Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Debate on the Northwest Imperative

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Interview with Harold Covington -- Swedish Nationalist News-Magazine

    Interview with Harold Covington -- Swedish Nationalist News-Magazine


    http://www.realisten.se/2012/09/30/i...old-covington/
    http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh...=6848#post6848



    Harold Covington
    .

    REPORTS: An associate of Realisten.se went a few days ago to the U.S. and conducted an interview with author and political theorist Harold Covington, who is also politically active in the American Association The Northwest Front. One of the central ideas of the Northwest Front is the creation of a sovereign nation in the Pacific Northwest with access to only white people.

    Translated from Swedish to English using Google Translate:
    .

    What is the idea of ​​creating a homeland for white?

    It is actually quite similar to the reasoning whatsoever concerning endangered species. That's what white is today an endangered species. We are in danger of becoming extinct, no matter where we live. So we must ask ourselves: how we save an endangered species? It gives them their own habitat where they can grow, prosper, be free from predators, be safe and avoid being hunted and so on. This means that we must have a state of their own. There are many white people in America who believe that it is possible to take over a small town, for example, in Idaho or Kentucky, and where to create one idyliserad (idyllic?) existence. A small idylliserad (idyllic?) American small town where everyone is white and all live in a time bubble of the 1950s where you can still waving the good old American flag. It's almost like they're looking for a time machine, and it is something that is impossible to implement. The only way for whites to survive is that we have a state of their own in which we control the government, the laws of design, military, economy.

    There must be a state, a society, which is only for white people. It must not be allowed any foreign breeds parasites on us, exploit us. It's almost like they are now trying to reintroduce wolves to our national parks here in the western U.S., and they create a lot of rules to protect the wolves. Unfortunately there is no counterpart with respect to white people, there are no rules that protect us in the current power structure that exists in the U.S., there is no one who wants to give us protected status. On the contrary, there are a lot of rules that work for non-whites to have a good life in the U.S.. So we have to see for themselves that we have the power to protect us and that we can meet our own interests. We must create our own nation, our own government, and the only white people.

    Is this idea of ​​creating a homeland exclusively for whites a controversial political idea here in the U.S.? How does the U.S. rasmedvetenheten out in the U.S.?

    I used to think that the great mass of white people here in the U.S. was completely ignorant and only lived in a state of denial and totally beyond the reach of political influence, because they simply became too brainwashed since birth, and many people in the national movement here in U.S. still share that view. Of course, I am not so sure anymore that it's a bad situation. More and more across the country, I see signs, particularly since Obama was acting as president, that white people are more aware than we thought before. The problem is that many people were too scared and too reserved for daring to express their opinions publicly, and loud say what they believe to be true regarding race and the Jewish question, and so on because it would cause them to have problems, and because it so to speak could lead to separation from the rest of the herd. White people in the U.S. are unfortunately still very much pack animals, and they have no traits of loner that allows them to live and exist outside of the pack. I think that more and more white people are becoming more and more racialist and Jew conscious or aware of the Jewish question if you want to call it that. They become politically conscious and economically conscious. Especially considering what's happening now under Obama, because we are facing a disaster in the U.S., and the racial aspect of this disaster is becoming clearer.

    Obama depression that this country endured during the past four years has a clear racial aspect, and white people will not avoid this. This is one reason that we get what we call organic migrants here in the Pacific Northwest. People who come here do actually largely the same reasons as racially aware migrants come here, but they use code words, they use euphemisms, they say, in fact, not that they are going to the north to get away from the Negroes, Mexicans and chaos caused by the liberal system's embrace of multiculturalism and diversity. They say they move here for the schools are so good, pure air, the pleasant local communities, and so on and so forth. They do not want to admit why they move here, some may not be fully aware of it themselves, they just know instinctively that they are more at ease here when they are surrounded by their own race and a majority consisting of white, which is not the case in California or Arizona or Georgia or wherever. So I think that white people are actually more racially aware than we actually think.

    If social stigma ever released, and white people dare to say what they have in their hearts without fear of reprisal, so we will see how racially aware they really are. I think a homeland for white people is possible, it's about reaching out to enough people. Unfortunately, we do not do it now. I think there could be millions of white people if they heard our cries to come here to create one's own country, but they do not know that we are here.

    You mentioned the Jewish question, what do you mean by that?

    Jewish Question is about the Jewish attitude to the rest of humanity, as it has played out over the last three or two thousand years. It is complex, but I would like to simplify it down to a few basic assertions. Firstly, the Jews are a problem for the rest of the human species? Is their behavior a problem? Are their economic activity a problem? Is their subversion of other people's morale a problem? I believe that this is so. The second is, of course, what should we do with the Jews?

    According to you, is there any difference between the situation of white people in the United States compared to the situation of whites in Europe?

    The great common denominator of course is that we are both here in the United States and Europe are facing an existential threat. This applies to all white people everywhere, whether you live in the U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, South Africa and so on. According to the latest high estimate of the world's population as equal to whites only eight percent. Of these totals white women who are able to bear children only three percent. There is a terrible danger. Of all the world's great races, the white, black, yellow, and if you want to add the brown for South America (mestizos), is only a species in danger of becoming extinct. With obliterated do I mean that in a hundred years will not be any more of us. So the problem is common to all, whether we live in Sweden or in the Pacific Northwest.

    But there are also individual differences. As far as I know, there is in Europe, in practice laws that prevent a free and open debate regarding race, the Jewish question and similar important issues. Here in the U.S. we are able to say things that you can not say in Europe, Sweden, or certainly not in Germany, ie the so-called hate speech laws. But even if we can say what we want here in the U.S. so there is no guarantee that someone will listen. Media turn us out altogether. For about 18 months ago, we had an event in Spokane, here in Washington state, which led to a mass media attention. We were attacked in the media by a cable TV personality named Rachel Maddow who swore dear and sacred that she would destroy us through their TV's power. In about two days, she vomited bile over us in their TV programs, and the comments on her blog was like a heavy artillery raining down on our views. Then suddenly disappeared all internet comments on her blog, both those who were anti ourselves and our own contribution to the debate where we presented our policy. After these two days, she has not returned a single time for us as a political movement. It is quite obvious that someone called Rachel Maddau and simply said, "Okay, the arrangement is that these people should not be given attention."

    Commander Rockwell remarked on this behavior already in the 1960s, he termed it as the " the Paper Curtain ". When was mostly newspapers that he was dealing with. At the time, White did not know that Rockwell existed and what views he had. It is the same situation for us today. We are, however, on the internet where we have internet sites where we can use free speech but it's just that there is so much material online that we lost in the rest of the noise. So there is a problem, we have certain rights that you lack in Europe but we can not use them effectively. Here in the U.S. we have the second amendment of the Constitution which guarantees individuals the right to own guns, I guess there is a difference regarding this between European countries, but it is not important for us here, because we do not use this right as it was intended be used.

    In Europe, you will be prosecuted and imprisoned when you say things that governments do not want to hear. It may involve incitement to racial hatred, denial of the Holocaust or the like. Here in the United States use rulers a much more subtle approach. If you use your right to free speech here and make enough noise, you will notice that you no longer have a job. You will find that you can no longer get a new job. You will suddenly find yourself exposed to a variety of attacks in civil litigation. The last has to do with the organizations that the Southern Poverty Law Center and Anti-Defamation League has become proficient at using the legal system all the convoluted, something that even the U.S. Justice Department have become increasingly better at. All lawsuits taking place, of course, only one purpose, to slowly grind down the people who are unpleasant for the system. It is also sheer fabrication of alleged crimes, which on occasions like the infamous scandal trial against Edgar Steele . Believe me, this society approach to silence the people in power do not want to hear.

    Can you tell me about Edgar Steele?

    Edgar Steele was a lawyer in North Idaho who made ​​the mistake of defending a man named Richard Butler , the leader of a group called the Aryan Nation. This is a long and complex story, but the essence of the story is that a wealthy property owners in Idaho wanted Aryan Nation away from a certain area because they lowered the value of his property. By a man named Morris Dees of the Southern Poverty Law Center, created a legal dispute which I mentioned earlier. Unfortunately, this process was successful and Pastor Butler lost his house. But who represented Pastor Butler was Edgar Steele, and he was very upset about the reaction that he had to endure, mostly from Jews, because he stood as public defender of Pastor Butler. He endured threats, harassment, economic pressure against his attorney firms and instead of folding like most Americans do, create this behavior in Butler's opponent a rage of Edgar Steele. He sat in the white nationalized Planters positions, and suddenly he realized that there was a truth in the political message that his client Pastor Butler brought. He became something of a political activist, and for some years he came to defend others nationalists in court trials.

    At some point, Edgar Steele seems to have angered one or a few powerful people. Again, this is a long and complex history, but in december 2009, Edgar Steele heart problems and had to undergo a lot of heart surgery. He spent a total of four months in hospital and had no intention of running for local office, but that he was forced to surrender. In June 2010, he was then arrested, accused of having hired a man named Larry Fairfax to kill his wife and mother in law. It presented no real motives why Edgar Steele would want to do such a deed. It turned out during the trial that Fairfax, who worked as craftsmen at Steeles family property, had stolen a quantity of gold and silver coins that were stored in their house. Fairfax also made ​​a bomb and primed this on Cindy Steele 's car. The bomb was discovered by chance when Cindy Steele went to a shop to obtain servicing, mechanics said simply, "Mrs.. Steele, we have a problem, you have a bomb in your car. " Fairfax was found in the trial guilty primed bomb on the car and tried to kill Cindy Steele. The penalty was for this 18 months in prison in an open prison. Edgar Steele got 50 years in a heavily guarded maximum security prison. Then we also remember that Edgar Steele is 66 years old today and he has a serious heart problem.

    The foundation of Edgar Steele's guilt is an audio recording in which he allegedly discussing compensation to Fairfax for him to murder his wife. These audio recordings are obviously doctored, especially in the part where the core of the alleged murder comp palette will appear. During the trial, two independent international audio experts prepared to testify that the sound recordings were constructed, but the judge refused to let them testify. Of course it was a big part of the trial weight to producing Edgar Steele as a "Nazi" and that he had previously defended "the evil Pastor Butler." His first public defender was an alcoholic who sued the law firms where he worked. After Steele family managed to get through a lawyer bytes, to Robert McCallister , it turned out after the trial that the latter lawyer himself faced prosecution when he accused of having swindled to the money from his clients. This is a full example of how shamelessly the American legal system works. They have effectively given Edgar Steele a death penalty, he has ended up on one of the worst prisons in this part of the United States.

    His wife is now facing a disaster, when she used the money the family had the defense costs while authorities have filed foreclosure claim the family estate when Edgar Steele found guilty party: a further consequence of his conviction, he not only found guilty of attempted murder, he will this also pay a fine to the state of having committed an offense, notwithstanding that the alleged crimes committed against his wife, who live in the house that is now meted out by U.S. enforcement agency. Even Cindy Steele has now incurred the authorities' anger as she supported her husband and always maintained that everything is fabricated. The prosecutor has relatively openly requested that Cindy Steele should divorce her husband, among other things, the authorities have made it clear that she will not get any public assistance when they confiscated the family property if she did not carry out a divorce, which she then refused. On the contrary, she works now extremely hard to get her husband released. My personal theory why this happened Edgar Steele is to make it an example is. Our opponents are trying to send a message to the rest of us: we can destroy you when we most desire.

    Have spouses Steele any children?

    Yes, four kids, I think, but I think they are adults and expatriates.

    In Germany nationalists to power in 1933 through a general election. What is the Northwest Front to stand in general election? Do you think that a general election could be a way to get the government?

    The parliamentary system you're talking about, where we have two opinions. First, the creation of a sovereign state only for white and partly after the creation of this state. On our website we have a draft of a constitution for our future republic. But we absolutely believe that some of the government will be included in a parliament in the upcoming Republic. But only citizens who earned the right to participate in the political process will have access to this power. It will not be like in today's current Western model of democracy where anyone capable of stopping the ballot in an envelope must vote. You must show that you have the ability to drive a car in order to obtain a license, but there is no corresponding distinction in the case of important issues such as voting rights.

    Would you or anyone else in the Northwest Front consider standing for election today, to gain political influence?

    I have set up in the general election four times before, when I was open with my National Socialist views and used them as election platform. Today, I would probably not stand for election because the system is in the U.S. are completely ignorant towards candidates who do not belong to Democrats or Republicans. We are invisible in ordinary media, and in an election the media would do everything to close us out. When I stood for election before, in North Carolina during the 1970s and early 1980s, I wore swastika openly, which we are allowed to do in this country. And there Commander Rockwell absolutely right, the media simply can not help but to ignore such a strong symbol as a swastika. So from that aspect, I managed to get some spotlight on my ballot paper.

    If today I would put up a ballot paper on which was written Northwest Front, I would probably end up in a mental patient list of the public, because no one up here yet familiar to us in any significant way. Maybe I would get 200 votes or something similar. But it is difficult to predict the future, it is possible that we set up in the general election. But to return to your question, how do we do to get political influence, so I must also respect certain laws in the United States. So there is a limit to what I can say to you that online magazine on our strategies to gain political influence. But generally, I think there is a shortcoming in terms of opportunities for white nationalists to obtain political power. I think that to some extent is the experience you have in Europe, where opponents simply change the rules of the game as you become stronger. Although we as nationalists advancing everywhere on the rules, so changing opponents rulebook all the time. So as a strategy for racial survival I do not think a representative democratic approach is sufficient. There is not enough in the long run. However, I think I was pretty clear in my now five published books presented an alternative strategy for achieving state power.

    In your radio broadcasts on the internet, you return often to the question of character. What do you mean by this?

    Perhaps the greatest success of the Jews is that they managed to break down the notion of what is considered normal in white people in American society, and I guess this also applies to most of Europe. Especially in areas such as pornography, language and so-called understanding of other cultures, races, these things have been presented as something desirable against the traditional values ​​of Western European cultures. One result of this is that many people today, especially young white people, lack a moral compass, a sense of the White Aryan ideals and values.

    Young people today are growing up with MTV, South Park and so on. Unfortunately, the young American man today is something of a Beavis & Butthead-figure. Young Americans are completely narcissistic, it's all about them, they have no loyalty to any higher than their own impulsive desires. Sometimes you can on American workplaces see a sign saying " Life is a game and he who dies with the most toys wins." This is a very pleasing expression of contemporary American society. Most Americans share honestly this position. This is also a reason why most of today's American society discussion carried out in an economic context. The discussion is mostly about budget deficits, unemployment, cost of individual and so on. That we still avoids race depends largely also because we become imprinted from birth to only look to our own individual needs. Bottom line is that it is simply impossible to create revolutionaries, political soldiers, the people who lack sound fundamental values. To change the world, you must be completely dedicated an ideal, you have to see something more than your own selfish needs. This has been completely lost in the U.S. Readers of the online magazine you might laugh at this, but I'm still inclined to say that those who are politically active in Europe is more political soldiers than many of those in the so-called nationalist movement here in the U.S. Many European nationalists who come here are simply horrified at the poor quality of our activists.

    A central part of my broadcasts is to make clear to people that before we can shape the world as we wish, we first need to shape ourselves to be like our ancestors. We must be like the past several genotypes, and I do not really know how to do it, but this change in ourselves is of utmost importance. I've already decided what I want written on my tombstone " He spent his whole life trying to drive a nail with a marshmallow "(He spent a lifetime trying to hammer a nail with a marshmallow). That's what I do. Northwest Front has a plan, an idea, a constitution, a feasible method. All waiting to start. What we lack is people.

    In one of your Internet broadcasts are you talking about replacing geopolitics to biopolitics. What do you mean by that?

    I mean that we must replace the concept of geopolitics, used for a few decades, the concept of biopolitics in order to better understand the challenges involved. We can no longer assume a debate context of nation-states and their governments, but must be based on a discussion that is based on race and racial survival. It's no longer a question of discussing politics based on national boundaries but by a concept of race. Liberals have the viewpoint that if they only manage to ban all discussion of race, then all automatically start loving each other and rasblandas which will lead to a world without any racial differences. This part of their concept for a new and, according to their concept, fantastic world.

    Interestingly, it is also the only whites [who] are stupid enough to fall for this propaganda. Asians from the Far East rasblandar not, avoid it. If you look at those times when a black has had children with an Asian woman, leading to a black-Asian mulatto, so have these children extremely difficult to be accepted in, for example, Japan or Korea. They are hated like the plague in the local community. They become outcasts, and that's because Asians are very racially conscious. Same with Arabs, although Islam as a religion is not really a racialist belief. Muslims who are black marry other black Muslims and Arabs marry other Arabs who are Muslim. If the white race would disappear, so will not these remaining non-whites to rasblandas and live in a perpetual happy kingdom. Rather, they will FIGHT AGAINST each other, which in the end, after several centuries, probably leading to östasiaterna with the Chinese in the lead, erasing the black and brown races. This is what I mean by bio-politics. The policy of the of the human races that will dominate the planet in the future.

    In the media often portrayed miscegenation as something elegant and desirable. Especially in White countries lifted it up as something desirable. What is your opinion about this media production?

    In movies and TV series tend to be about a white man who is with a rasfrämling (race-mixing?), usually a white woman who is dating a non-white man. Every now and then it usually also be a white male who has an Asian girlfriend. But it's always the white race to be mixed. This is how Hollywood works. At the end of the 1970s came a movie called The Summer of My German Soldier. It is about a soldier who is a prisoner of war and interned in the United States but who manage to escape. Soldier's National Socialist and want to get back to the war to continue fighting. The film gives a typical picture of a German soldier, unfortunately this is a film that is now very difficult to get hold of, something I suspect is based in the fact that it describes a German National Socialist as normal. Unfortunately, this is how propaganda works: by distorting the image of the normal so try opponent creating delusions of our people.

    You have in your radio show talked about religion and how this substance can cause irritation and discord among white nationalists. Why do you think nationalists can not leave religion to be a private topic?

    In our movement, there a lot of people who do not understand that our ideas must be based on blood and not on faith. There are religious people who are genuinely concerned about our breed and want to do something active, but they are nevertheless largely Christian first and racist secondary. Or are they anti-Christian altogether in the first place and then racist. This problem with religion is in my view not so much to do with the relationship between Christians and hednatroende (heathens?), or Christians and Nazis either. The problem is between Christian and anti-Christian. With Christians, I mean the people who have some form of Christianity as a religious belief, and anti-Christian, I mean people who simply hate everything associated with Christianity right to do. For about 25 years ago [Benny Klassen] founded a small cult of one Jew who hid his true nature. I will not say who was in the spectacle, you do not know this, it's good for you, you have not missed anything. Their very basic foundation was to attack Christianity and they had the slogan " Jesus was a dead jew on a stick. " The first thing he did was to bring his followers to what we in the U.S. call the Bible Belt, and this according to me is that he was only looking to create conflict. He was not interested in our racial survival or even race in general, he was only looking to push its provocative message in the face of white people with the Christian faith.

    And we get some people like this in our U.S. operations. They are neither Christians, hednatroende (heathen?), atheist or even spiritual in some way, they hate only Christianity. This can be explained by traumatic problems in childhood or something similar, but it is nonetheless clear that the religious divisions that have arisen over the years between nationalists largely depend on these anti-Christian. They simply can not refrain from mocking, humiliating or otherwise annoy the Christian Nationalists.

    It can also be a part of our racial nature. White people seem to be easy to tease on other white rather than focus on the real enemy. Added to this is also the fact that we are white in our civilization's history constantly been at loggerheads over religious issues, even if religion sometimes only been a cover for more real political power.

    Religion can also be a reason that people use that excuse to avoid having to engage in practical reality. A white man who dare not lift a finger against a black, yellow or brown man, can almost do anything against another white man. This will come back to what we talked about earlier regarding the nature, finding excuses for not having to engage in real political life. A white person can find the creative solutions anywhere just to avoid doing what must be done. There are good and logical excuses, and I really wish this creativity could be used in a more constructive purpose. I keep being told by white nationalists that they would move to the Pacific Northwest and become politically active, but that excuse stating that they can not associate with people who have one or the other religious belief. My understanding is that in the future when we have a stable and secure country, which protects our racial survival and future of white children, then maybe we can afford the luxury of having a theological discussion and really try to reach some kind of consensus which type of spiritual guidance that will best help us as a race. But that time is not now, but has room number 147 on the list of what must be done to safeguard our racial survival. Until then, we need to put all those things aside. We must all understand that we can not let these things get in the way of the 14 words, which is to secure the future of our people and the future of White children. We must make a conscious choice to not let these things become obstacles in our political struggle.

    When people come with different objections, it may be old schisms that have existed for decades, so I try as objective as possible, explain to them that now the situation is serious. I say: okay, it happened 20 years ago, you know that today we are facing an existential threat, that we must now begin to act politically for real? At the same time, I also believe there is a certain fear, a bit like people argue within themselves along the lines that we can not go all the way in our political struggle when the government will get mad at us seriously. I think many are afraid because they know that our political idea is something that today's politicians fear and therefore will fight when we crossed a line that allows no turning back. Instead, begin these people then discuss religious questions because they know, consciously or unconsciously, that there is an area where we will never reach a consensus.

    Tell us about your writing. What is the most important thing for a writer who wishes to reach an audience?

    I believe that the current readership is easy to lose, and there is a difference from what it was before. Previously, people could sit down one evening and read a book, for example, Charles Dickens . Today, people are much more concerned that it had to happen some thing all the time, people have more need for things like an action movie. As a writer, you must write in short paragraphs that captures the reader, it is one of the first things you must consider. One of the other things you have to do is to articulate your ideas in an interesting way. If it gets too long debauchery, people will lose interest. One way to avoid this is that I mix longer pieces that are a bit heavier with the conversations between people.

    Do you feel that you've developed as a writer during the period in which you wrote your books?

    Yes in part, but I'm not as quick to write as I used to be. Maybe it's because I'm getting older.

    Are your books banned in Canada?

    No, not really, you are not allowed to take them into the country. There are really no banned books in Canada, but they have a strange lagformulering (legal formula?) concerning distribution of books. Would you like a copy of the example The Brigade then it would not happen, but if you would have 10 editions of the same book you would be involved with the distribution of hate propaganda, and it would all copies confiscated.

    If you could give one piece of advice to a young man or woman who is a nationalist, what would it be?

    Learn a trade. Please take care of your studies. If you have the ability to cook [fix] the rich [man's] toys, and by that I mean computers, cars and other things that people today do not seem to do without, so you will always have work, no matter what political views you have. Things like social care sector, to take care of the old, there will always be work. Technical repair work, like fixing computers and household appliances will also provide work. Electricians, plumbers and similar professions will also provide work. Do not go to college and get a useless degree in political theory, English literature, traditional fabrics grazing or similar. Avoid being active in a profession where you can be banned because of your political beliefs. Say you are a teacher and it appears that you have political opinions that those in power do not like. The result will be that you will lose your work. But if you are self-employed and are good in your profession, and to combine this with offering your services cheaper than the competition, so you will always be able to support yourself because then people basically do not care what political views you have.

    Here in the U.S. we have people that I call for T-shirts-youth (T-Shirts youth), but they are not young anymore. They can be between 25-40 years but they have no qualifications, but have been living with their parents, had various odd jobs and basically behaved like Beavis & Butthead with the result that today they are not established in the labor market.

    Many parents may have the view that higher education and a college degree is a great way to get a good job?

    It is the typical American middle-class dream, everyone should go to college. It is probably also a reason why we have so many Mexicans and Third World immigrants here in the U.S., because they simply perform traditional white working-class jobs. In the United States today is all about young people to read at the college and then sit dressed in costume in a small cubicle in an office belonging to a multinational giant company, to the end of the day driving his luxury car back to suburbia. That's the gist of what is expected of American youth today. But someone needs to fix cars, build roads, organize, sewers and so on. So my advice to young people who want to make a living is to learn a trade.

    Links:

    North West Front ( Mirror Page )
    Harold Covington's books available at Arminius.se


    Come Home to the Northwest

    http://northwestfront.org/

    Comment

    Working...
    X