Archive for November, 2009

Cousin Randy Wants To Deflect Suspicion From Hisself

Sunday, November 29th, 2009


Swillis Gumpf Turner
Cousin Randy is a gliberal whigger butthole fag

Cousin Randy Wants To Deflect Suspicion From Hisself

http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh…=1174#post1174
http://stumbleinn.net/forum/showthre…988#post219988
http://cjcc-an.blogspot.com/2009/11/…suspicion.html
http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/blog/?p=763

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cousin Randy
News-Leader: Judge in Pete Newman case ignored law with decision to close hearing

http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2009/…wman-case.html

When he was using a new law to close a preliminary hearing for former Kanakuk Kamp director Pete Newman, Taney County Circuit Court Judge Tony Williams did not even check to see what the law said.

Williams told the Springfield News-Leader:

“They agreed to do it, so I never did actually get the book out” to review the new law, Williams said.

Told of the controversy generated by the attempt to close the hearing, he said: “My concern is children. If that is no one else’s concern, then that’s their problem.”

It is sad that it is so easy for Williams to make decisions that close the workings of the judicial system to the public and open the door to all kinds of possible mischief. What he should have considered are ways in which the children could have been protected without closing the courtroom doors to the public and to the press. These types of procedures are used on a regular basis in cases in which people are testifying who might be in danger if their identities are revealed, such as confidential informants. Why couldn’t the same methods be put to use in this case?

It turned out to be a moot point since Newman waived his preliminary hearing at the last moment.

The News-Leader story indicates the Taney County prosecutor never asked for the closed courtroom and offered other options. It was the judge who immediately suggested the public and press be removed. That kind of hair-trigger reaction should concern people.

No one wants children to suffer when testifying about evils that have been committed against them, but at the same time, when you start closing public court hearings you are starting a dangerous precedent. Once it has been done for a case like this, soon it will be done for all cases involving children, and then it will spread to other cases where people have been victimized and soon we will have no way of knowing what is going on in our courts.

Friday, November 20, 2009, Posted by Randy at 3:42 AM

Comments:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Believes in ZOG korts
Anonymous said…

Courtrooms have always been public forums…and with good reason. To protect our system of justice and to hold the judge, attorneys, clients and witnesses accountable to the adherence of the rules and regulations of the courts. I understand the desire to protect children from possible public humiliation and scrutiny…but, also know the importance of not beginning the practice of closing courtrooms. The closing of courtrooms allows for the potential of so many violations of justice and is against everything this country was built upon.

5:30 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kathlee Byrd
http://crimesceneinvestigations.blogspot.com/

But those right make our justice system work. Judges are not above the law and Williams should have looked at the law before ruling on something he didn’t have knowledge of.

10:25 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loves crooked jewdges
Judge Williams was big enough to admit that he didn’t look at the book, okay!!!!!! He didn’t have to say that, but he was honest. He didn’t make that ruling to undermine the law! He was thinking about the victims!!!!

Pete waived his right to the hearing so shut up and stop trying to prove your point! I take it that this is a rich whigger who had one of his spawn ass-raped by the pervert to the spawn of the Rich & ‘Tarded.

11:23 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Screw the Law!
What he did WAS within the law. He did the right thing. Wish more judges around this country would follow his lead. When they fail to protect these child-witnesses or give minimal sentences to their abusers, O’Rielly should expose them on his show.

When Mr. Peter’s sentencing comes around, the judge should give him the MAXIMUM PENALTY.

11:56 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whigger that thinks it knows what the law should be
This is yet another example of Randy not letting his ignorance of a subject stop him from expressing an opinion.

It sounds to me like the issue wasn’t that the Judge ignored the law, rather it was that no one objected. Judges only make rulings when there are controversies, in this case there was no opposition and thus nothing for him to decide. For example, hearsay is not allowed in a trial but if a lawyer does not raise the objection then a judge is not going to do it for him. It was the same way here, no one objected so there was no controversy for the judge to rule on.

12:51 PM

Swillis Gumpf Turner sez:

For once this idiot Turner is correct. The judge violated the written law and if a judge can’t obey the law which gives him power over others, then why should anyone else obey the law when it is inconvenient?

The idiots on this blog seem to think that judicial lawlessness is OK as long as the results are with their prejudices. They never figure out until they are on the docket in a secret court that perhaps civilized behavior and rule of law is a good thing, but like criminals in the prisons everywhere that everyone is guilty except theysselfs.

Right now the lawyer and defendant are cowed, hoping that if they let the judge have his way that the judge will cut them some slack later. When the course of events arrive, the defendant and his probable later lawyer will then claim that the judge and prosecution went along with public hysteria whipped up by the media and move for an acquittal on all charges based upon being railroaded in a secret court without the right to confront uncoached witnesses and challenge the constitutionality of the new law misused to justify closing the courtroom.

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the old Ohio v Roberts allowance of hearsay testimony and said in recent cases that the accused MUST be able to confront the witnesses against him in open court. The old Roberts-era ‘hearsay exceptions’ have been so scrapped that people who ‘testify’ against their killers using previous 911 calls can’t use that ‘hearsay’ evidence in court any more. The recent Missouri statutes are an effort to get around those Constitutional protections and will more than likely be challenged by a smart convictee with a lot of time on his hands and a law library available in prison.

Not that there is any need to use this new law 491.725 for the benefit of social workers in coaching children in court to reach the desired conclusion. This ‘law’ was designed to entrap working-class daddy for allegedly diddling his kids without there being any real material evidence present while welfare mommy was off at the casino so that the social workers could sell the children to rich yuppies and perverts. The alleged victims in this case are well able to confront the accused in open court as it seems that they are 10, 12, years old. So this new law shouldn’t be used and abused to do away with the established trial process of open courts and open witness testimony. The end result might be that a smart manipulator will ‘lose’ in court and end up having all the charges dismissed upon appeal by getting a new attorney claiming that his client didn’t get a fair trial thanks to a hysterical witch-hunt whupped up by the media and allowed by a corrupt weak judge to using an unconstitutional set of laws abused by the prosecution.

Best thing that can happen is for the prosecutor to file a motion that the current judge be replaced and the arraignment be redone and that the case be started over without using the latest legal ‘trick’ of RSMo 491.725.

Weak, stupid, arrogant judges, corrupt prosecutors, idiot press and degenerate people. So much for rule of law. Let civil war decide who wins, who loses, who lives, who dies in favor of the strong and unscrupulous able to think clearly.

5:15 PM

===================

Quote:
Originally Posted by Savvy whigger ass-clown
Well Randy I guess you got Maddog’s vote.

7:53 PM

Swillis Gumpf Turner sez:

The Springfield paper had one of the drafters of this suspect legislation say the following:

“The purpose of that statute — and I think it’s clear on its face — it was never intended to close a courtroom,” Moore said. “It was intended to create certain safeguards so children could feel comfortable testifying … it’s designed to help them testify in open court.”

The purpose of that legislation was to allow social workers and divorce lawyers wanting to break up families by having the kiddies testilie that daddy diddled them while welfare mommy was gone to the casino would have those who got the children under their thumb easier ability to coach the nippers while obeying the requirements that they no longer can use a videotape of their production out of open court. These lawyers and social workers are upset that their handiwork will be destroyed by some ham-handed judge and idiot prosecutor trying to shoot fish in a barrel and by closing the courtroom destroy the entire case AND their legislative machinations and let an egregious pedophile run wild upon appeal.

==================

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby-Stealing DFS fuktard
Well 5:15 you were giving a pretty good arguement until you started talking about social workers selling kids, then you showed your real lack of intelligence. Your a moron.

8:21 PM

Swillis Gumpf Turner sez:

So I take it that you, 8:21 are some sort of social worker or enabler who is uncomfortable with the amount of hatred generated towards the current regime for their baby-stealing ways.

Them little white babies born to poor white trash are the only valuable thing that you white liberals really want. There isn’t much market for them little tar babies and wealthy couples will go to Eastern Europe or China and adopt some surplus female children that the Chinese don’t want. But what fetches the highest dollars are healthy white babies from poor white families.

So it is a simple thing for you social workers to make up some rules and take little white children and buy and sell them. Happens all the time. Occasionally some kids get sold to rich yuppies or homos and there is a big stink for a few years like happened in Washington State. But most of the time everyone knows what is happening and there is some sort of agreement not to speak of the matter because those the social workers victimize are poor and uneducated and powerless.

However, the possibilities of retalitory violence against social workers and the entire social system is enhanced because some people won’t forget or forgive what has been done to them in destroying their families under color of law for the personal profit of those in power.

In any case, this thread was about judicial overreaching in these alleged child molestation cases. The particular law was passed in order to give you social workers a thumb on the scales when the brainwashed and terrorized kiddies, suitably prepped and coached to claim that daddy or mommy molested them when there is no physical evidence and send daddy and mommy to prison for the rest of their lives.

Reading the Springfield newspaper, you find that the lawyers and social workers who created this law are all annoyed that this judge has so far over-reached in creating a secret judicial process that the law AS APPLIED will be ruled unconstitutional. Or it will create an atmosphere of hatred and suspicion for the minions of the System that they get scared to go outside among the general population.

As it is, this current alleged molester will doubtless get the entire ball of wax overturned because of this stupid and corrupt judge couldn’t be bothered in reading and obeying the law. Reversible error/prejudice has already occurred and the Defendant, with a new lawyer, should let all these errors pile up and then get the entire conviction overturned upon appeal, probably with prejudice. But for now it is the prosecution’s turn and the best thing to do is to let the prosecution shoot its wad and muddy up the water with prosecutorial misconduct.

As for Turner and you other baby-stealing liberals, I have no intention of arguing with your kind. Rather, like a remorseless prosecutor, I prefer to point out the issues and facts involved so that your kind can continue to do evil because you are evil and have an agenda of evil and make ‘points’ so that when it is your turn on the docket you can be judged as you did judge those who you accused when it is your victims’ time to judge you. A political rule of thumb, especially around here, is that conservatives are invariably stupid and liberals are invariably evil.

So if something was said that smote what little conscience you still had as a government ‘worker’ or regime enabler, then I can only hope that it made you sick enough to quit and repent or that you continue to do evil and thus damn yourself and your family when what is going around finally comes around to you and yours.

8:23 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonservantive Ass-clown 4 Baby-Stealing
This isn’t a liberal vs conservative issue for me. I’m politically conservative, my kids knew Pete Newman and thankfully weren’t victimized by him, and I can think of no good reason to have the courtroom closed to the public.

I’m sure it will be difficult and embarrassing for these teenaged guys to sit in a witness chair and describe what Pete did with them. I have no doubt, however, that they now fully understand that Pete, as the adult, manipulated and abused them. Pete should feel shame for his actions; his victims should not. Hopefully these young guys know that they’re heroes for telling their stories to their parents and the authorities so that Pete could be prevented from continuing these heinous acts.

By the way, social workers don’t coach kids to lie in court about abuse. In cities with Children’s Advocacy Centers children who have made an outcry of abuse tell their stories to social workers in videotaped interviews. The social workers have been trained to ask questions which are phrased in such a way so as NOT to lead them to exaggerate or say something untrue. The authorities want truthful and accurate testimony so that it can’t be torn apart on the witness stand. The police and DA’s study these videotapes to build their cases. They get accurate info and the victim doesn’t have to tell his/her story over and over during the investigative process.

Obvious a DFS/CPS baby-stealing bitch or an enabler of the same. I certainly hope that this Randy Newman did rape the spawn of this rich & powerfool whigger who loves to see the children of the poor stolen and their parents jailed on bogus child molestation cases. — Swillis Gumpf Turner

Furthermore, the kids get to practice testifying in court ahead of time so that it is less stressful when the time comes. They know where the defendant will be sitting, what his lawyer may ask, etc.

Judges: don’t close the courtroom! The brave victims are prepared to tell their stories, otherwise they would have never come forward in the first place!

3:20 PM

===================

Swillis Gumpf Turner sez:

What goes around comes around said…

Saturday night there was some fat bitch from the Social Services on the TV whining about how there were over 400 children in Jasper County needing foster parents. Thus the lie that these social workers are not about removing white children from the homes of politically incorrect or poor white families for those chosen to raise these children to become good little government lovers is revealed for the grossly idiotic lie it is. Four hundred children removed from so many families in one county alone so that the baby-stealers got to in effect advertise for somebody to raise the children they stole like they are giving out so many Thanksgiving turkeys if you will only fill out a credit card application. And on this forum, rich liberal/conservative liars think that they can pull the wool over us all when there is such a wrenching in the social fabric from these policies.

Let me tell you what it seems like to the discerning:

None of these 400 childrens’ parents have the money to send their children to some ‘Christian camp’ where they can live in the equivalent of gated-community kiddie care. The lying fools on this forum have no problem with the children of poor white people getting put in foster care where they are abused and molested in the equivalent of human puppy mills for the foster check or adopted by rich yuppies or perverts who the police dare not arrest. And no, they have no problem with homosexual social workers and school teachers for the children of the poor and middle class. Why homosexuality isn’t an abomination but rather a legally protected lifestyle to be protected by ‘hate-crime’ laws.

But there comes a disconnect in such ‘thinking’ when they farm out their own spawn to some expensive ‘Christian camp’ where their little bi-curious nippers learn the joys of rump-ranging, fudge-packing, and wiener-munching, not from other little twelve year old gaywads but from predatory homosexuals typically churning out more homos just like them.

And, it goes to show that God has a sense of humor when the very laws designed by the rich and powerful in order to steal, buy and sell the children of the poor in order by convict their daddies and mommies of child molestation absent forensic evidence comes back to bite them by these laws then being openly abused in order to railroad a genuine sexual predator who turns the spawn of these rich ‘Christians’ into sexual, as well as social predators and parasites. All of which goes to show that in a decaying plutocracy that the laws are routinely made by the rich and powerful in order to be enforced selectively against the poor and weak.

Wouldn’t it be ever so just if someone who lost their children to the state was to get past the jury-tampering phase and vote “Not Guilty” because in a world full of evil people the misery and despair of broken-up destroyed families should be democratized?

Perhaps Pete Newman, pervert pedophile of the spawn of the rich and powerful, is nothing more than an unlikely agent of God’s Justice.

4:47 AM

==========

Well, Cousin Randy deleted the above comment. Cousin Randy loves these laws designed by the social workers and lawyers in order to convict the parents of poor and middle-class children of bogus child molestation cases and put the White children being raised White into foster care and the whigger factory so that pervert skrule teachers like Cousin Randy can get to them.

But when these laws are abused in order to close the kortroom when the sexual predators of the spawn of the rich & whiggroid can be railroaded, Turner is caught in a quandry. What happens if Turner gets caught?

The rich gliberal whigger shitheads have no problem with child molestation of the children of the white working poor but have a cow when the perverts teach their bi-curious whigger spawn the ‘joys’ of faggot sex. Then when it hits them, they go ballistic.

Well, part of me hopes that the jew pervert gets away with sodomizing and turning into faggots the spawn of these jewdayo-whigger rich ass-clowns. What goes around comes around.

______________________

===========

Cousin Randy’s Lying Blog, The Turner Report

My Truthful Blog, The Turner Diaries


Ewelene still misses Cousin Randy, the slut!!!

Sexy Sarah Bars Hostile jewsmedia Whores From Starting Shit At Skrule of the Ozarks

Friday, November 20th, 2009


Swillis Gumpf Turner
Cousin Randy is a gliberal whigger butthole fag

Sexy Sarah Bars Hostile jewsmedia Whores From Starting Shit At Skrule of the Ozarks

http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh…=1173#post1173
http://stumbleinn.net/forum/showthre…927#post217927
http://cpm.freehostia.com/forum/show…=2620#post2620
http://cjcc-an.blogspot.com/2009/11/…jewsmedia.html
http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/blog/?p=760
http://www.whitenationalist.org/TurnerDiaries/?p=39

____________________


Time for some Megan Fox photoshopping!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cousin Randy
Gutless Palin bars media from College of the Ozarks appearance

http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2009/…m-college.html

I am sure this post will bring out the legions of Sarah Palin acolytes who believe the Alaska governor can do no wrong, but the agreement between Mrs. Palin and College of the Ozarks to bar the media from her Dec. 2 speech is indefensible and shows that for all of her legendary “mavericky” tendencies, she is simply a politician who plays too fast and loose with the truth (when she has any idea what that truth is).

College of the Ozarks is a private institution and has every right to bar whomever it wishes from its premises, but For Mrs. Palin to set such guidelines is a clear sign that she is still unable to cope with the media, so she takes the next best approach- demonizing it to try to cover all of her shortcomings.

It would be nice if Mrs. Palin relented and agreed to let reporters cover the event, but that would require Mrs. Palin to admit she was wrong about something and that day will probably never come.

Posted by Randy at 4:28 AM, Thursday, November 19, 2009

============

Comments:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knows Cousin Randy is a faggot
I don’t blame Randy for his hate filed rants against female politicians. If I was a middle-aged “confirmed bachelor” I would be bitter too.

10:31 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by OwlGore, who censors the judenpress, is better
Regarding Al Gore:

Personally, I think Gore should let the media into all of his conference talks. It’s gutless to do otherwise, just as it is gutless for Palin to refuse to let the media — even a hostile media — question her.

However, there’s one big distinction. Gore is giving talks about the environment. Palin is clearly gearing up to run for the office of President of the most powerful country on Earth.

If ANY candidate for POTUS refused to regularly meet the media (no, not Oprah, a press conference) and be questioned, there’s no way in hell I’d vote for them.

Palin included. She has something to hide, which is clearly that she has no real grasp of the issues.

The whole “the media is out to get me” nonsense don’t fly either. Nice cover story, flies with her true believers, but it don’t wash with the independent voter. You run for POTUS, you answer questions. Democrat. Republican. Independent.

In the end it won’t matter. Palin refuses to try to expand her base of supporters with cowardly silliness like this. And you can’t get elected POTUS with the same old 22% of the population voting for you.

1:15 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinks Cousin Randy is a gliberal whigger ass-clown
Actually, I think Palin is doing the same thing Gore is doing, selling books and trying to control their image.

Everybody is entitled to their opinion on Palin. However, it seems to me if you are going to call someone “gutless” or a “coward” then you ought to have the balls to run for office yourself and not just pontificate on a blog.

2:04 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cousin Randy whines like a censorsheep pussy
Considering that I allow anonymous jerks like you to make comments about me all of the time and I sign my own name to what I write says a lot more about my courage than it says about yours.

2:07 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Give it a rest, Turner
Yes Randy, you are a real hero. The abuse you take from jerks like me far exceeds the attacks made on Palin and her kids.

What impresses me the most about your posts is how you excel at childish name calling while eschewing intelligent debate.

BTW, I see that the editorial review for your new book at Amazon states that you enjoyed “a storied newspaper career” that earned you “ more than 100 awards.” Could you share with us what awards you won (or at least the top ten)? Also, the review mentions that your latest book is “the follow-up to the highly successful The Turner Report.” I see that The Tuner Report has an Amazon sales rank of #2,597,282 is that your definition of “highly successful?”

3:57 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yes, Turner is a gutless ass-clown
It is just amazing that Turner continues to criticize others for their personal attacks but his “gutless” attack on Palin is okay? I have asked you many times on this blog why you have this double standard but you have never been able to answer. I doubt that she has ever personally attacked you Turner so I don’t see the need for the hostility. Oh that’s right we are the fools for reading your babbling. Anytime you put down Nodler’s name or Palin’s name….it increases your blog traffic and makes you feel important even though it is not you people are searching for. perhaps you should put a bit more effort into your lesson planning in order to get those comm arts MAP scores up. Lord knows that craphole school district could use improvement. It’s no wonder the reputation the district has with teachers like you continuing to add to the embarrassment.

8:12 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Codney Kink “Can’t weez all gets along?”
I know this may seem to be a big jump for some or maybe many, but it amazes me how divided our country has become.
Let’s go back to WWII and how our country, all political parties, all individuals, united together to fight a common enemy.
Do we not now have a common enemy trying to destroy our nation. Is not our economy and our standing in the world not at risk for our survival?
Must we be so petty about our little differences that we can’t unite with a common cause!

5:59 PM

Swillis Gumpf sez:

Send in the clowns said…

Sarah Palin is a politician and all politicians are whores. The politicians who are not whores and who honestly show their disdain for the public and thus are running for office in order to cause trouble or demand certain things get done are called ‘nuts.’

The news-media are all whores. They lie and connive in order to put forward their idiot notions. They get caught and then lose audience share and then get fired. Right, Turner?

So the secret to political success given that whores lie is to get their johns in a row. Palin wants to sell her idiot ghost-written book before an audience of Republi-tards as surely as OwlGore wants to only appear before worsheepfull Demo-tards. Neither are able to think on their feet, to engage hecklers, so they choose a safe path, like Obama with a back-up teleprompter and Flush Rimblow with call screeners.

So the sundry partisans choose their safe grounds and safe audiences and turn it into a media event and bar the hostile whores of a different faction. Then the barred whores then screetch outside in the ‘free-speech’ area about how they can’t set up shop in that particular brothel area, how the opposing whores are diseased, and how their johns are pathetically stupid to buy their tail from their preferred prostitutes.

I say that all of them are poxed and morally and mentally syphilitic. And so I don’t take any of them seriously. Why should anyone? The whole country is polarized and so they pick and side with politicians and bloggers who cater to their prejudices. What else is new?

I do, however, appreciate Turner screetching about how cowardly and idiotic the Republi-tards are, especially given that the Demo-tards are usually smarter, just eviler.

And Turner, if you want to cut off the comments section which is what most of us read in order to see you you yelp and scramble, then go ahead and make your blog irrelevant. You are a performing clown — a swine who sometimes finds a truffle — and if your audience wants to see a free circus then you will need to go with the flow and shuck & jive and juggle for our entertainment with a smile. You really do need to understand that in the great meaning of things you are really nothing but a whore-clown needing to stop taking yourself so very seriously. You have the drawback of any politician or reporter in that your political half-life is determined by how much you got caught lying in the past. Your only cure is to move to a place where nobody knows you. Otherwise, stop threatening to ‘pull a Palin’ (Ashcroft, OwlGore, etc.) on us. OK?

Whores galore. Buy you a ghost-written book and leave twenty Federal Reserve Note$ on the nightstand when you go to see the clown of your choice. Ain’t De-mock-racy wonderfool?

By the way, I think I’ll stay at home this season and rewatch the youporn video of a Sarah look-alike cherry-picking some Y&D&FofC feeb that I bookmarked from last year.

9:45 PM

__________________

===========

Cousin Randy’s Lying Blog, The Turner Report

My Truthful Blog, The Turner Diaries


Ewelene still misses Cousin Randy, the slut!!!

Let’s leave the mass-murdering to qualified Muslim Mental Health Professionals!!!

Sunday, November 15th, 2009


Swillis Gumpf Turner
Cousin Randy is a gliberal whigger butthole fag

Let’s leave the mass-murdering to qualified Muslim Mental Health Professionals!!!

http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh…=1157#post1157
http://stumbleinn.net/forum/showthre…910#post216910
http://cpm.freehostia.com/forum/show…=2579#post2579
http://cjcc-an.blogspot.com/2009/11/…qualified.html
http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/blog/?p=756

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cousin Randy Turner

Cynthia Davis: Keep an eye on those Muslims

http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2009/…e-muslims.html


That Cyndi legisheifer sure chaps
my skrule-teecher faggot ass!

Considering the murders at Fort Hood, Rep. Cynthia Davis, R-O”Fallon in her latest column, says we need to keep an eye on those of the Islamic faith in our military:

When we heard the news last week about Army officer, Nidal Hasan, who opened fire at the Fort Hood Army Base, I felt compassion for all who have a loved one on any military base. This tragedy serves as a reminder that there are major philosophical clashes between Christianity and Islam.

Christianity is the foundation of tolerance. American laws are based upon Judeo-Christian principles. Jesus teaches us to love our enemies. On the other hand radical Muslims, such as Hasan’s imam (Islamic cleric) teach it is honorable to kill non-Muslims. In the Koran, Sura 2:191 says, “Kill the disbelievers wherever we find them.” There are some Muslims who are praising Hasan’s actions and condemning the Muslims who condemned this act. While some Muslims may be unaware of what their faith teaches and others do not adhere to these parts of the Koran, we as a country should not ignore the obvious.

And her conclusion:

At first glance, it would seem like we could protect our military if we allow Muslims an opportunity to be discharged based upon a conscientious objection. However, it may not have helped in a case where an individual is using his position in the military to harm our country. It is critical that our leaders identify the cause of this attack. It would be difficult to protect ourselves against those who are mentally ill. However, if this proves to be an act of terrorism and nothing is done, we can expect more of these types of attacks and even worse. We owe it to our military personal and all the citizens to have policies that support unity and patriotism.

Posted by Randy at 5:24 AM, Thursday, November 12, 2009

=============

Comments:

Quote:
Originally Posted by gliberal whigger ass-clown needing plugging by ragheads
Although I’m sure her constituents will eat up this us vs them rhetoric, she should shelve the talking points about religions she knows nothing about (other than scans of Wikipedia). Anyone from any religion — Christianity, Islam, whatever — can cherry pick quotes to justify acts of violence in the name of God. What we need to do is identify people who have mental illnesses and watch them (which she gives lip service to later), not watch people from certain faiths in general.

8:27 AM

Swillis Gumpf Turner sez:

Let’s leave the mass-murdering to qualified Muslim Mental Health Professionals said…

Anonymous @ 8:27 is a typical idiot like the fool sheep killed the other day by this Muslim ‘Mental Health Professional.’

As the news comes in, it is apparent that the FBI and others in his chain-of-command knew that they probably had a problem in this Muslim officer of Palestinian descent talking about being a ‘holy warrior’ and wanting to leave an army which is killing his fellow Muslims, men, women and children civilians, but because of Politically Correct notions needing saying that “This is not a Crusade against Islam”, this potential problem was simply wished away until the matter literally blew up with over 40 people being shot and 13 killed so far.

Cynthia Davis is absolutely correct. Muslim soldiers who don’t want to be killing their fellow co-religionists shouldn’t be forced to deploy to a war zone, much less given guns to kill our soldiers in an act of betrayal. They have divided loyalties, and when we force them to choose sides, we may not indeed like the end results.

I don’t know why Turner obsesses on some state legislator who lives across the state, but so far Turner’s attempts to show how stupid Cyndi is ends up with the result of showing how very stupid and out of touch Turner is, especially given this area. You’re batting a perfect .000 so far Turner.

Anonymous 8:27 knows nothing about religion or history. The Christians of the past 2000 years had no problem in reconciling their religious beliefs with killing Huns, heathens, Turks, and Christians among others and within this country during the 17th-19th centuries in keeping negro slaves and slaughtering redskins. In fact, the idiotic notions the above-mentioned fool holds explains precisely why the Muslims are winning the current two wars of occupation in places we have no business in occupying. Trillions of dollars wasted and thousands of lives lost in order to make people into our own image when they like how they are now just fine.

And concerning those who use religion to justify their acts of aggression against others; that is caused not by mental illness, but rather rational manipulation of soft-headed fools who are mercilessly exploited or killed under color of religion. These predators are often far more calculating in assessing the reality on the ground than these feeble-minded fools wishing that their ‘reality’ was only real. Insofar as claiming that those who either calculatingly or naively use religion as a political tool are mentally ill, I can only hope that that Mental Health Professional Doctor Nidal will perform something useful on such nitwits to improve their lack of intelligence — like another lobotomy.

I certainly wouldn’t want some Muslim guarding my six in Iraq and Afghanistan. But then again, I’m able to learn from the unfortunate experiences of others who were forced, because of Army Political Correctness, to have a ‘job enriching’ diverse workplace like that at Ft. Hood.

Idiots. I’m sure glad that I’m not in the Army no more.

4:10 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by another ass-clown
Anonymous said…

wouldn’t you like to be in a war zone somewhere and have this guy assigned as your fox hole partner?

what are the non-Muslim soldiers to do now? Let’s listen to them…those boots on the ground are way ahead of the airheads in the White House….

7:28 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by He Likes Cynthia Davis Too
Why Randy doesn’t like Cynthia Davis:

1. She’s female in a power-type position

2. She’s Republican

3. She speaks her mind openly

4. She doesn’t fear the press

5. Some national TV clown (the kind of fool Randy sheepisly follows and believes) (Olbermamzer) doesn’t like her and tries to make her look bad on his show

Randy obsesses over people with these traits…makes me think we need more people like this.

5:05 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Had Enuf Ragheads
Muslims need to go back from where they came from.

6:21 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by gliberal whigger ass-plunge
Randy–

I am amazed at the vindictiveness in these comments!

11:17 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Not amused at gliberal whigger bloggers
a “blogger” is AMAZED … you have to be kidding! Bloggers, as a rule, live in a maze

4:25 PM

Swillis Gumpf Turner sez:

I like Cynthia Davis said…

William Lind, who writes a great deal about Fourth-Generation warfare isn’t too surprised about what happened at all:

http://www.d-n-i.net/dni/2009/11/10/…es-to-ft-hood/

“Last week’s shootings at Ft. Hood, in which thirteen U. S. Soldiers were killed and 30 people wounded, appear to be a classic example of Fourth Generation war. The shooter, U. S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, was a practicing Muslim. He sometimes wore traditional Islamic dress and carried a Koran. He reportedly cried “Allahu Akbar” before he opened fire. Though American-born and a U.S. citizen (and army officer), Major Hasan appears to have transferred his primary loyalty away from the state to something else, Islam. For his new primary loyalty, he was willing to kill. That is what defines Fourth Generation war.”

Nov. 10, 2009

Seems to me that Cyndi has a better grasp on the situation on the ground than all of you liberal fools who seem to think that a ‘good Muslim’ is one who repeats your idiot notions before he kills his fellow soldiers or detonates a suicide bomb OVER HERE as opposed to an openly unfriendly ‘bad Muslim’ OVER THERE who plainly tells us that he wants our soldiers to go home now because they are tired of having their cities bombed and civilians murdered.

Such a conservative notion that maybe we should not open the military ranks to jihadists. Why, the next thing you know Cyndi will be saying things like we ought to have parents feeding their own children as opposed to having you idiot liberal school teachers keeping them over the summer so that they can get a free school lunch.

http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/pol…cynthia-davis/

11:48 PM

______________________

===========

Cousin Randy’s Lying Blog, The Turner Report

My Truthful Blog, The Turner Diaries


Ewelene still misses Cousin Randy, the slut!!!


Last edited by John Q. Whigger : Today at 04:37 AM. Reason: Add Links

The Revised Missouri “State Coercion of Child Witnesses” Statute 491.725

Saturday, November 14th, 2009




Swillis Gumpf Turner
Cousin Randy is a gliberal whigger butthole fag

The Revised Missouri “State Coercion of Child Witnesses” Statute 491.725

http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh…=1142#post1142
http://stumbleinn.net/forum/showthre…776#post216776
http://cpm.freehostia.com/forum/show…=2575#post2575
http://cjcc-an.blogspot.com/2009/11/…ercion-of.html
http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/blog/?p=754

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cousin Randy ‘Big Fag’ Turner’s Report
New law may be used in Pete Newman sex case

http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2009/…ewman-sex.html

The Taney County Prosecuting Attorney filed a motion Monday to protect the child witnesses expected to testify about former Kanakuk Kamp director Pete Newman when he comes to trial on felony sex charges. If Judge Tony Williams approves the state’s motion, it will be one of the first times that Missouri’s new Child Witness Protection Act, has been employed since it became law Aug. 28.

Newman is charged with two counts of sexual misconduct and single counts of statutory sodomy and sexual misconduct involving a child under 15. The Taney County prosecuting attorney has said that Newman’s acts, all with underage boys, took place over a 10-year period.

The Child Witness Protection Act is printed below:

The “Child Witness Protection Act” was created in 491.725 RSMo. to give courts the discretion to make numerous changes to
court procedures to help prevent children from becoming confused, intimidated or harassed when they participate in court prceedings.

Some of the accomodations include changes to the oath required of witnesses to make it more easily understood by children, limiting the duration or timing of questioning, rephrasing confusing or harassing questions, changing the layout of the courtroom, or allowing the child to hold a toy, blanket or similar item during testimony. Perhaps most importantly, the court may designate a “support person” who may accompany a child to the witness box and remain near the child but who may not obstruct the defendant’s view of the child-witness or influence the child’s testimony in any way.

Posted by Randy at 5:30 AM, Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2009.

4 comments:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous 11:43 a.m.
Hey Randy check out Ozarksfirst .com
11:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chilly
It was my understanding that the majority of these children are now 16-20 years in age now. I’m not sure holding a toy while being questioned is going to apply here.

12:48 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous AssClown
Chilly, you’re just plain stupid.

8:20 PM

Swillis Gumpf Turner sez:

For uncoerced child witnesses said…

This ‘revised’ law is yet another way to allow the baby-stealers at Department of Family Services/Child Protective Services and the ‘advocates’ to coach and terrorize the children that they stole in order to testify against their parents. The US Supreme Court decided back in 2004 that no longer would the DFS and police be able to refuse to put children on the stand to testify against their parents by using a video deposition which they controlled. Eventually the results of that law was filtered down so now the 6th Amendment right to confront one’s accusers was upheld in Missouri. So this new law is a means of allowing these baby-stealers and social services to continue to try to influence the testimony that they elicit, coach and coerce. In short, it allows those government workers who stole the children in the first place to be in the view of the stolen children to remind them that regardless of what the kid says, that they still will be in the foster-care system and can be punished until they are eighteen, and then shoved out to fend for themselves.

In short, this new law should be called the “Subornation of perjury of child witnesses by social workers and therapists” law, because that is what it will be used for. Because that is exactly what this law was designed to do, is to allow the social workers to keep their thumbs on the scales of justice in these court cases drawn up against those parents deemed unfit by the state to raise their own children to become probable enemies of the state.

Well, hopefully some day these very same tricks will be used against the perpetraitors who steal children today under color of law and the politicians who enable them. Let them get back what they dished out. I bet if I had control of their children I could make them say anthing against their former parents.

But Turner loves these sort of laws because he is against parents being able to counter-indoctrinate their own children. Turner foams at the mouth at parents getting to teach their own offspring independent of what those indoctrinators of State choice, the public school teachers get to do in order to make more liberal drones like themselves.

Plus, Turner is the one who wants these people accused to be pre-lynched in the news media so that they can’t get an untainted jury.

9:36 PM
______________________

===========

Cousin Randy’s Lying Blog, The Turner Report

My Truthful Blog, The Turner Diaries


Ewelene still misses Cousin Randy, the slut!!!

Cyndi’s Gotta Gun!!!

Monday, November 9th, 2009


Swillis Gumpf Turner
Cousin Randy is a gliberal whigger butthole fag

Cyndi’s Gotta Gun!!!
. . . . . And Cousin Randy Don’t.

http://whitenationalist.org/forum/sh…=1130#post1130
http://stumbleinn.net/forum/showthre…632#post215632
http://cpm.freehostia.com/forum/show…=2544#post2544
http://cjcc-an.blogspot.com/2009/11/…gotta-gun.html
http://www.pastorlindstedt.org/blog/?p=750

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cousin Randy Turner
Cynthia Davis, a pistol-packing mama

http://rturner229.blogspot.com/2009/…king-mama.html

In her latest column, Rep. Cynthia Davis, R-O-Fallon, addresses gun laws and lets the world know she now has a permit to pack heat.

Here I am at my St. Charles County Sheriff’s Department to pick up my permit. I paid $100 for the privilege of participating in my second amendment rights. I still would rather have a strong hero come to my rescue if in trouble. At least that’s the way it happens in the movies! Then again, I only like to watch movies with happy endings.

Going through the process was valuable and helpful in understanding our gun laws. One concern I have with the current law is that guns are prohibited in churches. This means there is no defense for the members if a criminal act is attempted or perpetrated. There is a provision in another section of Missouri statues allowing an override of this prohibition, but why should this section of the law exist it at all? This subjects churches to state laws in an area where the state should be silent. It’s as though the state does not consider churches capable of defining acceptable standards within their own jurisdiction.

Churches do not belong to the state. Therefore the state is overstepping its bounds by taking gun-possession decisions away from the churches. The state would do well to delete this issue for the same reason that we do not dictate what people can do in the privacy of their own homes. Most of us were taught as children that the church is God’s house. Just think how differently things may have turned out if it were not for a heroic woman with a gun at the New Life Church in Colorado.

When well motivated and properly trained people demonstrate personal responsibility to protect themselves against law-breakers, it saves costs of law enforcement and human suffering. The State of Vermont does not require a permit to carry a concealed gun. Former Vermont Representative, Fred Maslack, went a step further in 2000 by introducing House Bill 760 which encouraged residents to protect themselves against crime. Under his bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their names, addresses, Social Security Numbers, and driver’s license numbers with the state. “There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so,” Maslack says. This bill did not pass.

I am not intending to introduce anything like this, nor do I know of any other states entertaining this idea, but it shows how other people in our country feel about the benefits of gun ownership and the importance of being able to protect the innocent.

When I was on the O’Fallon board of Aldermen I went through the Citizens Police Academy. During the classes the police officers emphasized the importance of the good guys staying in control at all times. I don’t like violence, yet I recognize that a strong defense is the best deterrent to violent behavior.


(Photo: Cynthia Davis is shown with her gun permit)

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tired of Turner
Anonymous said…

Randy, why do you feel the need to constantly dish out childish name calling? Are you that lonely that the only way you can fill your evenings is to serf the net looking for new opportunities to try to put down your “enemies”?

9:06 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Turner edjewmacated me
Anonymous said…

It’s called surf the Web, first you misspelled and no one has used the term net regularly since about 2002.

12:34 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stick it up jewr ass
Anonymous said…

Hey, you’re right I made a typo and I’m out of date, thus my point has been totally invalidated. Kudos! (that’s another old-timer term for you)

1:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Everybuddy needs guns
Anonymous said…

Maybe if Rep. Davis had been packing some heat at Fort Hood today, there would have been fewer killings.

Hey Anonymous 9:06 – I surf the web now and then myself…don’t you love being out of date….I do

Sorry Anonymous 12:34 (Edjewmacated), you’re just gonna have to live with us … we’re not going anywhere…maybe you can get some hand sanitizer to guard you from the unclean masses

7:30 PM

Swillis Gumpf Turner sez:

I like Cynthia Davis said…

CYNDY’S GOTTA GUN!!!!

And Turner don’t. When liberals say that right-wingers equate gun registration with castration it is because they have already willingly undergone the process, and like the eunuch priests of Cybelene, never really miss much what they didn’t have no use for neither. What steams their little crock is the well-grounded, for once, suspicion that us reactionary neo-nazis here in flyover country are having fun with our guns and know how to use them — preferably on liberals.

Pore Turner. Obsessed with Cynthia Davis who probably doesn’t even know a pathetic critter like Randy Turner exists, and if she did, would probably emit a girlish, “Ohhhhh, yuck!!!” if she seen one, even though she knows liberals, pathetic feebs demanding power, exist because she always runs agin them.

Turner is like a rabid chihuahua chasing an eighteen-wheeler, foaming at the mouth and out of breath trying to cock a leg to spray on the steer tire. Pore Turner, always seeing the southern end of a northbound lead female dog in estrus and being already cut, can’t do anything but impotently snarl and snap and yap about the unfairness of life. Woe is Turner.

Perhaps you should give it a rest, Turner. Cyndi is living well and that is the best revenge.

9:54 PM

______________________

===========

Cousin Randy’s Lying Blog, The Turner Report

My Truthful Blog, The Turner Diaries


Ewelene still misses Cousin Randy, the slut!!!