Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Edgar Steel -- The Whigger-Whimperer -- Charged in murder for hire plot

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Op-Ed: Was Edgar Steele framed?


    http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/306634
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=3731#post3731


    An in-depth article and analysis relating to the possible framing of controversial American attorney Edgar J. Steele for the attempted murder of his wife.

    On May 5 this year, controversial attorney Edgar J. Steele was convicted on a four count indictment. As he awaits sentencing, his alleged co-conspirator, FBI informant Larry Fairfax, has been sentenced to 27 months in prison, an extremely modest punishment for a man who by his own admission planted a potentially lethal explosive device under a car, and allowed an unsuspecting woman to drive around in it. Steele can expect no such leniency when he is sentenced on August 22. He faces up to thirty years, perhaps more, in prison for his part in an alleged plot to murder his wife and mother-in-law.
    Immediately after his arrest, up to his trial, throughout the trial, and after his conviction, Steele has made one consistent claim: he was framed. And that in spite of the existence of audio tapes which appear to show him plotting with Fairfax to murder Cyndi Steele, his wife of twenty-six years, and her mother ? his mother-in-law - so that he could take the insurance money and start a new life with a Russian mail order bride.
    Steele claims he was targeted because of his track record of defending unpopular clients, clients to whom he appears to have got a shade too close to ideologically, if an analysis of his own writings is anything to go by. ?I wuz framed?. Well, you would say that, wouldn?t you, dummy?
    Steele has some supporters who many would regard as ugly, embarrassing, or even an outright liability. It is all too easy for some people to cry foul when they have been caught red-handed, or severely compromised by the evidence. And those active in ?radical? politics at both ends of the spectrum are fond of crying not only foul but ?government conspiracy?.
    In December 1981, Mumia Abu-Jamal was arrested within two minutes of murdering police officer Daniel Faulkner; an empty gun with five spent casings was found at his feet, as was a bullet from the dead man?s gun in Jamal?s chest. There were credible eyewitnesses to the murder, and what has been called a confession but was in reality a boast, that he had shot the man and hoped he died. That didn?t deter Jamal from pleading not guilty, nor his supporters from subjorning perjury and fabicated evidence in a long series of spurious appeals to prevent his execution.
    Edgar Steele is at the opposite end of the political spectrum from Jamal, and on the face of it, the evidence against him is just as compelling. On the face of it, there are no holes in the prosecution case, so why then does his wife Cyndi insist that he is innocent, and the tapes, fake?
    One of Steele?s most vehement champions is Harold A. Covington, who is regarded by many including himself as America?s leading National Socialist theorist, but scratch away the racial bigotry and the rabid anti-Semitism, and ?Wicked Harold? espouses a Libertarian agenda that Ayn Rand herself would relish. In his weekly podcasts, excoriation of the Federal Government is always at the top of his list; his latest such podcast includes a surprising condemnation of the execution of Osama Bin Laden; earlier podcasts have included condemnations of torture, the perceived persecution of Moslems, and the condemnation of American ?Imperialism?, so his defence of Edgar Steele is not simply a case of ?He would say that, wouldn?t he??
    The inconvenient questions that Covington has posed and continues to ask relate to Steele?s health as much as his motives. In his podcast of June 17 last year, shortly after Steele?s arrest, he commented ?...I find it rather difficult to believe that a sixty-four year old man who just a couple of months ago was in the hospital for major open heart surgery would be concentrating on anything but restoring his health...I would take this opportunity to remind all of you yet again that anyone who attempts to involve you in illegal activity is either a cop or a lunatic, but you never know when he?s wired and there?s a tape running somewhere?.
    If Covington could work that out without the benefit of a college education, then so could Steele, who has an MBA as well as a degree from UCLA School of Law.
    Steele was alleged to have offered Larry Fairfax $25,000 from the insurance money if the bomb that was planted under the car ? his own ? killed both women. The mode of execution would have made it appear that Steele was himself the target, with the obvious inference that he had been so targeted for political reasons. There is though a problem with that scenario, Steele and his wife had cancelled their insurance. There are also problems with much of the rest of the evidence; one is that according to Cyndi Steele, her husband had been very kind to her mother. Another is that the Russian bride with whom this semi-invalid geriatric was supposed to elope, was no such thing. Steele was he said, actually researching the trafficking of women for sexual purposes, a claim that doesn?t sound quite so outrageous when his wife claims she was aware of what he was doing and in fact was looking over his shoulder at one point as he typed a billet doux to his prospective bride.
    If all that sounds incompatible with the State?s claims, the tapes played in court, obviously the most compelling evidence for the jury, are claimed to be bogus. Not simply by Edgar Steele but as stated by Cyndi, who in an extensive radio interview with Dave Gahary said that before she heard these tapes she was convinced that her husband had indeed intended to murder her, but that they were so obviously fake that she realised at once that he had been framed.
    So why was this alleged fabrication not exposed in court? Because the defence was not allowed to adduce expert evidence to that effect! One supporter of Steel has made a bogus tape which he has posted to the Youtube website; made up entirely from edits of the lawyer?s public speeches, it is only half-convincing; one would expect a much better quality to be produced by some rogue element within the FBI. How credible is such a claim?
    Leftists in particular are fond of alluding to the FBI?s COINTELPRO program, including in relation to Mumia Abu-Jamal, and there is certainly evidence in the public domain relating to this. The FBI?s black operations were though concerned primarily with creating discord within groups like the Black Panthers, although they had one spectacular and in retrospect embarrassing succces; Kwanzaa was invented by a Black ?radical? COINTELPRO managed to dupe. In this they appear to have taken a leaf out of the British Army?s book; in his 1960 monograph Gangs and Counter-gangs, Major Frank Kitson relates how in the fight against Mau Mau in Kenya in the 1950s, he had succeeded in introducing a new Mau Mau oath.
    Whether or not the FBI ever went that far, there is one notorious and thoroughly documented example of an FBI informant not only participating in a crime but setting it up from scratch, the framing of John De Lorean.
    De Lorean was an American whizz kid who got out of his depth when his motor business floundered in the early 1980s. With his company in receivership, he sought a way out, and was arrested for and charged with trafficking cocaine. At his trial in August 1984, he was cleared without a witness being called when his legal team were able to demonstrate that he had been entrapped by FBI shill and drug smuggler James Hoffman.
    There is no suggestion by Edgar Steele or anyone fighting his corner that he was entrapped by Larry Fairfax, rather that the crime was initiated and carried out by Fairfax either as part of an FBI operation or for personal reasons ? greed ? related to the covering up for his theft of silver from the Steele household.
    After her husband?s conviction, Cyndi Steele vowed they would fight on. Others of a gentler persuasion than Harold Covington are also determined to prove Steele?s innocence; it may be the only way to do that, or to resolve this issue either way once and for all, is to have the original tapes analysed by independent experts such as the Idaho Innocence Project. That is unless they go missing mysteriously or become corrupted, as happened with forensic evidence in the ongoing case of Michael Stone, who is believed by many to be Britain?s longest serving miscarriage of justice prisoner.
    This opinion article was written by an independent writer. The opinions and views expressed herein are those of the author and are not necessarily intended to reflect those of DigitalJournal.com


    Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/articl...#ixzz1MIb98Utn

    I'm Little Butt I'm Loud!!!

    Comment


    • #32
      The Martyrdom of Edgar Steele

      The Martyrdom of Edgar Steele



      http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/...ar-steele.html
      http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=3733#post3733




      This is a transcript of my recent Radio Free Northwest podcast on the Edgar Steele case. I am publishing this transcript to prevent any possible future alteration or tampering with the audio by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The podcast may be downloaded from

      http://northwestfront.org/2011/05/ra...t-may-12-2011/

      ================

      Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades. It?s May the 12th. 2011, I?m Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.

      This week?s podcast will be shorter than usual, and there will be no musical interludes, because what I have to say this week is of vital importance. I want to keep it short and simple, and avoid any potential distractions.

      On Thursday, May the 5th, Edgar Steele was found guilty of all four charges against him. The media has reported that he now faces thirty years in prison at sentencing. They?re wrong. Edgar Steele is a man of 65 with severe medical problems. Whatever the judge gives him, the sentence will be death.

      It?s customary to wait until someone is dead before burying them. Edgar Steele will be buried alive. This elderly man, who spent his entire adult life serving the law and the judicial system which betrayed him and destroyed him, will be warehoused in a box somewhere in the GULAG archipelago of the vast slave labor system which the American government and American corporations run for their profit, and there Edgar Steele will wait to die.

      The so-called trial of Edgar Steele was an unmitigated horror. The so-called trial of Edgar Steele was arguably the final degradation of the once proud and vibrant legal system we inherited from our ancestors in Great Britain. It is a tradition spanning eight centuries, which began in June of 1215 in the meadow of Runymede with the creation of the Magna Carta, the Great Charter that above all established the rule of law as the basic underlying principle of Anglo-Saxon society.

      That tradition of almost eight centuries came to an end on May the 5th, 2011, when a sick and elderly man was murdered by the courts of the United States, because those who rule us did not like what Edgar Steele had to say and decided to destroy him, out of no reason that anyone can determine other than petty, vindictive, senile spite.

      With one bang of a federal judge?s gavel, the world has returned to the thirteenth century, as if the previous 800 years had never been. Once more we are back in the days when the king, or the local baron, can simply command his henchmen to drag a peasant away into the castle dungeon so that the lord may take his home, his cow, his daughter or his life at will.

      Edgar Steele?s defense was simple: he didn?t do it. He did not say the things that the alleged audio recordings have him saying. Nor was this mere paranoia on his part. There is in fact extensive electronic and forensic evidence that the recorded conversations between Edgar Steele and Larry Fairfax were tampered with and altered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

      But the jury was never allowed to see that evidence. Two electronics experts were willing to swear in court to the fact that the audio tracks had been tampered with by the FBI, and were fraudulent. These experts were not allowed to testify by order of the judge.

      The precedent has now been established that henceforth no one will be allowed to question the veracity or authenticity of any evidence presented in court by the FBI; from this point on, the American secret police are free to come up with any piece of fabricated rubbish they feel like, in order to frame someone that the government finds inconvenient for crimes that he or she did not commit. There have been others before Edgar Steele, but now that the FBI has been given the green light by the judge in the Steele case, there will be many more to come.

      The grotesque and vicious Edgar Steele case has further established that no American any longer has the right to present a defense against whatever absurd and deranged charges some U.S. Attorney sees fit to bring against them, without first obtaining permission from the very system and the very government functionaries who seek their destruction. What?s wrong with this picture?

      I?m severely hampered here, because I am unable to say publicly what really should be said. The First Amendment, the right to express any opinion and to do so without punishment and retaliation by those in power, the freedom of speech and of thought which was once this country?s crowning glory, is no more. In Obama?s America, white men who say or write things which the regime or certain politically protected minorities find disagreeable are now subject to harassment, legal persecution, and in Edgar Steele?s case, to judicial murder.

      It?s been like that for quite some time, of course, but last Thursday?s verdict has finally stripped the last veneer of legality and legitimacy off the criminal power structure that rules us. It cannot be denied or ignore anymore that the government of the United States is no longer a legitimate or lawful government, for they have finally violated their own laws and their own standards so egregiously that the social contract that allows them to rule us is broken for all time. From now on, the government of the United States is just another gang of thugs, no different from the Crips and the Bloods, only better dressed and better armed.

      Nor are they particularly brave or manly thugs. America is a coward that shows its prowess in destroying old men.

      In the same week in which Edgar Steele was crucified by the same system he so foolishly spent most of his life serving, another elderly man was murdered in a house in Pakistan by gunmen from the United States who broke into his home and shot him dead, unarmed, in front of his family. without even the shabby sham of a trial that Edgar Steele got.

      Many years before, in the same Idaho that perpetrated this ghastly outrage against Steele, the same gunmen murdered 14 year-old Sam Weaver by shooting him in the back and later on shot Vickie Weaver dead in the door of her home while she was holding her baby in her arms.

      The government that framed and murdered Edgar Steele are the same people who burned children alive at Waco and continue to fire multi-million dollar Predator drones at elementary schools and Muslim weddings in Iraq and Afghanistan.

      The United States and its thugs are really good at killing old men, women, and children. I can?t help but wonder just how big and bad and tough all these FBI and BATF and U.S. Marshals would be if they ever came up against grown men who had the skill and the courage to shoot back. In fact, I?ve written several novels on the subject. America is not an eagle. America is a rat, with a yellow stripe running down its back.

      They need not worry, though. We who remain will not deal with the judicial murder of Edgar Steele as we should, as upright and honorable free men should, as our own ancestors not too long ago would have done. We will not deal with the destruction of Edgar Steele as decency and justice demand because we lack the will, the self-respect, and above all we lack the courage to do so. All we will do while Edgar Steele is dragged away to his tomb is to whine on the internet. No one will hear us, and no one would listen to us if they did, because our craven acquiescence to this monstrous act renders us unworthy of notice.

      So be it. One has to play the hand one is dealt.

      But at least I?m going to say what has to be said, and if you FBI and Justice Department reptiles who are listening to this are displeased by what I have to say, I promise you won?t have to alter and falsify this recording like you did the recordings of Edgar Steele with your informer Larry Fairfax. I?m going to say what needs to be said, and if you don?t like it, you can all go straight to hell.

      Edgar Steele used to end all of his articles on his Conspiracy Penpal site with his signature phrase, ?New America: An Idea Whose Time Has Come.?

      He was wrong. The solution is not a New America, Ed. It?s No America.

      America must end. It is a diseased, leprous thing. There is no health or goodness in it, there hasn?t been for a long time, and the ultimate interest of all humanity lies in this rotting and poisonous monster called the United States being removed from the earth. All of us know in our souls what has to be done. The problem is that out of our own weakness and cowardice, we?re just sitting around waiting for some one else to do it.

      But that won?t last forever. Eventually someone will do what has to be done and expunge the United States and the worms and grubs who serve it from the earth. Tyranny such as this inevitably becomes intolerable, and at some point even the most supine and cowardly of people will reach a point where the chains of fear and intimidation and brainwashing and bullying will not hold, and they find that they would rather die themselves than live one more day like this.

      It is virtually certain that Edgar Steele will be dead in body as well as in law by then. I wish I could promise you all that someday the prison doors will be blown open, and Edgar Steele will be brought out into the light again, but I can?t. I cannot make that decision. Only you who are listening to this can.

      What I will do, as a kind of epitaph for a fine and decent man and a damned good writer and commentator who has drawn the short straw and must now descend into living hell never to return, is I will read an article of my own that I wrote a few years ago. It?s called Let?s Talk A Little Treason.

      ===========

      In Ireland, when a man has an old friend over for dinner, after the meal is over he will generally tell his wife the traditional Irish tale: ?Love, Seamus and I are going down to the pub and talk a little treason.? (That?s from Brendan Behan, I think.)

      Oh, hell, let's come right out and say it. Us White boys need to be talking a little treason.

      I notice that the great state of Oregon is about to pass more grotesque ?hatecrime? laws in favor of sodomites, making perverts who commit the filthiest acts imaginable (people don't seem to realize what it is that homosexuals actually do) a politically and legally protected class. Better than me, in the eyes of the law. Better than any white man who likes girls, because they will have specific legal protections that we are denied.

      There is no more equality under the law. Some states are even worse; in Idaho all women, period are considered a special politically and legally protected class under these deranged hatecrime laws, effectively meaning that only heterosexual white males are without legal protection against ?hate? and only white males can be victimized only on the lowest level, as mere Americans. Less than a woman of their own race, less than a Mexican, less than a faggot, less than a black. Three-fifths of a man, at best.

      I?m going to say something now to all my fellow girl-loving honkies, and I?m dead serious. I think we need to start re-evaluating our relationship with the United States of America, with a view towards bringing that relationship to an end.

      America gives us nothing except ridicule, hatred, contempt and oppression. America ignores our interests, laughs at us and reviles us, picks our pockets, discriminates against us with affirmative action and racial quotas, and kicks us in the teeth when we try to protest or petition for the redress of just grievances. America rigs the electoral process so that no one without ten million dollars in the bank should even think about running for office, and so that only criminals, incompetents, and mentally unbalanced mediocrities can win. America passes laws that give foreigners who are in our country illegally, and perverts who literally wallow in their own filth during sexual acts, a preferred and privileged status over us.

      Every time we turn on the television we see grinning black and brown monkey-faces mocking and reviling us, mincing faggots waving their limp wrists mocking and reviling us, toilet-mouthed Jews like the loathsome Sarah Silverman spewing hatred and abuse at us, pathological liars in the White House and Congress pissing down our back and assuring us with solemn faces that it is raining.

      Thanks to the media and the Jews who control the media, when the world thinks of White males they think of revolting cartoon characters. George Washington, Daniel Boone, and Charles Lindbergh have been replaced by Homer Simpson and Peter Griffin.

      White women are in their own way just as much victims as White men are, although some of them haven?t quite seen sufficiently through the feminist horse shit to understand that. If we can ever succeed in de-programming our sisters and making them understand what has been done to them, so that they realize that their place is by their menfolks' side and not with the Jews who hate them and hold them in just as much contempt as they do white men, calling them shiksas, etc...well, if we can ever succeed in doing that, you kikes had better start running.

      White people do the real work in this country; Mexicans and blacks do nothing that couldn?t be done twice as well and at half the expense by a good cart horse. Robotics will eventually make the black man and the brown man completely obsolete.

      White people pay the overwhelming percentage of the taxes that finance the grotesque horror show that is America. White boys, and increasingly girls, are dragged into the military and come back from the Jews? foreign wars with their bodies mangled, to rot in the filthy Army hospitals like Walter Reed, because the influx of illegal aliens has taken all the entry-level jobs in their home towns and there is no future for White kids where they grew up.

      White people, especially boys, are denied access to college education, to employment, to workplace promotion and job stability because of their skin color, because of their gender, and increasingly because of their age. I could go on and on, but if you?re White, you know what I?m talking about, and if you?re not White, I?m not talking to you anyway.

      Guys?and gals?let me ask you something. What the hell do we owe a society that treats us like this?

      The neocons wave their red, white, and blue Masonic dishrags and babble about all this ?freedom? we?ve got. Bullshit.

      What freedom? The freedom to never be able to get any kind of decent career because you?re the wrong color and you?ve got convex genitalia? The freedom not to be admitted to college because their quota for White boys was filled by the sons of the wealthy elite long before you even applied? The freedom to spend thirty years in the workforce and see incompetent affirmative action employees promoted over your head year after year?

      What freedom? The freedom to pay one third of your income to support stupid wars in the Middle East to protect the Jews from the consequences of their own behavior? The freedom to ?vote? in elections where half the time these arrogant swine no longer bother to conceal the massive fraud?

      What freedom? The freedom to have your children corrupted by the endless tsunami of filth from the television screen and taught sodomy techniques in school? The freedom to have your son and your daughter come back from Iraq in a plastic bag or minus some limbs because all of the jobs in their home town had been gobbled up by illegals and the military was the only place they could get a paycheck?

      What freedom? The freedom to be insulted, belittled, and spat upon every time we turn on a TV or pick up a newspaper? The freedom to eventually be carried off to the living hell of some state-run ?nursing home? when the government finally finds some way to steal the Social Security and Medicare fund and piss it away in the deserts of Iraq or blow it on the stock market?

      What the hell kind of loyalty do we owe to a government that has made us third-class citizens? What the hell kind of loyalty do we owe to a state that uses us like toilet paper and throws us away?

      Why, exactly, should we respect the ?rights? of media garbage people who give us nothing but insults, contempt, and vilification?

      Why, exactly, should we allow our country to be taken over by millions of Mexican mestizos and all the overflow from the Third World?s sewers, and never raise a hand in our own defense because the tyrant?s law forbids it?

      Yes, yes, I know the United States of America is ?the law.? Of course it is. Tyrants always are the law. That?s why they?re tyrants and not simple gangsters. The difference between Barack Hussein Obama and John Gotti is only a technicality of paperwork.

      (Except that Gotti dressed better and killed a lot fewer people.)

      When the law is cruel and uncaring; when the law is vicious; when the law is oppression wrapped up in paper and forced down the throats of the powerless, the coerced and the cowed; when the law is enforced by steroid-popping bullies with badges and jackals with briefcases and reptiles in black robes who use it solely to maintain their own power over other human beings and to squeeze them dry of every last wretched penny they possess; when the law is being used to do you and your family harm, then you are under no obligation to obey it.

      In every society there is a social contract that cuts both ways. The United States Constitution was an attempt to create such a contract, and until 1861 it worked. But we need to be very clear on this: the White American has upheld that contract and is even now upholding it as the blood of our young men is spilled in the Iraqi desert. It is the federal government of the United States and the squamous alien things who have stolen it away from us who have violated that social contract, again and again and again over the past century.

      Like an abused wife, White Americans have put up with it all from our cheating, lying, thieving, murdering government?the beatings, the drinking up the rent money, the lipstick on the collar, the constant bullying and browbeating. But even the most abused spouse eventually decides it?s time for a divorce. That time has come. Enough! Fuck the United States government, fuck democracy, fuck America! We?ve seen enough, we?ve had enough, and we want out.

      Yeah, I know. Our ancestors tried this in 1861. Well, it?s time for a re-match. Here in the Northwest, and anyplace else where White males are tired of being treated like dogs, and finally decide to show the Jews that dogs have teeth.

      And you know something? I think if we ever do pull off the old Macbeth trick and ?screw our courage to the sticking point,? I suspect the world will discover that as far as the baby-shit brown Barack Hussein Obama goes?well, he damned sure ain?t no Abraham Lincoln.

      * * * * * * * *

      The United States has murdered Edgar Steele; he?s just not physically dead yet. There is one thing and one thing alone that we can do for him: we can make sure that his work continues to be read and that his name is never forgotten.

      The Americans are fools: they have taken from us the lives of our martyred dead, but they have left us their names and their memories, and from those memories and from that martyred blood will spring a force that someday will unleash the fury of hell upon the vile tyranny that has done this, and on all those who have served that tyranny for a monthly direct deposit paycheck into their bank accounts.

      Someday, at the hand of someone most likely as yet unknown, the filth that is America will be purged from the world with fire and sword. The darkness that covers this land will be lifted, and a new generation of White children will be born and grow strong in the light.

      And when they do, they will remember the name of Edgar Steele, while the dogs who devoured him will be consigned to oblivion.

      Well, our time is up and so that?s it for this week?s edition of Radio Free Northwest. This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 4856, Seattle, Washington 98194 or you can go to the Party?s website at www.northwestfront.org. This is Harold Covington and I?ll see you next week. Until then, Saoirse an dath B?n ? Freedom!

      Last edited by PastorLindstedt; 07-17-2011, 01:47 PM.
      Come Home to the Northwest

      http://northwestfront.org/

      Comment


      • #33
        Jim Giles and this Mattoid Meercat think the Whigger-Whimperer is as nutty as we is



        http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=3790#post3790
        http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...53#post1280353


        Edgar J. Steele suffered a severe cardiac trauma in late 2009. In early 2010 he was charged with attempting to hire somebody to kill his wife and mother-in-law. The key evidence against Steele was an audio recording made by the FBI.

        Steele claimed that the recording was a fraud, and that he was being framed in a "Mission Impossible, world-class operation." That is an extraordinary claim and I did not believe it. Neither did Jim Giles, who had a daily internet talkshow at the time.

        Giles and I collaborated last summer in studying the Steele case. Giles conducted interviews and I wrote up the results and did research and made suggestions.

        There were essentially two different, mutually exclusive approaches to the case.

        The first approach was to take Steele seriously. If Steele really was being framed with a fraudulent recording then he would need a forensic audio expert to demonstrate that it was a fraud. Giles interviewed two top forensic audio experts; the name and contact information for the more experienced of the two was given to Steele in the letter below.

        The second approach to the case was to try to explain why Steele would have done that of which he was accused. I discovered that after serious heart traumas and surgery, people are often not in their right minds, sometimes for a long time. Giles interviewed a forensic psychiatrist who said that an adverse effect on Steele's mind and disposition as a result of the trauma was entirely possible. Since Steele had done a number of things that suggested that he was not thinking clearly, I strongly favored this explanation, and a suggestion relating to it was included in this letter to Steele.

        Jim Giles asked me to write this letter to Edgar J. Steele for him. Essentially it tells Ed Steele how he should pursue his frame-up defense if it is true (which, believe it or not, nobody else was discussing at the time, since they were preoccupied with squawking like Chicken Little that he was being railroaded and had no chance), and gently suggests that he should pursue a psychiatric defense instead if the "Mission Impossible" story is not true.


        Jim Giles
        Radio Free Mississippi
        173 Pear Lane
        Pearl, MS 39208-8749
        July 15, 2010


        Edgar Steele #361857
        Spokane County Jail
        W. 1100 Mallon
        Spokane, Wash. 99260-0320



        Mr. Steele:

        I have been making inquiries relevant to your case and have turned up some information that may be of great use to you.

        I understand that the key evidence against you consists of audio recordings, which you say have been manufactured. Recently I discussed your case with one of the leading forensic audio experts in the country, Mr. Tom Owen. Mr. Owen has worked on many prominent cases, and he has not been afraid to find that the government has at times done wrong. If in fact the recordings have been falsified, he can help you by scientifically demonstrating it to the court, even if the counterfeit is very sophisticated. Mr. Owen is one of only four or five audio experts in the country with this level of expertise. His contact information is as follows:

        Tom Owen
        758 S. Middlesex Ave.
        P. O. Box 189
        Colonia, NJ 07067

        Voice: (732) 574-9672

        Fax: (732) 381-4523

        E-mail: owlinvestigations@comcast.net

        http://www.owlinvestigations.com/

        What I wish to see is the truth of the matter brought to light. If it happens to be the case that the recordings are genuine and that you did that of which you are accused, I still think you could make a credible defense based on diminished capacity, because there is a well known condition called post-operative psychosis, which is especially common as a sequel to heart surgery. If you have not had a psychiatric evaluation since the arrest, by all means, do.

        If it is at all possible, I would also urge you to seek a private attorney rather than relying on the Federal Public Defender. Somebody like Jerry Spence would be ideal. Can you have your counsel seek a private attorney for you?

        Do you have access to adequate funds? I have heard that your personal assets are frozen. Can you instruct your counsel to seek to have your assets unfrozen?

        I would strongly advise for your sake that you make no further statements to anybody except your legal counsel about the case, and conduct all communication with the outside world through your legal counsel, including any response to this missive.

        Sincerely,


        Jim Giles



        On May 5, 2011 Ed Steele was found guilty after a very short trial, where the defense really had no argument, since their forensic audio expert Dr. George Papcun essentially found nothing suspect about the FBI's recording. I am hoping that the sentencing will reflect some awareness that Ed Steele is not of sound mind, and I hope that on appeal he will use a psychiatric defense. I hope that some rational person will get to Steele and advise him to do that, and that his family and his friends will allow him to do that instead of continuing to insist that he was framed.

        Comment


        • #34
          I'm a treasonous ZOG bowel Movement cocksucker that hates Edgar Steele but loves the manly Kevin Alfred Strom

          I'm a treasonous ZOG bowel Movement cocksucker that hates Edgar Steele but loves the manly Kevin Alfred Strom



          http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...67#post1314167
          http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=4457#post4457

          Good Advice from Edgar J. Steele

          This is an old post from 2007 by Edgar Steele himself. He shows what is to be done when a White Nationalist is an embarrassment to the community. Note how he condemns both Fields and Strom. So I'm getting even with Steele because Steele betrayed us chomos. Curiously enough, Strom has supported Steele as having been framed even after pleading guilty to the charges and after Steel took notice of that by having been maligned by him. I advised Strom today about this post by Steele and he already knew about it. So Strom can't shit and piss on Steele while Steele is down. So I'm going to shit all over Steele and have another faggot, Hadding/Scott David Spiedel help me in it. Us intellectumacated ZOGbot faggot chomos need to stick together. My comments follow in the next post.


          Originally posted by Edgar J. Steele
          http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.p...358#post499358

          Rarely do I speak out against individuals who support our cause and then, always, it has been in self defense after first having been maligned by them. Today, I must break that rule and add my voice to those in condemnation of Joe Fields and his scheduled March conference.

          FIRST, Joe Fields is a self-confessed child molester.

          In 1996, Fields pled "nolo contendre" to four counts of violating California's Penal Code Section 647.6, in exchange for the prosecution dropping another five counts under the same statute.

          Pleading [nolo[/I] to a charge (literally, "no contest," or "you got me dead to rights and I ain't got no defense") is a fiction created by the courts to allow guys like Fields to claim, somehow, that they didn't really plead guilty. Courts do this because it saves time by getting cases closed that, otherwise, would have to be tried in order to obtain the inevitable guilty verdict. People pleading "nolo" get marked down as "guilty" and are sentenced accordingly.

          The most recent extended descriptions by Bill White, posted at his site, Overthrow.com, and in this thread are accurate in all respects, so I will not recount the details. The statute, which makes it illegal to "molest or annoy any child under the age of 18," is not used lightly or frivolously. Not in LA, where the cops and the DAs have far more real work to do than they can handle. The next step up from this charge requires actual sexual intercourse with children.

          Both Bill White and Tom Metzger provided me partial copies of Fields' court file, at my request and without much of any comment. I saw the rest for myself in the LA County records. The file speaks for itself. Joe pled, did some hard time and then served extended probation.

          SECOND, Joe Fields is a liar.

          When the allegations first were brought to my attention via postings to VNN, I called Fields and spoke to him. Fields absolutely swore to me that, while he "mistakenly" had been charged with six counts under the statute above, eventually all those charges were dropped and he was not convicted, nor did he pay any penalties. At the time, it seemed unlikely to me that he would so baldly lie to me about something so easily verified. I was wrong. As the court file was to show, He lied to me.

          Fields also wrote an extended letter to the WN community at the time which attempted to explain away the charges and his admissions thereto. He lied extensively in it about the charges, the meaning of his pleas, his lawyer and about appealing the result. Fields tried to blame copping the pleas on his lawyer's pressure and lying, then made some truly remarkable claims about the lawyer, to boot.

          I found no evidence of Fields appealing squat. He lied about that.

          Quite recently, I spoke at length with Fields' lawyer at the time, Encino lawyer David Currie. Though Currie was unable to discuss much about the case, due to attorney-client privilege, California Attorney Disciplinary rules do allow an attorney to speak out enough to rebut charges made by an ex-client. Currie unequivocally called Fields' written charges (he never even had heard about Fields' letter prior to my call) "absolutely false." I believe him. Fields lied about his lawyer.

          Fields issued his conference announcement stating that I would be present before I confirmed that I would attend. Despite that, I did confirm, because of the others who already (according to Fields) had confirmed. I have spoken to a couple of them. At least some of them did NOT confirm. "He shouldn't be saying that about me, since I don't even intend to be there, let alone speak," said one to me. Fields lied about that.

          I invited Fields to respond to some of the above material. He declined to do so...apparently more "nolo contendre." Silence in the face of accusation is acquiescence.

          Yes, one should be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Once the primary evidence of guilt is produced, however, the presumption then shifts to the accused. At that point, silence is an admission (save only in a formal court of law, though juries pretty much see things that way, too).

          There is more, but that is more than enough for me. I will NOT be attending Fields' conference. I encourage you not to attend. If the listed speakers who have not yet returned my calls or answered my emails will do either, I personally will attempt to dissuade them from attending, either.

          Some may think my attitude about this matter to be too harsh. To those, I say: You have a problem, not I, and perhaps you should seek treatment for it.

          Admittedly, child molestation is something of a "third rail" for me, since I believe that child molesters should receive the death penalty for a first offense. Solicitation of children for sexual purposes, which is all to which Fields pled guilty, is enough for me to want to see someone locked up for a long time. Had I been the judge, Fields would not have gotten off so lightly, despite no apparent evidence of his having actually touched any of the children who identified him.

          Should someone actually touch my child, I hope the authorities never hear about it .... do the math.

          Lying is another matter, albeit lesser. Honesty and forthrightness are key with me in life. When someone lies repeatedly, I thereafter refuse to believe anything he has to say. Henceforth, just as will I, you are entitled to disregard anything Joe Fields has to say about anything.

          We do not need this sort of role model in the WN movement. Just now, Kevin Strom's lengthening silence makes clear that he, too, is some sort of pervert. Terrific. Just terrific.

          It is our responsibility to clean up our own act and condemn those among us who break the law, particularly when violations so thoroughly trash the fundamental principles upon which we stand.

          Make no mistake: Joe Fields was not a political prisoner. Obviously, neither is Kevin Strom. These men do not deserve our support. They have not earned our indulgence for this sort of thing. If we do not step up and condemn their actions, then we are hypocrites and worse.

          I am not the first to cast a stone in the direction of either Fields or Strom, but now I do just that. What you do is between your conscience and yourself, but I will not sit silently while men such as these posture and presume to speak for us.

          Because of the extensive censorship that exists over at Stormfront, particularly concerning Strom, I will not be posting this there myself, but I encourage those of you who think it might survive to do so.

          If anybody knows of Fields' conference having been advertised elsewhere, please let me know so that I might set the record straight there, as well.

          Edgar J. Steele
          Well, now I'm showing the real reason for my hatred of Edgar Steele, me and Hadding/Scott David Spiedel. We have hated Edgar Steele for the past four years but never had a chance to shit on him until now, that he was found guilty by a jewry of Ida-ho ZOGling whigger and mamzer ass-clowns, some of them probably put on the jewry by the jew Ass of A prostitutor. If I had shown my hatred previously, then I'd have been kicked off of VNNF, like my fellow manly faggot Hadding by Linder until five days after the guilty verdict. But now I can snarl and shit on Edgar after pretending to be his friend all along.

          D-g, I feel like going down to the local gay bar bathroom and sucking a quart of cum through a nigger and beaner faggot meat-straw!!!


          Last edited by Librarian; 10-02-2011, 01:28 AM.
          666___666___666

          Five Words: The Whigger-Whimperer Is Guilty!!!

          Comment


          • #35
            I hate Edgar Steele for what he did to Joe Fields, so I'm gonna do it to Da Whigger-Whimperer

            I hate Edgar Steele for what he did to Joe Fields, so I'm gonna do it to Da Whigger-Whimperer



            http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...01#post1314201
            http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=4742#post4742

            This is Pravda Bill's post on Joe Fields. Steele soundly rejected Fields defense and his accusation that he had been framed by the ADL. Steele claims that Fields had done what the prosecutors had charged him with.

            Originally posted by Bill White
            Stormfront Leader Solicited At Least Nine Girls As Young as Nine In 1996

            Update And Correction On Joe Fields

            1/23/2007 6:15:02 PM
            Discuss this story in the forum
            Overthrow Staff

            Torrance, California -- Stormfront activist and close associate of Don Black, David Duke, Jamie Kelso and Willis Carto Joe Fields offered at least nine young girls as young as nine $1000 each to appear in pornographic movies and had at least five other child porn films seized from his home in 1996, Overthrow.com has learned today.
            This information partially confirms and partially corrects an earlier story this website ran on fields.

            According to a copy of Fields' court and prison records, which was forward to Overthrow today along with several news articles on Field's arrest and a copy of a letter Field sent to supporters claiming he was framed for the crime by Tom Metzger, Ernst Zundel and the ADL, Fields served a year in prison after being convicted on a plea of no contest to five counts of offering girls nine to sixteen years old $1000 each to appear in pornographic films with him.

            The full test of the Torrance, California Daily Breeze article on the case from March 30, 1996, follows:

            FORMER CANDIDATE DENIES CHILD ANNOYANCE CHARGES

            By Ian Gregor, Staff Writer
            Torrance California Daily Breeze 30 March 1996

            Two time ultra-right political candidate Joe Fields has been charged with trying to persuade underage girls to appear in a pornographic movie, Torrance police said.

            Fields was taken into custody Thursday morning at his home on West 260th Street in Harbor City, said Torrance police sergeant [obscured] La Londe. An arrest warrant charged Fields with nine misdemeanor counts of child annoyance.

            His arrest follows complaints in February from nine Torrance and Lomita girls, ages 12 to 16 [Bill: note that a later article amended the ages to "9 to 13"], that a man had approached them as they walked home from school and, in some cases, offered them money to appear in a pornographic movie, according to a search warrant police obtained March 11 for Fields' home and car.

            Police executed the warrant earlier this month, seizing five pornographic videotapes, according to court records.

            Fields posted $15,000 bail and was released from custody Thursday afternoon, La Londe said.

            Each count of misdemeanor child annoyance carries a maximum penalty of a $1000 fine and a year in jail.

            Officials from the Police Department and City Attorney's office did not know whether arraignment had been scheduled.

            Fields, 32, gained local attention in the 1980s with his public espousal of anti-Semitic and racist views before his unsuccessfull runs for state Assembly in 1992 and Congress in 1994. He vehemently denied the child annoyance charges during a brief interview at his home.

            "All charges are false," Fields said [though he later pleaded no contest to them], "I completely deny them. I think its being fabricated to destroy me because of my political views."

            [Bill: Note that nine unreleated girls picked out Fields as having solicited them. That's not exactly unpersuasive on its face.]

            Fields says he believes he is being set up by the Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish organization dedicated to fighting prejudice. He did not elaborate on his theory, saying he had not yet spoken with his attorney.

            Court documents filed by police to support their search warrant detailed the following events leading to Fields' arrest.

            The alleged incidents occurred from Feb 5 to Feb 14, mostly in the Arlington Avenue / Carson Street area near Torrance High School. Five of the girls attend Torrance High School, thre attend JH Hull Middle School, and one goes to a vocational school.

            Interview separately, the girls said they were walking home when they were approached by a man in an older model white car.

            The man, who was unshaven with a mustache and dirty short hair, asked the girls if they wanted to be in a pornographic movie that was being filmed in Long Beach that evening. Three of the girls said the man offered them $1,000 to be in the movie. Six reported that he gave them a piece of paper with a name and telephone number and said to call the number if they were interested.

            The car was dirty inside and littered with food wrappers, clothing, pornographic movies, and graphic porn magazines, several girls said. Some of the girls walked a way. One threw a Coke at the suspect. None called the number.

            When Torrance police ran a DMV check on the car based on a license plate number several girls provided, they found it registered to Fields. All of the girl identified Fields when show his drivers licesne photo along with those of five other men of similar appearance.

            The father of one girl, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said he was relived to hear an arrest had been made and was upset with his daughter for even speaking with the man.

            Fields was never more than a [obscured] on the local political scene.

            He ran as a member of the far right American Independence Party for the 36th Congressional District in 1994 and the 54th Assembly District in 1992. He finished with a tiny fraction of the vote each time.

            During the elections, Fields campaigned as a nationalist in favor of immigration control and trade restrictions.

            'Vicious Nazi'

            But he had a long history of hate-laced statements and actions. An official with the Jewish Defense League [a terrorist organization] described him in 1992 as a "vicious Nazi".

            In a tape recorded 1986 conversation with former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke in a Culver City hotel room, Fields, then 22, said: "Sure, I love the Klan. I love the Nazi Party better, though. There's something about the swastika and the brown shit. I just like it better."

            In October 1985, Fields and three other men were evicted from a Torrance Boulevard restaurant for wearing swastikas on their lapels, exchanging "Sieg Heil" salutes and allegedly vandalizing a restroom with anti-Semitic graffitti.

            In December 1984, the Harbor Hawk, Harbor College's student newspaper, was censured by community college trustees after it published a series of opinion peices by then student Fields in which he claimed that an institute had uncovered "convincing evidence that the 'Holocaust' was a giant fraud."

            Fields was fired from the paper three months later after he and Tom Metzger, the reputed head of the white supremacist group White Aryan Resistance, distributed pamphlets claiming the Holocaust is a myth.


            Last edited by PastorLindstedt; 11-13-2011, 05:36 PM.
            666___666___666

            Five Words: The Whigger-Whimperer Is Guilty!!!

            Comment


            • #36
              THE EVIL OF THE GOOD? Deirdre Fields

              THE EVIL OF THE GOOD? Deirdre Fields


              http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=4029#post4029
              http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.p...190#post507190


              Dear Edgar,

              Needless to say, I am even more disappointed in you, following our telephone conversation on Friday the 9th, than I was upon reading your rant against Joe. I told you a number of things that make a substantial difference; yet you chose to ignore them all, and refused to apologize for anything.

              FRATRICIDE: Isn’t it amazing how the Jews and the left wing close ranks and protect their members who come under attack -- yet the right wing behave like brainless fish or squawking chickens who, upon perceiving that one of their members is wounded, proceed to peck and bite that wounded member until it dies. Higher animals such as elephants aid their wounded comrades.

              Your obduracy and venom in this particular case are so out of proportion to the charges that they suggest an ulterior motive, or underlying problem; your objectivity is certainly very clouded, especially for an attorney.

              I realize that some ten percent of all boys in this sickened country have been molested (and twenty percent of girls). Those who have themselves been molested can become volatile over the subject; such as in the case of the character played by Tim Robbins in Clint Eastwood’s prize-winning masterpiece Mystic River.

              I can only guess at the reason, Edgar, but your usual objectivity is absent from your reaction in this case. Let me assure you that as a mother, I understand rage against child molesters and especially the fury of those who were once victims themselves, but Joe Fields is neither a pervert nor a predator, least of all on children. I am not a naïve woman, Edgar, nor am I so perceived; and I give you this assurance in all objectivity.

              Joe will also stand up to these charges in a separate letter to follow.

              THE FACTS: You know that Joe was charged with a bizarre misdemeanor, Child Annoyance under California Statute 647.6 “Child Annoyance and Child Molestation.” Illogically, this law combines a misdemeanor, Child Annoyance, with a felony, Molestation, under one heading.

              As I mentioned to you, it is pointless to palaver long-distance about whether my activist husband was actually guilty of the government charges – his friends will believe in his innocence; you who do not know him, apparently do not. However, you should take cognizance of the fact that
              * it was never claimed, even by a government that hates him, that any young person was ever touched, let alone molested;
              * all the girls were sexually mature teenagers, one was actually 18 years old!
              * None of them ever claimed that there had been any indecent exposure; and
              * it was never claimed that any movie -- porn or otherwise-- was actually being made or contemplated. In fact the police admitted freely that they knew that there was no movie involved and that the invitation to be in a movie was not a serious offer. You're the lawyer! Perhaps you can explain to me why -- if they did have cause to believe he was guilty -- these Zionist tools would not have prosecuted him for producing child porn and done so to the fullest extent of the law?
              * Even supposing some of those girls may have been interested; the encounter could not have gone any further as the name and ‘phone number he supposedly gave, were factitious. So much for the movie producer. . . .

              Thus, the charges – even if you choose to believe the claims of the powers that rule Los Angeles -- would amount to nothing more than a rather clumsy substitute for a wolf-whistle from a man going through an early mid-life crisis; however these allegations were just sufficient to have him charged under this nefarious statute. As a lawyer, what do you think of such a fish-and-fowl law that could catch any man who ever wolf-whistled at an underage female?

              In fact, as I told you on the phone Edgar, a cop from LA Police Intelligence Division met with Joe and asked him for his mailing list. When Joe, protecting the names and locations of our comrades, refused to hand it over, he was warned: “Your response to this request will determine where these charges go.” Of course, why take Joe's word when you can believe the L.A.P.D.?

              THE ACTUAL CHARGES: Joe was accused of driving past some teenagers and asking them a question. There were three alleged instances, each lasting just seconds; one with an 18 year old; and the other two involving groups of teenagers – Whites with Mexicans -- with no indication as to which teenager he is supposed to have addressed in particular. Such a group situation is hardly conducive to raping anyone, nor to actually “picking up” anyone.

              As I recall, the first alleged approach was an invitation to “be in a movie,” without any kind of movie being specified; in the next alleged encounter, apparently a girly asked “What kind of movie?”, and the response was allegedly “a porno”. Now this might indeed amount to an insult, and surely the girls might have been annoyed -- it might also, have been a sarcastic, reality call that like so many of the girls strutting about L.A. , they were dressed like porno actresses (supposing it happened that is).

              The 18 year old was asked whether she wanted to “invest her money” – in what was not specified -- which can hardly be taken seriously.

              It all sounds like some guy wising off at some girls dressed like sluts.


              Thus, all the charges amount to at the very worst, is having “impure thoughts”, without any further action contemplated or attempted. In our natural, unadulterated law, these charges would never have been brought at all. Certainly, there are no “verbal sex crimes” or “sex thought crimes” in Europe, where they are more well-balanced.

              Do you, on the contrary, think that verbal suggestions or insinuations should be prosecuted in the harshest manner possible, and that a person should pay for the rest of his life for a mid-life verbal indiscretion? This is neither Christian nor just. Perhaps you believe in the Muslim tradition of cutting off the hand of someone who steals an apple. Indeed, it is most curious for someone on our side, to subscribe to the NWO control tactic which makes “thoughts” a crime.

              PAID IN FULL: Rest assured that Joe has paid by the bucketful for his real or trumped up indiscretions. In this ordeal, to which you are adding a new chapter, he was firstly represented by a lawyer who had no clue about what he was doing as he later admitted to our appeals attorney.

              Then with our subsequent attorneys we fought onward, until we simply had no more money. “Not enough!” you screech, Edgar, a kindred spirit to Madame Dufarge, the vindictive hag in Charles Dickens’ Tale of Two Cities who sat knitting by the guillotine while heads were severed.

              The fact that the alleged incidents occurred almost eleven years ago, and that there was never any such behavior either before or after (aren’t child molesters supposed to be 80% recidivist?) does not mitigate your icy judgmentalism. No, just as Police Inspector Javert in Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables, a novel of grace versus legalism, persecuted forever the former convict Jean Valjean, you intend to hunt Joe down and destroy him AS AN ACTIVIST, which is what his Zionist enemies failed to do. You attempt to cancel with the strokes of your keyboard all the good he has done and is doing.

              THE PROCEEDINGS:

              Edgar, you stated that “I found no evidence of Fields appealing squat. He lied about that.” Such incautious language from an attorney! And what a sweeping and false conclusion, for of course Joe did appeal! That is why we had an appeals attorney.

              It appears that Joe has given you the name of his Appeals attorney, H. Peter Young, so I will tell you a little more about this man. He achieved great notoriety for his role in the Vietnam-era “Pentagon Papers” case. He is an admitted ultra liberal, but he is intellectually honest, and has a sense of justice, and a healthy distrust of the government. Although he is opposed to everything for which Joe has ever fought, he saw injustice here, and he saw “Star chamber” and so he decided to take up the cudgels on Joe’s behalf.

              Young discovered that there had been an ex parte meeting with the first Judge (who subsequently died), the police, and the prosecution. The subject of this meeting was solely Joe’s politics – in their words, that he was a “Nazi”.

              The transcript of this meeting was put in a sealed envelope and passed on to the succeeding judge to in order to color his judgment. Two files were kept, one for our defense--kept ignorant of this envelope--and one for the prosecution and the new judge. Peter Young discovered all these things and the whole cover up. He was totally opposed to the eventual plea bargain, but we just could not carry on; we had children to support and we could not even pay Peter his last fees.

              Similar tactics are being used against Ernst Zundel: 'Bankrupt the activist' is the name of their game -- exhaust his nerves, his energies and his funds. They have stretched out Ernst's jail time and now his kangaroo trial over the course of three solid years, an ordeal spread over three countries, with dozens of hearings, some very brief, but all of which necessitate that lawyers and witnesses travel long and expensive distances over and over—paying for trains, for hotels, for flights and for meals. This is one of their tried and true methods—exhaust the innocent victim with fees and expenses until he caves in.

              Way back in FDR's Sedition Trial against White activists, they dismissed well-heeled defendants and went after “the little guys,” grinding them into poverty and even one suicide. They moved the trial to Washington , DC , where none of the defendants lived, so their families could not constantly stand by them emotionally in court or travel to be there for every session. In the end, of course, the charges were dismissed; they were entirely bogus; the defendants were innocent but ruined.

              I really have to wonder at you Edgar, joining forces with Tom Metzger, who is now effectively working for, or at least aiding Morris Dees, and who has always been jealous of Joe; and the obsessive Movement gossip Bill White, almost certainly an agent provocateur and a “former” anarchist, (this site thinks he is a Zionist agent

              http://judicial-inc.biz/Bill_White.htm ).

              For what it is worth, Wikipedia reports that he has over 30 real estate properties in Roanoke, worth $3 million. How is he able to make these purchases, and how is it that he can indulge in illegal activities against Webb--a major senatorial candidate who was a key to the national Democrat victory in November 2006 that gave the Democrats the Senate -- boast about it on his website

              http://www.overthrow.com/lsn/news.asp?articleID=9936

              and yet nothing happens to him? What a charmed life he leads.

              Metzger and White are the instigators trying to sabotage Joe’s conference “No More Wars for Israel .” Through using these ancient charges against Joe, they openly aim at much bigger fish in the right-wing pond who have always stood by him. But now these dirt-scoopers have a champion in you, Edgar. My, my! The Jews must be paralytic with laughter, as the “white wing” cannibalizes itself. They can just sit back and watch as you attempt to destroy the arsenal of speakers, activists and proven doers, Joe is arraying!

              And all this because Joe committed the “crime” of paying you the compliment of inviting you to speak at the conference! Why couldn’t you just have declined? You accepted the invitation firmly. True, some of the others did not give a firm commitment, but many conference organizers publicize the intended speakers before the final confirmation is received. You should know that! In this case, Joe actually sent this line-up to only a few people on his list, and one of them decided on his own initiative, to post it publicly.

              SEEING OURSELVES AS OTHERS SEE US: You fancy yourself as Edgar Steele, Esq., but you are a neophyte in our movement. We and others like us who have been in it for years welcomed you into our ranks because you speak and write quite well, but let's not become over-impressed with ourselves. You really don’t bring much new to our movement; all your pieces are opinion pieces, sent off with a mouse-click. How many conferences have you organized? What demonstrations have you led? How many T.V. shows have you been on? Have you done original historical research for our Cause, or unearthed scandals in current events? Have you slugged it out in a political race against Zion ? That's what the real leaders do.

              Joe has been involved in this battle, since long before you came into it, Edgar. You owe him respect for that. And far from his organization having collapsed, he has been holding meetings regularly all the while. This conference is unusual only in that it is a two day event, but we have held big meetings many times. We are an ongoing thorn in the enemy's side.

              Joe may have gained weight now, as some people do under stress. But in the 1990s he was young, very good-looking and articulate (and he still is): He ran for public office twice and did very well, despite a severe lack of funds, and ferocious media opposition. He had real potential to convey our message to a wide audience, so at the very least, it was desirable to our enemies that he should be brought down.

              But an arriviste named Edgar Steele now presumes to set himself up as the chairman of the regulatory board of the “WN movement” to remove “wrong types” -- of his definition of course -- and too bad if it thereby sabotages what promises to be yet another effective conference by veteran doer Joe Fields.

              I have to ask you Edgar, are we so lacking in targets amongst the NWO that you need to shoot in the back those on our side? No? Then if you are on the side of the WN Cause, you need to back off.

              That you have declined to accept Joe’s invitation to speak at the conference has been well noted and your name removed. If ever, you are again invited to speak by someone you dislike, refuse politely, like a gentleman.

              POINT-BY-POINT: One really has to wonder about your bona fides when you tell me that you will not apologize though your allegations are patently false.

              For instance, you claim that:

              "The most recent extended descriptions by Bill White, posted at his site, Overthrow.com, and in this thread are accurate in all respects, so I will not recount the details. “

              You know full well that Bill White alleges that Joe:

              “raped little girls in front of his video camera for his home-viewing pleasure.”

              This is a blatant lie!

              This was never even claimed in any of the police charges. If it had been, he would have been charged with felony counts of rape and producing child porn, not misdemeanor child annoyance.

              Also, he claims that the alleged “victims” were pre-pubescent “nine year” olds, whereas they were underage teenagers, not children, and one was 18 years old. Read the record.

              Actually, Bill White didn’t get anything right; not the above, and not anything concerning Joe’s relations to David Duke, Jamie Kelso, Don Black, Kevin Strom or Bo Gritz.

              You also naively state that
              “The statute, which makes it illegal to "molest or annoy any child under the age of 18," is not used lightly or frivolously. Not in LA, where the cops and the DAs have far more real work to do than they can handle.”

              You are really remarkably credulous for someone who claims to see through the NWO;' and you have an amazing faith in the integrity of its institutions! How silly of us, of course, ZOG's police (fresh from a sensitivity course held by the ADL) would never be diverted from writing tickets to arrest a hated activist on trumped-up charges!

              Just ask the victims of FDR's Sedition Trial in 1944-46, or the men at Nuremberg found “guilty” of the “Holocaust.” Just ask all the victims of the FBI's COINTELPRO. Just ask James Earl Ray, or Lee Harvey Oswald--except they were disposed of.

              The word, Edgar, is “railroading.” Take a course on it. It can happen even in the City of Angels .

              And don't think the bureaucracy grinds down only our people. Just recently, there was the case of a teacher who told an immodestly dressed student that she should go home and change as her nipples were visible through her blouse. He was subsequently charged under the same statute as Joe.

              Remember too the earlier case of another teacher who put his arm around a student to comfort her. She broke down in court, and ironically, her own attorney in that open courtroom also put his arm around her to comfort her!

              In this Brave New World, we all are indictable as criminals.

              You further write of
              “Solicitation of children for sexual purposes, which is all to which Fields pled guilty,”

              Once again, this is remarkably imprecise language for an attorney: You know perfectly well, that broke, he pled nolo contendre -- he no longer contested -- to “Child annoyance.” And you know perfectly well that if he had been charged with the above as you contend, he would have been prosecuted for child porn.

              Which brings us to another of Bill White’s allegations that you endorse as being accurate in all respects, viz. that child porn movies were confiscated from Joe. You know full well that it is a felony to possess child porn, so if that were true; he would have been prosecuted for that too. Or was ZOG just being nice that day?

              There’s a lot more Edgar, but this missive is becoming boring. The bottom line is that you have made false statements regarding Joe, and lent credence to many more egregious statements made by full-time disruptors White and Metzger.

              Your actions in attacking Joe may well be construed as an attempt to sabotage a conference, highly objectionable to our enemies, at a time when Israel is plummeting in the opinion polls, and to smear all the major nationalist activists that are linked to Joe.

              I’d like to give you the benefit of the doubt Edgar, but if you really are bona fide, you’ll retract, apologize, and quit trying to shoot nationalists in the back! And you'll be doing yourself a favor, because now the shadow is on you.

              A GREATER MIND EVEN THAN EDGAR STEELE. Here is an extract from Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables, his magnum opus about justice gone wild, and about a judgmental man who hounds others into the ground. Yet grace triumphs, after all.
              Inspector Javert has just spotted Jean Valjean, who served 19 years for stealing food and trying to escape, and has resurfaced under a new name, “Monsieur Madeleine,” and has become a successful factory owner and useful citizen.

              Javert was a complete character, who never had a wrinkle in his duty or in his uniform; methodical with malefactors, rigid with the buttons of his coat. … He stood erect in the half-open door. . .…

              The instant that [Jean Valjean’s] glance encountered Javert's glance, Javert, without stirring, without moving from his post, without approaching him, became terrible.

              No human sentiment can be as terrible as joy. It was the visage of a demon who has just found his damned soul.

              The satisfaction of at last getting hold of Jean Valjean caused all that was in his soul to appear in his countenance. … The deformity of triumph overspread that narrow brow. All the demonstrations of horror that a satisfied face can yield were there.

              Javert was in heaven at that moment. Without putting the thing clearly to himself, but with a confused intuition of the necessity of his presence and of his success, he, Javert, personified justice, light, and truth in their celestial function of crushing out evil. Behind him and all around him to an infinite distance, he had become authority, reason, the case to be judged, the legal conscience, the public prosecution, all the stars in the sky; he was protecting order, he was causing the laws to thunder, he was avenging society, lending a helping hand to Absolute Good and standing erect in the midst of glory.
              There existed in his victory a touch of defiance and of combat. Erect, haughty and brilliant, he flaunted abroad in open day the superhuman bestiality of a ferocious archangel. The terrible shadow of the social sword was visible in his clenched fist; happy and completely indignant, he ground his heel upon crime, vice, rebellion, perdition and hell; he was radiant; he exterminated, he smiled; there was an incontestable grandeur in this monstrous archangel Michael.

              Javert, though frightful, had nothing ignoble about him. Probity, sincerity, candor, conviction, the sense of duty, are things which may prove hideous when wrongly applied ; but even when hideous, they seem grand: their majesty, the majesty of the human conscience, sticks to them while they commit horrors; they are virtues which have one vice,--error.

              The honest, pitiless joy of a fanatic in the full flood of his atrocious measures does preserve a certain dark radiance. Yet, without himself suspecting the fact, Javert in his formidable happiness was to be pitied, as is every ignorant man who triumphs. Nothing could be so poignant and so terrible as this face of Javert, wherein was displayed all that may be designated as the evil of the good.


              Deirdre Fields -- February 20th, 2007


              Last edited by PastorLindstedt; 11-13-2011, 08:58 PM.
              ____________________________
              I am The Librarian
              http://whitenationalist.org/forum/
              http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/forum/

              Comment


              • #37
                You Only Think You’ve Got Rights Part I – No Attorney-Client Privilege

                You Only Think You’ve Got Rights
                Part I – No Attorney-Client Privilege
                by Edgar J. Steele
                September 4, 2011

                As you know, I have been serializing parts of my upcoming book, “Evil Edgar,” to my list on the internet, as I have been writing it. We have just finished up (most of) “Sex, Lies and Audiotape,” a chapter about those phony recordings and how my experts were prohibited by the judge from proving them false.

                Next up (or so I intended): “Love and Other Four-Letter Words,” about the Russian bride scam I was investigating and the possible involvement of the “Russian Mafia” in my takedown. I have that entire chapter almost done. The very recent, stupefying dismissal by the Idaho Supreme Court of my ethics complaint against the lead prosecutor in my show trial forces me to take the basis of that complaint up now, however.

                Government Misconduct

                In my time, I have been witness to some incredible legal railroad jobs of the politically incorrect. Nobody ever really believes me when I tell them how bad things have gotten in America, thinking I must be wrong or, at least, exaggerating. I’ve gotten used to the disbelief, the total unwillingness of people to believe our government actually would do the things to which I have been witness in my career. I shake my head, in awe of the overwhelming nature of the con job done by all of America’s media in fostering such naïve beliefs.

                Now comes what likely is the final case of my career: my own. Never have I seen such overarching brazenness on the part of our government. Never have I seen so many different, outrageously illegal gambits employed in a single case.

                Are they pulling out all the stops because I’m a lawyer? Or, perhaps it just takes a lawyer on the hot seat to see all that they do? Other trial lawyers tell me they’ve never seen anything like my case, so I have to believe there is something special going on.

                Why me? The answer will become glaringly obvious as we go along, but remember that I always have promised that one day I will pull some real skeletons out of my closet, when I no longer need my bar licenses.

                What’s that? You say I should already have written “Attorney for the Damned?” How do you know that I haven’t? Except for the last chapter, of course.

                The Attorney-Client Non-Privilege

                I have believed the attorney-client confidentiality privilege to be more sacrosanct, even, than that between doctor and patient or priest and penitent. Always. Until now.

                The right to counsel, guaranteed by the US Constitution’s Sixth Amendment, is absolute. Talk to somebody else’s lawyer at a cocktail party about your legal problems and the privilege applies. Money need not change hands. Talk to your lawyer in the middle of a crowded Grand Central Station and the privilege applies. Yeah… right.

                Here’s one of the things I have learned from a year in five different county jails: There is no inmate more naïve than a lawyer inmate. Because I knew the law and where all the boundary lines are drawn, I told myself I would do okay. I knew the government never would invade my attorney-client privilege. I was wrong.

                Your Tax Dollars at Work

                Our government secretly and illegally recorded my “private” phone calls with lawyers at more than one jail.
                Our government secretly and illegally opened more than one of my “confidential” letters to lawyers.
                Our government even secretly and illegally listened into more than one of my “private” conversations with lawyers in the jail and Federal courthouse booths set aside for private conferences with lawyers.

                How do I know all these thing if they were done secretly? Easy – the government told me, every step of the way; they repeatedly used the information they illegally obtained in prosecuting me.

                No, really! I swear. Ask my lawyers. Ask my fellow inmates, all of whom have been surprised at the degree of my naiveté. Of course the government does all this and more. What did I expect?

                Copyright ©2011, Edgar J. Steele

                Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate this article and its related audio file among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.


                http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...89#post1316489
                http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=4317#post4317

                Comment


                • #38
                  You Only Think You’ve Got Rights Part II - No Attorney-Client Privilege

                  You Only Think You’ve Got Rights
                  Part II - No Attorney-Client Privilege

                  by Edgar J. Steele


                  September 10, 2011

                  As noted previously, the US Constitution’s 6th Amendment guarantees “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall… have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.” The US Supreme Court has called the confidentiality of the Attorney-Client Privilege in communications the “oldest known confidential privilege known to the common law.”

                  I knew this and, therefore, knew that, even if the Federal prosecutors did happen to overhear a part of a call to one of my lawyers, they would turn a deaf ear. In thirty years of trial practice, I often heard prisoners allege that their communications with their lawyers were monitored. I always assumed that was done by jails and prisons for the sole purpose of preventing jailbreaks or other illegal activity, though even that sort of monitoring was prohibited by the 6th Amendment.

                  Federal Prosecutors Routinely Listen In

                  I never dreamed that such monitoring was ordered by the Federal prosecutors, who demanded and got copies and recordings of every single communication between prisoners and their lawyers. Read that last sentence again, because that is exactly what happens. The Federal judges give cover to this incredibly pervasive and pernicious behavior by all manner of Federal authorities. So much for “checks and balances.” So much for even the illusion of freedom in today’s Amerika. How do you think they get that 97% conviction rate? Do you really think that many accused people actually could be guilty?

                  Wake up, folks. It really is that bad. Here, let me give you just two fully-documented (and ignored by judges) examples of each type of such illegal intrusions by the government in my case (telephone, letter and personal conference):

                  Government Recorded My Calls to Attorneys

                  In State and Federal jails and prisons, inmates do not receive telephone calls. Inmates are allowed outgoing calls only, at specific times and only with specified phones, usually at a cost of about fifty cents per minute.

                  Repeatedly, I was assured by the guards at Spokane and Bonner County jails that my phone calls to lawyers never would be monitored, let alone recorded. They lied. Both of these jails (and all others in which I have been held) have written policies against such secret and illegal monitoring, which are routinely are ignored. Here is Spokane’s, where so much of the secret taping took place, in my case, despite the written assurance that, per Washington State Law, inmate phone calls would not be monitored or recorded “except by court order”:

                  The Feds Admitted It

                  How do I know the Feds were listening in to my attorney calls? They admitted it! At one of the many secret hearings in my case, held outside my and the public’s presence, on October 7, 2010, Federal Prosecutor Traci Whelan asked Judge Winmill to prohibit Attorney Wesley Hoyt from representing my wife, claiming that Mr. Hoyt was “too closely aligned” with me. How did she know? She said that she had been listening to recordings of my calls to Mr. Hoyt. She admitted it. These were calls I made to Wesley Hoyt, discussing all aspects of my case and in which I was trying to hire him to replace Roger Peven as my lawyer, too.

                  Mr. Peven wasn’t to share this revelation with me until much later, when he angrily told me that I “might as well call Traci Whelan directly, because she knows everything before I (Peven) do.” I still never have been allowed to see a transcript from that October 7 hearing.

                  When finally told by Mr. Peven that the government was secretly and illegally taping my telephone conversations with lawyers, already I was negotiating with Robert McAllister to take over my representation.

                  In one of my telephone calls in January or February 2011, I told Mr. McAllister I wanted a motion filed, as soon as possible, to disqualify and recuse Federal Prosecutor Whelan from further handling my prosecution because of her admitted illegal recording of my attorney phone calls. I also said, during that call to McAllister, that I intended to file an Idaho State Bar Ethics complaint about her illegal and unethical conduct. Less than a week after I told McAllister of my wishes, regarding Federal Prosecutor Whelan, she filed for another secret hearing, this time to ask Judge Winmill to declare that I had waived my attorney-client privilege merely by using one of those phones in Spokane County Jail, on which the preliminary recording said call “may” be monitored or recorded. Recall that the written policy assured inmates that such calls would not be recorded, “except by court order.” Remember, too, that I repeatedly had been assured by guards that such recording was not taking place (though it was).

                  One Federal Hand Washes the Other

                  Following yet another secret hearing from which both the public and I were excluded, on February 9, 2011, Judge Winmill was only too happy to provide cover for Prosecutor Whelan’s illicit activity by ruling that I waived my right to confidential telephone communications merely by using the only phone I was allowed to use. As we will see next, the Feds were also opening my outgoing mail to lawyers and monitoring my in-person lawyer visits. How, exactly, was I expected ever confidentially to contact any lawyer.

                  Incidentally, I was not allowed to make any calls (not even if recorded by the Feds) to any lawyer during the first month I was held at Spokane County Jail.

                  So, there you have proof of two times that Federal Prosecutor Whelan listened to recordings of my telephone calls to two lawyers that were to become my attorneys of record, during the phase of my interviewing them to take over my case. First, Whelan admitted listening to a tape when she moved to have Wesley Hoyt barred from representing my wife. Second, Whelan filed a motion to have my attorney-client privilege declared waived, as soon as she heard on yet another tape that I was going to file a Bar Ethics Complaint against her and have my new lawyer (McAllister) move to have her barred from the case. There was no other reason – nothing – to justify the motion for waiver that she then filed (and which the judge illegally granted).

                  Copyright ©2011, Edgar J. Steele
                  Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate this article and its related audio file among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.



                  http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...78#post1318978
                  http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=4322#post4322

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    You Only Think You’ve Got Rights -- No Attorney-Client Privilege (Part III)

                    You Only Think You’ve Got Rights -- No Attorney-Client Privilege (Part III)
                    by Edgar J. Steele
                    September 17, 2011

                    Let’s see if I can state the prevailing secret federal rule about attorney-client privilege in brief:
                    From the moment of one’s arrest by Federal authorities, one has no right to confidential communications with any attorney except the one approved by a Federal judge.

                    It remains an open question whether one has a right to confidential communications with any attorney prior to one’s arrest. Certainly, no such right exists after one’s arrest.

                    No Right to Confidential Communications with Lawyers

                    All court hearings before Federal District Court Judge Winmill proved to be remarkable for one thing or another. All of those hearings (especially the actual trial) showcased active misconduct by the Justice Department and by the judge himself. Two hearings, one before the trial and another after, most directly highlight the judge’s denying me the right to confidential communications with lawyers.

                    Perhaps the most remarkable is this colloquy between the judge and the US Marshal’s service (responsible for inmate security):
                    “THE MARSHALL [Glen Morgan]: Now that Mr. Hoyt is Mr. Steele’s attorney of record, he would have no impediment, whatsoever, as far as attorney-client privilege . . . The muddying of the waters arise when defendants that are in custody wish to have attorney-client privileges with attorneys that are not attorneys of record.

                    “THE COURT [Judge Winmill]: Right…since the 13th of June (when Hoyt filed his Substitution of Attorneys), it has been muddy. The government filed its concern (trying to bar Wes Hoyt from the case). The court addressed that by scheduling this hearing but that… the waters should no longer be murky. I think it’s now clear Mr. Hoyt should have the right of access, and he certainly should have the right to communicate with his client without any concern of his conversations being recorded or compromised in any way.”







                    (Motion” Hearing July 6, 2011, transcript pages 30-31.)

                    US Marshall Policy Trumps the Constitution

                    Here is a recap of what had taken place: For a year, from the summer of 2010 until the summer of 2011, after I was convicted, the government eavesdropped on my telephone conversations, letters and “private” conferences with all attorneys, save only my Federally-paid “attorney of record,” and I am not convinced they didn’t invade those communications, as well.

                    After my sham showtrial in April 2011, the USMS policy continued and, in fact, continues to this day. Here’s what the judge said about the secret, unwritten USMS policy during that July 6, 2011 hearing:
                    .
                    .
                    JUDGE WINMILL: “I’m assuming that the Marshall’s Service has some policy that probably would restrict that (private attorney-client communication) only to someone who has entered an appearance on behalf of the defendant…”

                    US MARSHALL MORGAN: “If Mr. Steele wishes to do that, I would suggest that he notify the management at the jail… that he wishes to… contact an attorney of his choice. They would in turn call us… At that point, then we could probably allow that…”

                    JUDGE WINMILL: “…We need to have some assurance that person contacted was a licensed attorney.”

                    US MARSHALL MORGAN: “…between the jail and us… we can probably confirm that.”

                    JUDGE WINMILL: “If there is a concern by Mr. Steele, than I think he can presumably communicate directly with the court… in an ex parte fashion… “






                    (7/6/11 “Motion” Hearing, July 6, 2011 pages 32 & 35)

                    Speaking Confidentially

                    So – if I want to talk confidentially to any lawyer except my judge-blessed “attorney of record,” I must get “permission” from the US Marshall’s service or “communicate directly with the court.” Problem is, they never shared this rule with me until two months after I was convicted in a sham show trial wherein the prosecutor used all my prior communications with the two attorneys (McAllister and Hoyt) who had not yet (but would) become my “attorneys of record.”

                    Today, there is only one lawyer with whom I am allowed private discussions: Wes Hoyt. Even so, all my conversations with Mr. Hoyt that took place prior to July 6, 2011, when the judge “approved” him as my “attorney of record,” are not privileged and the prosecutor, by her own admission, did listen in to them.


                    Unappealing

                    Meanwhile, I have an appeal that needs to be developed and filed, but I have no appellate lawyer. On July 14, 2011, I wrote an ex parte letter to Judge Winmill, in keeping with his 7/6/11 order, asking permission to contact two appellate lawyers in confidence. The judge refused to answer me, though I complied with his former order in court, ordering that all such requests be brought to him only by my “attorney of record” and, then, only by formal motion.

                    They railroaded me into a bogus conviction with fake evidence and refused to allow me to present a defense, all the while listening in to my attorney phone calls, letters and in-person conferences. Now, they appear bent upon denying me the ability to appeal my wrongful conviction.

                    Hey, is this a great country, or what?

                    Copyright ©2011, Edgar J. Steele
                    Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate this article and its related audio file among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.


                    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=4349#post4349
                    http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...91#post1321291
                    http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/...ts-part-3.html
                    Last edited by PastorLindstedt; 09-19-2011, 12:41 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Why Frame Edgar Steele?

                      Why Frame Edgar Steele?



                      http://stumbleinn.net/forum/showthre...238#post283238
                      http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=4922#post4922

                      Lucky's posts are usually this strange admixture of precision shooting, updated Old Norse battle myth, a soupcon of dead deer slurry, and the word 'jewr'.

                      Dead on with the Steele analysis, however. Who better, after all, to identify and describe the formula the gummint has perfected for committing murder in super-slo-mo?Steele has a bad heart, which means they don't need evidence or witnesses, let alone a conviction, to finish him off. Just stall, stall, stall, making sure you keep him locked down the whole time as - ahem - a "flight risk". All the while awaiting the inevitable, of course.

                      Now that said I don't think they'll pull it off. He's a lawyer, albeit not a very good one, but competent enough to file the right motions to - at very least - get kicked loose on an ROR. But y'know the ironic thing here? If they do end up nailing his pelt to their belt, it'll be because he resided in Harold Covington's vaunted new white homeland - the Pacific Northwest - and not in some jewified, media-besotted metropolis. You've got more pennysavers than newspapers out there, and vast expanses of gorgeous scenery, I'm sure, but not a lot of people. If the Feds decide to dawdle on processing any paperwork he submits, which they almost certainly will, he's just lost another year. He's going to have to yell at the top of his lungs, and catch a strong headwind besides, if he expects anyone to hear him way the hell out in the midle of nowhere. In Idaho, no one can hear you scream.

                      The only part that keeps nagging at me is 'why'. As I said, he's not any Clarence Darrow....in fact, he's more a stunt-lawyer than anything else. And he's one of those prophets of gold-hoarding, but shit, there's millions of guys preaching that gospel who are left unmolested. I can't quite see the ROI for ZOG on this one. If anything, with Steele out of the way, a railroaded racist's chances of acquittal just went up.

                      The Spider Knows!!!

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Us ZOGbot ass-clowns have taken over the Edgar Steele thread over on VNNF

                        Us ZOGbot ass-clowns have taken over the Edgar Steele thread over on VNNF


                        http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...00#post1321500
                        http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...ted=1#post4369


                        Steele's latest rant from jail is whiny and irrelevant to his real problems. Jails have every justification for monitoring letters and phone calls both going in and out. At least that's what piglice, regime criminals and faggot supporters of Kevin Alfred Strom who Edgar Steele 'betrayed' can agree on that!!! Us piglice cocksuckers all agree with the following ZOGsshit: Inmates sometimes order their associates on the outside to commit illegal acts such as intimidating witnesses and revenge killings. Those outside sometimes get their inmate collaborators to kill or injure other inmates. Both of these activities are frequently tied with blackmail or extortion. After Steele was charged with intimidating his witness wife, his surveillance was properly increased. If it wasn't for the fact that I'm a faggot, I'd be sucking that bull-dyke US Attorney Traci Whelan's lesbo-skank twat.

                        Steele is in a poor position to whine if his attorney interviews were monitored or his letters to them were read. What damage was done anyway by monitoring his attorney communications? The evidence against him was damning. After all he abused the legal mail system to write steamy love letters to his Ukrainian honey Tatyana Loginova from jail. ZOG gets to make the ASSumption of guilt and put its thumb on the scales of jewstice.

                        As a ZOGling poseur pretending to be a White Nationalist I don't believe that he is being hampered in his appeal. His new lawyer Hoyt has filed a 70 page motion for a new trial and is likely handling his appeal. Steele needs to see that he is to blame for all of his problems for not firing his public defender immediately and handling his own case. Since he is crazy he cannot see this and all of this makes sense. I'm a certified ZOGling ass-clown pretending that my delusions make good sense.

                        Last edited by Pauley Da Parrot; 09-21-2011, 10:21 PM.
                        666___666___666

                        Five Words: The Whigger-Whimperer Is Guilty!!!

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          You Only Think You’ve Got Rights Part IV - No Attorney-Client Privilege


                          You Only Think You’ve Got Rights
                          No Attorney-Client Privilege (Part IV)
                          by Edgar J. Steele
                          September 24, 2011

                          Last week, I described how the government secretly and illegally recorded my telephone calls to attorneys Wes Hoyt and Bob McAllister before (and after) they each formally signed on as my “attorney of record.” I, of course, discussed every single aspect of my case with each of them in interviews about representing me, never suspecting that the Federal prosecutor had the US Marshall’s Service actually recording them!

                          So What!?!
                          Let me tell you about a few things from yet another secret hearing held in my case on February 9, 2011, that shows how the Judge provided cover to the government’s secret and illegal intrusion into my confidential attorney-client communications. My then-attorney-of-record, Bob McAllister, told Judge Winmill that Attorney Wes Hoyt, whom I had been trying to hire, had been told that his telephone conversations with me were monitored and recorded and, based upon those conversations, the government was seeking to disqualify Attorney Hoyt. Judge Winmill’s response was to ask why it was even relevant that our conversations had been recorded, since Mr. Hoyt had yet to represent me.

                          Here’s what just happened: My then-“attorney-of-record,” McAllister, was objecting to my telephone conversation with Wes Hoyt being invaded by the government. Judge Winmill, noting that Mr. Hoyt had not yet become my “attorney-of-record,” was saying in essence, “So what? It doesn’t matter.” clearly underscoring his belief that I had no rights to confidentiality in speaking with Attorney Hoyt.

                          Ve Haff Our Vays
                          Later in that same secret hearing, Judge Winmill pressured my lawyer to capitulate and make the illegal and secret recording of my phone conversation with the man who later was to become my attorney of record a non-issue by agreeing or stipulating that he was aware that the conversations were being recorded.

                          Amazing, isn’t it? Yes, this is exactly how judges force defense lawyers to help in the cover-up of governmental wrongdoing. During every single one of my phone conversations with Bob McAllister, he always insisted upon saying, up front, “This is an attorney-client privileged conversation. If you are recording it, stop listening now and send the tape to Judge Winmill.”

                          US Marshall Service Punishes Me
                          I continued to have to fight this battle (to this day, actually), even after they moved me to the Bonner County Jail. On May 16, 2011, after I had been wrongfully convicted, I filed a formal grievance (copy attached) demanding that they stop recording my calls to attorneys. The jail’s response: “Phones will remain the same unless instructed by US Marshall.”

                          Notice in that grievance form that I told Lt. Wiens of the Bonner County Jail: “I guarantee you this: I am going to sue you over this!!!” That was what got me “transferred” from Sandpoint’s Bonner County Jail to Moscow’s Latah County Jail. Yes, it was retaliatory. Yes, it was illegal.

                          You see, they knew that my wife, Cyndi, was visiting me the two times per week allowed by Bonner County Jail policy and that moving me to Moscow, a 3-hour drive, would put a stop to that. They punished us because I demanded my Constitutional rights! Never mind that my property taxes had been supporting that jail for 15 years (and still do).

                          Our tax dollars at work, folks.

                          http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/wp-...r4_9-24-11.jpg


                          Copyright ©2011, Edgar J. Steele

                          Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate this article and its related audio file among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.




                          http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.p...30#post1323030
                          http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=4577#post4577

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            You Only Think You’ve Got Rights Part V - No Attorney-Client Privilege
                            You Only Think You’ve Got Rights
                            No Attorney-Client Privilege (Part V)

                            by Edgar J. Steele


                            October 1, 2011

                            I learned that the government secretly and illegally had been recording all my telephone calls to lawyers, save only my judge-approved “attorney of record,” just as I decided to engage Robert McAllister to try my case. By then, of course, all my telephone conversations with “Mac” and attorney Wesley Hoyt (whom I had tried to hire) had been recorded and, with them, every shred of my evidence, trial strategy and witness testimony. The Federal prosecutor knew my defense as well as I did.

                            Judge Allows Feds to Listen In

                            What was I to do? As we saw in Part II, both Washington statute and the written jail policy said no calls would be recorded without a court order and no such order had issued. The jail guards refused me access to any telephone except those reserved for inmate use. Those same guards assured me, time and again, that none of my calls were being recorded. If I wanted to find a new lawyer, which I desperately needed to do, I had to use a phone that, unbeknownst to me, was secretly tapped and recorded by the US Marshals Service for the Federal prosecutor seeking to imprison me for the rest of my life.

                            Nobody told me that the Feds had an unwritten policy that all Federal inmates’ calls to legitimate attorneys not “of record” secretly would be taped. If they had told me, I never would have believed that the Federal judge on my case would bless such blatantly illegal and un-Constitutional conduct… but that is exactly what Judge Winmill did.

                            But, Wait…

                            But, wait – it gets even worse. In addition to listening in to my phone calls with lawyers, the government also opened my mail to lawyers and, even, secretly listened in to my “private” in-person conferences with my lawyers.

                            Next week, I will tell you about my private conferences with attorneys that were secretly monitored by the Feds. This week, let me tell you about a couple of letters I sent to attorneys that were opened by the US Marshals Service and copied for the Federal prosecutor on my case. How do I know? Because, incredibly, the Feds were brazen enough to produce copies back to me in pretrial discovery, replete with Bates numbering stamps.

                            The Feds Open My Legal Mail

                            Enclosed is one of those letters. Note that, in both cases, I wrote “Legal Mail” on the face of the envelopes, along with “Atty At Law” in conjunction with each lawyer’s name. Note also that each letter dealt very specifically with my defense.

                            .

                            See those six-digit numbers in the lower, right-hand corners? Those are the “Bates-number stamps” placed on all documents by the Feds that are produced to the Defense (me!) for their use as trial evidence.

                            I told both Roger Peven (my then-Public Defender) and Mac (my-soon-to-be “Attorney of Record”) about these letters, upon seeing them in the government’s pretrial document production. Neither was surprised and, incredibly both eventually were to do nothing about this blatantly-illegal invasion of my attorney-client-privileged written communications.

                            In one of the letters, I tried to guide Mac (my soon-to-be-but-not-quite-yet “Attorney of Record”), in transitioning from Peven’s office by noting that Peven’s associate attorney “is useless.” I pointed that out to Peven as likely being why the Feds produced the letter back to us, as an attempt to further divide Peven and myself. Totally ignoring the point I was making about the secret and illegal violation of my attorney-client privilege, Roger Peven told me, “Oh, she (his associate attorney) probably hasn’t even seen it.” Note the matter of fact way that Roger Peven seemed to share my opinion of his associate attorney, who should already have examined every shred of evidence produced to us by the Feds! Mr. Peven neglected to do anything about the un-Constitutional conduct by the Federal prosecutor.

                            A Crime? Not if the Feds Do It!

                            I also should note that I placed all “Legal Mail” letters to attorneys, sealed, in the box at the jail labeled “U.S. Mail.” The supervising guard assured me that, once mail went into that box it was “in the U.S. Postal system” and if anybody opened it (other than the addressee) a Federal crime would be committed. Just as with my secretly-recorded phone calls to lawyers, thus was I lulled into yet another naïve complacency.

                            Copyright ©2011, Edgar J. Steele


                            Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate this article and its related audio file among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.


                            http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.p...42#post1324942
                            http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=4583#post4583

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              You Only Think You’ve Got Rights Part VI - No Attorney-Client Privilege


                              You Only Think You’ve Got Rights
                              No Attorney-Client Privilege (Part VI)

                              by Edgar J. Steele

                              October 8, 2011

                              So far in this chapter, I have shown four instances of prosecutorial misconduct by the Feds secretly and illegally invading my confidential communications with lawyers, twice by listening in to phone calls and twice opening my “Legal Mail” to lawyers.

                              You also have seen how the US Marshals Service (USMS) believes it has the right to invade communications between any federal inmate and all lawyers who are not “Attorney of Record” for that inmate. I also told you of the secret court hearing in which Federal Judge Winmill sanctioned that grotesquely-illegal and un-Constitutional position.

                              No Private Attorney Conferences

                              So – no phone calls to lawyers are private and no letters, either. “What’s left?” you might ask. Plenty. Let me show you two documented instances of the USMS listening in on my supposed “private and confidential” in-person conferences with Attorney Bob McAllister – once just before he replaced Roger Peven as my “Attorney of Record” and again, afterward, during my trial in the Boise Federal District Courthouse.

                              Just before Bob “Mac” McAllister first came to see me in person at Spokane County Jail, the glass window in the attorney visiting booth mysteriously was broken in the middle of the night. It was the only visiting booth not set up to record all conversations. I had to meet with Mac in one of the regular visiting booths, wired for recording, as a result of this “coincidental” mishap with the glass.

                              As was Mac’s practice with our phone calls, he always prefaced our personal discussions with a verbal warning, demanding that any eavesdropping be stopped right then and the recording, if any, be filed with Federal Judge Winmill. I hired Mac as my new “Attorney of Record” during our first meeting in that regular conference booth. It was during that, our first in-person conference, that Mac disclosed his intention to me to wait a couple of months, until a pretrial conference set for February 7, 2011, to enter his formal appearance, then move for a continuance to get time to finish the pretrial investigation and preparation that had not yet been begun by my then - Public Defender, Roger Peven.

                              A month later, Peven was to tell me (among others) of his extreme dissatisfaction about the Federal Prosecutor (Traci Whelan) knowing about all my pre-trial strategies and tactics. Said Peven, huffily: “You might as well call Traci Whelan first and tell her everything, because she hears about it before I do.” Peven was annoyed that I was interviewing lawyers to take over the case from him. Peven cited to me some defense strategies I never discussed on the phone with anybody, as well as Mac’s late entry of appearance and intent to ask for a continuance. Mac had discussed his strategy with me only in our personal meetings in the Spokane County Jail Visiting Booths, which proved that the Feds were listening in to my meetings with Mac just before he filed to formally represent me!

                              In fact, Mac’s privately-stated intent was used against him at the February 7 hearing by the prosecutor, who quoted Mac verbatim, to oppose the motion Mac then made for a continuance – further proof of the government’s secret and illegal eavesdropping on my personal conferences with my soon-to-be “Attorney of Record.”

                              But, wait – it gets worse… much worse.

                              Yes – Even the Judge Listened In!

                              In one of the many secret hearings and conferences from which I was excluded by Judge Winmill on May 3, 2011 (during my trial!), a blockbuster emerged from the court’s own transcript. Mac never told me a thing about it, either (and, yes, in weeks to come, I will have a great deal to say about Mac’s incredible misrepresentation of me, both prior to and during that trial).

                              I stumbled upon this secret hearing’s remarkable colloquy several months after the trial, while reviewing late-released transcripts for which we paid much earlier, in preparation for the appeal. You see, we had been challenging the court reporter over some clearly-altered on-the-record talk by Judge Winmill during the trial (also to be the subject of a future article) and, while I am only speculating now, I suspect that she decided she better break loose with portions of transcripts that had been (illegally) held back from us at first.

                              I wish I could enclose a copy of the transcript from that 5/3/11 secret hearing held by the judge in the afternoon. Problem is, it still is sealed by Judge Winmill’s order and, thus, still is being kept secret from the public.

                              Earlier that same day, the judge had flip-flop-flipped in ruling that my key witness, forensic sound expert Dr. George Papcun, would not be allowed to testify unless he could be in court absolutely no later than 8:30 the very next morning, an impossibility, as Judge Winmill well knew, because Dr. Papcun was, at the moment, on the other side of the earth, in Tahiti. Dr. Papcun was preparing for his satellite video uplink testimony the next day just as the judge previously had said he could testify.

                              My Rights Yield to (Nonexistent) Government Rights

                              In excluding my key defense witness, the judge said that the government had a Constitutional right to confront witnesses in person during the trial. (Not true – that is a right guaranteed only to criminal defendants by the 6th Amendment.) Never mind that I had been denied that very right during the trial by the judge when he allowed the government to play a video taped satellite-uplink deposition given by an absent “witness” who also happened to be on the other side of the world, in Ukraine.

                              In response to the judge’s ruling denying me my key witness, Mac moved for a continuance of the trial while we flew Dr. Papcun to Boise. Just one day is all that would have been required. “No,” said the judge, while continuing to pressure us to wrap up even earlier than the end-of-week deadline he previously had set (he had a “meeting” the following week, you see).

                              During that same day’s trial proceedings, I met with Mac, my “Attorney-of-Record,” in the Boise Federal District courthouse Attorney-Client conference room. This was a separate room with concrete walls and a locked metal door, in which Mac and I were supposed to have complete privacy. It was impossible for anyone accidentally to hear discussions in that room while on the outside.

                              Just Another Illegal Secret Hearing – (ho hum)

                              Even so, the judge was to confront Mac in the afternoon secret hearing, from which I was excluded, with the news that I had been overheard by the US Marshall’s Service while in private conference with Mac. The judge quoted me as having said to Mac: “Well, if we need a continuance, I can guarantee us three days by just having a medical emergency.” How odd that, of all the talks I had with Mac, that was the only conversation that the USMS claims to have overheard (plus the one before he entered his appearance, of course, in which Mac arguably discussed with me some alleged misconduct of his own).

                              Mac never told me about this little secret hearing, but now I understand why he then stopped even pretending to present a defense on my behalf. Why he laid down. Why my “defense” took less than one court day. He had been cowed by the judge a second time with the spectre of being charged with criminal misconduct, based upon things said between us in confidence. This time, though, the government couldn’t rely upon their old (wrong) standby argument of “He’s not the Attorney-of-Record.” The Judge was betting that, having denied me my key witness, I would create my own continuance. The Judge was wrong.

                              Even The Judge Steps In It, This Time

                              Nor could Judge Winmill this time provide himself, cover, because he willingly listened to what the USMS claimed I said, then used it in a not-very-subtle way to intimidate my lawyer into standing down before even starting to present my “defense.”

                              Ironically, the “medical emergency” easily could have been justified, because I was barely aware of what was going on in court, due to my ongoing nosebleeds and incredibly intense headaches. I almost called for a time-out before the trial even started, but decided not to do so, only because I figured that the doctors would drug me so badly that I really wouldn’t understand what was happening. My headaches and nosebleeds were well-documented in the records of every jail in which I had been held since my arrest, a result of no follow-up care for the emergency cranial-aneurysm surgery I underwent just prior to my arrest. It would have been a legitimate call, as Mac well knew at the time. I never did make that call, of course. Note that nothing was illegal or wrong about this whole incident, except the Judge and the USMS eavesdropping on my “confidential” attorney conference.

                              Judge Winmill himself crossed the line when he agreed to hear what the USMS heard while secretly and illegally listening to my “confidential” conversations with my “Attorney-of-Record,” even during the trial. Then, Judge Winmill himself used that invasive eavesdropping in an attempt to intimidate my lawyer.

                              Just another day in the Amerikan Just-Us System, folks. Your tax dollars at work.


                              http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...ted=1#post4723
                              http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.p...23#post1326823

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                You Only Think You’ve Got Rights Part VII - No Attorney-Client Privilege


                                You Only Think You’ve Got Rights
                                No Attorney-Client Privilege (Part VII)
                                by Edgar J. Steele
                                October 15, 2011

                                As we have seen so far, the US Marshals Service (USMS) secretly violated my 6th-Amendment right to confidential communications with attorneys in every way possible: telephone, letter and personal conferences. The USMS even gave letter copies and sound recordings to the Federal Prosecutor for use against me right from the very beginning. Then, Judge Winmill gave them an illegal pass when we discovered they had been recording my phone calls to lawyers.

                                After Attorney Wes Hoyt filed a Substitution of Attorney, whereby he took over my case after I was wrongfully convicted, the Judge pretended that Mr. Hoyt had filed a motion, thus requiring the Judge’s approval, and scheduled a hearing. Recall that we talked of that July 6, 2011, hearing in Part III of this series, where we learned that the US Marshals Service, with the Judge’s blessing, believed it legal to record my conversations with all attorneys not “of-record” and give these recordings to the Federal Prosecutors of my case. At that hearing, Judge Winmill also revealed his wrongful belief that he had the right to decide just who could be my attorney. Then, the Judge went even further and ruled that he had to approve in advance any and all “confidential” communications I wished to have with any attorney, excepting only my new “Attorney of Record” (Wes Hoyt).



                                http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/waiver7_p35_36_transcript.jpg
                                http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/wp-...transcript.jpg
                                Click hyperlink above to see image.
                                .

                                (Pages 35 and 36 of the transcript from that hearing.)

                                Don’t be misled by the Judge’s verbiage about being concerned that a lawyer is not “licensed in the State of Idaho or perhaps Washington.” Remember that this is Federal court. All legitimate American lawyers are allowed to practice before all Federal courts. Besides, even in state court criminal proceedings, a defendant still has a 6th-Amendment right to consult confidentially with out-of-state attorneys.

                                Here’s the key statement made by the Judge: “If there is a concern by Mr. Steele, then I think he can presumably communicate directly with the court, submitting something in ex parte fashion…” Ok, I do have a concern: I have to file an appeal soon, yet I am not allowed to talk confidentially with any appellate lawyer! So, per his in-court ruling, I wrote to Judge Winmill, “in ex parte fashion,” asking for permission to call two appellate attorneys in confidence. Enclosed is a copy of that 9-page, handwritten letter, in which I also asked the judge a few questions about this new (un-constitutional) rule of his.

                                The judge never did answer my letter. Guess he isn’t going to, since he since has issued an ex parte order, specifying that, I can’t “communicate directly with the court,” after all. Instead, in order to interview and speak confidentially with appellate attorneys, I must file a formal motion with the court and, then, only through my official, Judge-endorsed “Attorney of Record.” I have asked Mr. Hoyt to do that. Meanwhile, the clock is ticking on my appeal, I still am languishing in jail and I am judicially prohibited from confidentially contacting any lawyer other than Wes Hoyt, who literally cannot handle my appeal. Now what am I supposed to do, Judge?

                                My 9-page letter to Judge Winmill follows.


                                Copyright ©2011, Edgar J. Steele

                                Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate this article and
                                its related audio file among private individuals and groups, post on all
                                Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications.
                                Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.

                                (Due to the difficulty of reading Mr. Steele's hand-written letter to Judge Winmill, the pages below provide a typed version for easier reading. Note that Mr. Steele was only capable of sending his handwritten letter.)

                                Edgar Steele
                                Latah County Jail
                                POB 8068
                                Moscow, ID 83843
                                July 14, 2011
                                Hon. B. Lynn Winmill, Judge
                                US District Court for Idaho

                                RE: US v. Steele, Case No. 2110-CC-148-BLW

                                Dear Judge Winmill:

                                In accordance with your order during last week’s hearing, I write you to request permission to contact (confidentially) two lawyers who are not my attorney of record at present:

                                ? Riordan of San Francisco
                                ? Benjamin of ?, Idaho

                                If I have trouble getting these two lawyers’ phone numbers, how do I confidentially secure them?




                                This rule of yours, restricting my confidential communications to only my “attorney of record,” is new to me and raises a great many questions as to how I am to observe it:
                                1. For example, I have been forbidden confidential access, even to my previous attorney of record, “Robert McAllister, through a phone number he gave me that is answered in the name of a furniture store (warehouse). How do I use such numbers to confidentially call my “attorney of record?”
                                2. Must I secure your permission each and every time I wish to confidentially contact an attorney who is not my “attorney of record?” That is, the same attorney, again and again?
                                3. Must I secure your permission to send confidential “legal mail” to attorneys not “of record?”
                                4. How does an attorney not “of record” contact me confidentially? Must he first secure you permission, too?
                                5. You specified in court that I must contact you, Judge, which is why I write to you today (though I am having difficulty getting your phone number or address).
                                6. This, of course, constitutes an ex parte communication with the court, which I thought was frowned upon, if not actually illegal. Should I contact you through someone else? If so, then who?
                                7. Should I be contacting you only through my attorney of record? If so, how do I keep confidential from him the fact of my communicating with other lawyers?
                                8. How do I call any attorney, even my attorney of record, if I am short of funds? Calls here at Latah County Jail cost me $0.50 per minute, which mounts up quickly.
                                9. If I am not to contact you ex parte, how do I seek you permission to confidentially contact an attorney not “of record” and keep that fact from the prosecution, not to mention the rest of the world?
                                10. I have been so distressed by how much of this case against me has been conducted in secret (closed hearings, sealed filings, all those trial sidebars that I was forbidden by you from attending, and so on). Even so, some documents have disappeared from the court record and I see that the trial transcript has been altered in places. I am not suggesting that you would be a party to such things, Judge (except denial of my access to sidebar conferences, of course), but I truly am disturbed by how both the facts of my prosecution have been hidden and the documentation of how it was conducted now seem to be disappearing. How can I possibly organize an effective appeal? Even so, I would like to have some confidentiality for my attorney contacts.
                                11. After the way I was deceived by Spokane and Bonner Count jail deputies, I simply do not trust any jail’s personnel to honor my attorney-client confidentiality, not to mention the US Attorney’s office and the US Marshals Service. How do I keep them from knowing about such contacts, let alone prevent their secretly listening, despite written jail policies and specific assurances to the contrary?
                                12. Spokane County Jail forbade me from contacting any attorney, except via the inmates telephones. Because inmates in line and on either side of me could hear what is said, how do I keep even “attorney of record” calls confidential?
                                13. Spokane County Jail opened my marked legal mail, copied it and gave copies to the US Attorney (just my letters to attorneys not “of record,” I think, though I cannot be sure). In order to comply with your new, more liberal rule, how do I designate such attorneys to the jail so that I do not have that intrusion continue, yet still comply with your rule?
                                14. Is this letter going to be opened and read by the US Attorney’s office, since you are not my “attorney of record?”
                                15. It is too late for me to talk confidentially with other lawyers before the deadline to file post-trial motions. Is there some form of expedited request/approval for me to speak confidentially with attorneys not “of record?”
                                16. I had a hard enough time securing McAllister and, now, Hoyt to sign on as my attorneys of record. McAllister absolutely committed legal malpractice leading to my conviction. I must file a claim with his E & O insurance to finance my appeal, since all my funds (and then some) were expended upon McAllister’s representation. Once word of that claim gets out, no lawyer in America will be willing to come near me. How do I avoid that taint from attaching to me?
                                17. Speaking of taints. I was absolutely doomed to conviction by your ruling that I had waived my right to confidentiality in my calls and letters, previously, to attorneys “not of record.” If I do manage to secure a new trial on appeal and if I somehow can find a way to pay for it and if I find a good lawyer to handle my appeal, how do I remove that taint from the US Attorney’s files or, for that matter, from the minds of the prosecutors or, even, from your mind? This worries me greatly, Judge.
                                18. Finally, why do the USMS policies forbidding confidentiality in my communications with attorneys not “of record” trump the federal rules and bar ethics rules, Judge, as you so clearly intimated by your remarks during last week’s hearing?
                                1. Judge, I do not mean to be contradictory, impertinent or, even, disagreeable with you. The stakes (the rest of my natural life) are too high for me to risk that sort of behavior. However, I am in a fight, literally, for my life and now, with four unjust convictions, my back truly is against the wall.
                                I have been held in jail, essentially incommunicado, for over a year, therefore prevented from any meaningful defense of myself while I have had two truly horrible and incompetent “do nothing” attorneys of record. Now my money is gone and I wonder how I can pay for the motions or appeal, let alone a new trial. I feel like a drowning man, going down for the third time. Please help me! All I have been asking for is a level playing field, not the stacked deck I have been facing. Just simple fairness, Judge. Why do I not seem to deserve even fundamental fairness?

                                By the way, every time I have been taken to Kootenai County Jail for holding in relation to hearings before you, I am treated in truly horrible fashion by some of the meanest and rudest county deputies I ever have seen. I am held in a holding cell in booking with no privacy and no shower and forbidden anything to read. Not even the bible I regularly ask for. I must sit there on a concrete bench or a thin mattress on the floor, all day and all night with no rec time, nothing to read and with the temperature so low that I seem to shiver all the time. Do not even the Geneva Accords (to which the US is a signatory) forbid such treatment? Does not the US Constitution forbid “cruel & unusual punishment,” Judge?

                                Detention is not supposed to be punishment. I have spent a year being punished illegally. I really can’t take it anymore. Please, Judge, Help me!

                                Respectfully, /S/ Edgar J. Steele



                                http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=4724#post4724
                                http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.p...95#post1328295

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X