of me giving a speech on the courthouse steps in Aurora, Missouri, which were mailed, certified mail, to the FCC weeks ago.

      As for plaintiffs? claim that I don?t show proof of statewide campaign offices, it is simply because most of my campaign workers are terrified of being murdered or else harmed personally in some other way, if it becomes public knowledge they are helping me to get elected. Fears that are more than justified, as plaintiffs damn well know and so does every FCC attorney, and every reporter in every media outlet, who?s listened to my ?controversial? radio campaign commercials.

      Plaintiffs admit, by their very reluctance to broadcast my campaign commercials, that they too fear reprisals. In fact, the only reason plaintiffs filed their motion to the FCC in the first place, was their fear of suffering financially from loss of listeners and from loss of paid advertisements, should they broadcast my ?controversial? radio campaign commercials. They also fear reprisals of a more violent nature from those opposed to equal rights for white people.

      Frankly, I wonder why I even bother to submit rebuttals to what I perceive to be highly paid bureaucrats working for a jewish occupation government or JOG. A fact about the US government stated by many prominent politicians recently, to include former Ohio Congressman Paul Findley, former Congressman James Traficant, and former US presidential candidate Patrick Buchanan, who refers to the US Congress as Israel?s Amen Corner, and to Capitol Hill, as Israeli Occupied Territory.

      The ?fix is in?. And therefore, this kangaroo ?hearing? by the JOG?s FCC is nothing more than a foregone conclusion of the fix that was made immediately after my first radio campaign commercial was broadcasted back in March 2010.

      Another JOG fix was made in 06 when I tried to get my name on the Missouri election ballot as a candidate for the US Congress.. First, neither of the JOG political parties (Republican, Democrat, or Libertarian) would accept my $100.00 filing fee. Consequently, the Missouri Secretary of State said she couldn?t therefore, place my name on the election ballot. And guess what, the federal court in Springfield agreed with her, saying all political parties can decide who can and who cannot be members of their party. (Federal Case Number: 06-5032-CV-S-RED)

      Bottom line. The JOG can fix any freakin thing.

      I await the formal announcement of the ruling you?d already decided on in March when you first chatted on the phone with the Missouri JOG?lings who filed this petition.


      GLENN MILLER
      Candidate for US Senate
      Aurora, Missouri
      Tel: 417-463-7703
      ========================

      NO WAY OUT BUT THRU US MAMZERKIKE RATS

      My Side of The Story

      The Whigger Fuktard Party

      My FBI Ghostwritten Book - "A Whigger Mamzer Rat Sqeaks Out"

      Comment


      • #18
        jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj jjjjjjjjjjj

        Pastor Lindstedt's Web Page
        Pastor Lindstedt's Archive Page & Christian Nationalist Forum

        Comment


        • #19
          TraitorGlenn Miller got all of two votes for U.S. Senaturd in Missery

          Billy Roper's Write-In Campaign For Governor Of Arkansas Not Quite As Successful As Lisa Murkowski's Write-In Campaign For Senator; NSM's Jeff Hall The Most Successful Of All Pro-White Candidates
          -- Oh, and TraitorGlenn Miller got all of two votes for U.S. Senaturd in Missery



          http://www.whitenationalist.org/foru...=3069#post3069
          http://stumbleinn.net/forum/showthre...d=1#post290669
          http://www.thebeerbarrel.net/showthr...ed=1#post13119
          http://whitereference.blogspot.com/2...paign-for.html
          http://cjcc-an.blogspot.com/2010/11/...i-asswipe.html


          All of America is abuzz over the apparent success of Lisa Murkowski's write-in campaign to remain one of Alaska's U.S. senators. With 99 percent of the votes counted, "Write-In" has 41 percent, Joe Miller 34.2 percent, and Scott McAdams 23.74 percent. It is assumed that the overwhelming majority of "Write-In" votes are for Lisa Murkowski, anywhere from 90-95 percent, but the final tally won't be known until November 18th.

          However, Lisa Murkowski's example is hardly representative of the average write-in candidate. After all, she's not only an incumbent U.S. Senator, but she "married" herself to various corporation, in particular Alaska Native corporations who get no-bid government contracts, as well as to the Alaska Federation of Natives, in order to buy her way to possible victory. Much more representative of the typical write-in candidate is the experience of Billy Roper, who ran for governor of Arkansas under the auspices of his Nationalist Party of America. Roper announced his candidacy early, crisscrossed the state in search of support, deployed numerous yard signs, and maintained a vigorous online outreach. Roper reported that many prospective White constituents reacted favorably to his candidacy. Some thought Roper could pull as many as 10,000 votes. In fact, his candidacy threw such a scare into Republican also-ran Jim Keet that Keet threatened to no-show a critical candidate forum if Roper showed up. Roper ultimately decided not to show up.

          So how did Billy Roper's campaign work out? The Arkansas election returns are filtering in now, and with 89 percent of the counties reporting, the governor's race shows that incumbent Mike Beebe stuffed Jim Keet. It also shows an aggregate total of 668 votes for all write-in candidates combined. However, Arkansas election officials have not completed the task of counting the write-in votes by candidate; Roper obviously got more than two votes. But I would think that with all the publicity generated by the Roper campaign, he most likely got at least half the write-in votes, and perhaps as many as two-thirds.

          Nevertheless, Roper's candidacy was still worthwhile because he ran openly as a White racial activist under his own name, his dress and demeanor blended in with the population, and he reaped valuable publicity for the White racialist cause.

          So how did other White activists do with their campaign? The Indiana Division of elections reports that Tom Metzger earned nine votes in his write-in campaign for U.S House District 3, finishing fourth in a field of five.

          In the non-partisan race for the Monongalia County (WV) Board of Education, Harry Bertram finished third in a field of three with 2,546 votes, or 14.03 percent of the total. Bertram received some help from the American Third Position Party.

          In the non-partisan race for the Rialto (CA) School Board, Dan Schruender has finished sixth in a field of six, but with a credible 1,807 votes, or 9.64 percent of the total. The fifth place finisher was only 442 votes ahead of him (read media story in the Press-Enterprise). All votes have been counted in this race.

          But perhaps the best performance was by National Socialist Movement activist Jeff Hall, who ran for the non-partisan District 2 seat on the Western Municipal Water District Board. With 87 percent of the votes counted, Hall received a very credible 6,303 votes, or 27.73 percent of the total. While Hall was initially accused of running merely to give the NSM public exposure, a lengthy platform statement showed that Hall was quite conversant on water issues, and should be considered a serious candidate. Over 27 percent of voters agreed.

          By the way, in his once-vocal campaign for Missouri's U.S. Senate seat which gave us serious nationwide publicity, the votes are all in, and Frazier Glenn Miller got two votes. TraitorGlenn had to beat pore Margaret's ass in order to get her to vote. The gut-sick guido-weasel with jew ass-cancer was in Sans Fagscrisco getting the jew GAIDS doctors to look at its Gay Bowel Syndrome and a new set of colostomy bags and forgot to leave an absentee ballot for its Department of ZOGland InSecurity Paymaster.

          And Roxie Fausnaught, the domestic partner of Pastor Martin Luther Dzerzhinsky Lindstedt got 597 votes and 3.35% of the votes cast for her run as a Libertarian/National-Socialist Libertarian Party Candidate and she didn't spend a nickel on her campaign. She also retained ballot access in Newton County Missouri for her county-level political party, however named.


          Hats off to all those White activists who stepped up to the plate and ran for office.

          Posted by Anchorage Activist at 10:14 AM Wednesday, November 03, 2010
          http://whitereference.blogspot.com/2...paign-for.html

          Last edited by Anchorage Activist; 11-03-2010, 10:46 PM. Reason: Add Links
          =============

          For Recent News of the Bowel Movement
          http://whitereference.blogspot.com/

          Comment


          • #20
            Missouri primary may be dim indicator at best

            Missouri primary may be dim indicator at best


            http://www.joplinglobe.com/local/x20...icator-at-best
            http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=5207#post5207

            By Jeff Lehr
            jlehr@joplinglobe.com
            February 4, 2012


            No one expects Tuesday’s primary in Missouri to provide much of a twist or turn in Republican efforts to select a candidate to run against President Barack Obama.

            Five Republicans whose names will appear on the state’s ballot are no longer running: Herman Cain, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann, Jon Huntsman and Gary Johnson.

            Perhaps more importantly, Newt Gingrich, the GOP winner in South Carolina and runner-up to Mitt Romney this past week in Florida, is not even on the ballot, and Missouri voters will not be able to show their support for him. There’s no write-in option.

            “(Gingrich) can discount the results because it’s non-binding and the ballot is so skewed,” said John Putnam, chairman for Jasper County Republicans.

            No delegates to the GOP’s national convention in Tampa, Fla., in August are at stake. The process of determining the alignment of state delegates begins next month with Republican caucuses set for March 17.

            That’s why there’s been little political advertising in Missouri as yet. The campaigns know the primary here means less than in states where delegates are at stake.

            Missouri’s primary will cost $7 million to $8 million and amount to little more than a straw poll for Republicans. None of the three candidates opposing Obama for his party’s nomination — Darcy Richardson, John Wolfe and Randall Terry — are considered serious challengers.

            Republicans have whittled the field to four candidates: Romney, Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Ron Paul.

            Missouri’s early primary date might have elevated the state’s role in the presidential nomination steps by helping to answer key questions: Can Gingrich weather a possible string of Romney victories in February to reach March primaries in states where the former House speaker is strongest? Might party dissatisfaction with Romney and Gingrich grow to a point where Santorum can take advantage? If Paul hangs in the race, could his supporters ultimately determine which of the others wins at the national convention?

            The trouble is that Missouri’s primary date ran afoul of national party rules prohibiting most states from holding a binding contest before March 6. If Missouri stuck to the early date, the state’s parties faced the threat of losing up to half their delegates to the national conventions and other possible sanctions.

            State legislators tried to move the primary back to March. But gridlock in the Missouri Senate led to a bill that Gov. Jay Nixon would not sign because of various provisions, including one that would have imposed additional costs to taxpayers for special elections.

            State Sen. Ron Richard, R-Joplin, said “a factional dispute” in Jefferson City produced the situation where Missouri is holding both a primary that is little more than a straw poll and caucuses. He said both parties bear a share of the blame.

            He said the fight was between those who wanted to see Missouri’s influence enhanced in the national primary system, and those who wanted to save money and see a greater emphasis put on caucuses.

            “It’s an odd set of circumstances,” Richard said. “Now, they’re going to do both, and I’m not sure either one of them is going to make a big difference.”

            Local and state Republicans are not viewing the primary as completely unimportant.

            “I do see some value to it,” said Nick Myers, GOP chairman in Newton County.

            Myers would have preferred that Nixon did not veto the bill, but he intends to pay close attention to primary results to see whom local Republicans prefer. He expects the primary to be a good gauge of how the caucuses will go in March and thinks those party members who plan to participate in the caucuses and wish to be a delegate at district and state levels should heed the results as well.

            Myers thinks Gingrich’s failure to get his name on the ballot could be a detriment to his campaign in the state as the process advances.

            Putnam admits some reluctance to put too much stock in the primary’s outcome.

            “Some of the least informed voters vote in the primary, and I don’t think that’s the best way to choose a candidate,” he said.

            He said the GOP primary also will be vulnerable to crossover voting by Democrats who may wish to influence its outcome in a way they perceive as advantageous to Obama. But Putnam doesn’t intend to ignore the results. He said if primary voters show up strong for one candidate or another, it could have an impact on which candidate Missouri Republicans ultimately back.

            Jonathan Prouty, communications director for the state party, thinks Tuesday’s results will have an influence on media perceptions. They will provide national and state reporters a better idea of what Missouri voters are thinking, he said.

            He said Gingrich is not on the ballot because of a decision by his own campaign and not any state rules for qualifying as a candidate. He said the decision made the state’s caucuses all the more important to the Gingrich campaign.

            Caucus-goers and delegates to the district and state conventions may well look to the results to figure out whom they should support, Prouty said. In the past, caucus-goers were bound by primary results, he said. This year they won’t be, but a sense of obligation can develop in the caucus system.

            Prouty said the most important role of the primary may be to provide an outlet for what he sees as a growing level of excitement within the party.

            “I think there’s a grass-roots energy out there,” Prouty said. “Republicans are excited about the opportunity to nominate a candidate who’ll go on to defeat Barack Obama in November.”

            Democrats have less reason than Republicans to go to the polls Tuesday. But Susan DeCarlo, Jasper County chairwoman for the Democrats, hopes party members will feel motivated to vote.

            “I think what Democrats in this area should do is not stay at home, but get out and show our support for the president,” DeCarlo.

            She scoffed at the notion of Democrats attempting to affect the GOP primary.

            “What sense does it make not to vote in your own party’s primary?” she said. “I know we don’t have many options this time. But we are Democrats, and we ought to support our party.”


            All the shit unfit to print

            http://www.joplinglobe.com

            Comment


            • #21
              Our Own Fucking Stupid View: Meaningless in Missouri

              Our Own Fucking Stupid View: Meaningless in Missouri


              http://www.joplinglobe.com/editorial...ss-in-Missouri
              http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=5212#post5212


              Missourians have an opinion about who should be the Republican candidate to run against Barack Obama in November. Too bad it won’t matter. Not that it ever fucking did. Do any of you clowns actually think that 'The Piss-Pul' get to decide theyz [d]rulers?

              Tuesday’s presidential primary election will go down as one of the most irrelevant elections in state history — except for the $8 million price tag.

              The results will be nonbinding and, therefore, meaningless — mainly because Missouri’s choice for the election will be made in March by caucuses of party insiders from around the state. Same as always. What do you think this is? A Demockracy.

              Politicians have commiserated that all the money we’ve saved from a light winter and associated snow removal will go right back into an $8 million election that doesn’t count. On top of that, winter isn’t finished. We still may have to salt the roads, so we wish everyone would stop teasing Mother Nature or Old Man Winter — whoever is responsible. What that has to do with anything shouldn't matter.

              Seriously, the biggest tragedy is that this situation could have been avoided.

              Last year, a bill was submitted to move Missouri’s primary elections to March to conform with national party rules. The bill passed through the General Assembly, but with amendments that removed write-in candidates for city elections and other provisions. Amendments made to further ensure that mere voters shouldn't get to decide anything.

              Gov. Jay Nixon was left with no choice but to veto a bill that was otherwise just fine. Though the House was able to pass it without amendments last year, the Senate could not. The Fuktards.

              Here’s the thing: We still believe that a primary is the best way for Missourians to make their voices heard — especially with Missouri’s system of voting for a political party without declaring an affiliation to one. Especially since "White Supremacists" are not to be allowed to run for federal and state [s]elections and pro-white voters are thus not to be allowed a choice as to who [d]rules over the-m-asses in Moronsouri. We decry the fact that the sheeple might figure out that these [s]elections are rigged in advance insofar as what candidates and what issues are allowed to be brought forward, and thus the System loses all legitimacy. Gotta give the goofs the notions that their wants matter worth a fuck.

              Remember that voters can choose to vote Republican or Democrat in a primary. While some argue it’s a system for gamesmanship, it allows people to truly make up their minds based on current issues and events. As if it really matters worth a fuck.

              The only reason this particular election is irrelevant is because none of them really matter. But we will claim that it is because of some badly placed amendments at the wrong time. We’re disappointed that, during what many would argue is one of the most critical presidential elections we’ll have, the voices of Missourians won’t count for much in an election. As if it ever really mattered.



              All the shit unfit to print

              http://www.joplinglobe.com

              Comment


              • #22
                Turnout could be low for ‘straw poll’ primary

                Turnout could be low for ‘straw poll’ primary


                http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=5214#post5214
                http://www.joplinglobe.com/local/x13...w-poll-primary

                By Susan Redden
                news@joplinglobe.com
                February 6, 2012


                Local election officials don’t know what to expect in terms of voter turnout for today’s presidential preference primary, several said Monday.

                Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan said some election officials are estimating that nearly 23 percent of registered voters will take part.

                Several county clerks in the area predicted lower turnouts, saying the fact that today’s vote is not binding has lessened the incentive for residents to cast a ballot. Today’s vote has been likened to an $8 million straw poll since the Republican Party has decided to use Missouri caucus results to determine which presidential nominees will get the state’s support at the national convention.

                One of the GOP’s two front-runners, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia, is not on today’s ballot, and several candidates on the ballot have dropped out of the race.

                Bonnie Earl, Jasper County clerk, said she expects today’s turnout to be low.

                “I would be surprised if we got up around 18 percent,” she said. “It was 27 percent in 2008, and that’s when the results meant something.”

                Kay Baum, Newton County clerk, said she expects turnout to be around 15 percent.

                “But really, we have no idea, because it (the election outcome) won’t mean anything and there has been publicity to that effect,” she said.

                Baum said barely over 100 absentee ballots had been cast before the election. “That also makes you think the turnout is going to be low,” she said. “But, we’re going to have nice weather, so people might go ahead and get out.”

                In Jasper County, just over 400 absentee ballots had been cast, election officials said, most by residents who are homebound and automatically are sent ballots each election.

                Kristina Crockett, Barton County clerk, said 45 absentee ballots had been cast by voters there.

                “I just don’t see a lot of interest,” she said. “I’d be real surprised if we got close to 25 percent.”

                Earl issued a reminder to residents of Joplin’s tornado zone that their polling place might have changed. Starting with today’s election, residents of five Joplin precincts will vote at new locations. Four polling places were moved because sites were damaged or destroyed, while a fifth was moved to divide two large precincts in which residents had voted at the same site.

                Some polling places also have changed in Barton County, where the number of precincts has been consolidated, Crockett said.

                “We’ve gone from 16 precincts to eight,” she said. “We’ve sent notices to all the voters, and we’re going to post reminders at the polling places we’ve closed.”

                The consolidation was designed to hold down election costs. The state is picking up the tab for today’s election, though counties pay costs for primary and general elections in August and November.

                The clerks expressed surprise that the presidential primary was not canceled by lawmakers after the GOP decided to use caucus votes to determine convention delegates.

                Local counties have sent invoices for election costs, based on estimates, and have been reimbursed by the state, clerks said. The estimated costs were $103,000 in Jasper County, nearly $53,000 in Newton County, and about $16,600 in Barton County.

                Voting hours

                POLLING PLACES will be open from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. today in Missouri.


                All the shit unfit to print

                http://www.joplinglobe.com

                Comment


                • #23
                  Missouri GOP: Thanks for your Santorum votes; now stand aside while we vote for Romney

                  Missouri GOP: Thanks for your Santorum votes; now stand aside while we vote for Romney


                  http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2012/...-santorum.html
                  http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=5221#post5221



                  .


                  At last look, Rick Santorum was leading the non-binding Missouri Primary by about 30 percent and has been projected the winner.

                  So much for the power of the endorsement.

                  The Missouri Republican establishment, including Sen. Roy Blunt, former Sen. Jim Talent, former Gov. Matt Blunt, and Seventh District Congressman Billy Long are solidly in former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's camp and that managed to net their candidate only about one in every four votes.

                  This was the statement released by the Missouri Republican Party:

                  Missouri Republican Party Chairman David Cole released the following statement regarding the Missouri primary:
                  “With national Republicans, analysts, and media focused on Missouri, our state is once again playing an important role in the process of electing a president. And while the non-binding primary is certainly not an ideal situation, we agree with the reporter who observed earlier today that the Show-Me State primary could still ‘carry a lot of weight.’

                  “We thank all Missourians who did their civic duty and made their voices heard, and we encourage all Republicans to attend the March caucuses and take part in the beginning of the process that will bind Missouri’s national delegates.”

                  Translation: Thanks for your votes for Rick Santorum. Now get out of the way while we hold our country club caucuses and make sure Missouri is a Romney state.


                  POSTED BY RANDY AT 7:32 PM TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 07, 2012


                  ___666___666___666___



                  The Turner Diaries RULES, The Turner Report drools

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Local voter turnouts for nonbinding primary lighter than predictions

                    Local voter turnouts for nonbinding primary lighter than predictions


                    http://www.joplinglobe.com/local/x17...an-predictions
                    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=5224#post5224

                    By Susan Redden
                    news@joplinglobe.com
                    February 7, 2012


                    JOPLIN, Mo. — The fact that Missouri’s presidential preference primary would not count for much was not lost on local voters, at least judging from voter turnouts reported Tuesday by election officials in the region.

                    Turnouts topped double digits in only two counties in the area. Most voters in the largely Republican region stayed home, rather than going to the polls in an election that will not be used to help determine the Republican presidential nominee.

                    Voter turnouts among counties in the region ranged from a high of 11.6 percent in Lawrence and Barton counties to a low of 5.4 percent in Jasper County.

                    Ballots were cast by only 4,172 of Jasper County’s 76,789 registered voters, according to figures released by Bonnie Earl, county clerk.

                    All the turnouts were well below a statewide turnout of 23 percent that had been predicted by Robin Carnahan, Missouri secretary of state.

                    Earl said Tuesday’s vote, at minimum, gave some Joplin voters an opportunity to cast ballots in new locales after some previous polling places were damaged or destroyed in the May 22 tornado.

                    “That was my thought; with so many changes, we can look at this as a training session,” she said. “It will help people learn where their polling places are and let them get back to a sense of normalcy.”

                    Residents who choose to do so will get a chance to return to the polls April 3 for town and school elections.

                    The GOP decided to ignore the Missouri primary vote and instead use caucuses that begin in March to award the state’s 52 presidential delegates. Lawmakers in Missouri’s Republican-dominated General Assembly were unable to pass legislation to move the primary back to March.

                    State Republican Party Chairman David Cole, of Cassville, issued a statement late Tuesday saying that the state was playing an important role in the process of electing a president, even though the nonbinding primary “certainly is not an ideal situation.”

                    “We thank all Missourians who did their civic duty and made their voice heard, and we encourage all Republicans to attend the March caucuses and take part in the beginning of the process that will bind Missouri’s national delegates,” he said.

                    Statewide, officials were estimating costs of the election at between $7 million and $8 million. Local counties already have been paid for election expenses, based on cost estimates that projected $103,000 in Jasper County, nearly $53,000 in Newton County and about $16,600 in Barton County. Earl said counties will settle up with the state, by either submitting bills or reimbursements, after the final costs are tallied.

                    Democrats

                    RESULTS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY Tuesday in Missouri will be used to award delegates for the Democratic National Convention.


                    All the shit unfit to print

                    http://www.joplinglobe.com

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Official: Santorum Wins Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri Caucuses

                      Official: Santorum Wins Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri Caucuses


                      http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...rado-caucuses/
                      http://www.occidentaldissent.com/for...ead.php?t=1992
                      http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=5226#post5226

                      Colorado

                      It looks like a clean sweep for Rick Santorum: he won Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri, but since these caucuses and primaries are non-binding, he won nothing more than a beauty pageant.


                      http://www.occidentaldissent.com/for...ead.php?t=1992

                      The train wreck continues to drag on.

                      http://www.boston.com/news/politics/...enges_in_colo/




                      The quality of people I am reaching is much higher than I ever did with a forum.
                      I'm now at the top of the racialist intellectual community in the United States.
                      I was a nobody when I ran The Phora.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Drowning In Hypocrisy

                        Drowning In Hypocrisy


                        http://lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts337.html
                        http://www.whitenationalist.org/foru...=5268#post5268


                        The US government is so full of self-righteousness that it has become a caricature of hypocrisy. Leon Panetta, a former congressman who Obama appointed CIA director and now head of the Pentagon, just told the sailors on the USS Enterprise, an aircraft carrier, that the US is maintaining a fleet of 11 aircraft carriers in order to project sea power against Iran and to convince Iran that “it’s better for them to try to deal with us through diplomacy.”

                        If it requires 11 aircraft carriers to deal with Iran, how many will Panetta need to project power against Russia and China? But to get on with the main point, Iran has been trying “to deal with us through diplomacy.” The response from Washington has been belligerent threats of military attack, unfounded and irresponsible accusations that Iran is making a nuclear weapon, sanctions and an oil embargo. Washington’s accusations echo Israel’s and are contradicted by Washington’s own intelligence agencies and the International Atomic Energy Agency. Why doesn’t Washington respond to Iran in a civilized manner with diplomacy? Really, which of the two countries is the greatest threat to peace?

                        Washington sends the FBI to raid the homes of peace activists and puts a grand jury to work to create a case against them for aiding a nebulous enemy by protesting Washington’s wars. The Department of Homeland Security unleashes goon cop thugs to brutalize peaceful Occupy Wall Street demonstrators. Washington fabricates cases against Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, and Tarek Mehanna that negate the First Amendment by equating free speech with terrorism and spying. Chicago mayor and former Obama White House chief-of-staff, Rahm Israel Emanuel, pushes an ordinance that outlaws public protests in the City of Chicago. The list goes on. And in the midst of it all Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other Washington hypocrites accuse Russia and China of stifling dissent.

                        Washington’s grotesque hypocrisy goes unremarked by the American “media” and in the debates for the Republican presidential nomination. The corrupt Obama “Justice” Department turns a blind eye while goon cop thugs commit gratuitous violence against the citizens who pay the goon cop thugs’ undeserved salaries.

                        But it is in the War Crimes Arena where Washington shows the greatest hypocrisy. The self-righteous bigots in Washington are forever rounding up heads of weak states whose countries were afflicted by civil wars and sending them off to be tried as war criminals. All the while Washington indiscriminately kills large numbers of civilians in six or more countries, dismissing its own war crimes as “collateral damage.” Washington violates its own law and international law by torturing people.

                        On January 13, 2012, Carol Rosenberg of McClatchy Newspapers reported that Spanish judge Pablo Rafael Ruz Gutierrez re-launched an investigation into Washington’s torture of prisoners in Guantanamo Prison. The previous day British authorities opened an investigation into CIA renditions of kidnapped persons to Libya for torture.

                        Rosenberg reports that although the Obama regime has refused to investigate the obvious crimes of the Bush regime, and one might add its own obvious crimes, “other countries are still interested in determining whether Bush-era anti-terror practices violated international law.”


                        There is no question that Bush/Cheney/Obama have trashed the US Constitution, US statutory law, and international law. But Washington, having overthrown justice, has established that might is right. No foreign government is going to send its forces into the US to drag the war criminals out and place them on trial.

                        The War Criminal Court at the Hague is reserved for Washington’s show trials. No foreign government is going to pay Washington several hundred millions of dollars to turn Bush, Cheney, Obama and their minions over to them in the way the US bought Milosevic from Serbia in order to create the necessary spectacle at the War Crimes Tribunal to justify Washington’s naked aggression against Serbia.

                        No government can be perfect, because all governments are composed of humans, especially those humans most attracted by power and profit. Nevertheless, in my lifetime I have witnessed an extraordinary deterioration in the integrity of government in the United States. We have reached the point where nothing that our government says is believable. Not even the unemployment rate, the inflation rate, the GDP growth rate, much less Washington’s reasons for its wars, its police state, and its foreign and domestic policies.

                        Washington has kept America at war for ten years while millions of Americans lost their jobs and their homes. War and a faltering economy have exploded the national debt, and a looming bankruptcy is being blamed on Social Security and Medicare.

                        The pursuit of war continues. On January 23 Washington’s servile puppets–the EU member states–did Washington’s bidding and imposed an oil embargo on Iran, despite the pleas of Greece, a member of the EU. Greece’s final ruin will come from the higher oil prices from the embargo, as the Greek government realizes.

                        The embargo is a reckless act. If the US navy tries to intercept oil tankers carrying Iranian oil, large scale war could break out. This, many believe, is Washington’s aim.

                        It is easy for an embargo to become a blockade, which is an act of war. Remember how easily the UN Security Council’s “no-fly zone” over Libya was turned by the US and its NATO puppets into a military attack on Libya’s armed forces and population centers supportive of Gaddafi.

                        As the western “democracies” become increasingly lawless, the mask of law that imperialism wears is stripped away and with it the sheen of morality that has been used to cloak hegemonic ambitions. With Iran surrounded and with two of Washington’s fleets in the Persian Gulf, another war of aggression seems inevitable.

                        Experts say that an attack on Iran by the US and NATO will disrupt the flow of oil that the world needs. The crazed drive for hegemony is so compelling that Washington and its EU puppets show no hesitation in putting their own struggling economies at risk of sharply rising energy costs.

                        War abroad and austerity at home is the policy that is being imposed on the western “democracies.”


                        January 26, 2012

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X